Activation Likelihood Estimation Neuroimaging Meta-Analysis: a Powerful Tool for Emotion Research

References

• Deak A. Brain and emotion: cognitive neuroscience of emotions. Rev Psychol. 2011;18(2):71–80.
   Google Scholar
• Brooke AH, Harrison NA. Chapter 30 - neuroimaging and emotion. In: Fink G editor. Stress: Concepts, Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior. Academic Press; 2016:251–259. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800951-2.00030-3
   Google Scholar
• Davis KM, Ryan JL, Aaron VD, Sims JB. PET and SPECT imaging of the brain: history, technical considerations, applications, and radiotracers. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2020;41(6):521–529. doi:10.1053/j.sult.2020.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Zhuang C, Wang F, Liu YJ, Im CH, Zhang D. fNIRS evidence for recognizably different positive emotions. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019;13:120. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junghöfer M, Peyk P, Flaisch T, Schupp HT. Neuroimaging methods in affective neuroscience: selected methodological issues. Prog Brain Res. 2006;156:123–143. doi:10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56007-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kragel PA, LaBar KS. Decoding the nature of emotion in the brain. Trends Cognit Sci. 2016;20(6):444–455. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan KL, Wager T, Taylor SF, Liberzon I. Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. Neuroimage. 2002;16(2):331–348. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett LF, Wager TD. The structure of emotion: evidence from neuroimaging studies. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2006;15(2):79–83. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00411.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist KA, Wager TD, Kober H, Bliss-Moreau E, Barrett LF. The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review. Behav Brain Sci. 2012;35(3):121. doi:10.1017/S0140525X11000446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner J, Russell JA, Gerber A, et al. The neurophysiological bases of emotion: an fMRI study of the affective circumplex using emotion-denoting words. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(3):883–895. doi:10.1002/hbm.20553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett LF, Mesquita B, Ochsner KN, Gross JJ. The experience of emotion. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007;58:373–403. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition Emotion. 1992;6(3–4):169–200. doi:10.1080/02699939208411068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu S, Wang F, Cao C, Wu E, Tang YY, Huang JH. An integrative way for studying neural basis of basic emotions with fMRI. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:628. doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamann S. Mapping discrete and dimensional emotions onto the brain: controversies and consensus. Trends Cognit Sci. 2012;16(9):458–466. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell JA. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(1):145–172. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebneabbasi A, Mahdipour M, Nejati V, et al. Emotion processing and regulation in major depressive disorder: a 7T resting-state fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(3):797–810. doi:10.1002/hbm.25263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKechanie AG, Lawrie SM, Whalley HC, Stanfield AC. A functional MRI facial emotion-processing study of autism in individuals with special educational needs. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2022;320:111426. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2021.111426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Zutphen L, Siep N, Jacob GA, Goebel R, Arntz A. Emotional sensitivity, emotion regulation and impulsivity in borderline personality disorder: a critical review of fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;51:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett LF. The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2017;12(1):1–23. doi:10.1093/scan/nsw154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp J. Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Solms M. The Hidden Spring: A Journey to the Source of Consciousness. Profile Books; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller D, Yu ANC, Alia-Klein N, et al. The Human Affectome. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024;158:105450. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szucs D, Ioannidis JP. Sample size evolution in neuroimaging research: an evaluation of highly-cited studies (1990–2012) and of latest practices (2017–2018) in high-impact journals. Neuroimage. 2020;221:117164. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carp J. The secret lives of experiments: methods reporting in the fMRI literature. Neuroimage. 2012;63(1):289–300. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremers HR, Wager TD, Yarkoni T. The relation between statistical power and inference in fMRI. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0184923. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samartsidis P, Montagna S, Nichols TE, Johnson TD. The coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data. Stat Sci. 2017;32(4):580–599. doi:10.1214/17-STS624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager TD, Lindquist M, Kaplan L. Meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging data: current and future directions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2007;2(2):150–158. doi:10.1093/scan/nsm015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowring A, Maumet C, Nichols TE. Exploring the impact of analysis software on task fMRI results. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(11):3362–3384. doi:10.1002/hbm.24603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nani A, Manuello J, Liloia D, Duca S, Costa T, Cauda F. The neural correlates of time: a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. J Cogn Neurosci. 2019;31(12):1796–1826. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ML, Glass GV. Meta-analysis of research on class size and its relationship to attitudes and instruction. Am Educ Res J. 1980;17(4):419–433. doi:10.3102/00028312017004419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuello J, Costa T, Cauda F, Liloia D. Six actions to improve detection of critical features for neuroimaging coordinate-based meta-analysis preparation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;137:104659. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Laird AR, et al. Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;84:151–161. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morawetz C, Bode S, Derntl B, Heekeren HR. The effect of strategies, goals and stimulus material on the neural mechanisms of emotion regulation: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;72:111–128. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspers J, Zilles K, Beierle C, Rottschy C, Eickhoff SB. A novel meta-analytic approach: mining frequent co-activation patterns in neuroimaging databases. Neuroimage. 2014;90:390–402. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans AC, Collins DL, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. In: 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference. 1993:1813–1817. doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.1993.373602.
