The Influence of Tourist Attraction Type on Product Price Perception and Neural Mechanism in Tourism Consumption: An ERP Study

References

• Cohen SA, Prayag G, Moital M. Consumer behaviour in tourism: concepts, influences and opportunities. Curr Issues Tour. 2014;17(10):872–909. doi:10.1080/13683500.2013.850064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneke J, Carter S. The development of a consumer value proposition of private label brands and the application thereof in a South African retail context. J Retail Consum Serv. 2015;25:22–35. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stangl B, Prayag G, Polster L. Segmenting visitors’ motivation, price perceptions, willingness to pay and price sensitivity in a collaborative destination marketing effort. Curr Issues Tour. 2020;23(21):2666–2682. doi:10.1080/13683500.2019.1662380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer A, Buratto LG, Goto N, Brotherhood EV. The Feedback-Related Negativity and the P300 Brain Potential Are Sensitive to Price Expectation Violations in a Virtual Shopping Task. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):e0163150. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0163150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajendran KN, Tellis GJ. Contextual and temporal components of reference price. J Mark. 1994;58(1):22–34. doi:10.1177/002224299405800102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnukka J. Customers’ purchase intentions as a reflection of price perception. J Prod Brand Manag. 2008;17(3):188–196. doi:10.1108/10610420810875106
   Google Scholar
• Bigné JE, Andreu L. Emotions in segmentation. Ann Tour Res. 2004;31(3):682–696. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumdar T, Raj SP, Sinha I. Reference price research: review and propositions. J Mark. 2005;69(4):84–102. doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon H, Han H. Tourist experience quality and loyalty to an island destination: the moderating impact of destination image. J Travel Tour Mark. 2019;36(1):43–59. doi:10.1080/10548408.2018.1494083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellinen J. Making price decisions in tourism enterprises. Int J Hosp Manag. 2003;22(2):217–235. doi:10.1016/S0278-4319(03)00019-7
   Google Scholar
• Boz H, Arslan A, Koc E. Neuromarketing aspect of tourism pricing psychology. Tour Manag Perspect. 2017;23:119–128. doi:10.1016/j.tmp.2017.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levrini GRD, Jeffman Dos Santos M. The Influence of Price on Purchase Intentions: comparative Study between Cognitive, Sensory, and Neurophysiological Experiments. Behav Sci. 2021;11(2):16. doi:10.1080/13683500.2013.850064
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zeithaml VA. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J Mark. 1988;52(3):2–22. doi:10.1177/002224298805200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard T, Trapp P, Pinar M, Gulsoy T, Boyt TE. Consumer-based brand equity of a private-label brand: measuring and examining determinants. J Mark Theory Pract. 2017;25(1):39–56. doi:10.1080/10696679.2016.1236662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakel LAW, Shevrin H. Freud’s dual process theory and the place of the a-rational. Behav Brain Sci. 2003;26(4):527–528. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03210116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajewski PD, Drizinsky J, Zülch J, Falkenstein M. ERP correlates of simulated purchase decisions. Front Neurosci. 2016;10. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin C. Neuromarketing: the new science of consumer behavior. Society. 2011;48(2):131–135. doi:10.1007/s12115-010-9408-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Fu W, Jin J, Shang Q, Zhang X. Differential effects of monetary and social rewards on product online rating decisions in e-commerce in China. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1440. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01440
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolau JL. Testing reference dependence, loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in Spanish tourism. Investig Económicas. 2008;32(2):105–128. doi:10.1016/S0210-1521(08)70005-5
   Google Scholar
• Choi C, Mattila AS. The effects of internal and external reference prices on travelers. Price Evaluat J Travel Res. 2018;57(8):1068–1077. doi:10.1177/0047287517735910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielke S. Integrating emotions in the analysis of retail price images: integrating emotions in the analysis of retail price images. Psychol Mark. 2011;28(4):330–359. doi:10.1002/mar.20355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somervuori O, Ravaja N. Purchase behavior and psychophysiological responses to different price levels. Psychol Mark. 2013;30(6):479–489. doi:10.1002/mar.20621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marpaung BOY, Tania F. Visitor satisfaction and tourist attraction image. Int J Psychol Stud. 2021;13(2):1–13. doi:10.5539/ijps.v13n2p1
   Google Scholar
• Koschate-Fischer N, Diamantopoulos A, Oldenkotte K. Are consumers really willing to pay more for a favorable country image? A study of country-of-origin effects on willingness to pay. J Int Mark. 2012;20(1):19–41. doi:10.1509/jim.10.0140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Zhang Y, Huang X. Tourism satisfaction of different types of tourist attractions in Beijing based on perceived situation. Sci Geogr Sin. 2018;4(38):564–574. doi:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2018.04.010
   Google Scholar
• Dong H. Tourism efficiency of different types of tourist attractions in China. Resour Dev Mark. 2021;37(10):1264–1270. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1003-0794.2021.10.005
   Google Scholar
• Evans JSBT. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol. 2008;59(1):255–278. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrouillet P. Dual-process theories of reasoning: the test of development. Dev Rev. 2011;31(2–3):151–179. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Cheng L, Qiu W, Wang J. The neural basis of the unattended processing of destination-slogan consistency. J Destin Mark Manag. 2021;19:100556. doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2021.100556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiter HC, Block M, Blood AJ, et al. Redefining neuromarketing as an integrated science of influence. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;8:1073. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee N, Broderick AJ, Chamberlain L. What is ‘neuromarketing’? A discussion and agenda for future research. Int J Psychophysiol. 2007;63(2):199–204. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Mo Z. The effects of review’s mobile phone price on consumers’ purchase intention: an event-related potential study. J Neurosci Psychol Econ. 2021;14(4):197–206. doi:10.1037/npe0000152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan U, Dhar R. Price-framing effect on the purchase of hedonic and utilitarian bundles. J Mark Res. 2010;47(6):1090–1099. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.6.1090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Mo Z, Zhang H, Wang C, Fu H. The temptation of zero price: event-related potentials evidence of how price framing influences the purchase of bundles. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:251. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00251
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çakir MP, Çakar T, Girisken Y, Yurdakul D. An investigation of the neural correlates of purchase behavior through fNIRS. Eur J Mark. 2018;52(1/2):224–243. doi:10.1108/EJM-12-2016-0864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo Z, Ma H, Wei W, Wang C, Fu H. When does the discount look more attractive: neural correlates of discount framing effect in the purchase of bundles. NeuroReport. 2019;30(10):718–724. doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000001265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Hou W, Zhang Q, Tian S. Discounts or gifts? Not just to save money: a study on neural mechanism from the perspective of fuzzy decision. J Contemp Mark Sci. 2018;1(1):53–75. doi:10.1108/JCMARS-08-2018-0009
   Google Scholar
• Ma Q, Zhang L, Wang M. “You Win, You Buy”—how continuous win effect influence consumers’ price perception: an ERP Study. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:691. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Han W. The impact of perceived quality on online buying decisions: an event-related potentials perspective. NeuroReport. 2014;25(14):1091–1098. doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knutson B, Rick S, Wimmer GE, Prelec D, Loewenstein G. Neural predictors of purchases. Neuron. 2007;53(1):147–156. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccia F, Malgeri Manzo R, Covino D. Consumer behavior and corporate social responsibility: an evaluation by a choice experiment. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag. 2019;26(1):97–105. doi:10.1002/csr.1661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee EJ. Empathy can increase customer equity related to pro-social brands. J Bus Res. 2016;69(9):3748–3754. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu H, Ma H, Bian J, Wang C, Zhou J, Ma Q. Don’t trick me: an event-related potentials investigation of how price deception decreases consumer purchase intention. Neurosci Lett. 2019;713:134522. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsøy TZ, Skov M, Christensen MK, Stahlhut C. Frontal brain asymmetry and willingness to pay. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:138. doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plassmann H, O’Doherty J, Rangel A. Orbitofrontal cortex encodes willingness to pay in everyday economic transactions. J Neurosci. 2007;27(37):9984–9988. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2131-07.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Zhao Y, Ling B. The joint influence of online rating and product price on purchase decision: an EEG Study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2020;13:291–301. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S238063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zubair M, Iqbal S, Usman SM, Awais M, Wang R, Wang X. Message framing and self-conscious emotions help to understand pro-environment consumer purchase intention: an ERP study. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18304. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-75343-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Yao M, Fang S, Gao X. A dual-process perspective to explore decision making in internet gaming disorder: an ERP study of comparison with recreational game users. Comput Hum Behav. 2022;128:107104. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polezzi D, Lotto L, Daum I, Sartori G, Rumiati R. Predicting outcomes of decisions in the brain. Behav Brain Res. 2008;187(1):116–122. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan J, Zhang Q, Chen A, et al. Are we sensitive to valence differences in emotionally negative stimuli? Electrophysiological evidence from an ERP study. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(12):2764–2771. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein JR, Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology. 2008;45(1):152–170. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00602.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Jin J, Wang A, Ma Q, Yu H. Consumers’ implicit motivation of purchasing luxury brands: an EEG Study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:913–929. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S215751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring DR, Taylor JH, White KR, Crites SL. Electrophysiological responses to evaluative priming: the LPP Is sensitive to incongruity. Emotion. 2011;11(4):794–806. doi:10.1037/a0022804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Meng L, Liu M, Wang Q, Ma Q. How do social-based cues influence consumers’ online purchase decisions? An event-related potential study. Electron Commer Res. 2016;16(1):1–26. doi:10.1007/s10660-015-9209-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia J, Zhang W, Chen M. How consumers are affected by product descriptions in online shopping: event-related potentials evidence of the attribute framing effect. Neurosci Res. 2017;125:3–11. doi:10.1016/j.neures.2017.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen NS, Chen KH, Liu EH. Emotional modulation of the late positive potential (LPP) generalizes to Chinese individuals. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010;75(3):319–325. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hooff JC, Crawford H, van Vugt M. The wandering mind of men: ERP evidence for gender differences in attention bias towards attractive opposite sex faces. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2011;6(4):477–485. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Roy M. Leveraging factors for sustained green consumption behavior based on consumption value perceptions: testing the structural model. J Clean Prod. 2015;95:332–340. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Liang X, Li P, et al. The processing of perceptual similarity with different features or spatial relations as revealed by P2/P300 amplitude. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;95(3):379–387. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi J, Jiang Z. Willingness to pay a premium price for green products: does a reference group matter? Environ Dev Sustain. 2022. doi:10.1007/s10668-022-02419-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong Y, Guo X. An experimental study on anchoring effect of consumers’ price judgment based on consumers’ experiencing scenes. Front Psychol. 2022;13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.794135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T M, M S, X N. Evaluation of the virtual economic effect of tourism product emotional marketing based on virtual reality. Front Psychol. 2021;12:759268. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Q, Lv D, Lin Y, Zhu D, Liu S, Liu Y. Influence of utilitarian and hedonic attributes on willingness to pay green product premiums and neural mechanisms in China: an ERP study. Sustainability. 2023;15(3):2403. doi:10.3390/su15032403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp JP, Benjamin DJ, Laibson DI, Chabris CF. Measuring and controlling for the compromise effect when estimating risk preference parameters. Exp Econ. 2020;23(4):1069–1099. doi:10.1007/s10683-019-09640-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofir C. Reexamining latitude of price acceptability and price thresholds: predicting basic consumer reaction to price. J Consum Res. 2004;30(4):612–621. doi:10.1086/380293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar