346
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Understanding Social Media Information Sharing in Individuals with Depression: Insights from the Elaboration Likelihood Model and Schema Activation Theory

, , &
Pages 1587-1609 | Received 15 Dec 2023, Accepted 02 Apr 2024, Published online: 12 Apr 2024

References

  • Pennycook G, Rand DG. The Psychology of Fake News. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2021;25(5):388–402. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007
  • Cinelli M, De Francisci Morales G, Galeazzi A, Quattrociocchi W, Starnini M. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(9):e2023301118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2023301118
  • Gao Y, Liu F, Gao L. Echo chamber effects on short video platforms. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):6282. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33370-1
  • Scheibenzuber C, Neagu LM, Ruseti S, et al. Dialog in the echo chamber: fake news framing predicts emotion, argumentation and dialogic social knowledge building in subsequent online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior. 2023;140:107587. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107587
  • Baumann F, Lorenz-Spreen P, Sokolov IM, Starnini M. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks. Phys Rev Lett. 2020;124(4):048301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301
  • Dubois E, Blank G. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Inform Comm Soc. 2018;21(5):729–745. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
  • De Biasio A, Monaro M, Oneto L, Ballan L, Navarin N. On the problem of recommendation for sensitive users and influential items: simultaneously maintaining interest and diversity. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2023;275:110699. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2023.110699
  • Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–1222. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
  • Radovic A, Gmelin T, Stein BD, Miller E. Depressed adolescents’ positive and negative use of social media. Journal of Adolescence. 2017;55(1):5–15. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.12.002
  • Zhu W, Mou J, Benyoucef M, Kim J, Hong T, Chen S. Understanding the relationship between social media use and depression: a review of the literature. Online Information Rev. 2023;47(6):1009–1035. doi:10.1108/OIR-04-2021-0211
  • Khaleel I, Wimmer BC, Peterson GM, et al. Health information overload among health consumers: a scoping review. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(1):15–32. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.008
  • Soroya SH, Farooq A, Mahmood K, Isoaho J, Zara SE. From information seeking to information avoidance: understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis. Information Processing and Management. 2021;58(2):102440. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440
  • Islam AKMN, Laato S, Talukder S, Sutinen E. Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: an affordance and cognitive load perspective. Technol Forecasting Social Change. 2020;159:120201. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120201
  • Laato S, Islam AKMN, Islam MN, Whelan E. What drives unverified information sharing and cyberchondria during the COVID-19 pandemic?. Eur J Inf Syst. 2020;29(3):288–305. doi:10.1080/0960085X.2020.1770632
  • Bathina KC, ten Thij M, Lorenzo-Luaces L, Rutter LA, Bollen J. Individuals with depression express more distorted thinking on social media. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(4):458–466. doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01050-7
  • Yao X, Yu G, Tian X, Tang J. Patterns and Longitudinal Changes in Negative Emotions of People with Depression on Sina Weibo. Telemed E-Health. 2020;26(6):734–743. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0108
  • LeMoult J, Gotlib IH. Depression: a cognitive perspective. Clinic Psychol Rev. 2019;69:51–66. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.008
  • Keller AS, Leikauf JE, Holt-Gosselin B, Staveland BR, Williams LM. Paying attention to attention in depression. Transl Psychiatry. 2019;9(1):1–12. doi:10.1038/s41398-019-0616-1
  • Piani MC, Maggioni E, Delvecchio G, Brambilla P. Sustained attention alterations in major depressive disorder: a review of fMRI studies employing Go/No-Go and CPT tasks. J Affective Disorders. 2022;303:98–113. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.003
  • Yoon S, Kleinman M, Mertz J, Brannick M. Is social network site usage related to depression? A meta-analysis of Facebook–depression relations. J Affective Disorders. 2019;248:65–72. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.01.026
  • Kreski N, Platt J, Rutherford C, et al. Social Media Use and Depressive Symptoms Among United States Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2021;68(3):572–579. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.006
  • Boer M, Stevens GWJM, Finkenauer C, de Looze ME, van den Eijnden RJJM. Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: investigating directionality and mediating processes. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;116:106645. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106645
  • Valkenburg PM, Van Driel II, Beyens I. The associations of active and passive social media use with well-being: a critical scoping review. New Med Soc. 2022;24(2):530–549. doi:10.1177/14614448211065425
  • Aubry R, Quiamzade A, Meier LL. Depressive symptoms and upward social comparisons during Instagram use: a vicious circle. Pers Individ Dif. 2024;217:112458. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112458
  • Biglbauer S, Lauri Korajlija A. Do socially anxious and non-anxious individuals differ in their social media use?. Computers in Human Behavior. 2023;149:107970. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107970
  • Kelley SW, Gillan CM. Using language in social media posts to study the network dynamics of depression longitudinally. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):870. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28513-3
  • Eichstaedt JC, Smith RJ, Merchant RM, et al. Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2018;115(44):11203–11208. doi:10.1073/pnas.1802331115
  • Yang X, McEwen R, Ong LR, Zihayat M. A big data analytics framework for detecting user-level depression from social networks. International Journal of Information Management. 2020;54:102141. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102141
  • Yang K, Zhang T, Ananiadou S. A mental state Knowledge–aware and Contrastive Network for early stress and depression detection on social media. Information Processing and Management. 2022;59(4):102961. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102961
  • Cacheda F, Fernandez D, Novoa FJ, Carneiro V. Early Detection of Depression: social Network Analysis and Random Forest Techniques. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(6):e12554. doi:10.2196/12554
  • Gori A, Topino E, Griffiths MD. The associations between attachment, self-esteem, fear of missing out, daily time expenditure, and problematic social media use: a path analysis model. Addict. Behav. 2023;141:107633. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107633
  • Matz SC. Personal echo chambers: openness-to-experience is linked to higher levels of psychological interest diversity in large-scale behavioral data. J Personality Social Psychol. 2021;121(6):1284–1300. doi:10.1037/pspp0000324
  • Susmann MW, Xu M, Clark JK, et al. Persuasion amidst a pandemic: insights from the Elaboration Likelihood Model. Eur Rev Social Psychol. 2022;33(2):323–359. doi:10.1080/10463283.2021.1964744
  • Beck AT, Haigh EAP. Advances in Cognitive Theory and Therapy: the Generic Cognitive Model. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10(1):1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153734
  • Dozois DJA, Beck AT. Cognitive Schemas, Beliefs and Assumptions. In: Risk Factors in Depression. Elsevier; 2008:119–143. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-045078-0.00006-X
  • Chancellor S, De Choudhury M. Methods in predictive techniques for mental health status on social media: a critical review. Npj Digit Med. 2020;3(1):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0233-7
  • Adarsh V, Arun Kumar P, Lavanya V, Gangadharan GR. Fair and Explainable Depression Detection in Social Media. Information Processing and Management. 2023;60(1):103168. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103168
  • Zhang T, Yang K, Alhuzali H, Liu B, Ananiadou S. PHQ-aware depressive symptoms identification with similarity contrastive learning on social media. Information Processing and Management. 2023;60(5):103417. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103417
  • Rodriguez M, Aalbers G, McNally RJ. Idiographic Network Models of Social Media Use and Depression Symptoms. Cogn Ther Res. 2022;46(1):124–132. doi:10.1007/s10608-021-10236-2
  • Sun L. Social media usage and students’ social anxiety, loneliness and well-being: does digital mindfulness-based intervention effectively work?. BMC Psychology. 2023;11(1):362. doi:10.1186/s40359-023-01398-7
  • Victor SA, Ibrahim MS, Yusuf S, et al. Social media addiction and depression among adolescents in two Malaysian states. Int J Adolesc Youth. 2024;29(1):2292055. doi:10.1080/02673843.2023.2292055
  • Zheng H, Goh DHL, Lee EWJ, Lee CS, Theng YL. Understanding the effects of message cues on COVID-19 information sharing on Twitter. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2022;73(6):847–862. doi:10.1002/asi.24587
  • Evans JSBT, Stanovich KE. Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: advancing the Debate. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013;8(3):223–241. doi:10.1177/1745691612460685
  • Shahab MH, Ghazali E, Mohtar M. The role of elaboration likelihood model in consumer behaviour research and its extension to new technologies: a review and future research agenda. Int J Consum Stud. 2021;45(4):664–689. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12658
  • Yang S, Zhou C, Chen Y. Do topic consistency and linguistic style similarity affect online review helpfulness? An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Processing and Management. 2021;58(3):102521. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102521
  • Ba Z, Zhao Y, Song S, Zhu Q. Does the involvement of charities matter? Exploring the impact of charities’ reputation and social capital on medical crowdfunding performance. Information Processing and Management. 2022;59(3):102942. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.102942
  • Bhattacherjee S. Influence Processes for Information Technology Acceptance: an Elaboration Likelihood Model. MIS Quarterly. 2006;30(4):805. doi:10.2307/25148755
  • Dozois DJA. The importance of social connectedness: from interpersonal schemas in depression to relationship functioning and well-being. Canadian Psychol. 2021;62(2):174–180. doi:10.1037/cap0000253
  • Matsumoto N, Katahira K, Kawaguchi J. Cognitive Reactivity Amplifies the Activation and Development of Negative Self-schema: a Revised Mnemic Neglect Paradigm and Computational Modelling. Cogn Ther Res. 2023;47(1):38–51. doi:10.1007/s10608-022-10332-x
  • Gilboa A, Marlatte H. Neurobiology of Schemas and Schema-Mediated Memory. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2017;21(8):618–631. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013
  • Jiwa M, Cooper PS, Chong TTJ, Bode S. Hedonism as a motive for information search: biased information-seeking leads to biased beliefs. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):2086. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29429-8
  • Auerbach RP, Stanton CH, Proudfit GH, Pizzagalli DA. Self-referential processing in depressed adolescents: a high-density event-related potential study. J Abnormal Psychol. 2015;124(2):233–245. doi:10.1037/abn0000023
  • Vieira C, Kuss DJ, Griffiths MD. Early maladaptive schemas and behavioural addictions: a systematic literature review. Clinic Psychol Rev. 2023;105:102340. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102340
  • Beck AT. The evolution of the cognitive model of depression and its neurobiological correlates. Am J Psychiatry. 2008;165(8):969–977. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050721
  • Disner SG, Beevers CG, Haigh EAP, Beck AT. Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(8):467–477. doi:10.1038/nrn3027
  • Zhang Y, Li X, Fan W. User Adoption of Physician’s Replies in an Online Health Community: an Empirical Study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2020;71(10):1179–1191. doi:10.1002/asi.24319
  • Westerman D, Spence PR, Van Der Heide B. Social Media as Information Source: recency of Updates and Credibility of Information*. J Comput-Mediated Commun. 2014;19(2):171–183. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12041
  • Lee EJ, Shin SY. Mediated Misinformation: questions Answered, More Questions to Ask. Am Behav Sci. 2021;65(2):259–276. doi:10.1177/0002764219869403
  • Srivastava V, Kalro AD. Enhancing the Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews: the Role of Latent (Content) Factors. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 2019;48:33–50. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2018.12.003
  • Cyr D, Head M, Lim E, Stibe A. Using the elaboration likelihood model to examine online persuasion through website design. Inf Manage. 2018;55(7):807–821. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.03.009
  • Chen Q, Min C, Zhang W, Wang G, Ma X, Evans R. Unpacking the black box: how to promote citizen engagement through government social media during the COVID-19 crisis. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;110:106380. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106380
  • Lerner JS, Li Y, Valdesolo P, Kassam KS. Emotion and Decision Making. Annual Review of Psychology. 2015;66(1):799–823. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
  • Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L. Emotions and Information Diffusion in Social Media—Sentiment of Microblogs and Sharing Behavior. J Manage Inf Syst. 2013;29(4):217–248. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222290408
  • Goldenberg A, Gross JJ. Digital Emotion Contagion. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2020;24(4):316–328. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.01.009
  • Brady WJ, Gantman AP, Van Bavel JJ. Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020;149(4):746–756. doi:10.1037/xge0000673
  • Robertson CE, Pröllochs N, Schwarzenegger K, Pärnamets P, Van Bavel JJ, Feuerriegel S. Negativity drives online news consumption. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7(5):812–822. doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01538-4
  • Horner CG, Galletta D, Crawford J, Shirsat A. Emotions: the Unexplored Fuel of Fake News on Social Media. J Manage Inf Syst. 2021;38(4):1039–1066. doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1990610
  • Waterloo SF, Baumgartner SE, Peter J, Valkenburg PM. Norms of online expressions of emotion: comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp. New Med Soc. 2018;20(5):1813–1831. doi:10.1177/1461444817707349
  • Tellis GJ, MacInnis DJ, Tirunillai S, Zhang Y. What Drives Virality (Sharing) of Online Digital Content? The Critical Role of Information, Emotion, and Brand Prominence. J Marketing. 2019;83(4):1–20. doi:10.1177/0022242919841034
  • Sui J, Humphreys GW. The Integrative Self: how Self-Reference Integrates Perception and Memory. Trends Cognitive Sci. 2015;19(12):719–728. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015
  • Xu X, Liu J, Liu JH. The effect of social media environments on online emotional disclosure: tie strength, network size and self-reference. Online Information Rev. 2023. doi:10.1108/OIR-04-2022-0245
  • Zhang R, Zhang M, Sima J, Liu F, Zou F, Luo Y. Self-reference processing of fat-face and sick-face in individuals with different disgust sensitivity: evidence from behavioral and neuroelectrophysiology. Neuropsychologia. 2022;175:108368. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108368
  • Kim K, Banquer AM, Resnik SN, Johnson JD, Fernandez L. Self-reference and cognitive effort: source memory for affectively neutral information is impaired following negative compared to positive self-referential processing. J Cognitive Psychol. 2022;34(7):833–845. doi:10.1080/20445911.2022.2067553
  • Constable MD, Becker ML, Oh YI, Knoblich G. Affective compatibility with the self modulates the self-prioritisation effect. Cognition & Emotion. 2021;35(2):291–304. doi:10.1080/02699931.2020.1839383
  • Phua J, Kim J. Starring in your own Snapchat advertisement: influence of self-brand congruity, self-referencing and perceived humor on brand attitude and purchase intention of advertised brands. Telematic Informatic. 2018;35(5):1524–1533. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.03.020
  • Yang J, Jiang M. Demystifying congruence effects in Instagram in-feed native ads: the role of media-based and self-based congruence. J Res Interactive Marketing. 2021;15(4):685–708. doi:10.1108/JRIM-03-2020-0048
  • Kim DH, Yoo JJ, Lee WN. The influence of self-concept on ad effectiveness: interaction between self-concept and construal levels on effectiveness of advertising. J Marketing Commun. 2018;24(7):734–745. doi:10.1080/13527266.2016.1235601
  • Ma E, Liu J, Li K. Exploring the mechanism of live streaming e-commerce anchors’ language appeals on users’ purchase intention. Front Psychol. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1109092
  • Dunlop SM, Wakefield M, Kashima Y. Pathways to Persuasion: cognitive and Experiential Responses to Health-Promoting Mass Media Messages. Commun Res. 2010;37(1):133–164. doi:10.1177/0093650209351912
  • Ku HH, Chen Y. Naming product colors with an individual’s identity and product evaluation: self-referencing as a mediator. J Product Brand Management. 2023;32(6):958–971. doi:10.1108/JPBM-12-2021-3791
  • Beck AT, Alford BA. Depression: Causes and Treatment. 2nd ed. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2009.
  • Everaert J, Vrijsen JN, Martin-Willett R, Van De Kraats L, Joormann J. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between explicit memory bias and depression: depression features an explicit memory bias that persists beyond a depressive episode. Psychol Bull. 2022;148(5–6):435–463. doi:10.1037/bul0000367
  • Everaert J, Podina IR, Koster EHW. A comprehensive meta-analysis of interpretation biases in depression. Clinic Psychol Rev. 2017;58:33–48. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.005
  • Würtz F, Kube T, Woud ML, Margraf J, Blackwell SE. Reduced Belief Updating in the Context of Depressive Symptoms: an Investigation of the Associations with Interpretation Biases and Self-Evaluation. Cogn Ther Res. 2024. doi:10.1007/s10608-023-10454-w
  • Chen L, Wang Q, Xu T. Working memory function in patients with major depression disorder: a narrative review. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2023;30(2):281–293. doi:10.1002/cpp.2811
  • Grahek I, Everaert J, Krebs RM, Koster EHW. Cognitive Control in Depression: toward Clinical Models Informed by Cognitive Neuroscience. Clin Psychol Sci. 2018;6(4):464–480. doi:10.1177/2167702618758969
  • Miller EK, Lundqvist M, Bastos AM. Working Memory 2.0. Neuron. 2018;100(2):463–475. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.09.023
  • Gotlib IH, Joormann J. Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285–312. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131305
  • Malhi GS, Mann JJ. Depression. Lancet. 2018;392(10161):2299–2312. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31948-2
  • Herrman H, Patel V, Kieling C, et al. Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet. 2022;399(10328):957–1022. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02141-3
  • Zhang D, Xie H, He Z, Wei Z, Gu R. Impaired Working Memory Updating for Emotional Stimuli in Depressed Patients. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:65. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00065
  • Hudson A, Wilson MJG, Green ES, Itier RJ, Henderson HA. Are you as important as me? Self-other discrimination within trait-adjective processing. Brain Cognition. 2020;142:105569. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2020.105569
  • Alashoor T, Keil M, Smith HJ, McConnell AR. Too Tired and in Too Good of a Mood to Worry About Privacy: explaining the Privacy Paradox Through the Lens of Effort Level in Information Processing. Inf Syst Res. 2023;34(4):1415–1436. doi:10.1287/isre.2022.1182
  • Pang H, Ruan Y. Determining influences of information irrelevance, information overload and communication overload on WeChat discontinuance intention: the moderating role of exhaustion. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2023;72:103289. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103289
  • Zhu L, Li H, He W, Hong C. What influences online reviews’ perceived information quality? Perspectives on information richness, emotional polarity and product type. Electronic Library. 2020;38(2):273–296. doi:10.1108/EL-09-2019-0208
  • Lopes AI, Dens N, De Pelsmacker P, De Keyzer F. Which cues influence the perceived usefulness and credibility of an online review? A conjoint analysis. OIR. 2020;45(1):1–20. doi:10.1108/OIR-09-2019-0287
  • Westerwick A. Effects of Sponsorship, Web Site Design, and Google Ranking on the Credibility of Online Information. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2013;18(2):80–97. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12006
  • Laros FJM, Steenkamp JBEM. Emotions in consumer behavior: a hierarchical approach. Journal of Business Research. 2005;58(10):1437–1445. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.09.013
  • Ahn J, Kim HK, Kahlor LA, Atkinson L, Noh GY. The Impact of Emotion and Government Trust on Individuals’ Risk Information Seeking and Avoidance during the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Cross-country Comparison. J Health Commun. 2021;26(10):728–741. doi:10.1080/10810730.2021.1999348
  • Negrão JG, Bazán PR, De Azevedo Neto RM, Lacerda SS, Ekman E, Kozasa EH. Baseline emotional state influences on the response to animated short films: a randomized online experiment. Front Psychol. 2022;13:1009429. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1009429
  • Zhang K, Zhang J, Yang J. The influence of human elements in photographs on tourists’ destination perceptions and intentions. Tourism Manage. 2023;95:104684. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104684
  • Zhang X, Zhang K, Li S, Koenitz D. Effects of store fixture shape at retail checkout: evidence from field and online studies. Prod Oper Manage. 2023;32(10):3158–3173. doi:10.1111/poms.14028
  • Chen L, Unsworth K, Zhang L, Zhang ZD. The curvilinear effect of negative affect on voice behavior from the perspective of activation theory. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(31):27497–27515. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03853-x
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
  • Zhao H, Fu S, Chen X. Promoting users’ intention to share online health articles on social media: the role of confirmation bias. Information Processing and Management. 2020;57(6):102354. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102354
  • Chua AYK, Banerjee S. Intentions to trust and share online health rumors: an experiment with medical professionals. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;87:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.021
  • Abbey JD, Meloy MG. Attention by design: using attention checks to detect inattentive respondents and improve data quality. J Oper Manage. 2017;53-56(1):63–70. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2017.06.001
  • Burnkrant RE, Unnava HR. Effects of Self-Referencing on Persuasion. J Consum Res. 1995;22(1):17–26. doi:10.1086/209432
  • Escalas JE. Self-Referencing and Persuasion: narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration. J Consum Res. 2007;33(4):421–429. doi:10.1086/510216
  • Furlanetto LM, Mendlowicz MV, Romildo Bueno J. The validity of the Beck Depression Inventory-Short Form as a screening and diagnostic instrument for moderate and severe depression in medical inpatients. J Affective Disorders. 2005;86(1):87–91. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2004.12.011
  • Wang YP, Gorenstein C. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2013;35:416–431. doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048
  • Sultan S, Luminet O, Hartemann A. Cognitive and anxiety symptoms in screening for clinical depression in diabetes A systematic examination of diagnostic performances of the Hads and BDI-SF. J Affective Disorders. 2010;123(1):332–336. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.09.022
  • Hammen C. Risk Factors for Depression: an Autobiographical Review. Ann Rev Clin Psychol. 2018;14(1):1–28. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084811
  • Albert K, Gau V, Taylor WD, Newhouse PA. Attention bias in older women with remitted depression is associated with enhanced amygdala activity and functional connectivity. J Affective Disorders. 2017;210:49–56. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.010
  • Yang W, Zhang JX, Ding Z, Xiao L. Attention Bias Modification Treatment for Adolescents With Major Depression: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016;55(3):208–218.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.005
  • Michikyan M. Depression symptoms and negative online disclosure among young adults in college: a mixed-methods approach. J Ment Health. 2020;29(4):392–400. doi:10.1080/09638237.2019.1581357
  • Brailovskaia J, Schillack H, Margraf J. Tell me why are you using social media (SM)! Relationship between reasons for use of SM, SM flow, daily stress, depression, anxiety, and addictive SM use – an exploratory investigation of young adults in Germany. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020;113:106511. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106511
  • Feldhege J, Moessner M, Bauer S. Who says what? Content and participation characteristics in an online depression community. J Affective Disorders. 2020;263:521–527. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.007
  • Kramer ADI, Guillory JE, Hancock JT. Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111(24):8788–8790. doi:10.1073/pnas.1320040111
  • Van Kleef GA, Côté S. The Social Effects of Emotions. Annual Review of Psychology. 2022;73(1):629–658. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-010855
  • LeMoult J, Kircanski K, Prasad G, Gotlib IH. Negative Self-Referential Processing Predicts the Recurrence of Major Depressive Episodes. Clin Psychol Sci. 2017;5(1):174–181. doi:10.1177/2167702616654898
  • Renner F, Siep N, Lobbestael J, Arntz A, Peeters FPML, Huibers MJH. Neural correlates of self-referential processing and implicit self-associations in chronic depression. J Affective Disorders. 2015;186:40–47. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2015.07.008
  • Verduyn P, Van Mechelen I, Tuerlinckx F. The relation between event processing and the duration of emotional experience. Emotion. 2011;11(1):20–28. doi:10.1037/a0021239
  • Curci A, Rimé B. The temporal evolution of social sharing of emotions and its consequences on emotional recovery: a longitudinal study. Emotion. 2012;12(6):1404–1414. doi:10.1037/a0028651
  • Watkins ER, Roberts H. Reflecting on rumination: consequences, causes, mechanisms and treatment of rumination. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2020;127:103573. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103573
  • Shaw ZA, Hilt LM, Starr LR. The developmental origins of ruminative response style: an integrative review. Clinic Psychol Rev. 2019;74:101780. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101780
  • Spendelow JS, Simonds LM, Avery RE. The Relationship between Co-rumination and Internalizing Problems: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017;24(2):512–527. doi:10.1002/cpp.2023
  • Bhat IH, Gupta S, Bhat GM. Effect of social media usage on major depressive disorder among generation Z: a study in Indian context. Information Discovery and Delivery. 2023. doi:10.1108/IDD-07-2022-0071
  • Huang L, Zhang J, Duan W, He L. Peer relationship increasing the risk of social media addiction among Chinese adolescents who have negative emotions. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(9):7673–7681. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01997-w
  • Lăzăroiu G, Kovacova M, Siekelova A, Vrbka J. Addictive Behavior of Problematic Smartphone Users: the Relationship between Depression, Anxiety, and Stress. Rev Contemporary Philosophy. 2020;19:50–56. doi:10.22381/RCP1920204_
  • Kliestik T, Scott J, Musa H, Suler P. Addictive Smartphone Behavior, Anxiety Symptom Severity, and Depressive Stress. Analysis Metaphysics. 2020;19:45–51. doi:10.22381/AM1920204
  • Green M, Kovacova M, Valaskova K. Smartphone Addiction Risk, Depression Psychopathology, and Social Anxiety. Analysis Metaphysics. 2020;19:52–58. doi:10.22381/AM1920205
  • Bowden-Green T, Hinds J, Joinson A. Understanding neuroticism and social media: a systematic review. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;168:110344. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110344
  • Dalvi-Esfahani M, Niknafs A, Alaedini Z, Barati Ahmadabadi H, Kuss DJ, Ramayah T. Social Media Addiction and Empathy: moderating impact of personality traits among high school students. Telematic Informatic. 2021;57:101516. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2020.101516
  • Clak DA, Beck AT, Alford BA. Scientific Foundations of Cognitive Theory and Therapy of Depression. 1st ed. Wiley; 1999.
  • Mahmoudi A, Jemielniak D, Ciechanowski L. Echo Chambers in Online Social Networks: a Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access. 2024;12:9594–9620. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3353054
  • Diaz Ruiz C, Nilsson T. Disinformation and Echo Chambers: how Disinformation Circulates on Social Media Through Identity-Driven Controversies. J Public Policy Marketing. 2023;42(1):18–35. doi:10.1177/07439156221103852
  • Xing Y, Zhang JZ, Storey VC, Koohang A. Diving into the divide: a systematic review of cognitive bias-based polarization on social media. J Enterp Inf Manage. 2024;37(1):259–287. doi:10.1108/JEIM-09-2023-0459
  • Cuijpers P, Noma H, Karyotaki E, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA. Effectiveness and Acceptability of Cognitive Behavior Therapy Delivery Formats in Adults With Depression: a Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(7):700–707. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.0268
  • Moshe I, Terhorst Y, Philippi P, et al. Digital Interventions for the Treatment of Depression: a Meta-Analytic Review. Psychol Bull. 2021;147(8):749–786. doi:10.1037/bul0000334
  • Furukawa TA, Suganuma A, Ostinelli EG, et al. Dismantling, optimising, and personalising internet cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis using individual participant data. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8(6):500–511. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00077-8
  • Nahum-Shani I, Shaw SD, Carpenter SM, Murphy SA, Yoon C. Engagement in digital interventions. Am Psychologist. 2022;77(7):836–852. doi:10.1037/amp0000983
  • Karyotaki E, Efthimiou O, Miguel C, et al. Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: a Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021;78(4):361–371. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.4364
  • Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what’s in a name?. Health Educ Res. 2000;15(1):1–4. doi:10.1093/her/15.1.1