209
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of 20-Item Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (C-ZTPI-20) in Chinese Adolescent Population

, , &
Pages 1271-1282 | Received 23 Aug 2023, Accepted 05 Mar 2024, Published online: 19 Mar 2024

References

  • Worrell F, Temple E, Mckay M, et al. A theoretical approach to resolving the psychometric problems associated with the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory: results from the USA, Australia, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2016;34:1–12. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000313
  • Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: a valid, reliable individual-differences metric. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1999;77(6):1271–1288. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271
  • Kuan TYJ, Zhang LF. Educating students about time perspective and its effect on subjective well-being. Educ Psychol. 2022;42(5):644–668. doi:10.1080/01443410.2022.2060496
  • Fong CJ, Kim YW. A clash of constructs? Re-examining grit in light of academic buoyancy and future time perspective. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(4):1824–1837. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-0120-4
  • Jin H, Wang W, Lan X. Peer Attachment and Academic Procrastination in Chinese College Students: a moderated mediation model of future time perspective and grit. Front Psychol. 2019;10:2645. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02645
  • Diaconu-Gherasim LR, Mardari CR. Personality traits and time perspectives: implications for Adolescents’ mental health and mental illness. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(1):101–124. doi:10.1007/s10902-021-00390-5
  • Li X, Wang C, Lyu H, Worrell FC, Mello ZR. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(16):13547–13559. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02622-6
  • Stolarski M, Matthews G. Time perspectives predict mood states and satisfaction with life over and above personality. Curr Psychol. 2016;35(4):516–526. doi:10.1007/s12144-016-9515-2
  • Lee HJ, Lee DH, Lee DH. South Korean short version of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(4):3001–3010. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01591-0
  • Micillo L, Rioux PA, Mendoza E, et al. Time perspective predicts levels of anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 outbreak: a cross-cultural study. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0269396. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269396
  • Chan SM, Kwok WW, Fung TW. Psychometric properties of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory in Hong Kong adolescents. Time Soc. 2019;28(1):33–49. doi:10.1177/0961463X16678250
  • Sircova A, van de Vijver FJR, Osin E, et al. A global look at time: a 24-country study of the equivalence of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):2158244013515686. doi:10.1177/2158244013515686
  • Orkibi H. Psychometric properties of the Hebrew short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Eval Health Prof. 2015;38(2):219–245. doi:10.1177/0163278714531601
  • Laghi F, Baiocco R, Liga F, Guarino A, Baumgartner E. Identity status differences among Italian adolescents: associations with time perspective. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2013;35(3):482–487. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.12.018
  • Orosz G, Dombi E, Tóth-Király I, Roland-Lévy C. The less is more: the 17-item Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Curr Psychol. 2017;36(1):39–47. doi:10.1007/s12144-015-9382-2
  • Wang Y, Chen XJ, Ji-fang C, Liu L. Testing the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in the Chinese context. PsyCh J. 2015;4(3):166–175. doi:10.1002/pchj.103
  • Fieulaine N, Martinez F. Time under control: time perspective and desire for control in substance use. Addict Behav. 2010;35(8):799–802. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.03.022
  • Zhang JW, Howell RT, Bowerman T. Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Time Soc. 2013;22(3):391–409. doi:10.1177/0961463X12441174
  • Borsboom D, Deserno MK, Rhemtulla M, et al. Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nat Rev Method Primers. 2021;1(58). doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w
  • Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: a tutorial paper. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50(1):195–212. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
  • Briganti G, Scutari M, Linkowski P. Network structures of symptoms from the Zung Depression Scale. Psychol Rep. 2020. doi:10.31234/osf.io/dpwb2
  • Mi W, Gou Z, Ma Z. Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the 10-Item Social Provisions Scale in Chinese Populations. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2023. doi:10.1007/s10862-023-10047-7
  • Soto C, John O. The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2017;113(1):117–143. doi:10.1037/pspp0000096
  • Zhang B, Li YM, Li J, et al. The Big Five Inventory–2 in China: a comprehensive psychometric evaluation in four diverse samples. Assessment. 2022;29(6):1262–1284. doi:10.1177/10731911211008245
  • Duckworth AL, Peterson C, Matthews MD, Kelly DR. Grit: perseverance and passion for long-term goals. J Personal Soc Psychol. 2007;92(6):1087–1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  • Li J, Zhao Y, Kong F, Du S, Yang S, Wang S. Psychometric assessment of the Short Grit Scale among Chinese adolescents. J Psychoeducat Assess. 2018;36(3):291–296. doi:10.1177/0734282916674858
  • Duckworth AL, Quinn PD. Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (Grit–S). J Personal Assess. 2009;91(2):166–174. doi:10.1080/00223890802634290
  • Keyes CLM, Wissing M, Potgieter JP, Temane M, Kruger A, van Rooy S. Evaluation of the mental health continuum–short form (MHC–SF) in setswana-speaking South Africans. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008;15(3):181. doi:10.1002/cpp.572
  • Yu B. Validation of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) in Chinese Adolescents [ Master]. Yunnan Normal University; 2017.
  • Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Routledge; 1988. doi:10.4324/9780203771587
  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structur Equat Model. 2002;9(2):233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
  • Williams DR. Bayesian estimation for Gaussian Graphical Models: structure learning, predictability, and network comparisons. Multivar Behav Res. 2021;56(2):336–352. doi:10.1080/00273171.2021.1894412
  • Williams DR, Mulder J. BGGM: Bayesian Gaussian Graphical Models in R. J Open Source Software. 2020;5(51):2111. doi:10.21105/joss.02111
  • McNeish D, Wolf MG. Thinking twice about sum scores. Behav Res Methods. 2020;52(6):2287–2305. doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0
  • Keough KA, Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Who’s smoking, drinking, and using drugs? Time perspective as a predictor of substance use. Basic and Appl Soc Psychol. 1999;21(2):149–164. doi:10.1207/S15324834BA210207
  • Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, 2nd Ed. The Guilford Press; 2015:xvii, 462.
  • Akirmak U. The validity and reliability of the Zimbardo time perspective inventory in a Turkish sample. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(5):2327–2340. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-0153-3
  • Košťál J, Klicperová-Baker M, Lukavská K, Lukavský J. Short version of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI–short) with and without the Future-Negative scale, verified on nationally representative samples. Time Soc. 2016;25(2):169–192. doi:10.1177/0961463X15577254
  • Carelli MG, Wiberg B, Wiberg M. Development and construct validation of the Swedish Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2011;27(4):220–227. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000076