253
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Family-Work Conflict and Successful Aging at Work of Employees in Manufacturing Enterprises in North China

ORCID Icon &
Pages 3973-3986 | Received 21 Jul 2023, Accepted 14 Sep 2023, Published online: 25 Sep 2023

References

  • Phillips DR, Siu O-L. Global Aging and Aging Workers. In: The Oxford Handbook of Work and Aging. Oxford University Press; 2012.
  • Li F, Liu S, Zhang F, Huang H. Moderating effects of self-efficacy and time pressure on the relationship between employee aging and work Performance. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:1043–1054. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S359624
  • Guodong C, Yanyuan C, Zhu L, Guiyao T. Why Do Older Workers Grow “Older but Vigorous”? Research on the Influence of Work Locus of Control on Successful Aging at Work. Chine Human Res Dev. 2023;40(3):51–64. doi:10.16471/j.cnki.11-2822/c.2023.3.004
  • Kooij D, Zacher H, Wang M, Heckhausen J. Successful aging at work: a process model to guide future research and practice. Ind Organ Psychol. 2019;13:345–365. doi:10.1017/iop.2020.1
  • Zacher H, Kooij D, Beier M. Successful aging at work: empirical and methodological advancements. Work Aging Retirement. 2018;4:123–128. doi:10.1093/workar/way002
  • Cheung F, Wu A. Emotional labour and successful ageing in the workplace among older Chinese employees. Ageing Soc. 2013;33:1036–1051. doi:10.1017/S0144686X12000414
  • Cheung F, Wu AMS. An investigation of predictors of successful aging in the workplace among Hong Kong Chinese older workers. Int Psychogeriatrics. 2012;24(3):449–464. doi:10.1017/S104161021100192X
  • Alcover CM, Fernandez-Salinero S, Topa G, Desmette D. Family Care-Work Interference and Mid/Late-Career Motivation and Intentions: mediating Role of Occupational Future Time Perspective. J Career Dev. 2023;50(3):690–708. doi:10.1177/08948453221124895
  • Burch KA, Dugan AG, Barnes-Farrell JL. Understanding what eldercare means for employees and organizations: a review and recommendations for future research. Work Aging Retirement. 2019;5(1):44–72. doi:10.1093/workar/way011
  • Ireson R, Sethi B, Williams A. Availability of caregiver-friendly workplace policies (CFWPs): an international scoping review. Health Soc Care Community. 2018;26(1):1–14. doi:10.1111/hsc.12347
  • Cubrich M, Petruzzelli A. Advancing our understanding of successful aging at work: a socioemotional selectivity theory perspective. Ind Organ Psychol. 2020;13(3):369–373. doi:10.1017/iop.2020.71
  • Henry H, Zacher H, Desmette D. Future time perspective in the work context: a systematic review of quantitative studies. Front Psychol. 2017;8:413. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00413
  • Super DE. A life-span, life-space approach to career development. J Vocat Behav. 1980;16(3):282–298. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(80)90056-1
  • Wheatley D. Employee satisfaction and use of flexible working arrangements. Work Employment Soc. 2016;31(4):567–585. doi:10.1177/0950017016631447
  • English T, Carstensen LL. Socioemotional Selectivity Theory. In: Pachana NA, editor. Encyclopedia of Geropsychology. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2015:1–6.
  • Zacher H, Rudolph CW. Successful aging at work and beyond: a review and critical perspective. In: Age Diversity in the Workplace. Vol. 17. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2017:35–64.
  • Rudolph CW, Kooij DTAM, Rauvola RS, Zacher H. Occupational future time perspective: a meta-analysis of antecedents and outcomes. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(2):229–248. doi:10.1002/job.2264
  • Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Human Aging: usual and Successful. Science. 1987;237(4811):143–149. doi:10.1126/science.3299702
  • Abraham JD, Hansson RO. Successful Aging at Work: an Applied Study of Selection, Optimization, and Compensation Through Impression Management. J Gerontol. 1995;50B(2):94–P103. doi:10.1093/geronb/50B.2.P94
  • Beier M, LoPilato A, Kanfer R. Successful motivational aging at work: antecedents and retirement-related outcomes. Work Aging Retirement. 2018;4:213–224. doi:10.1093/workar/wax034
  • Robson SM, Hansson RO, Abalos A, Booth M. Successful aging: criteria for aging well in the workplace. J Career Dev. 2006;33(2):156–177. doi:10.1177/0894845306292533
  • Kooij DTAM, Tims M, Kanfer R. Successful Aging at Work: the Role of Job Crafting. In: Bal PM, Kooij DTAM, Rousseau DM, editors. Aging Workers and the Employee-Employer Relationship. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015:145–161.
  • Zacher H. Successful Aging at Work. Work Aging Retirement. 2015;1(1):4–25. doi:10.1093/workar/wau006
  • Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ. Sources of Conflict Between Work and Family Roles. Acad Manage Rev. 1985;10(1):76–88. doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4277352
  • Kulik L. Work–home conflict, antecedents and outcomes: a life-stage perspective among working parents. Career Dev Int. 2019;24(3):257–274. doi:10.1108/CDI-06-2018-0177
  • Zheng J, Guangdong W. Work-family conflict, perceived organizational support and professional commitment: a mediation mechanism for Chinese project professionals. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:344. doi:10.3390/ijerph15020344
  • Lloyd CJ, Kwok R, Yip PSF. A Scenario analysis of future hong kong age and labour force profiles and its implications. J Royal Statistical Soc Series A. 2019;182(3):863–886. doi:10.1111/rssa.12428
  • Zaniboni S, Truxillo D, Fraccaroli F. Differential effects of task variety and skill variety on burnout and turnover intentions for older and younger workers. Eur J Work Org Psychol. 2013;22(3):306–317. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.782288
  • Fasbender U, Wöhrmann AM, Wang M, Klehe U-C. Is the future still open? The mediating role of occupational future time perspective in the effects of career adaptability and aging experience on late career planning. J Vocat Behav. 2019;111:24–38. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.006
  • Hcy H, Yeung DY. Effects of occupational future time perspective on managing stressful work situations. Int J Psychol. 2016;51(4):261–268. doi:10.1002/ijop.12144
  • Froehlich DE, Beausaert S, Segers M. Aging and the motivation to stay employable. J Managerial Psychol. 2016;31(3):756–770. doi:10.1108/JMP-08-2014-0224
  • Hanscom ME, Cleveland JN. The influence of successful aging at work upon simulated performance decisions. Work Aging Retirement. 2018;4(2):129–144. doi:10.1093/workar/wax021
  • Sippli K, Schmalzried P, Rieger M, Voelter-Mahlknecht S. Challenges arising for older workers from participating in a workplace intervention addressing work ability: a qualitative study from Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021;94. doi:10.1007/s00420-020-01639-x
  • Allen TD. Family-Supportive Work Environments: the Role of Organizational Perceptions. J Vocat Behav. 2001;58(3):414–435. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1774
  • Leslie LM, Manchester CF, Park T-Y, Mehng SIA. Flexible work practices: a source of career premiums or penalties? Acad Manage J. 2012;55(6):1407–1428. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0651
  • Namasivayam K, Zhao X. An investigation of the moderating effects of organizational commitment on the relationships between work–family conflict and job satisfaction among hospitality employees in India. Tourism Manage. 2007;28(5):1212–1223. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2006.09.021
  • Tonelli MJ, Pereira J, Cepellos V, Lins J. Ageing in organizations. RAUSP Manage J. 2020;55(2):127–142. doi:10.1108/RAUSP-08-2018-0062
  • Piszczek M, Pimputkar A. Student. Flexible Schedules across Working Lives: age-specific Effects on Well-being and Work. J Appl Psychol. 2020;106. doi:10.1037/apl0000844
  • Sun F, Li X, Akhtar M. Negative influences of differentiated empowering leadership on team members’ helping behaviors: the mediating effects of envy and contempt. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:9–20. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S346470
  • Rasool S, Samma M, Wang M, Zhao Y, Zhang Y. How human resource management practices translate into sustainable organizational performance: the mediating role of product, process and knowledge innovation. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:1009–1025. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S204662
  • Volkova T. Translation model, translation analysis, translation strategy: an integrated methodology. Procedia Social Behav Sci. 2014;154:301–304. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.167
  • Carlson D, Kacmar K, Williams L. Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. J Vocat Behav. 2000;56:249–276. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1713
  • Taneva S, Yankov G. A new perspective to measuring employee growth: developing a successful aging at work scale. Personnel Assess Decisions. 2020;6:48–62. doi:10.25035/pad.2020.01.005
  • Kulik CT, Perera S, Cregan C. Engage me: the mature-age worker and stereotype threat. Acad Manage J. 2016;59(6):2132–2156. doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0564
  • Zacher H, Frese M. Remaining time and opportunities at work: relationships between age, work characteristics, and occupational future time perspective. Psychol Aging. 2009;24:487–493. doi:10.1037/a0015425
  • Hornung S, Rousseau D, Glaser J. Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93:655–664. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.655
  • Richardson HA, Simmering MJ, Sturman MC. A tale of three perspectives: examining post hoc statistical techniques for detection and correction of common method variance. Org Res Methods. 2009;12(4):762–800. doi:10.1177/1094428109332834
  • Yeung GTY, Fung HH. Social support and life satisfaction among Hong Kong Chinese older adults: family first? Eur J Ageing. 2007;4(4):219–227. doi:10.1007/s10433-007-0065-1
  • Armstrong-Stassen M, Ursel ND. Perceived organizational support, career satisfaction, and the retention of older workers. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2009;82(1):201–220. doi:10.1348/096317908X288838
  • Cheung F, Yeung DY, Wu AMS. Occupational future time perspective and successful aging at work. J Career Dev. 2017;46(1):3–16. doi:10.1177/0894845317696805
  • Barnett RC, Gareis KC, Gordon JR, Brennan RT. Usable flexibility, employees’ concerns about elders, gender, and job withdrawal. Psychol Manager J. 2009;12(1):50–71. doi:10.1080/10887150802665356
  • Treadway DC, Duke AB, Perrewé PL, Breland JW, Goodman JM. Time may change me: the impact of future time perspective on the relationship between work–family demands and employee commitment. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2011;41(7):1659–1679. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00777.x
  • Alcover C-M, Topa G. Work characteristics, motivational orientations, psychological work ability and job mobility intentions of older workers. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195973
  • Allen J, Alpass F, Szabó Á, Stephens C. Impact of flexible work arrangements on key challenges to work engagement among older workers. Work Aging Retirement. 2021;7. doi:10.1093/workar/waab010
  • Bal PM, Boehm SA. How do i-deals influence client satisfaction? The role of exhaustion, collective commitment, and age diversity. J Manage. 2017;45(4):1461–1487. doi:10.1177/0149206317710722
  • Bal PM, De Lange AH. From flexibility human resource management to employee engagement and perceived job performance across the lifespan: a multisample study. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2015;88(1):126–154. doi:10.1111/joop.12082
  • Cahill KE, James JB, Pitt-Catsouphes M. The Impact of a Randomly Assigned Time and Place Management Initiative on Work and Retirement Expectations. Work Aging Retirement. 2015;1(4):350–368. doi:10.1093/workar/wav012
  • Kilroy S, Van de Voorde K, Kooij D, van den Dungen S. Engaging older workers: the role of a supportive psychological climate. J Org Effectiveness. 2022;9(2):336–351. doi:10.1108/JOEPP-04-2021-0097
  • Masuda AD, Poelmans SAY, Allen TD, et al. Flexible Work arrangements availability and their relationship with work-to-family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: a comparison of three country clusters. Appl Psychol. 2012;61(1):1–29. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00453.x
  • Hammer L, Kossek E, Anger WK, Bodner T, Zimmerman K. Clarifying work-family intervention processes: the roles of work-family conflict and family-supportive supervisor behaviors. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96:134–150. doi:10.1037/a0020927