Self-Other(s) Risk Decision Differences in Different Domains in the Chinese Context: A Social Value Theory Perspective

References

• Olschewski S, Dietsch M, Ludvig EA. Anti-social motives explain increased risk aversion for others in decisions from experience. Judgm Decis Mak. 2019;14(1):58–71. doi:10.1017/S1930297500002916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batteux E, Ferguson E, Tunney RJ. Risk preferences in surrogate decision making. Exp Psychol. 2017;64(4):290–297. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rigoli F, Preller KH, Dolan RJ. Risk preference and choice stochasticity during decisions for other people. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2018;18(2):331–341. doi:10.3758/s13415-018-0572-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batteux E, Ferguson E, Tunney RJ. Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216566. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polman E, Wu K. Decision making for others involving risk: a review and meta-analysis. J Econ Psychol. 2020;77(4):102184. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2019.06.007
   Google Scholar
• Atanasov P, Anderson BL, Cain J, Schulkin J, Dana J. Comparing physicians personal prevention practices and their recommendations to patients. J Healthcare Qual. 2015;37(3):189–198. doi:10.1111/jhq.12042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouter N, van Cranenburgh SV, van Wee BV. The consumer-citizen duality: ten reasons why citizens prefer safety and drivers desire speed. Accid Anal Prevent. 2018;121:53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisswanger AH, Stone ER, Hupp JM, Allgaier L. Risk taking in relationships: differences in deciding for oneself versus for a friend. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2003;25(2):121–135. doi:10.1207/S15324834BASP2502_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone ER, Allgaier L. A social values analysis of self–other differences in decision making involving risk. Basic Appl Soc Psych. 2008;30(2):114–129. doi:10.1080/01973530802208832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XY, Chen XY, Gao Y, Liu YJ, Liu YF. Self-promotion hypothesis: the impact of self-esteem on self–other discrepancies in decision making under risk. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;127:26–30. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XY, Li SJ, Liu YF, et al. Gain-loss situation modulates neural responses to self-other decision making under risk. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):632. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-37236-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polman E. Self–other decision making and loss aversion. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 2012;119(2):141–150. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu JY, Xie XF, Xu JZ. Desirability or feasibility: self–other decision-making differences. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013;39(2):144–155. doi:10.1177/0146167212470146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Gunten CD, Scherer LD. Self-other differences in multiattribute decision making: compensatory versus noncompensatory decision strategies. J Behav Decis Mak. 2019;32(2):109–123. doi:10.1002/bdm.2099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(3):403–421. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietri ES, Fazio RH, Shook NJ. Weighting positive versus negative: the fundamental nature of valence asymmetry. J Pers. 2013;81(2):196–208. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00800.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Lu JY, Xie XF. Self-other decision-making differences derived from construal level. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin. 2014;50(6):1124–1132.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull. 2001;127(2):267–286. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghassemi M, Bernecker K, Brandstätter V. ”Take care, honey!”: people are more anxious about their significant others’ risk behavior than about their own. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2019;86:103879. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein W, Ferrer RA. On being more amenable to threatening risk messages concerning close others (vis-à-vis the self). Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018;44(10):014616721876906. doi:10.1177/0146167218769064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone ER, Choi YS, de Bruin WB, Mandel DR. I can take the risk, but you should be safe: self-other differences in situations involving physical safety. Judgm Decis Mak. 2013;8(3):250–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menegatti M, Rubini M. Convincing Similar and Dissimilar Others: the Power of Language Abstraction in Political Communication. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013;39(5):596–607. doi:10.1177/0146167213479404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds DB, Joseph J, Sherwood R. Risky shift versus cautious shift: determining differences in risk taking between private and public management decision-making. J Bus Econ Res. 2009;7(1):63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Füllbrunn SC, Luhan WJ. Decision making for others: the case of loss aversion. Econ Lett. 2017;161:154–156. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1992;63(4):596–612. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllbrunn SC, Luhan WJ. Am I My Peer’s Keeper? Social responsibility in financial decision making. NiCE Working Paper 15-03. the Netherlands: Institute for Managemenet Research, Radboud University; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lonergan BG, McClintock CG. Effects of group membership on risk-taking behavior. Psychol Rep. 1961;8(3):447–455. doi:10.2466/pr0.1961.8.3.447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao W, Sun B, Zhou H, Fan L, Sun C, Shao Y. Moral threshold model is universal? Initial evidence from China’s collectivist culture. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1847–1855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar