Transactional Distance and College Students’ Learning Engagement in Online Learning: The Chain Mediating Role of Social Presence and Autonomous Motivation

References

• UNESCO. Education: from disruption to recovery UNESCO; 2020. Available from: http://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse. Accessed February 15, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dong C, Cao S, Li H. Young children’s online learning during COVID-19 pandemic: Chinese parents’ beliefs and attitudes. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;118:105440. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R, Zhang M, Shen Y, Tian Y, Zeng H. Research on the core elements of running a huge scale of cyber-learning: a case study of “disrupted class, undisrupted learning” supported effectively by online education. e-Educ Res. 2020;(03):10–19. doi10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2020.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Agung ASN, Surtikanti MW, Quinones CA. Students’ perception of online l learning during COVID-19 pandemic: a case study on the English students of STKIP Pamane Talino. Soshum. 2020;10(2):225–235. doi:10.31940/soshum.v10i2.1316
   Google Scholar
• Dumford AD, Miller AL. Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. J Comput Higher Educ. 2018;30(3):452–465. doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9179-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolliger DU, Halupa C. Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Educ. 2018;39(3):299–316. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.1476845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MG. Editorial: three types of interaction. Am J Distance Educ. 1989;3(2):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jung I, Choi S, Lim C, Leem J. Effects of different types of interaction on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2002;39(2):153–162. doi:10.1080/14703290252934603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woo Y, Reeves TC. Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: a social constructivist interpretation. Internet High Educ. 2007;10(1):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.00
   Google Scholar
• Grieve R, Padgett CR, Mofitt RL. Assignments 2.0: the role of social presence and computer attitudes in student preferences for online versus offline marking. Internet High Educ. 2016;28(4):8–16. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Huang X, Chandra A, DePaolo CA, Simmons LL. Understanding transactional distance in web-based learning environments: an empirical study. Br J Educ Technol. 2015;47(4):734–747. doi:10.1111/bjet.12263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaoglan Yilmaz FG, Yilmaz R. The impact of feedback form on transactional distance and critical thinking skills in online discussions. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2019a;57(1):119–130. doi:10.1080/14703297.2019.1612265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MG, Kearsley G. Distance Education: A Systems View of Online Learning. Cengage Learning; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Oyarzun B, Stefaniak J, Bol L, Morrison GR. Effects of learner-to-learner interactions on social presence, achievement and satisfaction. J Comput Higher Educ. 2018;30(1):154–175. doi:10.1007/s12528-017-9157-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz R, Keser H. The adaptation study of transactional distance scale. Hacettepe Univ J Educ. 2015;30(4):91–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz R, Keser H. The impact of interactive environment and metacognitive support on academic achievement and transactional distance in online learning. J Educ Comput Res. 2017;55(1):95–122. doi:10.1177/0735633116656453
   Google Scholar
• Kuo Y-C, Walker AE, Schroder KEE, Belland BR. Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet High Educ. 2014;20:35–50. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurucay M, Inan FA. Examining the effects of learner-learner interactions on satisfaction and learning in an online undergraduate course. Comput Educ. 2017;115:20–37. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyei-Blankson L, Ntuli E, Donnelly H. Establishing the importance of interaction and presence to student learning in online environments. World J Educ Res. 2016;3(1):48–65. doi:10.22158/wjer.v3n1p48
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Cao Y, Gong S, Wang Z, Li N, Ai L. Interaction and learning engagement in online learning: the mediating roles of online learning self-efficacy and academic emotions. Learn Individ Differ. 2022;94:102128. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbaugh JB, Rau BL. A study of disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decis Sci J Innov Educ. 2007;5(1):65–95. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00128.x
   Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ahmad R, Ives B. Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. Mis Quarterly. 2001;25:401–426. doi:10.2307/3250989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong KS. Relationships between students’ and instructional variables with satisfaction and learning from a Web-based course. Internet High Educ. 2002;5(3):267–281. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00105-7
   Google Scholar
• Schaufeli WB, Martinez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students: a cross-national study. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2002;33(5):464–481. doi:10.1177/0022022102033005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung E, Hwang W, Kim S, Sin H, Zhang Y, Zhao Z. Relationships among helicopter parenting, self-efficacy, and academic outcome in American and South Korean college students. J Fam Issues. 2019;40(18):2849–2870. doi:10.1177/0192513X19865297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates H. A model of online and general campus-based student engagement. Assess Eval High Educ. 2007;32(2):121–141. doi:10.1080/02602930600801878
   Google Scholar
• Soffer T, Cohen A. Students’ engagement characteristics predict success and completion of online courses. J Comput Assist Learn. 2019;35(3):378–389. doi:10.1111/jcal.12340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu B, Chen N-S, Chen G. Effects of teacher role on student engagement in WeChat-Based online discussion learning. Comput Educ. 2020;103956. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.1039
   Google Scholar
• Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Comput Human Behav. 2003;19(3):335–353. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Cleveland-Innes M. Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: interaction is not enough. Am J Distance Educ. 2005;19(3):133–148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
   Google Scholar
• Eom SB, Wen HJ, Ashill N. The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: an empirical investigation. Decis Sci J Innov Educ. 2006;4(2):215–235. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x
   Google Scholar
• So HJ, Brush TA. Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: relationships and critical factors. Comput Educ. 2008;51:318–336. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulford CP, Zhang S. Perceptions of interaction: the critical predictor in distance education. Am J Distance Educ. 1993;7(3):8–21. doi:10.1080/08923649309526830
   Google Scholar
• Lu J, Churchill D. The effect of social interaction on learning engagement in a social networking environment. Interact Learn Environ. 2014;22(4):401–417. doi:10.1080/10494820.2012.680966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domagk S, Schwartz RN, Plass JL. Interactivity in multimedia learning: an integrated model. Comput Human Behav. 2010;26(5):1024–1033. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal PR, Humphrey M, Conley Q, et al. Creating accessible and inclusive online learning: moving beyond compliance and broadening the discussion. Quart Rev Distance Educ. 2020;21(2):1–82.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb SC. Social presence and online learning: a current view from a research perspective. J Interact Online Learn. 2009;8(3):241–254.
   Google Scholar
• Shin N. Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Educ. 2003;24(1):69–86. doi:10.1080/01587910303048
   Google Scholar
• Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet High Educ. 1999;2(2–3):87–105. doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
   Google Scholar
• Tu CH. On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environment. J Ntwk Comput Appl. 2000;23(1):27–37. doi:10.1006/jnca.1999.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao J, Chang J, Ma L. Teacher–student interaction, student–student interaction and social presence: their impacts on learning engagement in online learning environments. J Genet Psychol. 2022;183(6):514–526. doi:10.1080/00221325.2022.2094211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson KE, Martinez M, Mills C, D’Mello S, Smilek D, Risko EF. Instructor presence effect: liking does not always lead to learning. Comput Educ. 2018;122:205–220. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Chen H, Phang CW. Role of instructors’ forum interactions with students in promoting MOOC continuance. J Glob Inform Manage. 2018;26(3):105–120. doi:10.4018/JGIM.2018070108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J. On the margins or at the center? Distance education in higher education. Distance Educ. 2018;39(2):259–274. doi:10.1080/01587919.2018.14292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorebo O, Halvari H, Gulli VF, Kristiansen R. The role of self-determination theory in explaining teachers’ motivation to continue to use e-learning technology. Comput Educ. 2009;53(4):1177–1187. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yueru L, Shaoying G, Yang C, Ya’nan W. The relationship between teacher-student interaction and college students’ learning engagement in online learning: mediation of autonomous motivation and academic emotions. Psychol Dev Educ. 2022;04:530–537. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.04.09
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. The general causality orientation scale: self-determination in personality. J Res Pers. 1985a;19:109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum; 1985b.
   Google Scholar
• Lin XH, Pi Q. A preliminary study on the academic emotion of learners in e-learning. Teach Educ Forum. 2010;23(01):70–73. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2187.2010.01.026
   Google Scholar
• Karaoglan Yilmaz FG, Yilmaz R. Impact of pedagogic agent-mediated metacognitive support towards increasing task and group awareness in CSCL. Comput Educ. 2019;134:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie K, Yu C, Bradshaw AC. Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes. Internet High Educ. 2014;20:10–19. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doo MY, Bonk CJ, Shin CH, Woo BD. Structural relationships among self-regulation, transactional distance, and learning engagement in a large university class using flipped learning. Asia Pacific J Educ. 2021;41(3):609–625. doi:10.1080/02188791.2020.1832020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekwunife-Orakwue KC, Teng TL. The impact of transactional distance dialogic interactions on student learning outcomes in online and blended environments. Comput Educ. 2014;78:414–427. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed W, Minnaert A, Werf G, Kuyper H. Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: the mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. J Youth Adolesc. 2010;39(1):36–46. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9367-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry NE, Vandekamp KO, Mercer LK, Nordby CJ. Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educ Psychol. 2002;37(1):5–15. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3701_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed S, Zyngier D. How motivation influences student engagement: a qualitative case study. J Educ Learn. 2012;1(2):252–267. doi:10.5539/jel.v1n2p252
   Google Scholar
• Lam JT, Gutierrez MA, Goad JA, Odessky L, Bock J. Use of virtual games for interactive learning in a pharmacy curriculum. Curr Pharma Teach Learn. 2019;11(1):51–57. doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2018.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltmarsh J, Zlotkowski E, Hollander EL. Indicators of engagement. In: Higher Education and Democracy: Essays on Service-Learning and Civic Engagement. Vol. 9781439900390. Temple University Press;2011:285–302. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0885-4_3
   Google Scholar
• Tu C-H. The relationship between social presence and online privacy. Internet High Educ. 2002;5(4):293–318. doi:10.1016/s1096-7516(02)00134-3
   Google Scholar
• Oztok M, Brett C. Social presence and online learning: a review of the research. J Distance Educ. 2011;25(3):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards OV. The impact of the social context on value and expectancy beliefs in an online graduate program: the role of social presence. J Comput Assist Learn. 2020;37(2):333–345. doi:10.1111/jcal.12492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S, Hung TC, Lee CT. Revalidate forms of presence in training effectiveness: mediating effect of self-efficacy. J Educ Comput Res. 2015;53(1):32–54. doi:10.1177/0735633115588772
   Google Scholar