   Google Scholar
• Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR, Kurth F, Fox PT. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2349–2361. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, Wang LE, Zilles K, Fox PT. Coordinate-based activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a random-effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(9):2907–2926. doi:10.1002/hbm.20718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkeltaub PE, Eden GF, Jones KM, Zeffiro TA. Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation. Neuroimage. 2002;16(3 Pt 1):765–780. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albajes-Eizagirre A, Solanes A, Vieta E, Radua J. Voxel-based meta-analysis via permutation of subject images (PSI): theory and implementation for SDM. Neuroimage. 2019;186:174–184. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radua J, Rubia K, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Pomarol-Clotet E, Fusar-Poli P, Mataix-Cols D. Anisotropic kernels for coordinate-based meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:13. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox PT, Lancaster JL, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. Meta-analysis in human neuroimaging: computational modeling of large-scale databases. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:409–434. doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salimi-Khorshidi G, Smith SM, Keltner JR, Wager TD, Nichols TE. Meta-analysis of neuroimaging data: a comparison of image-based and coordinate-based pooling of studies. Neuroimage. 2009;45(3):810–823. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa T, Manuello J, Ferraro M, et al. BACON: a tool for reverse inference in brain activation and alteration. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021;42(11):3343–3351. doi:10.1002/hbm.25452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa T, Liloia D, Cauda F, et al. A minimum Bayes Factor based threshold for activation likelihood estimation. Neuroinform. 2023;21(2):365–374. doi:10.1007/s12021-023-09626-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickhoff SB, Nichols TE, Laird AR, et al. Behavior, Sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation. Neuroimage. 2016;137:70–85. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Fox PM, Lancaster JL, Fox PT. Implementation errors in the GingerALE Software: description and recommendations. Hum Brain Mapp. 2017;38(1):7–11. doi:10.1002/hbm.23342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner R, Rottschy C, Laird AR, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB. Meta-analytic connectivity modeling revisited: controlling for activation base rates. NeuroImage. 2014;99:559–570. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox PT, Lancaster JL. Opinion: mapping context and content: the BrainMap model. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(4):319–321. doi:10.1038/nrn789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist MA. The Statistical Analysis of fMRI Data. Stat Sci. 2008;23(4):439–464. doi:10.1214/09-STS282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poldrack RA, Mumford JA, Nichols TE. Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Logothetis NK, Wandell BA. Interpreting the BOLD Signal. Ann Rev Physiol. 2004;66(66):735–769. doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.66.082602.092845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Talairach PJ Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain; 1988. Available from: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1370565169355516436. Accessed April 17, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Collins DL, Neelin P, Peters TM, Evans AC. Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18(2):192–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahmasian M, Sepehry AA, Samea F, et al. Practical recommendations to conduct a neuroimaging meta-analysis for neuropsychiatric disorders. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(17):5142–5154. doi:10.1002/hbm.24746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox PT, Laird AR, Fox SP, et al. BrainMap taxonomy of experimental design: description and evaluation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):185–198. doi:10.1002/hbm.20141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird AR, Fox PM, Price CJ, et al. ALE meta-analysis: controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts. Hum Brain Mapp. 2005;25(1):155–164. doi:10.1002/hbm.20136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanasse TJ, Fox PM, Barron DS, et al. BrainMap VBM: an environment for structural meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(8):3308–3325. doi:10.1002/hbm.24078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusar-Poli P, Placentino A, Carletti F, et al. Functional atlas of emotional faces processing: a voxel-based meta-analysis of 105 functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009;34(6):418–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vytal K, Hamann S. Neuroimaging support for discrete neural correlates of basic emotions: a voxel-based meta-analysis. J Cogn Neurosci. 