372
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Effect of Leader Perfectionism on Employee Deviance: An Interpersonal Relationship Perspective

, , , &
Pages 1677-1688 | Received 13 Dec 2023, Accepted 09 Apr 2024, Published online: 19 Apr 2024

References

  • Xu L, Liu Z, Ji M, et al. Leader perfectionism—friend or foe of employee creativity? Locus of control as a key contingency. Acad Manage J. 2022;65(6):2092–2117. doi:10.5465/amj.2019.0165
  • Song S, Chen X, Wang W, et al. Does perfectionism in leaders increase or impede team decision-making performance? Team level LMX as a key factor. Pers Individ Differ. 2022;197:111769. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2022.111769
  • Guo L, Chiang JTJ, Mao JY, et al. Abuse as a reaction of perfectionistic leaders: a moderated mediation model of leader perfectionism, perceived control, and subordinate feedback seeking on abusive supervision. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2020;93(3):790–810. doi:10.1111/joop.12308
  • Ocampo ACG, Wang L, Kiazad K, et al. The relentless pursuit of perfectionism: a review of perfectionism in the workplace and an agenda for future research. J Organ Behav. 2020;41(2):144–168. doi:10.1002/job.2400
  • Curran T, Hill AP. Perfectionism is increasing over time: a meta-analysis of birth cohort differences from 1989 to 2016. Psychol Bull. 2019;145(4):410–429. doi:10.1037/bul0000138
  • Suh H, Kim S, Lee D. Review of perfectionism research from 1990 to 2019 utilizing a text-mining approach. Rev Gen Psychol. 2021;25(3):283–303. doi:10.1177/10892680211018827
  • Hewitt PL, Flett GL. Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(3):456–470. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.3.456
  • Otto K, Geibel HV, Kleszewski E. “Perfect leader, perfect leadership?” Linking leaders’ perfectionism to monitoring, transformational, and servant leadership behavior. Front Psychol. 2021;12:657394. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.657394
  • Wang H, Li D, Wu L, et al. Effects of leader narcissism on career success of employees: an interpersonal relationship perspective. Front Psychol. 2021;12:679427. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679427
  • Chen G, Sharma PN, Edinger SK, et al. Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: cross-level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. J Appl Psychol. 2011;96(3):541–557. doi:10.1037/a0021886
  • Thiel CE, McClean S, Harvey J, et al. Trouble with big brother: counterproductive consequences of electronic monitoring through the erosion of leader-member social exchange. J Organ Behav. 2023;44(9):1320–1339. doi:10.1002/job.2748
  • Roopak K, Mishra SK, Sikarwar E. Linking leader-follower proactive personality congruence to creativity. Pers Rev. 2019;48(2):454–470. doi:10.1108/PR-11-2017-0332
  • Qin X, Chen C, Yam KC, et al. The double-edged sword of leader humility: investigating when and why leader humility promotes versus inhibits subordinate deviance. J Appl Psychol. 2020;105(7):693. doi:10.1037/apl0000456
  • Rizani M, Widyanti R, Kurniaty K, et al. Effect of the toxic leadership on organizational performance with workplace deviant behavior of employees as mediation. Strateg Manag J. 2022;2(01):26–38. doi:10.55751/smbj.v2i01.28
  • Park H, Hoobler JM, Wu J, et al. Abusive supervision and employee deviance: a multifoci justice perspective. J Bus Ethics. 2019;158(4):1113–1131. doi:10.1037/apl0000387
  • Zhou Y, Qian H. Research on the influence mechanism of dual leadership on the constructive deviant behavior of the new generation of employees-the chain mediating effect of promoting regulatory focus and role width self-efficacy. Front Psychol. 2021;12:775580. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.775580
  • Nevicka B, Sedikides C. Employee narcissism and promotability prospects. J Pers. 2021;89(4):847–862. doi:10.1111/jopy.12619
  • Bernerth JB, Carter MZ, Cole MS. The (in) congruence effect of leaders’ narcissism identity and reputation on performance: a socioanalytic multistakeholder perspective. J Appl Psychol. 2022;107(10):1725–1742. doi:10.1037/apl0000974
  • Mao JY, Quan J, Li Y, et al. The differential implications of employee narcissism for radical versus incremental creativity: a self‐affirmation perspective. J Organ Behav. 2021;42(7):933–949. doi:10.1002/job.2540
  • Orford J. The rules of interpersonal complementarity: does hostility beget hostility and dominance, submission?. Psychol Rev. 1986;93(3):365–377. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.365
  • Shechtman N, Horowitz LM. Interpersonal and noninterpersonal interactions, interpersonal motives, and the effect of frustrated motives. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006;32(8):1126–1139. doi:10.1177/0146167206288669
  • Man Tang P, Koopman J, McClean ST, et al. When conscientious employees meet intelligent machines: an integrative approach inspired by complementarity theory and role theory. Acad Manage J. 2022;65(3):1019–1054. doi:10.5465/amj.2020.1516
  • Rosenthal SA, Pittinsky TL. Narcissistic leadership. Leadersh Q. 2006;17(6):617–633. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.005
  • Li Z. Understanding the relations between narcissistic rivalry and reactive aggression: the roles of status-seeking motivation, hostile attribution bias and mindfulness. Pers Individ Differ. 2023;207:112154. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112154
  • Rasmussen K. Entitled vengeance: a meta-analysis relating narcissism to provoked aggression. Aggress Behav. 2016;42(4):362–379. doi:10.1002/ab.21632
  • Berkowitz L. Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation. Psychol Bull. 1989;106(1):59–73. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.1.59
  • Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1970;1(3):185–216. doi:10.1177/135910457000100301
  • Landry G, Vandenberghe C. Role of commitment to the supervisor, leader-member exchange, and supervisor-based self-esteem in employee-supervisor conflicts. J Soc Psychol. 2009;149(1):5–28. doi:10.3200/SOCP.149.1.5-28
  • Jonason PK, Webster GD. The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad[J]. Psychol Assess. 2010;22(2):420–432. doi:10.1037/a0019265
  • Mitchell MS, Ambrose ML. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. J Appl Psychol. 2007;92(4):1159–1168. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159
  • Christian MS, Ellis APJ. Examining the effects of sleep deprivation on workplace deviance: a self-regulatory perspective. Acad Manage J. 2011;54(5):913–934. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0179
  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, et al. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
  • Little TD, Cunningham WA, Shahar G, et al. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Struct Equation Model. 2002;9(2):151–173. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
  • Gao Y, Liu H. How supervisor–subordinate guanxi influence employee innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:2001–2014. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S342875
  • Guo Y, Chen L, Song LJ, et al. How LMX differentiation attenuates the influence of ethical leadership on workplace deviance: the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Front Psychol. 2021;12:693557. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.693557
  • Liu C, Yang J, Liu J, et al. The effect of abusive supervision on employee deviant behaviors: an identity-based perspective. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2021;32(4):948–978. doi:10.1080/09585192.2018.1511613