• Eunmo S, Richard M. Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Comput Human Behav. 2012;28(5):1738–1747. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Connell JP. Perceived locus of causality and internalization: examining reasons for acting in two domains. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(5):749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick WS, Ryan RM. Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of. Educ Psychol. 1989;81(2):143–154. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemiec CP, Lynch MF, Vansteenkiste M, Bernstein J, Deci EL, Ryan RM. The antecedents and consequences of autonomous self-regulation for college: a self-determination theory perspective on socialization. J Adolesc. 2006;29(5):761–775. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.11.00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Market Res. 1981;18(3):382–388. doi:10.2307/3151312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handa MC. Examining students’ and teachers’ perceptions of differentiated practices, student engagement, and teacher qualities. J Adv Acad. 2020;31(4):530–568. doi:10.1177/1932202X20931457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhang M, Qi D, Zhang Y. Understanding the role of learner engagement in determining MOOCs satisfaction: a self-determination theory perspective. Interact Learn Environ. 2022;1–15. doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2028853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin F, Bollinger DU. Engagement matters: student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online Learn. 2018;22(1):205–222. doi:10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun AB, Tracey MW. An innovative way of designing blended learning through design-based research in higher education. Turk Online J Distance Educ. 2021;22(2):126–146. doi:10.17718/tojde.906821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite LO, Go W, Nuutinen SH. Exploring the learning process of experienced teachers focused on building positive interactions with pupils. Scand J Educ Res. 2022;66(1):28–42. doi:10.1080/00313831.2020.1833237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie K, Ke F. The role of students’ motivation in peer‐moderated asynchronous online discussions. Br J Educ Technol. 2011;42(6):916–930. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swan K, Shih LF. On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. J Asynchronous Learn Ntwks. 2005;9(3):115–136. doi:10.2307/1063782
   Google Scholar
• McClure CD, Williams PN. Gather. town: an opportunity for self-paced learning in a synchronous, distance-learning environment. Compass. 2021;14(2):1–19. doi:10.21100/compass.v14i2.1232
   Google Scholar
• Bolliger DU, Halupa C. Student perceptions of satisfaction and anxiety in an online doctoral program. Distance Educ. 2012;33(1):81–98. doi:10.1080/01587919.2012.667961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderwell S, Liang X, Alderman K. Asynchronous discussions and assessment in online learning. J Res Technol Educ. 2007;39(3):309–328. doi:10.1080/15391523.2007.10782485
   Google Scholar
• Alamri H, Lowell V, Watson W, Watson SL. Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. J Res Technol Educ. 2020;52(3):322–352. doi:10.1080/15391523.2020.1728449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quong J, Snider SL, Early J. Reducing transactional distance in online and blended courses through the use of a closed social media platform. J Educ Technol Syst. 2018;47(1):79–100. doi:10.1177/004723951876665
   Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology / Psychologie Canadienne. 2008;49(3):182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang M, Im T. Factors of learner–instructor interaction which predict perceived learning outcomes in online learning environment. J Comput Assist Learn. 2013;29(3):292–301. doi:10.1111/jcal.12005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Exercise and Sport Champion[M]. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2007:113–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kizilgunes B, Tekkaya C, Sungur S. Modeling the relations among students’ epistemological beliefs, motivation, learning approach, and achievement. J Educ Res. 2009;102(4):243–256. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.4.243-256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore MG. Theory of transactional distance. In: Keegan D, editor. Theoretical Principles of Distance Education. London: Routledge; 1997:22–38.
   Google Scholar
• Guay F, Ratelle CF, Chanal J. Optimal learning in optimal contexts: the role of self-determination in education. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):233–240. doi:10.1037/a0012758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun R, Goetz T, Daniels LM, Stupnisky RH, Perry RP. Boredom in achievement settings: exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotions. J Educ Psychol. 2010;102(3):531–549. doi:10.1037/a0019243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: the concept of agentic engagement. J Educ Psychol. 2013;105(3):579–595. doi:10.1037/a0032690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovanovic V, Gaševic D, Joksimovic S, Hatala M, Adesope O. Analytics of communities of inquiry: effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. Internet High Educ. 2015;27(6):74–89. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002
   Google Scholar