233
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Which is More Important, Proposer Identity or Allocation Motive? Event-Related Potential in Economic Decision-Making

, , &
Pages 3845-3856 | Received 10 May 2023, Accepted 27 Aug 2023, Published online: 13 Sep 2023

References

  • Rilling JK, Sanfey AG. The neuroscience of social decision-making. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:23–48. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131647
  • Halali E, Bereby-Meyer Y, Ockenfels A. Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7:240. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00240
  • Ichinose G, Sayama H. Evolution of fairness in the not quite ultimatum game. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):5104. doi:10.1038/SREP05104
  • Debove S, Baumard N, André JB. Models of the evolution of fairness in the ultimatum game: a review and classification. Evol Hum Behav. 2016;37(3):245–254. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.01.001
  • Park G, Vanoyen-Witvliet C, Barraza JA, Marsh BU. The benefit of gratitude: trait gratitude is associated with effective economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Front Psychol. 2021;12:590132. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590132
  • Pohling R, Diessner R, Stacy S, Woodward D, Strobel A. Moral elevation and economic games: the moderating role of personality. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1381. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01381
  • Mcleish KN, Oxoby RJ. Social interactions and the salience of social identity. J Econ Psychol. 2011;32(1):172–178. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003
  • Wang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Huang L, Guo F, Yuan S. Group membership modulates the recipient’s fairness consideration in ultimatum game. Acta Psychol Sin. 2014;46(12):1850–1859. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01850
  • Brüne M, Tas C, Wischniewski J, Welpinghus A, Heinisch C, Newen A. Hypnotic ingroup-outgroup suggestion influences economic decision-making in an Ultimatum Game. Conscious Cogn. 2012;21(2):939–946. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.009
  • Kubota JT, Li J, Bar-David E, Banaji MR, Phelps EA. The price of racial bias: intergroup negotiations in the ultimatum game. Psychol Sci. 2013;24(12):2498–2504. doi:10.1177/0956797613496435
  • Balliet D, Wu J, De Dreu CKW. Ingroup favoritism in cooperation: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1556–1581. doi:10.1037/a0037737
  • Lane T. Discrimination in the laboratory: a meta-analysis of economics experiments. Eur Econ Rev. 2016;90:375–402. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.11.011
  • Otten S, Stapel DA. Who is this Donald? How social categorization affects aggression-priming effects. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2007;37(5):1000–1015. doi:10.1002/ejsp.413
  • Shinada M, Yamagishi T, Ohmura Y. False friends are worse than bitter enemies. Evol Hum Behav. 2004;25(6):379–393. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2004.08.001
  • Daskalova V. Discrimination, social identity, and coordination: an experiment. Games Econ Behav. 2018;107:238–252. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2017.10.007
  • Yeung MY, Coates PT, Li PK. Kidney Organ Allocation System: how to Be Fair. Semin Nephrol. 2022;42(4):151274. doi:10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.09.002
  • Bornstein G. Intergroup conflict: individual, group, and collective interests. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2003;7(2):129–145. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0702_129-145
  • Stagnaro MN, Dunham Y, Rand DG. Profit versus prejudice: harnessing self-interest to reduce in-group bias. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2018;9:50–58. doi:10.1177/1948550617699254
  • Chisadza C, Nicholls N, Yitbarek E. Group identity in fairness decisions: discrimination or inequality aversion? J Behav Exp Econ. 2021;93:101722. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2021.101722
  • Cole AP, Thomas EA. Group differences in fairness perceptions and decision making in voting rights cases. Law Hum Behav. 2006;30(5):543–560. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9046-8
  • Wang Y, Zhang Z, Bai L, Lin C, Osinsky R, Hewig J. Ingroup/outgroup membership modulates fairness consideration: neural signatures from ERPs and EEG oscillations. Sci Rep. 2017;7:39827. doi:10.1038/srep39827
  • Ma Q, Hu Y, Jiang S, Meng L. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study. Front Neurosci. 2015;9:77. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00077
  • Boksem MA, De Cremer D. Fairness concerns predict medial frontal negativity amplitude in ultimatum bargaining. Soc Neurosci. 2010;5(1):118–128. doi:10.1080/17470910903202666
  • Gehring WJ, Willoughby AR. The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science. 2002;295(5563):2279–2282. doi:10.1126/science.1066893
  • Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes. Biol Psychol. 2006;71(2):148–154. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.04.001
  • Martin LE, Potts GF, Burton PC, Montague PR. Electrophysiological and hemodynamic responses to reward prediction violation. NeuroReport. 2009;20(13):1140–1143. doi:10.1097/WNR.0b013e32832f0dca
  • Hewig J, Kretschmer N, Trippe RH, et al. Why humans deviate from rational choice. Psychophysiology. 2011;48(4):507–514. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01081.x
  • Hajcak G, Moser JS, Holroyd CB, Simons RF. It’s worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks. Psychophysiology. 2007;44(6):905–912. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00567.x
  • Polezzi D, Daum I, Rubaltelli E, et al. Mentalizing in economic decision-making. Behav Brain Res. 2008;190(2):218–223. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.03.003
  • Ma Q, Qian D, Hu L, Wang L. Hello handsome! Male’s facial attractiveness gives rise to female’s fairness bias in Ultimatum Game scenarios-An ERP study. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0180459. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180459
  • Batson CD, Moran T. Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner’s dilemma. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1999;29(7):909–924. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199911)29:7
  • Stürmer S, Snyder M, Kropp A, Siem B. Empathy-motivated helping: the moderating role of group membership. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006;32(7):943–956. doi:10.1177/0146167206287363
  • Hu XM, Mai XQ. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2021;16(7):670–682. doi:10.1093/scan/nsab032
  • Nieuwenhuis S, Aston-Jones G, Cohen J. Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system. Psychol Bull. 2005;131(4):510–532. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
  • Guo H, Song H, Liu Y, Xu K, Shen H. Social distance modulates the process of uncertain decision-making: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:701–714. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S210910
  • Wu Y, Hu J, van Dijk E, Leliveld MC, Zhou X. Brain activity in fairness consideration during asset distribution: does the initial ownership play a role? PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39627. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039627
  • Beck AT, Beamesderfer A. Assessment of depression: the depression inventory. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1974;7:151–169. doi:10.1159/000395074
  • Gui DY, Li JZ, Li X, Luo YJ. Temporal dynamics of the interaction between reward and time delay during intertemporal choice. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1526. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01526
  • He Y, Hu X, Mai X. Influence of empathic concern on fairness-related decision-making: evidence from ERP. Acta Psychol Sin. 2022;54(4):385–397. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00385
  • Alexopoulos J, Pfabigan DM, Lamm C, Bauer H, Fischmeister FP. Do we care about the powerless third? An ERP study of the three-person ultimatum game. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:59. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00059
  • Vaidya AR, Fellows LK. The neuropsychology of decision-making. Decision Neurosci. 2017;277–289. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-805308-9.00022-1
  • Otten S, Wentura D. About the impact of automaticity in the minimal group paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks. Eur J Soc Psychol. 1999;29(8):1049–1071. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8
  • Wang Y, Cheung H, Yee LTS, Tse CY. Feedback-related negativity (FRN) and theta oscillations: different feedback signals for non-conform and conform decisions. Biol Psychol. 2020;153:107880. doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107880
  • Moser A, Gaertig C, Ruz M. Social information and personal interests modulate neural activity during economic decision-making. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:31. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00031
  • Heintz C. The ecological rationality of strategic cognition. Behav Brain Sci. 2005;28(6):825–826. doi:10.1017/S0140525X05320140
  • Kupferberg A, Bicks L, Hasler G. Social functioning in major depressive disorder. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;69:313–332. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.002
  • Antonesei A, Murayama K, McCabe C. Reduced neural response to reward in major depression disorder using a FMRI reinforcement learning task. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;83(9):162–163. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.02.424
  • Gradin VB, Pérez A, Macfarlane JA, et al. Neural correlates of social exchanges during the Prisoner’s Dilemma game in depression. Psychol Med. 2016;46(6):1289–1300. doi:10.1017/S0033291715002834
  • Beste C, Ness V, Lukas C, et al. Mechanisms mediating parallel action monitoring in fronto-striatal circuits. Neuroimage. 2012;62(1):137–146. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.019
  • Zhong J, Liu Y, Zhang E, Luo J, Chen J. Individuals’ attentional bias toward an envied target’s name: an event-related potential study. Neurosci Lett. 2013;550:109–114. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.06.047