Investigating the Impact of the Community of Inquiry Presence on Online Learning Satisfaction: A Chinese College Student Perspective

References

• Hu Y, Huang J, Kong F. College students’ learning perceptions and outcomes in different classroom environments: a community of inquiry perspective. Front Psychol. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Huang J, Kong F, Hussain S. Examining self-regulated learning as a significant mediator among social presence, cognitive presence, and learning satisfaction in an asynchronous online course: a partial least squares structure equation modeling approach. Austral J Educ Technol. 2023;39(2):16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhu X, Huang C, Wang Y, Chang L. Study on factors influencing college students’ motivation to engage with online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International. Taylor & Francis; 2022:1–12. doi:10.1080/14703297.2022.2130394
   Google Scholar
• Zurlo MC, Cattaneo Della Volta MF, Vallone F. Psychological health conditions and COVID-19-related stressors among university students: a repeated cross-sectional survey. Front Psychol. 2022;12:741332. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.741332
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Huang J, Wang T, Xu S, Li J. The impact of the corona virus disease 2019 pandemic on Chinese middle school students’ self-perceived emotional states: a Wuhan perspective. Front Psychol. 2021;12:1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.740879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L. Students’ isolation challenges in blended EFL learning during covid-19: how can social presence and interaction help develop sense of community? Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:3117–3131. doi:10.2147/prbm.s388317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu X. Revisiting the cognition hypothesis: the impact of task complexity on L2 learner engagement in task performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. Comput Assist Lang Learn. 2022;1–23. doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2142245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avcı Ü, Ergün E. Online students’ LMS activities and their effect on engagement, information literacy and academic performance. Interact Learn Environ. 2022;30(1):71–84. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1636088
   Google Scholar
• Curran R, Arroteia N, Blesa A, Musteen M, Ripollés M. Improving cultural intelligence, psychological empowerment, and task performance in the classroom: global game challenge. J Teach Int Bus. 2021;32(1):36–56. doi:10.1080/08975930.2021.1906380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galanza MA, Aruta JJ, Mateo NJ, Resurreccion RR, Bernardo ABI. Mental health of Filipino university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the distinct associations of fear of COVID-19 and financial difficulties. Educ Dev Psychol. 2023;40(1):125–130. doi:10.1080/20590776.2021.1999168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Wang A, Wu Y, Han N, Huang H. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Psychol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669119
   Google Scholar
• Lim JRN, Rosenthal S, Sim YJM, Lim ZY, Oh KR. Making online learning more satisfying: the effects of online-learning self-efficacy, social presence and content structure. Technol Pedag Educ. 2021;30(4):543–556. doi:10.1080/1475939x.2021.1934102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack HR, Priestley M. Online learning and assessment during the Covid-19 pandemic: exploring the impact on undergraduate student well-being. Assess Eval High Educ. 2022;48(3):333–349. doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2076804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takır A. The qualitative study of Cypriot parents’ views about online education during COVID-19 pandemic: the challenges and responsibilities. Education. 2022;1–11. doi:10.1080/03004279.2022.2155483
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Stein D. Effects of online teaching presence on students’ cognitive conflict and engagement. Distance Educ. 2021;42(4):547–566. doi:10.1080/01587919.2021.1987837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 2000;2(2–3):87–105. doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 2001;15(1):7–23. doi:10.1080/08923640109527071
   Google Scholar
• Guo P, Saab N, Wu L, Admiraal W. The community of inquiry perspective on students’ social presence, cognitive presence, and academic performance in online project‐based learning. J Comput Assist Learn. 2021;37(5):1479–1493. doi:10.1111/jcal.12586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilporn G, Lakhal S. Investigating the reliability and validity of the community of inquiry framework: an analysis of categories within each presence. Comput Educ. 2020;145:103712. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea P, Richardson J, Swan K. Building bridges to advance the Community of Inquiry framework for online learning. Educ Psychol. 2022;57(3):148–161. doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2089989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellanos-Reyes D. Twenty years of the community of inquiry framework. Tech Trends. 2020;64:557–560. doi:10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
   Google Scholar
• Fiock HS. Designing a community of inquiry in online courses. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learn. 2020;21(1):135–153. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.3985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Arbaugh JB. Researching the community of inquiry framework: review, issues, and future directions. Internet High Educ. 2007;10(3):157–172. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Framework for Research and Practice. 2nd ed. London: Routledge /Taylor and Francis; 2011. DOI:10.4324/9780203838761
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice. 3rd ed. New York: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR. Shared metacognition in a community of inquiry. Online Learn. 2022;26(1):6–18. doi:10.24059/olj.v26i1.3023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muir T. The influences of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on pre-service teachers’ online engagement in productive mathematical discourse. Int J Mathe Educ Sci Technol. 2022;1–18. doi:10.1080/0020739x.2022.2119176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y. Effects of teaching presence on learning engagement in online courses. Distance Educ. 2022;43(1):139–156. doi:10.1080/01587919.2022.2029350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akyol Z, Garrison DR. The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. J Asynchron Learn Ntwk. 2008;12(3):3–22. doi:10.24059/olj.v12i3.72
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: a retrospective. Internet High Educ. 2010;13(1–2):5–9. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Santiuste E, Rodríguez-Sabiote C, Gallego-Arrufat MJ. Cognitive presence through social and teaching presence in communities of inquiry: a correlational–predictive study. Austral J Educ Technol. 2015;31(3):349–362. doi:10.14742/ajet.1666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozan K, Richardson JC. New exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis insights into the community of inquiry survey. Internet High Educ. 2014;23:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Hung TC, Lee CT. Revalidate forms of presence in training effectiveness:: mediating effect of self-efficacy. J Educ Comput Res. 2015;53(1):32–54. doi:10.1177/0735633115588772
   Google Scholar
• Shea P, Bidjerano T. Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Comput Educ. 2009;52(3):543–553. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim J, Richardson JC. Predictive effects of undergraduate students’ perceptions of social, cognitive, and teaching presence on affective learning outcomes according to disciplines. Comput Educ. 2021;161(1):104063. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan V, Rao S, Thirugnanasambantham C, Prabhu N. Community of inquiry (CoI) framework and course design as predictors of satisfaction in emergency remote teaching: perspectives of hospitality management students. J e-Learn Knowledge Soc. 2020;16(4):94–103. doi:10.20368/1971-8829/1135315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caskurlu S, Maeda Y, Richardson JC, Lv J. A meta-analysis addressing the relationship between teaching presence and students’ satisfaction and learning. Comput Educ. 2020;157:103966. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallmann GL, Maçada ACG. The mediating role of social presence in the relationship between shadow IT usage and individual performance: a social presence theory perspective. Behav Inf Technol. 2021;40(4):427–441. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1702100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozogul G, Zhu M, Phillips TM. Perceived and actual cognitive presence: a case study of an intentionally-designed asynchronous online course. Online Learn. 2022;26(1). doi:10.24059/olj.v26i1.3051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Marsh V, Rienties B, Whitelock D. Online learning experiences of new versus continuing learners: a large-scale replication study. Assess Eval High Educ. 2016;42(4):657–672. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1176989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RD, Hornik S, Salas E. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2008;66(5):356–369. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2007.11.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joo YJ, Lim KY, Kim EK. Online university students’ satisfaction and persistence: examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model. Comput Educ. 2011;57(2):1654–1664. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JC, Maeda Y, Lv J, Caskurlu S. Social presence in relation to students’ satisfaction and learning in the online environment: a meta-analysis. Comput Human Behav. 2017;71:402–417. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson JC, Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction. J Asynchron Learn Ntwk. 2003;7(1):68–88. doi:10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864
   Google Scholar
• Zhan Z, Hu M. Academic self-concept and social presence in face-to-face and online learning: perceptions and effects on students’ learning achievement and satisfaction across environments. Comput Educ. 2013;69:131–138. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova BEC, Felix CAC, Balingit NDZ, de Vera AMF, Briones MDM, Aruta JJ. Social support and bidimensional mental health among primary-level teachers during COVID-19 crisis. Int J School Educ Psychol. 2022;1–14. doi:10.1080/21683603.2022.2105998
   Google Scholar
• Watzek V, Rehm M, Mulder RH. Exploring dynamics of emotional reactions in online collaboration of communities of learners and their relations with learning outcomes. Interact Learn Environ. 2022;1–12. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2078985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ, Schunk DH. Self-regulated learning and performance. In: Zimmerman B, Schunk DH, editors. Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York: Routledge; 2011. doi:10.4324/9780203839010.ch1
   Google Scholar
• Broadbent J, Poon WL. Self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: a systematic review. Internet High Educ. 2015;27:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman BJ. Investigating self-regulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. Am Educ Res J. 2008;45:166–183. doi:10.3102/0002831207312909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho MH, Kim Y, Choi D. The effect of self-regulated learning on college students’ perceptions of community of inquiry and affective outcomes in online learning. Internet High Educ. 2017;34:10–17. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shea P, Bidjerano T. Learning presence as a moderator in the community of inquiry model. Comput Educ. 2012;59(2):316–326. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard L, Lan WY, To YM, Paton VO, Lai SL. Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments. Internet High Educ. 2009;12(1):1–6. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzayed ZA, Alabdulkareem RH. Enhancing cognitive presence in teachers’ professional learning communities via reflective practice. J Educ Teach. 2021;47(1):18–31. doi:10.1080/02607476.2020.1842134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Herring SC, Bonk CJ. Exploring presence in online learning through three forms of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Distance Educ. 2019;40(2):205–225. doi:10.1080/01587919.2019.1600365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh JB, Cleveland-Innes M, Diaz SR, et al. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet High Educ. 2008;11(3–4):133–136. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan KP, Richardson JC, Ice P, Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M, Arbaugh JB. Validating a measurement tool of presence in online communities of inquiry. E-Mentor. 2008;2(24):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard L, Paton V, Lan W. Online self-regulatory learning behaviors as a mediator in the relationship between online course perceptions with achievement. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learn. 2008;9(2). doi:10.19173/irrodl.v9i2.516
   Google Scholar
• Lan WY, Bremer R, Stevens T, Mullen G. Self-Regulated Learning in the Online Environment. San Diego, California: Inannual meeting American Educational Research Association; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R, Global A. Measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–396. doi:10.2307/2136404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moos RH, Moos BS. Family Environment Scale Manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh JB. How instructor immediacy behaviors affect student satisfaction and learning in a web-based course. Bus Commun Quart. 2001;64(4):42–54. doi:10.1177/108056990106400405
   Google Scholar
• Kuo YC, Walker AE, Belland BR, Schroder KEE. A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. Int Rev Res Open Distributed Learn. 2013;14(1):16–29. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber AD, Devellis RF, Boehlecke B. Cross-Cultural Translation: methodology and validation. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1994;25:501–524. doi:10.1177/0022022194254006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbach N, Ahlemann F. Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. J Inf Technol Theory Appl. 2010;11:5–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18:39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubley AM. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. In: Discriminant Validity. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014:1664–1667. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_751
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Industr Manage Data Syst. 2016;116:2–20. doi:10.1108/imds-09-2015-0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Adv Int Market. 2011;22:195–218. doi:10.1108/s1474-7979(2011)0000022012
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Fassott G. Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, editors. Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_31
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Li Y, Li W. Influence of platform characteristics on purchase intention in social commerce: mechanism of psychological contracts. J Theoret Appl Electron Commerce Res. 2021;16:1–17. doi:10.4067/s0718-18762021000100102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q. Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis. J Consumer Res. 2010;37(2):197–206. doi:10.1086/651257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaskin J, Godfrey S, Vance A. Successful system-use: it’s not just who you are, but what you do. AIS Transact Human Comp Interact. 2018;10:1–33. doi:10.17705/1thci.00104
   Google Scholar