Advanced search
Publication Cover
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Volume 17, 2024 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
184
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

A Study of the Developmental Mechanisms of Inter-Team Conflict Processes Within Multi-Team Systems - An Exploratory Analysis Based on a Collaborative R&D Context

Nan NiuSchool of Management, Hebei University, Baoding, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0009-0003-2910-2983
ORCID Icon,
Haozhe ShiSchool of Management, Hebei University, Baoding, People’s Republic of ChinaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-8396
ORCID Icon &
Hongfei LvSchool of Management, Hebei University, Baoding, People’s Republic of ChinaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0009-0005-7927-4606
ORCID Icon
Pages 1021-1043 | Received 20 Nov 2023, Accepted 08 Feb 2024, Published online: 13 Mar 2024

References

  • Dechurch LA, Zaccaro SJ. Perspective: teams won’t solve this problem. Human Factors. 2010;52(2):329–334. doi:10.1177/0018720810374736
  • Kugler T, Rapoport A, Pazy A. Public good provision in inter-team conflicts: effects of asymmetry and profit-sharing rule. J Behav Decis Making. 2010;23(4):421–438. doi:10.1002/bdm.667
  • van den Berg W, Curseu PL, Meeus MTH, Richard A. Emotion regulation and conflict transformation in multiteam systems. Int J Confli Manage. 2014;25(2):171–188. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-05-2012-0038
  • Misasi P, Lazzara EH, Keebler JR. Understanding Multiteam Systems in Emergency Care: One Case at a Time. Pushing the Boundaries; 2014:157–183.
  • Wombacher J, Felfe J. The interplay of team and organizational commitment in motivating employees’ interteam conflict handling. Acad Manage J. 2017;6(4):1554–1581. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0718
  • Glaser B, Bailyn L, Fernandez W, et al. What Grounded Theory Is. Acad Manage Proceed. 2013;1(1):11290. doi:10.5465/ambpp.2013.11290symposium
  • Cuijpers M, Uitdewilligen S, Guenter H. Effects of dual identification and interteam conflict on multiteam system performance. J Occupa Organ Psychol. 2016;89(1):141–171. doi:10.1111/joop.12113
  • Van BL, Greer LL, Van KD. When interteam conflict spirals into intrateam power struggles: the pivotal role of team power structures. Acad Manage J. 2018;61(3):1100–1130.
  • Zaccaro SJ, Marks MA, Dechurch L. Multiteam Systems: An Organizational Form for Dynamic. New York: Routledge; 2012.
  • Dechurch LA, Zaccaro SJ. Innovation in Scientific Multiteam Systems: Confluent and Countervailing Forces. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Committee on Team Science; 2013.
  • Healey MP, Hodgkinson GP, Teo S Responding effectively to civil emergencies: the role of transactive memory in the performance of multiteam systems. Proceedings of NDM9 the 9th international conference on naturalistic decision making. London: British Computer Society; 2009.
  • Olabisi J, Lewis K. Within- and between-team coordination via transactive memory systems and boundary spanning. Group Organiza Manage. 2018;43(5):691–717. doi:10.1177/1059601118793750
  • Carter DR, Dechurch LA, Zaccaro SJ Impact of leadership network structure on the creative output of multiteam systems. Academy of Management Proceedings. Briarcliff Manor: Academy of Management; 2014.
  • Shuffler ML, Rico R, Salas E. Pushing the Boundaries: Multiteam Systems in Research and Practice. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2014.
  • Wijnmaalen J, Voordijk H, Rietjens S, et al. Intergroup behavior in military multiteam systems. Human Relat. 2018;72(6):1–24.
  • Murase T, Carter DR, Dechurch LA, et al. Mind the gap: the role of leadership in multiteam system collective cognition. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(5):972–986. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.003
  • Pondy LR. Organizational conflict: concepts and models. Adm Sci Q. 1967;12(2):296–320. doi:10.2307/2391553
  • Korsgaard MA, Soyoung J S, Mahony DM, et al. A multilevel view of intragroup conflict. J Manage. 2008;34(6):1222–1252. doi:10.1177/0149206308325124
  • Glaser BG, Holton J. Basic social processes. Grounded Theor Rev. 2005;4(3):1–29.
  • Kukuh SA, Ciptomulyono U, Putra NI, et al. Navy ability development strategy using SWOT analysis-interpretative structural modeling (ISM). Strategic Manage. 2019;24(1):30–40. doi:10.5937/StraMan1901030S
  • Lin X, Cui S, Han Y, et al. An improved ISM method based on GRA for hierarchical analyzing the influencing factors of food safety. Food Control. 2019;99(3):48–56. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.12.020
  • Li G, Huang D, Sun C, et al. Developing interpretive structural modeling based on factor analysis for the water-energy-food nexus conundrum. Science of the Total Environment. 2019;651(1):309–322. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.188
  • Sarmah B, Rahman Z. Customer co-creation in hotel service innovation: an interpretive structural modeling and MICMAC analysis approach. Benchmarking. 2018;25(1):297–318. doi:10.1108/BIJ-09-2016-0145
  • Chauhan A, Singh A, Jharkharia S. An interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and decision making trail and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method approach for the analysis of barriers of waste recycling in India. J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 2018;68(2):100–110. doi:10.1080/10962247.2016.1249441
  • Davison RB, Hollenbeck JR, Barnes CM, et al. Coordinated action in multiteam systems. J Appl Psychol. 2012;97(4):808–824. doi:10.1037/a0026682

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.