2010;22(12):2864–2885. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks SJ, Savov V, Allzén E, Benedict C, Fredriksson R, Schiöth HB. Exposure to subliminal arousing stimuli induces robust activation in the amygdala, hippocampus, anterior cingulate, insular cortex and primary visual cortex: a systematic meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Neuroimage. 2012;59(3):2962–2973. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan X, Zhou X, Li J, et al. Common and distinct neurofunctional representations of core and social disgust in the brain: coordinate-based and network meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;135:104553. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaten M, Stevenson RJ, Case TI. Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychol Bull. 2009;135(2):303–321. doi:10.1037/a0014823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis V, de Barra M, Aunger R. Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011;366(1563):389–401. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicario CM, Rafal RD, Martino D, Avenanti A. Core, social and moral disgust are bounded: a review on behavioral and neural bases of repugnance in clinical disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;80:185–200. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips ML, Young AW, Senior C, et al. A specific neural substrate for perceiving facial expressions of disgust. Nature. 1997;389(6650):495–498. doi:10.1038/39051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley R, Howe S, Marmanis H. Notes on the data quality of bibliographic records from the MEDLINE database. Database. 2023;2023:baad070. doi:10.1093/database/baad070
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKeown S, Mir ZM. Considerations for conducting systematic reviews: evaluating the performance of different methods for de-duplicating references. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):38. doi:10.1186/s13643-021-01583-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrfuss J, Mar RA. Lost in localization: the need for a universal coordinate database. Neuroimage. 2009;48(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. PLoS Med. 2021;18(3):e1003583. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liloia D, Manuello J, Costa T, Keller R, Nani A, Cauda F. Atypical local brain connectivity in pediatric autism spectrum disorder? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of regional homogeneity studies. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024;274(1):3–18. doi:10.1007/s00406-022-01541-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkeltaub PE, Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Fox M, Wiener M, Fox P. Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(1):1–13. doi:10.1002/hbm.21186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster JL, Cykowski MD, McKay DR, et al. Anatomical global spatial normalization. Neuroinformatics. 2010;8(3):171–182. doi:10.1007/s12021-010-9074-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laird AR, Robinson JL, McMillan KM, et al. Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: validation of the Lancaster transform. Neuroimage. 2010;51(2):677–683. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuello J, Liloia D, Crocetta A, Cauda F, Costa T. CBMAT: a MATLAB toolbox for data preparation and post hoc analyses in neuroimaging meta-analyses. Behav Res. 2023. doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02185-3
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster JL, Woldorff MG, Parsons LM, et al. Automated Talairach atlas labels for functional brain mapping. Hum Brain Mapp. 2000;10(3):120–131. doi:10.1002/1097-0193(200007)10:3<120::aid-hbm30>3.0.co;2-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid AT, Bzdok D, Genon S, et al. ANIMA: a data-sharing initiative for neuroimaging meta-analyses. Neuroimage. 2016;124(Pt B):1245–1253. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.060
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schilbach L, Müller VI, Hoffstaedter F, et al. Meta-analytically informed network analysis of resting state fMRI reveals hyperconnectivity in an introspective socio-affective network in depression. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liloia D, Mancuso L, Uddin LQ, et al. Gray matter abnormalities follow non-random patterns of co-alteration in autism: meta-connectomic evidence. NeuroImage. 2021;30:102583. doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso L, Costa T, Nani A, et al. The homotopic connectivity of the functional brain: a meta-analytic approach. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3346. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-40188-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar