A Study of the Relationship Between Perceived Class Mobility, Philanthropic Sentiment and Consumer Online Giving Behavior Intention

References

• Andreoni J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ J. 1990;100(401):464–477. doi:10.2307/2234133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widya P, Felix S, Rokhima R, Sari W, Handini A. Turning narcissists into prosocial agents: explaining young people’s online donation behavior. Young Consum. 2020;21(4):369–388. doi:10.1108/YC-11-2019-1070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou TT, Hou KK, Wang X, Luo X. Why I give money to unknown people? An investigation of online donation and forwarding intention. Res Appl. 2021;47:101055. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101055
   Google Scholar
• Macarena A. Changing classes, changing preferences: how social class mobility affects economic preferences. West Eur Polit. 2020;43(6):1211–1237. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1644575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geumchan H, Lisa AK, Yuhei I. Corporate social responsibility and college sports fans’ online donations. Int J Sports Market Sponsorship. 2020;597–616. doi:10.1108/IJSMS-07-2019-0079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, Rheinschmidt ML, Keltner D. Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol Rev. 2012;119(3):546–572. doi:10.1037/a0028756
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JA. Status symbols and the measurement of status perception. Sociometry. 1956;19(3):154–165. doi:10.2307/2785629
   Google Scholar
• Immelman A. Theories of intergroup relations: international social psychological perspectives -Donald M. Taylor and Fathali M. Moghaddam. Westport, CT: praeger, 1994, 256 pp. US24. 95 paper. ISBN 0-275-94635-5. Praeger Publishers, 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881, USA. Polit Life Sci. 1996;15(1):143–145. doi:10.1017/S0730938400019997
   Google Scholar
• Michael WK, Jacinth JXT. Americans overestimate social class mobility. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2015;58:101–111. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daenekindt S. The experience of social mobility: social isolation, utilitarian individualism, and social disorientation. Soc Indic Res. 2017;133(1):15–30. doi:10.1007/s11205-016-1369-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JC, Hall DL, Wood W. Experiential or material purchases? Social class determines purchase happiness. Psychol Sci. 2018;29(7):1031–1039. doi:10.1177/0956797617736386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahal D, Huynh V, Cole S, Seeman T, Fuligni A. Subjective social status and health during high school and young adulthood. Dev Psychol. 2020;56(6):1220–1232. doi:10.1037/dev0000919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wymer W, Becker A, Boenigk S. The antecedents of charity trust and its influence on charity supportive behavior. J Philanthropy Market. 2021;26(2):e1690. doi:10.1002/nvsm.1690
   Google Scholar
• Spencer H. The Principles of Ethics. Vol. 1. D. Appleton and Company; 1892. Available from: https://sc.panda321.com/#v=onepage&q&f=false. Accessed June 21, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dreier J, Sugden SJB, Structures of normative theories. Monist. 1993;76(1):22–40. doi:10.5840/monist19937616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerbach L. The essence of christianity. Anboco; 2016. Available from: https://sc.panda321.com/#v=onepage&q=Feuerbach.%20(2016).%20The%20Nature%20of%20Christianity&f=false. Accessed June 21, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Trivers RL. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol. 1971;46(1):35–57. doi:10.1086/406755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wispe LG, Thompson JN. The war between the words. Biological versus social evolution and some related issues. Am Psychol. 1976;31(5):341–347. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.31.5.341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasko ML, Faraj S. ‘It is what one does!’: why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice. J Strategy Inf Syst. 2000;9(23):155–173. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00045-7
   Google Scholar
• Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol Rev. 2001;108(4):814. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruen R, Mendelsohn G. Emotional responses to affective displays in others: the distinction between empathy and sympathy. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(3):609–614. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feshbach ND, Roe K. Empathy in six-and seven-year-olds. Child Dev. 1968;39(1):133–145. doi:10.2307/1127365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier A, Pache AC. Research on corporate philanthropy: a review and assessment. J Bus Ethics. 2015;126(3):343–369. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1969-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cam PL, Gulas CS, Gruca TS. Corporate giving behavior and decision-maker social consciousness. J Bus Ethics. 1999;4(19):375–383. doi:10.1023/A:1006080417909
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer M. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harv Bus Rev. 2006;84(12):78–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons G, Seo M, Kim KW. Effects of motivation on charitable giving practices: the case of Korean American immigr ants. Voluntas. 2015;26(6):2645–2670. doi:10.1007/s11266-014-9532-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang HL, Choi J, Li JT. Too little or too much? Untangling the relationship between corporate philanthropy and firm financial performance. Organ Sci. 2008;19(1):143–159. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbonavicius S, Adomaviciute K, Urbutyte I, Urbutyte I, Cherian J. Donation to charity and purchase of cause-related products: the influence of existential guilt and experience. J Consum Behav. 2019;18(2):89–96. doi:10.1002/cb.1749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwell TB, Coote LV. Corporate sponsorship of a cause: the role of identification in purchase intent. J Bus Res. 2005;5(3):268–276. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00135-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten B. () Learning for social change: the Russian revolution in the baltic provinces. Stud Ethn Natl. 2017;17(3):358–368. doi:10.1111/sena.12254
   Google Scholar
• Cooley E, Brown-Iannuzzi JL, Lei RF, Cipolli W. Complex intersections of race and class: among social liberals, learning about White privilege reduces sympathy, increases blame, and decreases external attributions for White people struggling with poverty. J Exp Psychol. 2019;148(12):2218–2228. doi:10.1037/xge0000605
   Google Scholar
• Piff PK, Kraus MW, Côté S, Cheng BH, Keltner D. Having less, giving more: the influence of social class on prosocial behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010;99(5):771–784. doi:10.1037/a0020092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles S, Viviers S. The origins and meanings of names describing investment practices that integrate a consideration of ESG issues in the academic literature. J Bus Ethics. 2011;104(3):389–402. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borau S, Elgaaied-Gambier L, Barbarossa C. The green mate appeal: men’s pro-environmental consumption is an honest signal of commitment to their partner. The green mate appeal: men’s pro-environmental consumption is an honest signal of commitment to their partner. Psychol Market. 2021;38(2):266–285. doi:10.1002/mar.21321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson J, Musick MA. Work and volunteering: the long arm of the job. Soc Forces. 1997;76(1):251–272. doi:10.1093/sf/76.1.251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner LA, Dovidio JF, Piliavin JA, Schroeder DA. Prosocial behavior: multilevel perspectives. Ann Rev Psychol. 2005;56(1):365–392. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiepking P, Breeze B. Feeling poor, acting stingy: the effect of money perceptions on charitable giving. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sector Market. 2012;17(1):13–24. doi:10.1002/nvsm.415
   Google Scholar
• Dali M, Parish WL. Tocquevillian moment: charitable contributions by Chinese private entrepreneurs. Soc Forces. 2006;85(2):943–964. doi:10.1353/sof.2007.0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goenka S, van Osselaer SMJ. Charities can increase the effectiveness of donation appeals by using a morally congruent positive emotion. J Consum Res. 2019;46(4):774–790. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucz012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brethel-Haurwitz KM, Stoianova M, Marsh AA. Empathic emotion regulation in prosocial behaviour and altruism. Cogn Emot. 2020;1–17. doi:10.1080/02699931.2020.1783517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizabeth LC, Cynthia H. Gifts of giving: the role of empathy and perceived benefits to others and self in young adults’ decisions to become organ donors. J Health Psychol. 2013;18(1):128–138. doi:10.1177/1359105311433910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katarzyna M. Graphic emotion: a critical rhetorical analysis of online child-related charity communication in Poland. Crit Discour Stud. 2020;17(1):72–90. doi:10.1080/17405904.2019.1567362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appe S, Oreg A. Does effective altruism drive private cross-border aid? A qualitative study of American donors to grassroots INGOs. Third World Q. 2021;42(12):2841–2862. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.1969910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manoux E, Marmot M, Marmot MG. Subjective social status: its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the whitehall II study. Soc Sci Med. 2003;56(6):1321–1333. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiala L, Noussair CN. Charitable giving, emotions, and the default effect. Econ Inq. 2017;55(4):1792–1812. doi:10.1111/ecin.12459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leguina A. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage; 2015. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2015.1005806
   Google Scholar
• Campagnolo G. Introduction: in search of the meaning of liberalism in a China confronting crisis. In: Liberalism and Chinese Economic Development. Routledge; 2016:15–36. Available from: doi:10.4324/9781315694115-8/. Accessed June 21, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Liu SS, Wen ZY, Su JL, Chong AM, Kong SY, Jiang ZY. Social trust, trust differential, and radius of trust on volunteering: evidence from the Hong Kong Chinese. J Soc Serv Res. 2020;47(2):1–16. doi:10.1080/01488376.2020.1758867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siem B, Stürmer S. Attribution of egoistic versus altruistic motives to acts of helping: the role of the helper’s status and the act’s intended publicity. Soc Psychol. 2019;50(1):53–66. doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self‐efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(4):665–683. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petter S, Straub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems. MIS Quarterly. 2007;31(4):623–656. doi:10.2307/25148814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann L, Gaeckler J. A structured review of partial least squares in supply chain management research. J Purchas Supply Manage. 2015;21(4):259–262. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2015.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei S. Segmenting consumer decision-making styles (CDMS) toward marketing practice: a partial least squares (PLS) path modeling approach. J Retai Consumer Serv. 2015;22:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Smith D, Reams R, Hair JJF. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. J Fam Bus Strategy. 2014;5(1):105–115. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A, Malhotra A, John R. Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: evidence from distributed teams. Inf Syst Res. 2005;16(1):9–27. doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q. 1998;22:7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods. 2008;40(3):879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitzl C, Roldan J, Cepeda G. Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: helping researchers to discuss more sophisticated models. Industrl Manage Data Syst. 2016;116(9):1849–1864. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47331-4_130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu CJ, Hao F. Reciprocity belief and gratitude as moderators of the association between social status and charitable giving. Pers Individ Dif. 2017;111:46–50. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X, Lei XL, Liu BS. Mobility divergence in China? Complete comparisons of social class mobility and income mobility. Soc Indic Res. 2020;1–23. doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02501-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar