Effects of Exercise Habits and Gender on Sports e-Learning Behavior: Evidence from an Eye-Tracking Study

References

• Mouratidis K, Papagiannakis A. COVID-19, internet, and mobility: the rise of telework, telehealth, e-learning, and e-shopping. Sustainable Cities Soc. 2021;74:103182. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.103182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Arimi AM. Distance learning. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;152:82–88. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.159
   Google Scholar
• Cidral WA, Oliveira T, Di Felice M, Aparicio M. E-learning success determinants: Brazilian empirical study. Comput Educ. 2018;122:273–290. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun P-C, Cheng HK. The design of instructional multimedia in e-learning: a media richness theory-based approach. Comput Educ. 2007;49(3):662–676. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leser R, Baca A, Uhlig J. Effectiveness of multimedia-supported education in practical sports courses. J Sports Sci Med. 2011;10(1):184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtscher J, Burtscher M, Millet GP. Indoor) isolation, stress, and physical inactivity: vicious circles accelerated by COVID‐19? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(8):1544. doi:10.1111/sms.13706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang S, Chen H, Wang L, Lu T, Yan J. The relationship between physical exercise and negative emotions in college students in the post-epidemic era: the mediating role of emotion regulation self-efficacy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(19):12166. doi:10.3390/ijerph191912166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong HM. Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: current developments, problems and opportunities. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;55:1185–1193. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangshor NNA, Ibrahim S, Sabri N, Kamaruddin SA. Students’ learning habit factors during COVID-19 pandemic using multilayer perceptron (MLP). Internat J Advan Technol Engin Explorat. 2021;8(74):190. doi:10.19101/IJATEE.2020.S1762140
   Google Scholar
• Aparicio M, Bacao F, Oliveira T. Grit in the path to e-learning success. Comput Human Behav. 2017;66:388–399. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malureanu A, Panisoara G, Lazar I. The relationship between self-confidence, self-efficacy, grit, usefulness, and ease of use of elearning platforms in corporate training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability. 2021;13(12):6633. doi:10.3390/su13126633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer RE. Searching for the role of emotions in e-learning. Learn Instruction. 2020;70:101213. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jastrow F, Greve S, Thumel M, Diekhoff H, Süßenbach J. Digital technology in physical education: a systematic review of research from 2009 to 2020. Germ J Exerc Sport Res. 2022;52(4):504–528. doi:10.1007/s12662-022-00848-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çebi A, Araújo RD, Brusilovsky P. Do individual characteristics affect online learning behaviors? An analysis of learners sequential patterns. J Res Technol Educ. 2023;55(4):663–683. doi:10.1080/15391523.2022.2027301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y-H H. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the online learning behaviors of university students in Taiwan. Educat Inform Technol. 2022;27(1):469–491. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10677-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L-Y L, Tsai -C-C. Accessing online learning material: quantitative behavior patterns and their effects on motivation and learning performance. Comput Educ. 2017;114:286–297. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windschitl M. Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: an analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Rev Educ Res. 2002;72(2):131–175. doi:10.3102/00346543072002131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau D. Unreflective actions? Complex motor skill acquisition to enhance spatial cognition. Phenomenol Cognit Sci. 2015;14(2):349–359. doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9376-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppici L, Panchuk D. Specific and general transfer of perceptual-motor skills and learning between sports: a systematic review. Psychol Sport Exercise. 2022;59:102118. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.102118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameen N, Willis R, Abdullah MN, Shah M. Towards the successful integration of e‐learning systems in higher education in Iraq: a student perspective. Brit J Educat Technol. 2019;50(3):1434–1446. doi:10.1111/bjet.12651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrati N, Bouchrika I, Tari A, Ladjailia A. Exploring user satisfaction for e-learning systems via usage-based metrics and system usability scale analysis. Comput Human Behav. 2016;61:463–471. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Y, Dai Z-X, Zhao X-H, Fei M-M, Gan W-T. Exploring an on-line course applicability assessment to assist learners in course selection and learning effectiveness improving in e-learning. Learn Individual Differences. 2017;60:56–62. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maatuk AM, Elberkawi EK, Aljawarneh S, Rashaideh H, Alharbi H. The COVID-19 pandemic and E-learning: challenges and opportunities from the perspective of students and instructors. J Comput High Educ. 2022;34(1):21–38. doi:10.1007/s12528-021-09274-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Calvo G, Barba-Martín RA, Bores-García D, Hortigüela-Alcalá D. The (virtual) teaching of physical education in times of pandemic. Europ Phys Educat Rev. 2022;28(1):205–224. doi:10.1177/1356336X211031533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iuliano E, Mazzilli M, Zambelli S, Macaluso F, Raviolo P, Picerno P. Satisfaction levels of sport sciences university students in online workshops for substituting practice-oriented activities during the COVID-19 Lockdown. Educ Sci. 2021;11(10):600. doi:10.3390/educsci11100600
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka I, Von Krogh G. Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organ Sci. 2009;20(3):635–652. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong C-S, Lai J-Y. Gender differences in perceptions and relationships among dominants of e-learning acceptance. Comput Hum Behav. 2006;22(5):816–829. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay RH. Examining gender differences in attitudes toward interactive classroom communications systems (ICCS). Comput Educ. 2009;52(4):730–740. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Z, Deng X. A meta-analysis of gender differences in e-learners’ self-efficacy, satisfaction, motivation, attitude, and performance across the world. Front Psychol. 2022;13:897327. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad A, Hassan R, Aremu AY, Hussain A, Lodhi RN. Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Qual Quantity. 2021;55:805–826. doi:10.1007/s11135-020-01028-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capranica L, Piacentini MF, Halson S, Myburgh KH, Ogasawara E, Millard-Stafford M. The gender gap in sport performance: equity influences equality. Internat J Sports Physiol Perform. 2013;8(1):99–103. doi:10.1123/ijspp.8.1.99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goda Y, Yamada M, Kato H, Matsuda T, Saito Y, Miyagawa H. Procrastination and other learning behavioral types in e-learning and their relationship with learning outcomes. Learn Individual Differences. 2015;37:72–80. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon M, Lee J, Jo I-H. Video learning analytics: investigating behavioral patterns and learner clusters in video-based online learning. Int Higher Educ. 2021;50:100806. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang Y-M, Mallipeddi R, Lee S, Kwak H-W, Lee M. Human intention recognition based on eyeball movement pattern and pupil size variation. Neurocomputing. 2014;128:421–432. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2013.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein MK, Guerra-Carrillo B, Singley ATM, Bunge SA. Beyond eye gaze: what else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Develop Cognit Neurosci. 2017;25:69–91. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibaldi A, Vanegas M, Bex PJ, Maiello G. Evaluation of the Tobii EyeX Eye tracking controller and Matlab toolkit for research. Behavior Research Methods. 2017;49:923–946. doi:10.3758/s13428-016-0762-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, Lai M-L, Chuang -H-H. Using eye-tracking technology to investigate the redundant effect of multimedia web pages on viewers’ cognitive processes. Comput Hum Behav. 2011;27(6):2410–2417. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheval B, Miller MW, Orsholits D, Berry T, Sander D, Boisgontier MP. Physically active individuals look for more: an eye‐tracking study of attentional bias. Psychophysiology. 2020;57(6):e13582. doi:10.1111/psyp.13582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargezeh BA, Tavakoli N, Daliri MR. Gender-based eye movement differences in passive indoor picture viewing: an eye-tracking study. Physiol Behav. 2019;206:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.03.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai M-J, Hou H-T, Lai M-L, Liu W-Y, Yang F-Y. Visual attention for solving multiple-choice science problem: an eye-tracking analysis. Comput Educ. 2012;58(1):375–385. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2003;35(8):1381–1395. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew KF, Cheung WS. Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review. 2014;12:45–58. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paas FG. Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84(4):429. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi -H-H, Van Merriënboer JJ, Paas F. Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load. Educ Psychol Rev. 2014;26:225–244. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wermeskerken M, Ravensbergen S, Van Gog T. Effects of instructor presence in video modeling examples on attention and learning. Comput Human Behav. 2018;89:430–438. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist K, Örbom SL, Hooge IT, et al. Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline. Behavior Research Methods. 2023;55(1):364–416. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis. Curr Direct Psycholog Sci. 1992;1(3):98–101. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
   Google Scholar
• Ingram TG, Kraeutner SN, Solomon JP, Westwood DA, Boe SG. Skill acquisition via motor imagery relies on both motor and perceptual learning. Behav Neurosci. 2016;130(2):252. doi:10.1037/bne0000126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wang S, Shi F-Y, et al. The effect of motor imagery with specific implement in expert badminton player. Neuroscience. 2014;275:102–112. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang -L-L, Y-L P, Shen C, et al. Expertise-level-dependent functionally plastic changes during motor imagery in basketball players. Neuroscience. 2018;380:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.03.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozel S, Larue J, Molinaro C. Relation between sport and spatial imagery: comparison of three groups of participants. J Psychol. 2004;138(1):49–64. doi:10.3200/JRLP.138.1.49-64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Herold F, Becker B, et al. Cognitive benefits of exercise interventions: an fMRI activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Brain Struct Funct. 2021;226:601–619. doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02247-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J. The influence of motor expertise on the brain activity of motor task performance: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Cognit Affective Behav Neurosci. 2015;15:381–394. doi:10.3758/s13415-014-0329-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraeutner SN, Keeler LT, Boe SG. Motor imagery-based skill acquisition disrupted following rTMS of the inferior parietal lobule. Exp Brain Res. 2016;234:397–407. doi:10.1007/s00221-015-4472-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu D, Gao Y, Miao D. Using an eye tracker to measure information processing according to need for cognition level. Soc Behav Personal. 2018;46(11):1869–1880. doi:10.2224/sbp.7316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Stasi LL, Antolí A, Cañas JJ. Main sequence: an index for detecting mental workload variation in complex tasks. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(6):807–813. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogusoy-Taylan B, Cagiltay K. Cognitive analysis of experts’ and novices’ concept mapping processes: an eye tracking study. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;36:82–93. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brams S, Ziv G, Levin O, et al. The relationship between gaze behavior, expertise, and performance: a systematic review. Psychol Bull. 2019;145(10):980–1027. doi:10.1037/bul0000207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde JP, Healy AF. Learning of nondomain facts in high-and low-knowledge domains. J Exp Psychol. 2001;27(5):1160. doi:10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1160
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Duffy MC, Lajoie SP, Zheng J, Lachapelle K. Using eye tracking to examine expert-novice differences during simulated surgical training: a case study. Comput Human Behav. 2023;144:107720. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegenfurtner A, Lehtinen E, Säljö R. Expertise differences in the comprehension of visualizations: a meta-analysis of eye-tracking research in professional domains. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011;23(4):523–552. doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9174-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laeng B, Sirois S, Gredebäck G. Pupillometry: a window to the preconscious? Perspectives Psychol Sci. 2012;7(1):18–27. doi:10.1177/1745691611427305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller J, Van Merrienboer JJ, Paas FG. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev. 1998;251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanjers IA, Van Gog T, van Merriënboer JJ. A theoretical analysis of how segmentation of dynamic visualizations optimizes students’ learning. Educ Psychol Rev. 2010;22:411–423. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9135-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Li H, Umer W, et al. Identification and classification of construction equipment operators’ mental fatigue using wearable eye-tracking technology. Autom Constr. 2020;109:103000. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.103000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Cutsem J, Van Schuerbeek P, Pattyn N, et al. A drop in cognitive performance, whodunit? Subjective mental fatigue, brain deactivation or increased parasympathetic activity? It’s complicated! Cortex. 2022;155:30–45. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipas L, Martin K, Northey JM, La Torre A, Keegan R, Rattray B. A 4-week endurance training program improves tolerance to mental exertion in untrained individuals. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(12):1215–1219. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2020.04.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DM, Graham JD, Innes KI, Harris S, Flemington A, Bray SR. Effects of prior cognitive exertion on physical performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50:497–529. doi:10.1007/s40279-019-01204-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang P-S, Chen H-C. Gender differences in eye movements in solving text-and-diagram science problems. Internat J Sci Mathemat Educ. 2016;14:327–346. doi:10.1007/s10763-015-9644-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang K-E, Zhang J, Huang Y-S, Liu T-C, Sung Y-T. Applying augmented reality in physical education on motor skills learning. Interact Learn Envi. 2020;28(6):685–697. doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1636073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet G, Geary DC. The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychol Sci. 2018;29(4):581–593. doi:10.1177/0956797617741719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer J. The reality and evolutionary significance of human psychological sex differences. Biol Rev. 2019;94(4):1381–1415. doi:10.1111/brv.12507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett KA, Camba JD. Gender differences in spatial ability: a critical review. Educ Psychol Rev. 2023;35(1):8. doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09728-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabowska A. Sex on the brain: are gender‐dependent structural and functional differences associated with behavior? J Neurosci Res. 2017;95(1–2):200–212. doi:10.1002/jnr.23953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleman A, Bronk E, Kessels RP, Koppeschaar HP, van Honk J. A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2004;29(5):612–617. doi:10.1016/S0306-4530(03)00089-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koscik T, O’Leary D, Moser DJ, Andreasen NC, Nopoulos P. Sex differences in parietal lobe morphology: relationship to mental rotation performance. Brain Cognit. 2009;69(3):451–459. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe A. Doubling mental rotation scores in high school students: effects of motivational and strategic trainings. Learn Instruction. 2021;74:101461. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DI, Halpern DF. The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trend Cognit Sci. 2014;18(1):37–45. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttal DH, Meadow NG, Tipton E, et al. The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol Bull. 2013;139(2):352. doi:10.1037/a0028446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rekik G, Khacharem A, Belkhir Y, Bali N, Jarraya M. The instructional benefits of dynamic visualizations in the acquisition of basketball tactical actions. J Comput Assist Learn. 2019;35(1):74–81. doi:10.1111/jcal.12312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentschel T, Heilman ME, Peus CV. The multiple dimensions of gender stereotypes: a current look at men’s and women’s characterizations of others and themselves. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Soidán JL, Leirós-Rodríguez R, Romo-Pérez V, Arufe-Giráldez V. Evolution of the habits of physical activity and television viewing in Spanish children and pre-adolescents between 1997 and 2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(18):6836. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186836
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo LIC, Wendt A, Dos Santos Costa C, et al. Gender inequalities in physical activity among adolescents from 64 Global South countries. J Sport Health Sci. 2022;11(4):509–520. doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2022.01.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bian L, Leslie S-J, Cimpian A. Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science. 2017;355:6323):389–391. doi:10.1126/science.aah6524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra P, Rey-Cao A, Camacho–Miñano MJ, Soler-Prat S. The gendered social representation of physical education and sport science higher education in Spain. Phys Educ Sport Pedag. 2022;27(4):382–395. doi:10.1080/17408989.2021.1879768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsyth J, Jones J, Duval L, Bambridge A. Opportunities and barriers that females face for study and employment in sport. J Hospital Leisu Sport Tour Educ. 2019;24:80–89. doi:10.1016/j.jhlste.2019.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Rosales E, Hernández-Martínez A, Sola-Rodríguez S, Esteban-Cornejo I, Soriano-Maldonado A. Representation of women in sport sciences research, publications, and editorial leadership positions: are we moving forward? J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(11):1093–1097. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2021.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kheloui S, Jacmin-Park S, Larocque O, et al. Sex/gender differences in cognitive abilities. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;2023:105333.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlova MA, Weber S, Simoes E, Sokolov AN. Gender stereotype susceptibility. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114802. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidrich C, Chiviacowsky S. Stereotype threat affects the learning of sport motor skills. Psychol Sport Exercise. 2015;18:42–46. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klomsten AT, Marsh HW, Skaalvik EM. Adolescents’ perceptions of masculine and feminine values in sport and physical education: a study of gender differences. Sex Roles. 2005;52:625–636. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3730-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar