A Self-Categorization Perspective of Idiosyncratic Deals and Creativity: Mediating Role of Perceived Insider Status and Moderating Role of Psychological Safety

References

• Amabile TM, Conti R, Coon H, et al. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Acad Manage J. 1996;39(5):1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM. I‐Deals: idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Personnel Psychol. 2006;59(3):759–761. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00052_7.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JT, Hsieh HH. Supervisors as good coaches: influences of coaching on employees’ in-role behaviors and proactive career behaviors. Int J Human Resour Manage. 2015;26(1):42–58. doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.940993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Liu Y, Shalley CE. Idiosyncratic deals and employee creativity: the mediating role of creative self-efficacy. Human Resour Manage. 2018;57(6):1443–1453. doi:10.1002/hrm.21917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldmeadow AJ, Platow JM, Foddy M, et al. Self-Categorization, status, and social influence. Social Psychol Quar. 2003;66(2):138–152. doi:10.2307/1519844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg MA. Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: a motivational theory of social identity processes. Eur Rev Social Psychol. 2000;11(1):223–255. doi:10.1080/14792772043000040
   Google Scholar
• Xiong ZC, Samuel A. Delegation and employee work outcomes: an examination of the cultural context of mediating processes in China. Academy of Manage J. 2007;50(1):226–238. doi:10.2307/20159849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Chu X, Ni J. Leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior: a new perspective from perceived insider status and Chinese traditionality. Front Business Res China. 2010;4(1):148–169. doi:10.1007/s11782-010-0007-1
   Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Medeiros KE, Partlow PJ. Creative thinking: processes, strategies, and knowledge. J Creat Behav. 2012;46(1):30–47. doi:10.1002/jocb.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. Diff Between Social Group. 1978;24(1):285–295. doi:10.2307/1232310
   Google Scholar
• Liao C, Wayne SJ, Rousseau DM. Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: a qualitative and meta-analytical review. J Organizational Behav. 2016;37(1):9–29. doi:10.1002/job.1959
   Google Scholar
• Peng ZL, Zhao HD. Research of effect to team innovation performance from team chaxu climate based on knowledge transfer perspective. Stud Sci. 2011;12(1):121–137. doi:10.2991/iemi-14.2014.56
   Google Scholar
• Masterson SS, Stamper CL. Perceived Organizational Membership: an Aggregate Framework Representing the Employee-organization Relationship. J Organizational Behav. 2003;24(5):473–490. doi:10.1002/job.203
   Google Scholar
• Stamper CL, Masterson SS. Insider or outsider? How employee perceptions of insider status affect their work behavior. J Organizational Behav. 2002;23(8):875–894. doi:10.1002/job.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogg MA, Terry DJ. Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational context. Acad Manage Rev. 2000;25(1):121–140. doi:10.2307/259266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorich DP, Gash TB, Stalker KL, et al. Exploring the cognitive foundations of the shared attention mechanism: evidence for a relationship between self-categorization and shared attention across the autism spectrum. J Autism and Developl Disord. 2017;47(5):1341–1353. doi:10.1007/s10803-017-3049-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai L, Rousseau DM, Chang KTT. Idiosyncratic deals: coworkers as Interested Third Parties. J Appl Psychol. 2009;94(2):547–556. doi:10.1037/a0013506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng TWH. Can idiosyncratic deals promote perceptions of competitive climate, felt ostracism, and turnover? J Vocational Behav. 2017;99(4):118–131. doi:10.1037/a0013506
   Google Scholar
• Kahn WA. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad Manage J. 1990;33(4):692–724. doi:10.2307/256287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon MA, Salleh R, Mirza MZ, et al. Satisfaction matters: the relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. Intern J Manpower. 2020;42(1):21–50. doi:10.1108/ijm-04-2018-0127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiul MK, Mohamed AE, Patwary AK, et al. Linking human resources practices to employee engagement in the hospitality industry: the mediating influences of psychological safety, availability and meaningfulness. Eur J Manage Business Economic. 2023;32(2):223–240. doi:10.1108/EJMBE-12-2020-0347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coutifaris CGV, Grant AM. Taking your team behind the curtain: the effects of leader feedback-sharing and feedback-seeking on team psychological safety. Organ Sci. 2022;33(4):1574–1598. doi:10.1287/ORSC.2021.1498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh T, Kim MJ, Hong Y. Does servant leadership decrease bad behaviors? The mediating role of psychological safety and the moderating effect of corporate social responsibility. Sustainability. 2023;15(22):15901. doi:10.3390/SU152215901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung S, Rousseau DM, Glaser J, et al. Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. J Appl Psychol. 2008;93(3):655–664. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau DM, Ho VT, Greenberg J; Greenberg. I-deals: idiosyncratic terms in employment relationships. Acad Manage Rev. 2006;31(3):977–994. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2009.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Hornung S, Rousseau DM, Glaser J. Why supervisors make idiosyncratic deals: antecedents and outcomes of i-deals from a managerial perspective. J Manage Psychol. 2009;24(8):738–764. doi:10.1108/02683940910996770
   Google Scholar
• Chen C, Zhang X, Sun L, et al. Trust is valued in proportion to its rarity? Investigating how and when feeling trusted leads to counterproductive work behavior. Acta Psychol Sinica. 2020;52(3):329–344. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00329
   Google Scholar
• Rouzi A, Wang Y. Feeling trusted and taking-charge behaviour: an internal branding perspective based on self-categorization theory. Int J Hospitality Manage. 2021;94:102831. doi:10.1016/J.IJHM.2020.102831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao H, Liu D, Loi R. Looking at Both Sides of the social exchange coin: a social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Acad Manage J. 2010;53(5):1090–1109. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2010.54533207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornung S, Rousseau DM, Glaser J, et al. Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. J Organizational Behav. 2010;31(2):187–215. doi:10.1002/job.625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, et al. Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell. 1987;1987:1.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel H. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. Psychol Intergroup Relation. 1986;1986:7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JC Social categorization and the self-concept: a social cognitive theory of group behavior. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JC. Social influence[M]. Cole Publishing Co. 1991;1991:1.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Kessel M, Kratzer J. Supervisor–subordinate relationship, differentiation, and employee creativity: a self ‐ categorization perspective. J Creat Behav. 2014;48(3):165–184. doi:10.1002/jocb.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin J, Taylor MS, Seo MG. Resources for change: the relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(3):727–748. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui C, Lee C, Wang H. Organizational inducements and employee citizenship behavior: the mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of collectivism. Human Resour Manage. 2015;54(3):439–456. doi:10.1002/hrm.21620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang J, Farh CIC, Farh JL. Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examination. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(1):71–92. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plester BA, Lloyd R. Happiness Is “being yourself”: psychological safety and fun in hybrid work. Admin Sci. 2023;13(10):218. doi:10.3390/ADMSCI13100218
   Google Scholar
• Radu C, Deaconu A, Kis IA, et al. New ways to perform: employees perspective on remote work and psychological security in the post-pandemic era. Sustainability. 2023;15(7):5952. doi:10.3390/SU15075952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman A, Donohue R, Eva N. Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Human Resource Manage Review. 2017;27(3):521–535. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson AC, Lei Z. Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2014;1(1):23–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305
   Google Scholar
• Sumathipala S. Trust and psychological safety in a virtual healthcare team. World Family Med. 2020;18(9):53–57. doi:10.5742/MEWFM.2020.93855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyhn B, Bang H, Sverdrup TE, et al. Safe among the unsafe: psychological safety climate strength matters for team performance. Small Group Res. 2023;54(4):439–473. doi:10.1177/10464964221121273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Wan Z, Wang L. Cross-level research on the impact of self-serving leadership on employee innovation behavior: the roles of workplace anxiety and team psychological safety. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;13:1069022. doi:10.3389/FPSYG.2022.1069022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer SM, Kung-mcintyre TK, Kung-McIntyre K. Employee creativity in Taiwan: an application of role identity theory. Acad Manage J. 2003;46(5):618–630. doi:10.1108/CMS-08-2018-0640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jane Y. The role of organizational variables in predicting service effectiveness: an analysis of a multilevel model. Res Soc Work Pract. 2016;15(4):267–277. doi:10.1177/1049731505275868
   Google Scholar
• Ray WD. Multiple regression and analysis of variance. J Oper Res Soc. 2017;28(3):611–612. doi:10.2307/3150424
   Google Scholar
• Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. J Person Soc Psychol. 1986;51(8):1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang L, Preacher KJ. Moderated mediation analysis using bayesian methods. Struct Equ Modeling. 2015;22(2):249–263. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.935256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjornson FO, Dingsoyr T. Knowledge management in software engineering: a systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used. Inf Software Technol. 2008;50(11):1055–1068. doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2008.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards JR, Lambert LS. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods. 2007;12(1):1–22. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter P. Remote working in research: an increasing usage of flexible work arrangements can improve productivity and creativity. EMBO Rep. 2019;20(1):e47435. doi:10.15252/embr.201847435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J. When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(3):413. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal PM, Boehm SA. How do i-deals influence client satisfaction? The role of exhaustion, collective commitment, and age diversity. J Manage. 2019;45(4):1461–1487. doi:10.1177/0149206317710722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Sun H, Zhu P, et al. How do developmental I-deals promote team creativity: the role of team creative-efficacy and error management atmosphere. Chine Manage Stud. 2022;18(1):196–209. doi:10.1108/CMS-06-2022-0218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei QJ, Duan JY, Fan TW. A new perspective of researching the relationship between employee and organization: idiosyncratic deals. Adv Psych Sci. 2010;10:1601–1605. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1087.2010.02828
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Harris TB, Boswell WR, et al. The role of organizational insiders developmental feedback and proactive personality on newcomers performance: an interactionist perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(6):1317–1327. doi:10.1037/a0024029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Lee C, Hui C, et al. Idiosyncratic deals and employee outcomes: the mediating roles of social exchange and self-enhancement and the moderating role of individualism. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(5):832–840. doi:10.1037/a0032571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar