The Influence of Decision-Making Logic on Employees’ Innovative Behaviour: The Mediating Role of Positive Error Orientation and the Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamics

References

• Sarasvathy SD. Effectual reasoning in entrepreneurial decision making: existence and bounds. Acad Manage. 2001;2001(1):D1–D6. doi:10.5465/APBPP.2001.6133065
   Google Scholar
• Buganza T, Gerst MH, Verganti R. Adoption of NPD flexibility practices in new technology-based firms. Eur J Innov Manage. 2010;13(1):62–80. doi:10.1108/14601061011013230
   Google Scholar
• Li TZ, Ma J. From letting it go to taking it conscious: theoretical basis of rescuing the failed technological innovation. Stud Dialectics Nat. 2019;35(03):21–25. doi:10.19484/j.cnki.1000-8934.2019.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Qin YJ, Wang WX. Research on the relationship among uncertainty tolerance, decision-making logic and radical innovation performance. Sci Technol Progress Policy. 2020;37(02):1–9. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2019040890
   Google Scholar
• Zhang NJ, Yuan MS, Fu CX, Wu RJ. The relationship between error management climate and individual innovative behaviour. Sci Res Manage. 2015;36(S1):94–101. doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2015.s1.013
   Google Scholar
• Ju XH, Xie YQ, Zhang JN. Error learning: a study from the error knowledge flow perspective. J Intell. 2015;34(05):202–207. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2015.05.036
   Google Scholar
• Zhao B, Xu L. Research on the influence of error management climate on employee’s innovative-dual path effect of basic psychological needs and knowledge construction. Econ Survey. 2018;35(02):128–134. doi:10.15931/j.cnki.1006-1096.20180105.011
   Google Scholar
• Wang YF, Liu M, Wang SJ. Impact of organizational innovation orientation on innovative performance of R&D personnel: roles of creativity and error management atmosphere. J Technol Econ. 2019;38(01):9–18. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1002-980X.2019.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Wang LL, Zhao WH, Wei ZL. The effects of causation and effectuation on novelty-centered business model design: the moderating role of environment uncertainty. Manage Rev. 2019;31(01):90–100. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2019.01.009
   Google Scholar
• Ansoff HI. Critique of Henry Mintzberg’s ‘The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management’. Strat Manage J. 1991;12(6):449–461. doi:10.1002/smj.4250120605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettlie JE, Elsenbach JM. Modified Stage-Gate® regimes in new product development. J Prod Innov Manage. 2007;24(1):20–33. doi:10.1111/J.1540-5885.2006.00230.X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinckmann J, Grichnik D, Kapsa D. Should entrepreneurs plan or just storm the castle? A meta-analysis on contextual factors impacting the business planning-performance relationship in small firms. J Bus Ventur. 2010;25(1):24–40. doi:10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2008.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XE, Meng Q. Decision-making logic and business model innovation: a dual moderating effect model. J Manage Sci. 2022;35(01):79–89. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0334.2022.01.009
   Google Scholar
• Chandler GN, DeTienne DR, McKelvie A, Mumford TV. Causation and effectuation processes: a validation study. J Bus Ventur. 2011;26(3):375–390. doi:10.1016/J.JBUSVENT.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms R, Schiele H. Antecedents and consequences of effectuation and causation in the international new venture creation process. J Int Entrepreneur. 2012;10(2):95–116. doi:10.1007/s10843-012-0089-2
   Google Scholar
• Osiyevskyy O, Hayes L, Krueger N, Madill CM. Planning to grow? Exploring the effect of business planning on the growth of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Entrepreneur Pract Rev. 2013;2(3):36–56.
   Google Scholar
• Kristinsson K, Candi M, Saemundsson RJ. The relationship between founder team diversity and innovation performance: the moderating role of causation logic. Long Range Plann. 2016;49(4):464–476. doi:10.1016/J.LRP.2015.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu YQ, Zhao B, Song C. Decision-making logic, learning from failure and enterprises’ digital transformation performance. Foreign Econ Manage. 2021;43(09):68–82. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20210802.102
   Google Scholar
• Simon HA. Models of bounded rationality. volume 1: economic analysis and public policy. In: Volume 2: Behavioural Economics and Business Organization: 1982 (Reprinted 1983). Vol. 478. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1985:505.
   Google Scholar
• Frese M, Van DC. Error management: learning from errors and organizational design. Annual Meeting of The Academy of Management; Cincinnati; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Yin K, Sun JM, Chen LN. Error management climate: a literature review and prospect. Foreign Econ Manage. 2016;38(02):75–87. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.2016.02.006
   Google Scholar
• Olson BJ, Parayitam S, Bao Y. Strategic decision making: the effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. J Manage. 2007;33(2):196–222. doi:10.1177/0149206306298657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XL, Li DD, Liu J, Long YJ. Entrepreneurial bricolage or effectuation? Theoretical applications and future prospects. Foreign Econ Manage. 2020;42(1):17–29. doi:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20190816.003
   Google Scholar
• Long J, Su X. Easy first and difficult later? Novelty, usefulness of opportunities and the timing of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation. Res Econ Manage. 2022;43(01):110–124. doi:10.13502/j.cnki.issn1000-7636.2022.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):218–226. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenas A, Tabernero C, Briones E. Effects of goal orientation, error orientation and self-efficacy on performance in an uncertain situation. Soc Behav Pers. 2006;34(5):569–586. doi:10.2224/SBP.2006.34.5.569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J. Study on the relationship of error orientation and individual innovative behavior: team-based performance appraisal agency perspective. Sci Technol Progress Policy. 2013;30(22):11–15. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.2013090073
   Google Scholar
• Li M, Du PC. Research on the effect of error cognition, motivational preferences on employees’ innovative behavior. Sci Sci Manage S&T. 2014;35(09):161–170.
   Google Scholar
• Miao XN. Research on the relationship among leadership style, error orientation and employee innovative behavior. Leadersh Sci. 2014;(20):46–48. doi:10.19572/j.cnki.ldkx.2014.20.015
   Google Scholar
• Du PC, Li M, Ni T, Wu T. Investigating the effect of error aversion culture on employees’ innovative behavior. Chin J Manage. 2015;12(04):538–545. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-884x.2015.04.009
   Google Scholar
• Du PC, Du X, Wang JB. Employee hostility and employee innovative behavior from the perspective of error communication: a mediated moderating effect model. Enterprise Econ. 2017;36(09):106–111. doi:10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2017.09.017
   Google Scholar
• Ma L, Liu C. The research on the mechanism of error orientation to employees’ innovation behavior——the moderating role of misplay culture. Sci Technol Progress Policy. 2019;36(10):146–152. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.L201808449
   Google Scholar
• Su L, Xu BL. The influence of error orientation on employees’ proactive change behavior. Enterprise Econ. 2020;39(06):104–111. doi:10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2020.06.013
   Google Scholar
• Bragger JD, Hantula DA, Bragger D, Kirnan J, Kutcher E. When success breeds failure: history, hysteresis, and delayed exit decisions. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(1):6–14. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogliser C, Brigham KH. The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: mutual lessons to be learned. Leadersh Quart. 2004;15(6):771–799. doi:10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2004.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilduff GJ, Elfenbein HA, Staw BM. The psychology of rivalry: a relationally dependent analysis of competition. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(5):943–969. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding JX, Fu MH. Spiritual leadership and positive error orientation: a moderated mediating effect. Enterprise Econ. 2017;36(03):76–82. doi:10.13529/j.cnki.enterprise.economy.2017.03.011
   Google Scholar
• Yin RF. The influence of leadership style orientation on employee innovative behavior: the mediating role of employee error learning. Leadersh Sci. 2012;(20):51–53. doi:10.19572/j.cnki.ldkx.2012.20.016
   Google Scholar
• Hubner S, Baum M. Effectuation, entrepreneurs’ leadership behaviour, and employee outcomes: a conceptual model. Int J Entrepreneur Ventur. 2016;10(4):383–411. doi:10.1504/IJEV.2018.093917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng ZZ, Wang YF, Xiao MM, Ding L. Can errors enhance team radical creativity? — a fsQCA study on the cross-level interaction model. R&D Manage. 2022;34(03):147–161. doi:10.13581/j.cnki.rdm.20211518
   Google Scholar
• Miller D, Friesen PH. Strategy-making and environment: the third link. South Med J. 1983;4(3):221–235. doi:10.1002/SMJ.4250040304
   Google Scholar
• Zahra SA, Neubaum DO, Huse M. The effect of the environment on export performance among telecommunications new ventures. Entrepreneur Theory Pract. 1997;22(1):25–46. doi:10.1177/104225879702200102
   Google Scholar
• Simerly RL, Li M. Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strat Manage J. 2000;21(1):31–49. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<31::AID-SMJ76>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarasvathy SD. Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manage Rev. 2001;26:243–263. doi:10.5465/AMR.2001.4378020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read SA, Sarasvathy SD. Knowing what to do and doing what you know. J Private Equity. 2005;9(1):45–62. doi:10.3905/jpe.2005.605370
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson P, Gabrielsson M. A dynamic model of growth phases and survival in international business-to-business new ventures: the moderating effect of decision-making logic. Industr Market Manage. 2013;42(8):1357–1373. doi:10.1016/J.INDMARMAN.2013.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui LG, Zhang YL, He YQ. Research on the mechanism of innovation and performance improvement: an effectuation approach. Sci Sci Manage S&T. 2017;38(09):68–79.
   Google Scholar
• Yu X, Tao Y, Tao X, Xia F, Li Y. Managing uncertainty in emerging economies: the interaction effects between causation and effectuation on firm performance. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2018;135(11):121–131. doi:10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2017.11.017
   Google Scholar
• Su TY, Tao FY. Effectuation and causation: which decision making logic is more ‘effective’? A meta-analysis of the relationship between decision making logic and firm performance. Sci Sci Manage S&T. 2019;40(08):87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Chen YH, Zhang ZG. Research on the antecedents of business model innovation: based on the perspectives of decision-making logic and organizational learning. Manage Rev. 2022;34(05):81–92. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2022.05.008
   Google Scholar
• Wang YG, Peng XM. Measures to improve the representativeness of sampling survey samples. China Stat. 2011;358(10):51–52.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielsson J, Politis D. Career motives and entrepreneurial decision-making: examining preferences for causal and effectual logics in the early stage of new ventures. Small Bus Econ. 2011;36(3):281–298. doi:10.1007/S11187-009-9217-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybowiak V, Grast H, Frese M, Batinec B. Error orientation questionnaire (EOQ): reliability, validity, and different language equivalence. EMBO J. 1999;20(4):527–547. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<527::AID-JOB886>3.0.CO;2-G
   Google Scholar
• Zhang ZG, Yu CP, Li YJ. The relationship among proactive personality, knowledge sharing and employee’s innovation behavior. Manage Rev. 2016;28(04):123–133. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2016.04.013
   Google Scholar
• Xie HM. Market orientation and organizational performance: the effect of organizational learning and environment. Nankai Bus Rev. 2005;03:47–53. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2005.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Fang QW, Liu ZQ, Yuan HB, Cai N, He N, Zhang TJ. Construction of a structural equation model and implementation of AMOS software. Chin J Health Stat. 2018;35(06):958–960.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Long LR. Statistical remedies for common method biases. Adv Psychol Sci. 2004;(06):942–950. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3710.2004.06.018
   Google Scholar
• Alzamora-Ruiz J, Fuentes-Fuentes MM, Martinez-Fiestas M. Effectuation or causation to promote innovation in technology-based SMEs? The effects of strategic decision-making logics. Technol Anal Strat Manage. 2021;33(7):797–812. doi:10.1080/09537325.2020.1849609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brettel M, Mauer R, Engelen A, Küpper D. Corporate effectuation: entrepreneurial action and its impact on R&D project performance. J Bus Ventur. 2011;27(2). doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui LG, Su SI, Feng YC, Hertz S. Causal or effectual? Dynamics of decision making logics in servitization. Industr Market Manage. 2019;82(C):15–26. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.03.013
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Yang C, Wang B, Chen X, Wang B, Yuan W. When error learning orientation leads to learning from project failure: the moderating role of fear of face loss. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1317. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen YT, Wei JR, Zhang J, Li X. Effect mechanism of error management climate on innovation behavior: an investigation from chinese entrepreneurs. Front Psychol. 2021;12. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2021.733741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadia Z, Samuel A. Be open to failure: open innovation failure in dynamic environments. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2023;193. doi:10.1016/J.TECHFORE.2023.122632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JH. Research on the influence of dynamic work environment on employees’ innovative performance in the post-epidemic era – the role of job crafting and voice behavior. Front Psychol. 2021;12:795218. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2021.795218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alzamora-Ruiz J, Fuentes-Fuentes MM, Martinez-Fiestas M. Together or separately? Direct and synergistic effects of Effectuation and Causation on innovation in technology-based SMEs. Int Entrepreneursh Manage J. 2021;17(4):1917–1943. doi:10.1007/S11365-021-00743-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, He YC. Mechanism of how decision-making logic influences the performance of new ventures: the mediating role of business model innovation. Manage Rev. 2022;34(10):134–145. doi:10.14120/j.cnki.cn11-5057/f.2022.10.025
   Google Scholar
• Chen ZH, Li J. Perceived environmental uncertainty, boundary spanning behavior and team innovation. Nanjing J Soc Sci. 2020;392(06):40–48. doi:10.15937/j.cnki.issn1001-8263.2020.06.006
   Google Scholar
• Huang Q, Zhang J, Jiang CY. How does skill variety stimulate employee innovative behavior? An analysis of the serial mediating effects of coreself-evaluation and harmonious passion. Sci Technol Progress Policy. 2023;1–10. doi:10.6049/kjjbydc.Q202207166
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Du PC. Influence of core self-evaluation and error orientation on employees’ innovative behavior. J Capital Univ Econ Bus. 2019;21(06):100–108. doi:10.13504/j.cnki.issn1008-2700.2019.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Chen WP. An analysis on the cross - level model of the effect of error management climate on employee innovative behavior. Mod Finance Econ. 2013;33(10):121–129. doi:10.19559/j.cnki.12-1387.2013.10.013
   Google Scholar
• Wang YZ, Xu S. The mechanism and empirical study on business model innovation for start ups—— the moderating role of environmental dynamism. J Hunan Univ. 2023;37(02):42–50. doi:10.16339/j.cnki.hdxbskb.2023.02.007
   Google Scholar