Linking Entrepreneurs’ Felt Responsibility to Ventures’ Innovation Performance: The Roles of External Learning and Shared Vision

References

• Ketchen JDJ, Craighead CW. Research at the intersection of entrepreneurship, supply chain management, and strategic management: opportunities highlighted by COVID-19. J Manage. 2020;46(8):1330–1341 doi:10.1177/0149206320945028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Wang H, Wu YJ. Internal and external networks, and incubatees’ performance in dynamic environments: entrepreneurial learning’s mediating effect. J Technol Transf. 2021;46:1707–1733. doi:10.1007/s10961-020-09790-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitz A, Urbano D, Dandolini GA, de Souza JA, Guerrero M. Innovation and entrepreneurship in the academic setting: a systematic literature review. Int Entrepreneurship Manag J. 2017;13(2):369–395. doi:10.1007/s11365-016-0401-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo M, Mendez-Picazo M. Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Manag Decis. 2013;51(3):501–514. doi:10.1108/00251741311309625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton JD, Solomon GT. Technology, innovation, entrepreneurship and the small business—technology and innovation in small business. J Small Bus Manag. 2017;55(2):196–199. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anokhin S, Schulze WS. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. J Bus Ventur. 2009;24(5):465–476. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carland JC, Carland JW Jr. A model of shared entrepreneurial leadership. Acad Entrep J. 2012;18(2):71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Amaeshi KM, Nnodim P, Osuji OK. Corporate Social Responsibility, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation. UK: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tiba S, van Rijnsoever FJ, Hekkert MP. Firms with benefits: a systematic review of responsible entrepreneurship and corporate social responsibility literature. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2019;26(2):265–284. doi:10.1002/csr.1682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achi A, Adeola O, Achi FC. CSR and green process innovation as antecedents of micro, small, and medium enterprise performance: moderating role of perceived environmental volatility. J Bus Res. 2022;139:771–781. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison EW, Phelps CC. Taking charge at work: extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Acad Manage J. 1999;42(4):403–419. doi:10.2307/257011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay D, Frese M. The concept of personal initiative: an overview of validity studies. Hum Perform. 2001;14(1):97–124. doi:10.1207/S15327043HUP1401_06
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Y, Hu H, Wang Z. Entrepreneurs’ felt responsibility for constructive change and entrepreneurial performance: a moderated mediation model of technology action and market orientation. Front Psychol. 2021;12:751821. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.751821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halme M, Laurila J. Philanthropy, integration or innovation? Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 2009;84(3):325–339. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9712-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voegtlin C, Scherer AG. Responsible innovation and the innovation of responsibility: governing sustainable development in a globalized world. J Bus Ethics. 2017;143(2):227–243. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2769-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Olafsen AH, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;4:19–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
   Google Scholar
• Zhou H, He H. Exploring role of personal sense of power in facilitation of employee creativity: a dual mediation model based on the derivative view of self-determination theory. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020; 13:517–527. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S257201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagne M, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(4):331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory: a macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can Psychol. 2008;49(3):182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WE, Sinkula JM. The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance. J Acad Mark Sci. 1999;27(4):411–427. doi:10.1177/0092070399274002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowska M, Wiklund J. Entrepreneurial learning under uncertainty: exploring the role of self-efficacy and perceived complexity. Entrepreneurship Reg Dev. 2020;32(7–8):606–628. doi:10.1080/08985626.2020.1713222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Yang T, Hughes KD, Li Y. Entrepreneurial alertness and business model innovation: the role of entrepreneurial learning and risk perception. Int Entrepreneurship Manag J. 2021;17(2):839–864. doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00637-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva MN, Marques MM, Teixeira PJ. Testing theory in practice: the example of self-determination theory-based interventions. Eur Health Psychol. 2014;16(5):171–180.
   Google Scholar
• Strese S, Keller M, Flatten TC, Brettel M. CEOs’ passion for inventing and radical innovations in SMEs: the moderating effect of shared vision. J Small Bus Manag. 2018;56(3):435–452. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berson Y, Da’as R, Waldman DA. How do leaders and their teams bring about organizational learning and outcomes? Pers Psychol. 2015;68(1):79–108. doi:10.1111/peps.12071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord MD. Group learning capacity: the roles of open-mindedness and shared vision. Front Psychol. 2015;6:150. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooks G, Sserwanga A, Frese M. Unpacking the personal initiative–performance relationship: a multi‐group analysis of innovation by Ugandan rural and urban entrepreneurs. Appl Psychol. 2016;65(1):99–131. doi:10.1111/apps.12033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Zhu Y. How does organizational compassion motivate employee innovative behavior: a cross-level mediation model. Psychol Rep. 2022;125(6):3162–3182. doi:10.1177/00332941211037598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arain GA, Hameed I, Crawshaw JR. Servant leadership and follower voice: the roles of follower felt responsibility for constructive change and avoidance-approach motivation. Eur J Work Organ. 2019;28(4):555–565. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2019.1609946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller JB, Marler LE, Hester K. Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. J Organ Behav. 2006;27(8):1089–1120. doi:10.1002/job.408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Murad M, Shahzad F, Khan MAS, Ashraf SF, Dogbe CSK. Entrepreneurial passion to entrepreneurial behavior: role of entrepreneurial alertness, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and proactive personality. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1611. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai L, Maksimov V, Gilbert BA, Fernhaber SA. Entrepreneurial orientation and international scope: the differential roles of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking. J Bus Ventur. 2014;29(4):511–524. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Y, Lin L, Liu JT. Leveraging the employee voice: a multi-level social learning perspective of ethical leadership. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2019;30(12):1869–1901. doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1308414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenbaum RL, Mawritz MB, Bonner JM, Webster BD, Kim J. Supervisor expediency to employee expediency: the moderating role of leader-member exchange and the mediating role of employee unethical tolerance. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(4):525–541. doi:10.1002/job.2258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang YM, Lee KC. Investigating the effect of social learning about entrepreneurship on creativity. Asia. Pac J Bus Ventur Entrep. 2016;11(5):165–174. doi:10.16972/apjbve.11.5.201610.165
   Google Scholar
• Bergh P, Thorgren S, Wincent J. Entrepreneurs learning together: the importance of building trust for learning and exploiting business opportunities. Int Entrepreneurship Manag J. 2011;7:17–37. doi:10.1007/s11365-009-0120-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An W, Zhang J, You C, Guo Z. Entrepreneur’s creativity and firm-level innovation performance: bricolage as a mediator. Technol Anal Strateg Manag. 2018;30:838–851. doi:10.1080/09537325.2017.1383979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelen A, Flatten TC, Thalmann J, Brettel M. The Effect of organizational culture on entrepreneurial orientation: a comparison between Germany and Thailand. J Small Bus Manag. 2014;52(4):732–752. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels E. The process of technological competence leveraging. Strateg Manag J. 2007;28(5):511–533. doi:10.1002/smj.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais-Storz M, Nguyen N. The role of unlearning in metamorphosis and strategic resilience. Learn Organ. 2017;24(2):93–106. doi:10.1108/TLO-12-2016-0091
   Google Scholar
• Argote L, Lee S, Park J. Organizational learning processes and outcomes: major findings and future research directions. Manage Sci. 2021;67(9):5399–5429. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2020.3693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng DJF, Hung TH. Comeback of the failed entrepreneur: an integrated view of costs, learning, and residual resources associated with entrepreneurial failure. J Small Bus Strategy. 2019;29(1):30–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bresman H, Zellmer-Bruhn M. The structural context of team learning: effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organ Sci. 2013;24(4):1120–1139. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel DS, Renko M. The role of market and technological knowledge in recognizing entrepreneurial opportunities. Manag Decis. 2012;50(5):797–816. doi:10.1108/00251741211227500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong S, Lee S, Kim Y. Licensing versus selling in transactions for exploiting patented technological knowledge assets in the markets for technology. J Technol Transf. 2013;38(3):251–272. doi:10.1007/s10961-012-9252-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord MD, Ranft AL. Organizational learning about new international markets: exploring the internal transfer of local market knowledge. J Int Bus Stud. 2000;31(4):573–589. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas AC, Silva SA, Santos CM. Safety training transfer: the roles of coworkers, supervisors, safety professionals, and felt responsibility. J Occup Health Psychol. 2019;24(1):92–107. doi:10.1037/ocp0000125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Domínguez M, Enache M, Sallan JM, Simo P. Transformational leadership as an antecedent of change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior. J Bus Res. 2013;66(10):2147–2152. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusa R, Duda J, Suder M. Explaining SME performance with fsQCA: the role of entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneur motivation, and opportunity perception. J Innov Knowl. 2021;6(4):234–245. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2021.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covin JG, Rigtering JC, Hughes M, Kraus S, Cheng CF, Bouncken RB. Individual and team entrepreneurial orientation: scale development and configurations for success. J Bus Res. 2020;112:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Y, Chen X, Zhou KZ. External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: evidence from China’s high-tech firms. J Bus Res. 2012;65(8):1226–1233. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.06.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RE, Berthon P. Market orientation, generative learning, innovation strategy and business performance inter‐relationships in bioscience firms. J Manag Stud. 2008;45(8):1329–1353. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00778.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielen PM, Hoeve A, Nieuwenhuis LF. Learning entrepreneurs: learning and innovation in small companies. Eur Educ Res J. 2003;2(1):90–106. doi:10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.13
   Google Scholar
• Garud R, Nayyar PR. Transformative capacity: continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strateg Manag J. 1994;15(3):365–385. doi:10.1002/smj.4250150504
   Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Ireland RD, Hitt MA. International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Acad Manage J. 2000;43(5):925–950. doi:10.2307/1556420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipika S, Wilson G. Enabling technological learning among light engineering SMEs in Zimbabwe through networking. Technovation. 2006;26(8):969–979. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2005.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing V, Nooteboom B, Vanhaverbeke W, Duysters G, van den Oord A. Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Res Policy. 2008;37(10):1717–1731. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnyawali DR, Madhavan R. Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: a structural embeddedness perspective. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26(3):431–445. doi:10.2307/259186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagerberg J, Fosaas M, Sapprasert K. Innovation: exploring the Knowledge Base. Res Policy. 2012;41(7):1132–1531. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim N, Atuahene‐Gima K. Using exploratory and exploitative market learning for new product development. J Prod Innov Manage. 2010;27(4):519–536. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2010.00733.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor GC. Market learning and radical innovation: a cross case comparison of eight radical innovation projects. J Prod Innov Manage. 1998;15(2):151–166. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1520151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasution HN, Mavondo FT, Matanda MJ, Ndubisi N. Entrepreneurship: its relationship with market orientation and learning orientation and as antecedents to innovation and customer value. Ind Mark Manag. 2011;40(3):336–345. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storbacka K, Nenonen S. Learning with the market: facilitating market innovation. Ind Mark Manag. 2015;44:73–82. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2014.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouzes JM, Posner BZ. To lead, create a shared vision. Harv Bus Rev. 2009;87(1):20–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao M, Yao L, Ma R, et al. How green mindfulness and green shared vision interact to influence green creative behavior. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:1707–1723. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S405399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoe SL. Shared vision: a development tool for organizational learning. Dev Learn. 2007;21(4):12–13. doi:10.1108/14777280710758817
   Google Scholar
• Clayton BC. Shared vision and autonomous motivation vs. financial incentives driving success in corporate acquisitions. Front Psychol. 2015;5:1466. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldor L. How collective engagement creates competitive advantage for organizations: a businessü. level model of shared vision, competitive intensity, and service performance. J Manag Stud. 2020;57(2):177–209. doi:10.1111/joms.12438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce CL, Ensley MD. A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: the central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). J Organ Behav. 2004;25(2):259–278. doi:10.1002/job.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds N, Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch B. Pre-testing in questionnaire design: a review of the literature and suggestions for further research. J Mark Res Soc. 1993;35(2):1–11. doi:10.1177/147078539303500202
   Google Scholar
• Prajogo DI, Ahmed PK. Relationships between innovation stimulus, innovation capacity, and innovation performance. R D Manage. 2006;36(5):499–515. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00450.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986;51(6):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar