608
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Longitudinal Examination of the Relationship Between Virtual Companionship and Social Anxiety: Emotional Expression as a Mediator and Mindfulness as a Moderator

ORCID Icon &
Pages 765-782 | Received 31 Oct 2023, Accepted 08 Feb 2024, Published online: 25 Feb 2024

References

  • Strohmann T, Siemon D, Khosrawi-Rad B, Robra-Bissantz S. Toward a design theory for virtual companionship. Hum-Comput Interact. 2023;38:194–234. doi:10.1080/07370024.2022.2084620
  • Gong JK, Firdaus A, Said F, Aksar IA, Danaee M, Xu JH. Pathways linking media use to wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mediated moderation study. Soc Media Soc. 2022;8:87390. doi:10.1177/20563051221087390
  • Aksar IA, Danaee M, Firdaus A, Gong JK. Moderating effect of gender between social media needs and psychological wellbeing: a case study of Pakistani adolescents. J Hum Behav Soc Envi. 2022;32(3):383–401. doi:10.1080/10911359.2021.1901823
  • Weeks JW, Heimberg RG, Rodebaugh TL. The fear of positive evaluation scale: assessing a proposed cognitive component of social anxiety. J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22:44–55. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.08.002
  • Liu XQ, Zhang YF, Gao WJ, Cao XJ. Developmental trajectories of depression, anxiety, and stress among college students: a piecewise growth mixture model analysis. Hum Soc Sci Commun. 2023;736:10. doi:10.1057/s41599-023-02252-2
  • Romano M, Moscovitch DA, Ma RF, Huppert JD. Social problem solving in social anxiety disorder. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;68:102152. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102152
  • Abdul-Ghani E, Kim J, Kwon J, Hyde KF, Cui YY. Love or like: gender effects in emotional expression in online reviews. Eur J Marketing. 2022;56:3592–3616. doi:10.1108/Ejm-01-2021-0064
  • Poon KT, Jiang YF. Getting less likes on social media: mindfulness ameliorates the detrimental effects of feeling left out online. Mindfulness. 2020;11:1038–1048. doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01313-w
  • Meynadier J, Malouff JM, Loi NM, Schutte NS. Lower mindfulness is associated with problematic social media use: a meta-analysis. Curr Psychol. 2023. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04587-0
  • Shabahang R, Aruguete MS, Shim H. Social media posting anxiety interpersonal trust, fear of negative evaluation, and hurt feeling proneness as predictors. J Media Psychol-Ger. 2022;34:49–54. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000300
  • Weeks JW, Heimberg RG, Rodebaugh TL, Norton PJ. Exploring the relationship between fear of positive evaluation and social anxiety. J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22:386–400. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.04.009
  • D’Alfonso S. AI in mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology. 2020;36:112–117. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.005
  • Cao XJ, Liu XQ. Artificial intelligence-assisted psychosis risk screening in adolescents: practices and challenges. World J Psychiatr. 2022;12:1287–1297. doi:10.5498/wjp.v12.i10.1287
  • Pack A, Maloney J. Using generative artificial intelligence for language education research: insights from using OpenAI’s chatgpt. TESOL Quart. 2023;57(4):1571–1582. doi:10.1002/tesq.3253
  • Cobb S. Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosom Med. 1976;38(5):300–314. doi:10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
  • Lee MS, Lee JJ, Park S, Kim S, Lee H. Is social support associated with postpartum depression, anxiety and perceived stress among Korean women within the first year postpartum? J Psychosom Obst Gyn. 2023;44:2231629. doi:10.1080/0167482x.2023.2231629
  • He S, Jiang SW, Zhu RL, Hu X. The influence of educational and emotional support on e-learning acceptance: an integration of social support theory and TAM. Educ Inf Technol. 2023;28:11145–11165. doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11648-1
  • Gross JJ. Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;74:224–237. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224
  • Slovak P, Antle A, Theofanopoulou N, Roquet CD, Gross J, Isbister K. Designing for emotion regulation interventions: an agenda for HCI theory and research. ACM T Comput-Hum Int. 2023;30. doi:10.1145/3569898
  • Miers AC, Sumter SR, Clark DM, Leigh E. Interpretation bias in online and offline social environments and associations with social anxiety, peer victimization, and avoidance behavior. Cognitive Ther Res. 2020;44:820–833. doi:10.1007/s10608-020-10097-1
  • Purdon C, Antony M, Monteiro S, Swinson RP. Social anxiety in college students. J Anxiety Disord. 2001;15:203–215. doi:10.1016/S0887-6185(01)00059-7
  • Kuckertz JM, Strege MV, Amir N. Intolerance for approach of ambiguity in social anxiety disorder. Cognition Emotion. 2017;31:747–754. doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1145105
  • Jensen D, Bruce LC, Heimberg RG, Matt LM, Morrison AS. Social anxiety and misinterpretation of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire subscale. J Cogn Psychother. 2016;30:168–176. doi:10.1891/0889-8391.30.3.168
  • Zhu DH, Deng ZZ. Effect of social anxiety on the adoption of robotic training partner. Cyberpsych Beh Soc N. 2021;24:343–348. doi:10.1089/cyber.2020.0179
  • Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, Yamada S. Do people with social anxiety feel anxious about interacting with a robot? Ai Soc. 2020;35:381–390. doi:10.1007/s00146-019-00889-9
  • Park G, Lee SY, Chung JY. Do anthropomorphic chatbots increase counseling satisfaction and reuse intention? The moderated mediation of social rapport and social anxiety. Cyberpsych Beh Soc N. 2023;26(5):357–365. doi:10.1089/cyber.2022.0157
  • Ali F, Zhang QY, Tauni MZ, Shahzad K. Social chatbot: my friend in my distress. Int J Hum-Comput Int. 2023. doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2150745
  • Hu B, Mao YY, Kim KJ. How social anxiety leads to problematic use of conversational AI: the roles of loneliness, rumination, and mind perception. Comput Hum Behav. 2023;145:107760. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107760
  • Marino C, Manari T, Vieno A, et al. Problematic social networking sites use and online social anxiety: the role of attachment, emotion dysregulation and motives. Addict Behav. 2023;138:107572. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107572
  • Hutchins N, Allen A, Curran M, Kannis-Dymand L. Social anxiety and online social interaction. Aust Psychol. 2021;56:142–153. doi:10.1080/00050067.2021.1890977
  • Wang L, Chen J The influence of fear of negative evaluation on consumers’ preference for AI services. 2022 2nd International Conference on Management Science and Software Engineering (ICMSSE 2022). Atlantis Press; 2013. 561–565.
  • Chang YC, Hsing YC. Emotion-infused deep neural network for emotionally resonant conversation. Appl Soft Comput. 2021;113:107861. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107861
  • Liu BJ, Sundar SS. Should machines express sympathy and empathy? Experiments with a health advice chatbot. Cyberpsych Beh Soc N. 2018;21:625–636. doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0110
  • Han ELZB, Yin DZ, Zhang H. Bots with feelings: should ai agents express positive emotion in customer service? Inform Syst Res. 2022. doi:10.1287/isre.2022.1179
  • Dijk C, Fischer AH, Morina N, van Eeuwijk C, van Kleef GA. Effects of social anxiety on emotional mimicry and contagion: feeling negative, but smiling politely. J Nonverbal Behav. 2018;42:81–99. doi:10.1007/s10919-017-0266-z
  • Spokas M, Luterek JA, Heimberg RG. Social anxiety and emotional suppression: the mediating role of beliefs. J Behav Ther Exp Psy. 2009;40:283–291. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.12.004
  • Kivity Y, Huppert JD. Emotional reactions to facial expressions in social anxiety: a meta-analysis of self-reports. Emot Rev. 2016;8:367–375. doi:10.1177/1754073915594436
  • Iani L, Lauriola M, Cafaro V, Didonna F. Dimensions of mindfulness and their relations with psychological well-being and neuroticism. Mindfulness. 2018;9:670–671. doi:10.1007/s12671-018-0918-z
  • Parsons EM, Luebbe AM, Clerkin EM. Testing the relationship between social anxiety schemas, mindfulness facets, and state and trait social anxiety symptoms. Mindfulness. 2017;8:1634–1643. doi:10.1007/s12671-017-0738-6
  • Wang YZ, Chen J, Zhang XS, et al. The relationship between perfectionism and social anxiety: a moderated mediation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19: doi:10.3390/ijerph191912934
  • Yang XJ, Zhou ZK, Liu QQ, Fan CY. Mobile phone addiction and adolescents’ anxiety and depression: the moderating role of mindfulness. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28:822–830. doi:10.1007/s10826-018-01323-2
  • Graham JW, Olchowski AE, Gilreath TD. How many imputations are really needed? - Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prev Sci. 2007;8:206–213. doi:10.1007/s11121-007-0070-9
  • Enders CK. A primer on maximum likelihood algorithms available for use with missing data. Struct Equation Model. 2001;8:128–141. doi:10.1207/S15328007sem0801_7
  • Su S, Larsen H, Cousijn J, Wiers RW, Van den Eijnden RJJM. Problematic smartphone use and the quantity and quality of peer engagement among adolescents: a longitudinal study. Comput Hum Behav. 2022;126:107025. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107025
  • Alkis Y, Kadirhan Z, Sat M. Development and validation of social anxiety scale for social media users. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;72:296–303. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.011
  • Mattick RP, Clarke JC. Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety. Behav Res Ther. 1998;36:455–470. doi:10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6
  • Gross JJ, John OP. Facets of emotional expressivity - 3 self-report factors and Their correlates. Pers Indiv Differ. 1995;19:555–568. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-B
  • Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:822–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88:879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Viswanathan M, Kayande U. Commentary on “common method bias in marketing: causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies”. J Retailing. 2012;88(4):300–314. doi:10.1097/00006842-197609000-00003
  • Chin WW, Thatcher JB, Wright RT. Assessing common method bias: problems with the ulmc technique. Mis Quart. 2012;36:1003–1019. doi:10.2307/41703491
  • Eamiello ML, Reid AE. Does online social support uniquely buffer effects of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic?: a natural experiment. Soc Personal Psychol. 2023;17:doi:10.1111/spc3.12836
  • Katz Y. Interacting for Peace: rethinking peace through interactive digital platforms. Soc Media Soc. 2020;6:926620. doi:10.1177/2056305120926620
  • Barbareschi G, Oldfrey B, Xin L, et al. Bridging the divide: exploring the use of digital and physical technology to aid mobility impaired people living in an informal settlement. 22nd International ACM Sigaccess Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Assets ‘20). 2020.
  • Woodcock KA, Cheung C, Marx DG, Mandy W. Social decision making in autistic adolescents: the role of theory of mind, executive functioning and emotion regulation. J Autism Dev Disord. 2020;50:2501–2512. doi:10.1007/s10803-019-03975-5
  • Schodt KB, Mickelson KD. Emotion expressivity and regulation in romantic relationships: the role of social anxiety. Couple Fam Psychol. 2023. doi:10.1037/cfp0000249