The Effect of Moral Behavior on Facial Attractiveness

References

• Holzleitner IJ, Lee AJ, Hahn AC, et al. Comparing theory-driven and data-driven attractiveness models using images of real women’s faces. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019;45(12):1589–1595. doi:10.1037/xhp0000685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocsor F, Feldmann A, Bereczkei T, Kállai J. Assessing facial attractiveness: individual decisions and evolutionary constraints. Socioaffect Neurosci Psychol. 2013;3(1):21432. doi:10.3402/snp.v3i0.21432
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:199–226. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois JH, Kalakanis L, Rubenstein AJ, Larson A, Hallam M, Smoot M. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol Bull. 2000;126(3):390–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goller J, Leder H, Cursiter H, Jenkins R. Anchoring effects in facial attractiveness. Perception. 2018;47(10–11):1043–1053. doi:10.1177/0301006618802696
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson IR, Marshuetz C. Facial attractiveness is appraised in a glance. Emotion. 2005;5(4):498–502. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.5.4.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Thomas A, Smith SE, Aguirre GK. The neural response to facial attractiveness. Neuropsychology. 2009;23(2):135–143. doi:10.1037/a0014430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui J, Liu CH. Can beauty be ignored? Effects of facial attractiveness on covert attention. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009;16(2):276–281. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rule NO, Ambady N, Adams RB Jr. Personality in perspective: judgmental consistency across orientations of the face. Perception. 2009;38(11):1688–1699. doi:10.1068/p6384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov A, Pakrashi M, Oosterhof NN. Evaluating faces on trustworthiness after minimal time exposure. Soc Cogn. 2009;27(6):813–833. doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis J, Todorov A. First impressions: making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(7):592–598. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolier RM, Hehman E, Keller MD, Walker M, Freeman JB. The conceptual structure of face impressions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(37):9210–9215. doi:10.1073/pnas.1807222115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24(3):285–290. doi:10.1037/h0033731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Liu N. The nonlinear and gender-related relationships of face attractiveness and typicality with perceived trustworthiness. Front Psychol. 2021;12:656084. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.656084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin AM, Langlois JH. Stereotype directionality and attractiveness stereotyping: is beauty good or is ugly bad? Soc Cogn. 2006;24(2):187–206. doi:10.1521/soco.2006.24.2.187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink B, Neave N, Manning JT, Grammer K. Facial symmetry and judgements of attractiveness, health and personality. Pers Individ Dif. 2006;41(3):491–499. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui X, Cheng Q, Lin W, Lin J, Mo L. Different influences of facial attractiveness on judgments of moral beauty and moral goodness. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12152. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48649-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudert SC, Reutner L, Greifeneder R, Walker M. Faced with exclusion: perceived facial warmth and competence influence moral judgments of social exclusion. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;68:101–112. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross AE, Crofton C. What is good is beautiful. Sociometry. 1977;40(1):85–90. doi:10.2307/3033549
   Google Scholar
• Kniffin KM, Wilson DS. The effect of nonphysical traits on the perception of physical attractiveness-Three naturalistic studies. Evol Hum Behav. 2004;25:88–101. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00006-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Kong F, Zhong Y, Kou H. Personality manipulations: do they modulate facial attractiveness ratings? Pers Individ Dif. 2014;70:80–84. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.06.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunonen SV. You are honest, therefore I like you and find you attractive. J Res Pers. 2006;40(3):237–249. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2004.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessner R, Solom RC, Frost NK, Parsons L, Davidson J. Engagement with beauty: appreciating natural, artistic, and moral beauty. J Psychol. 2008;142(3):303–329. doi:10.3200/JRLP.142.3.303-332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Mo L, Mo C, et al. Is moral beauty different from facial beauty? Evidence from an fMRI study. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015;10(6):814–823. doi:10.1093/scan/nsu123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algoe SB, Haidt J. Witnessing excellence in action: the ‘other-praising’ emotions of elevation, gratitude, and admiration. J Posit Psychol. 2009;4(2):105–127. doi:10.1080/17439760802650519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Q, Cui X, Lin J, Weng X, Mo L. Neural correlates of moral goodness and moral beauty judgments. Brain Res. 2020;1726:146534. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diessner R, Iyer R, Smith MM, Haidt J. Who engages with moral beauty? J Moral Educ. 2013;42(2):139–163. doi:10.1080/03057240.2013.785941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohling R, Diessner R. Moral elevation and moral beauty: a review of the empirical literature. Rev Gen Psychol. 2016;20(4):412–425. doi:10.1037/gpr0000089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eco Umberto. Innovation & repetition: between modern & postmordern aesthetics. Daedalus. 2005;134(4):191–207. doi:10.1162/001152605774431527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudoy JD, Paller KA. Who can you trust? Behavioral and neural differences between perceptual and memory-based influences. Front Hum Neurosci. 2009;3:16. doi:10.3389/neuro.09.016.2009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorov A, Olson IR. Robust learning of affective trait associations with faces when the hippocampus is damaged, but not when the amygdala and temporal pole are damaged. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2008;3(3):195–203. doi:10.1093/scan/nsn013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verosky SC, Todorov A. Generalization of affective learning about faces to perceptually similar faces. Psychol Sci. 2010;21(6):779–785. doi:10.1177/0956797610371965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verosky SC, Todorov A. When physical similarity matters: mechanisms underlying affective learning generalization to the evaluation of novel faces. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2013;49(4):661–669. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolier RM, Hehman E, Freeman JB. Trait knowledge forms a common structure across social cognition. Nat Hum Behav. 2020;4(4):361–371. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falvello VB, Vinson M, Ferrari C, Todorov A. The robustness of learning about the trustworthiness of other people. Soc Cogn. 2015;33:368–386. doi:10.1521/soco.2015.33.5.368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verosky SC, Porter J, Martinez JE, Todorov A. Robust effects of affective person learning on evaluation of faces. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2018;114(4):516–528. doi:10.1037/pspa0000109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfi AM, Vessel EA, Brielmann A, et al. Dynamics of aesthetic experience are reflected in the default-mode network. Neuroimage. 2019;188:584–597. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Carraro L, Castelli L, Sacchi S. Changing impressions: moral character dominates impression updating. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2019;82:64–73. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Sacchi S, Rusconi P, Goodwin GP. The primacy of morality in impression development: theory, research, and future directions. Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2021;64:187–262. doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin GP, Piazza J, Rozin P. Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2014;106(1):148–168. doi:10.1037/a0034726
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung SM, Nieh CH, Hsieh PJ. Unconscious processing of facial attractiveness: invisible attractive faces orient visual attention. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37117. doi:10.1038/srep37117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stróżak P, Zielińska M. Different processes in attractiveness assessments for unattractive and highly attractive faces-The role of presentation duration and rotation. Acta Psychol. 2019;200:102946. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee A, Vartanian O. Neuroscience of aesthetics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016;1369(1):172–194. doi:10.1111/nyas.13035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar