Validation of a Chinese Version of the Digital Stress Scale and Development of a Short Form Based on Item Response Theory Among Chinese College Students

References

• Reinecke L, Aufenanger S, Beutel ME, et al. Digital stress over the life span: the effects of communication load and internet multitasking on perceived stress and psychological health impairments in a German probability sample. Media Psychol. 2017;20(1):90–115. doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1121832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu CL, Ding XH, Lu HZ. Relationship between excessive cellphone use and mental health among teenagers. Chin J Sch Health. 2015;31(11):1618–1620.
   Google Scholar
• Shensa A, Escobar-Viera CG, Sidani JE, Bowman ND, Marshal MP, Primack BA. Problematic social media use and depressive symptoms among U.S. young adults: a nationally-representative study. Soc Sci Med. 2017;182:150–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Baumeister RF, Yang CC, Hu B. Digital communication media use and psychological well-being: a meta-analysis. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2019;24(5):259–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefner D, Vorderer P. Digital stress: permanent connectedness and multitasking. In: Reinecke L, Oliver MB, editors. Handbook of Media Use and Well-Being. London: Routledge; 2016:237–249.
   Google Scholar
• Thomée S, Dellve L, Härenstam A, Hagberg M. Perceived connections between information and communication technology use and mental symptoms among young adults - A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele RG, Hall JA, Christofferson JL. Conceptualizing digital stress in adolescents and young adults: toward the development of an empirically based model. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2020;23(1):15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J. The experience of mobile entrapment in daily life. J Media Psychol Theor Methods Appl. 2017;29:148–158.
   Google Scholar
• LaRose R, Connolly R, Lee H, Li K, Hales KD. Connection overload? A cross cultural study of the consequences of social media connection. Inf Syst Manag. 2014;31(1):59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halfmann A, Rieger D. Permanently on call: the effects of social pressure on smartphone users’ self-control, need satisfaction, and well-being. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2019;24(4):165–181. doi:10.1093/jcmc/zmz008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JA, Baym NK. Calling and texting (too much): mobile maintenance expectations, (over)dependence, entrapment, and friendship satisfaction. New Media & Society. 2012;14(2):316–331. doi:10.1177/1461444811415047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenburg PM, Peter J. The differential susceptibility to media effects model. J Commun. 2013;63(2):221–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu WL, Wang P, Zhu LJ, Zhang YL, Luo ZR. Reliability and validity test of the multidimensional fear of missing out scale in Chinese college students. Chin J Clin Psychol. 2022;30(4):932–935.
   Google Scholar
• Perrone MA. FoMO: Establishing Validity of the Fear of Missing Out Scale with an Adolescent Population [Doctoral Dissertation]. New York: Alfred University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Misra S, Stokols D. Psychological and health outcomes of perceived information overload. Environ Behav. 2012;44(6):737–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JA, Steele RG, Christofferson JL, Mihailova T. Development and initial evaluation of a multidimensional digital stress scale. Psychol Assess. 2021;33(3):230–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin CZ, Li L. Research on spatial heterogeneity patterns of digital divide of Chinese internet. Econ Geogr. 2016;36(8):106–112.
   Google Scholar
• Nitsch C, Kinnebrock S. Well-known phenomenon, new setting: digital stress in times of the COVID-19 pandemic. SCM Stud Commun Media. 2022;10(4):533–556.
   Google Scholar
• Ji XQ. An investigation and analysis on the use values of mobile media in contemporary college students. Educ Mod. 2020;7(45):185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Heng S, Zhao H, Zhou Z. Nomophobia: why can’t we be separated from mobile phones? Psychol Dev Educ. 2023;39(1):140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Reinecke L, Klimmt C, Meier A, et al. Permanently online and permanently connected: development and validation of the online vigilance scale. PLoS One. 2018;13(10):e0205384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Champlain AF. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44(1):109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker SP, Schindler DN, Luebbe AM, Tamm L, Epstein JN. Psychometric validation of the revised child anxiety and depression scales-parent version (RCADS-P) in children evaluated for ADHD. Assessment. 2019;26(5):811–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma J, Batterham PJ, Calear AL, Sunderland M. The development and validation of the thwarted belongingness scale (TBS) for interpersonal suicide risk. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2019;41(3):456–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie M, Dai B. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the violent ideations scale and construction of a short form among Chinese university students. Curr Psychol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03156-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise SP, Henson JM. A discussion of modern versus traditional psychometrics as applied to personality assessment scales. J Pers Assess. 2003;81(2):93–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry CT, Sidoti CL, Briggs SM, Reiter SR, Lindsey RA. Adolescent social media use and mental health from adolescent and parent perspectives. J Adolesc. 2017;61:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przybylski AK, Murayama K, DeHaan CR, Gladwell V. Motivational, emotional, and behavioral correlates of fear of missing out. Comput Hum Behav. 2013;29(4):1841–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu FL. The Development of a Phase-Specific Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement System-Breast Cancer [Doctoral Dissertation]. Shanghai: Naval Medical University; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tang DD, Wen ZL. Statistical approaches for testing common method bias: problems and suggestions. J Psychol Sci. 2020;43(1):215–223.
   Google Scholar
• Wen ZL, Huang BB, Tang DD. Preliminary work for modeling questionnaire data. J Psychol Sci. 2018;41(1):204–210.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez R, Watson SD. Confirmatory factor analysis of the combined social phobia scale and social interaction anxiety scale: support for a bifactor model. Front Psychol. 2017;8:70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 1999;6(1):1–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen ZL, Hau KT, Marsh HW. Structural equation model test: cutoff criteria for goodness of fit index and chi-square test. Acta Psychol Sin. 2004;36(2):186–194.
   Google Scholar
• Arias VB, Ponce FP, Núñez DE. Bifactor models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): an evaluation of three necessary but underused psychometric indexes. Assessment. 2018;25(7):885–897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise SP, Widaman KF, Pugh RH. Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychol Bull. 1993;114(3):552–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J. 2002;9(2):233–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki E. A generalized partial credit model: application of an EM algorithm. Appl Psychol Meas. 1992;16(2):159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samejima F. Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika. 1969;34(1):1–97.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden D. The measurement of urban travel demand. J Public Econ. 1974;3(4):303–328.
   Google Scholar
• Dai B, Zhang W, Wang Y, Jian X. Comparison of trust assessment scales based on item response theory. Front Psychol. 2020;11:10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fliege H, Becker J, Walter OB, Bjorner JB, Klapp BF, Rose M. Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT). Qual Life Res. 2005;14(10):2277–2291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise SP, Ainsworth AT, Haviland MG. Item response theory: fundamentals, applications, and promise in psychological research. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005;14(2):95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Kwok AWY, Chan W, Chan CKY. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Asian adolescent depression scale and construction of a short form: an item response theory analysis. Assessment. 2017;24(5):660–676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KH, Yun H. Cying for me, cying for us: relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2007;13(1):298–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie P, Mu W, Li Y, Li X, Wang Y. The Chinese version of the digital stress scale: evaluation of psychometric properties. Curr Psychol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03533-w
   Google Scholar
• Reise SP, Waller NG. Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5(1):27–48. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang Q, Luo L, Xia BQ, et al. Refinement and Evaluation of a Chinese and Western Medication Adherence Scale for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: item Response Theory Analyses. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:2243–2252. doi:10.2147/PPA.S269255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan W, Mu W, Xiong H. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the physical disability resiliency scale in a sample of Chinese with physical disability. Front Psychol. 2020;11:602736. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):114–121. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector PE. Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: myth or significant problem? J Appl Psychol. 1987;72:438–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai XY, Li XY, Cao J, Lin DH. A short form of the Chinese positive youth development scale: development and validation in a large sample. Stud Psychol Behav. 2020;18(5):631–637.
   Google Scholar