216
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Perceived Social Mobility and Smartphone Dependence in University Students: The Roles of Hope and Family Socioeconomic Status

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 1805-1817 | Received 23 Dec 2023, Accepted 09 Apr 2024, Published online: 30 Apr 2024

References

  • Mahapatra S. Smartphone addiction and associated consequences: role of loneliness and self-regulation. Behav Inform Technol. 2019;38(8):833–844. doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1560499
  • Billieux J. Problematic use of the mobile phone: a literature review and a pathways model. Curr Psychiatry Rev. 2012;8(4):299–307. doi:10.2174/157340012803520522
  • Horwood S, Anglim J. Personality and problematic smartphone use: a facet-level analysis using the Five Factor Model and HEXACO frameworks. Comput Hum Behav. 2018;85:349–359. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.013
  • Chen L, Yan Z, Tang WJ, Yang FY, Xie XD, He JC. Mobile phone addiction levels and negative emotions among Chinese young adults: the mediating role of interpersonal problems. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;55:856–866. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.030
  • Hawi NS, Samaha M. To excel or not to excel: strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Comput Educ. 2016;98:81–89. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.007
  • Zhang MX, Wu AMS. Effects of smartphone addiction on sleep quality among Chinese university students: the mediating role of self-regulation and bedtime procrastination. Addict Behav. 2020;111:106552. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106552
  • Li L, Gao HY, Xu YH. The mediating and buffering effect of academic self-efficacy on the relationship between smartphone addiction and academic procrastination. Comput Educ. 2020;159:104001. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104001
  • Hong FY, Chiu SI, Huang DH. A model of the relationship between psychological characteristics, mobile phone addiction and use of mobile phones by Taiwanese university female students. Comput Hum Behav. 2012;28(6):2152–2159. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.020
  • Roberts JA, Pullig C, Manolis C. I need my smartphone: a hierarchical model of personality and cell-phone addiction. Pers Individ Dif. 2015;79:13–19. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.049
  • Rozgonjuk D, Elhai JD. Emotion regulation in relation to smartphone use: process smartphone use mediates the association between expressive suppression and problematic smartphone use. Curr Psychol. 2021;40(7):3246–3255. doi:10.1007/s12144-019-00271-4
  • Shen X, Wang J-L. Loneliness and excessive smartphone use among Chinese college students: moderated mediation effect of perceived stressed and motivation. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;95:31–36. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.012
  • Busch PA, McCarthy S. Antecedents and consequences of problematic smartphone use: a systematic literature review of an emerging research area. Comput Hum Behav. 2021;114:106414. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106414
  • Marengo D, Sindermann C, Häckel D, Settanni M, Elhai JD, Montag C. The association between the Big Five personality traits and smartphone use disorder: a meta-analysis. J Behav Addict. 2020;9(3):534–550. doi:10.1556/2006.2020.00069
  • Gifford E, Humphreys K. The psychological science of addiction. Addiction. 2007;102(3):352–361. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01706.x
  • Herrero J, Torres A, Vivas P, Urueña A. Technological addiction in context: the influence of perceived neighborhood social disorder on the extensive use and addiction to the smartphone. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2021;39(6):1108–1120. doi:10.1177/0894439319896230
  • Zhitomirsky-Geffet M, Blau M. Cross-generational analysis of predictive factors of addictive behavior in smartphone usage. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;64:682–693. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.061
  • Chiu SI. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese university student: a mediation model of learning self-Efficacy and social self-Efficacy. Comput Hum Behav. 2014;34:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.024
  • Herrero J, Torres A, Vivas P, Arenas AE, Urueña A. Examining the empirical links between digital social pressure, personality, psychological distress, social support, users’ residential living conditions, and smartphone addiction. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2022;40(5):1153–1170. doi:10.1177/0894439321998357
  • Gugushvili A, Reeves A, Jarosz E. How do perceived changes in inequality affect health? Health Place. 2020;62:102276. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102276
  • Snyder-Mackler N, Burger JR, Gaydosh L, et al. Social determinants of health and survival in humans and other animals. Science. 2020;368(6493):843–854. doi:10.1126/science.aax9553
  • Zhang F, Jiang Y, Ming H, Yang CY, Huang SL. Family socioeconomic status and adolescents’ academic achievement: the moderating roles of subjective social mobility and attention. J Youth Adolescence. 2020;49(9):1821–1834. doi:10.1007/s10964-020-01287-x
  • Day MV, Fiske ST. Movin’on up? How perceptions of social mobility affect our willingness to defend the system. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2017;8(3):267–274. doi:10.1177/1948550616678454
  • Anderson C, Hildreth JAD, Howland L. Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychol Bull. 2015;141(3):574–601. doi:10.1037/a0038781
  • Wang X, Teng F, Chen Z, Poon K-T. Control my appearance, control my social standing: appearance control beliefs influence American women’s (not men’s) social mobility perception. Pers Individ Dif. 2020;155:109629. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109629
  • Day MV, Fiske ST. Understanding the nature and consequences of social mobility beliefs. In: The Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer; 2019:365–380.
  • Weintraub MLR, Fernald LCH, Adler N, Bertozzi S, Syme SL. Perceptions of social mobility: development of a new psychosocial indicator associated with adolescent risk behaviors. Front Public Health. 2015;3:62. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2015.00062
  • Yoon SY, Kim HC. Keeping the American Dream Alive: the interactive effect of perceived economic mobility and materialism on impulsive spending. J Marketing Res. 2016;53(5):759–772. doi:10.1509/jmr.15.0053
  • Davis RA. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Comput Hum Behav. 2001;17(2):187–195. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(00)00041-8
  • Lu X, Yeo KJ. Pathological Internet use among Malaysia University Students: risk factors and the role of cognitive distortion. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:235–242. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.021
  • Hobfoll SE. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev Gen Psychol. 2002;6(4):307–324. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.6.4.307
  • Snyder CR. Hope theory: rainbows in the mind. Psychol Inq. 2002;13(4):249–275. doi:10.1207/S15327965pli1304_01
  • Browman AS, Destin M, Kearney MS, Levine PB. How economic inequality shapes mobility expectations and behaviour in disadvantaged youth. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(3):214–220. doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0523-0
  • Jeon BC. Personal Social Mobility Beliefs and Motivation for Goals. Memorial University of Newfoundland; 2020.
  • Lee E, Yoon Y. Heading up or stuck down here? The effect of perceived economic mobility on subjective social status and brand identification. SAGE Open. 2022;12(3). doi:10.1177/21582440221123755
  • Hirschman AO, Rothschild M. The changing tolerance for income inequality in the course of economic development: with a mathematical appendix. Q J Econ. 1973;87(4):544–566. doi:10.2307/1882024
  • Jiang YQ, Ren YX, Zhu JJ, You JN. Gratitude and hope relate to adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: mediation through self-compassion and family and school experiences. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(2):935–942. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00624-4
  • Yowell CM. Possible selves and future orientation: exploring hopes and fears of Latino boys and girls. J Early Adolescence. 2000;20(3):245–280. doi:10.1177/0272431600020003001
  • Schmid KL, Phelps E, Kiely MK, Napolitano CM, Boyd MJ, Lerner RM. The role of adolescents’ hopeful futures in predicting positive and negative developmental trajectories: findings from the 4-H study of positive youth development. J Posit Psychol. 2011;6(1):45–56. doi:10.1080/17439760.2010.536777
  • Chen JH, Huebner ES, Tian LL. Longitudinal relations between hope and academic achievement in elementary school students: behavioral engagement as a mediator. Learn Individ Differ. 2020;78:101824. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101824
  • Qiu CX, Li RJ, Luo HC, Li SN, Nie YG. Parent-child relationship and smartphone addiction among Chinese adolescents: a longitudinal moderated mediation model. Addict Behav. 2022;130:107304. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2022.107304
  • Kimball TG, Shumway ST, Austin-Robillard H, Harris-Wilkes KS. Hoping and coping in recovery: a phenomenology of emerging adults in a collegiate recovery program. Alcohol Treat Q. 2017;35:46–62. doi:10.1080/07347324.2016.1256714
  • Koehn C, O’Neill L, Sherry J. Hope-focused interventions in substance abuse counselling. Int J Ment Health Ad. 2012;10(3):441–452. doi:10.1007/s11469-011-9360-3
  • Russo C, Barni D, Zagrean I, Lulli MA, Vecchi G, Danioni F. The resilient recovery from substance addiction: the role of self-transcendence values and hope. Mediterr J Clin Psyc. 2021;9(1). doi:10.6092/2282-1619/mjcp-2902
  • Davidai S, Gilovich T. Building a More Mobile America-One Income Quintile at a Time. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(1):60–71. doi:10.1177/1745691614562005
  • Day L, Hanson K, Maltby J, Proctor C, Wood A. Hope uniquely predicts objective academic achievement above intelligence, personality, and previous academic achievement. J Res Pers. 2010;44(4):550–553. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.009
  • Geraghty AWA, Wood AM, Hyland ME. Dissociating the facets of hope: agency and pathways predict dropout from unguided self-help therapy in opposite directions. J Res Pers. 2010;44(1):155–158. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.12.003
  • Kraus MW, Tan JJX. Americans overestimate social class mobility. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2015;58:101–111. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.01.005
  • Tan XY, Dou XJ, Zhang Y, Xing C, Bai BY, Miao RK. The structural dilemma of citizen participation: the interactive influence of social status and subjective social mobility. J Pac Rim Psychol. 2021;15. doi:10.1177/18344909211003169
  • Kraus MW, Piff PK, Mendoza-Denton R, Rheinschmidt ML, Keltner D. Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: how the rich are different from the poor. Psychol Rev. 2012;119(3):546–572. doi:10.1037/a0028756
  • Browman AS, Destin M, Carswell KL, Svoboda RC. Perceptions of socioeconomic mobility influence academic persistence among low socioeconomic status students. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2017;72:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2017.03.006
  • Laurin K, Fitzsimons GM, Kay AC. Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;100(1):149–171. doi:10.1037/a0021343
  • Browman AS, Svoboda RC, Destin M. A belief in socioeconomic mobility promotes the development of academically motivating identities among low-socioeconomic status youth. Self Identity. 2022;21(1):42–60. doi:10.1080/15298868.2019.1664624
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods. 2009;41(4):1149–1160. doi:10.3758/brm.41.4.1149
  • Stamps DL. The nexus between Black media consumers’ racial identity, critical and digital media literacy skills, and psychological well-being. Inform Commun Soc. 2024;27(1):56–72. doi:10.1080/1369118x.2023.2174789
  • Rao TT, Yang SL, Yu F, Xu BX, Wei J. Perception of class mobility moderates the relationship between social class and prosocial behaviour. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2022;25(1):88–102. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12466
  • Botella C, Molinari G, Fernández-álvarez J, et al. Development and validation of the openness to the future scale: a prospective protective factor. Health Qual Life Out. 2018;16(1):1–16. doi:10.1186/s12955-018-0889-8
  • Fischer E, Glashauser A, Laireiter AR. Development and Evaluation of a Prospective Group coaching program: increasing well-being and openness to the future in a subclinical sample. J Happiness Stud. 2022;23(8):3799–3842. doi:10.1007/s10902-022-00561-y
  • Vazquez C, Valiente C, García FE, et al. Post-traumatic growth and stress-related responses during the COVID-19 pandemic in a national representative sample: the role of positive core beliefs about the world and others. J Happiness Stud. 2021;22(7):2915–2935. doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00352-3
  • Miragall M, Escrivá-Martínez T, Wrzesien M, et al. Too many lemons to make lemonade? Disentangling mental health during the third wave of COVID-19 infections in Spain. Curr Psychol. 2022. doi:10.1007/s12144-022-03638-2
  • Leung L. Linking psychological attributes to addiction and improper use of the mobile phone among adolescents in Hong Kong. J Child Media. 2008;2(2):93–113. doi:10.1080/17482790802078565
  • Wu J, Yang ZL, Wu MX, Huang H. The relationship between college students’ mobile phone addiction and aggression: a moderated mediation model. Appl Res Qual Life. 2023;18(2):1037–1055. doi:10.1007/s11482-022-10126-z
  • Gao TT, Li JM, Zhang H, et al. The influence of alexithymia on mobile phone addiction: the role of depression, anxiety and stress. J Affect Disord. 2018;225:761–766. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.08.020
  • Li XW, Feng XC, Xiao WL, Zhou H. Loneliness and mobile phone addiction among Chinese college students: the mediating roles of boredom proneness and self-control. Psychol Res Behav Ma. 2021;14:687–694. doi:10.2147/Prbm.S315879
  • Liang X, Wang Z, Yu J. Family socioeconomic status and toddlers’ social adjustment in rural‐to‐urban migration and urban families: the roles of maternal sensitivity and attachment security. Psychol Dev Educ. 2021;37(6):792–799. doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.06.05
  • Chu XY, Chen YX, Litifu A, et al. Social anxiety and phubbing: the mediating role of problematic social networking and the moderating role of family socioeconomic status. Psychol Schools. 2024;61(2):553–567. doi:10.1002/pits.23067
  • Chu XY, Wang Q, Huang WF, et al. Neuroticism and problematic online gaming: the mediating role of social anxiety and the moderating role of family socioeconomic status. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(16):13497–13506. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02588-5
  • Yang JP, Li S, Gao L, Wang XC. Longitudinal associations among peer pressure, moral disengagement and cyberbullying perpetration in adolescents. Comput Hum Behav. 2022;137:107420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107420
  • Bradley RH, Corwyn RF. Socioeconomic status and child development. Annu Rev Psychol. 2002;53(1):371–399. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233
  • Cheung GW, Lau RS. Accuracy of parameter estimates and confidence intervals in moderated mediation models: a comparison of regression and latent moderated structural equations. Organ Res Methods. 2017;20(4):746–769. doi:10.1177/1094428115595869
  • Klein A, Moosbrugger H. Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika. 2000;65(4):457–474. doi:10.1007/BF02296338
  • Cheung GW, Cooper-Thomas HD, Lau RS, Wang LC. Testing moderation in business and psychological studies with latent moderated structural equations. J Bus Psychol. 2021;36(6):1009–1033. doi:10.1007/s10869-020-09717-0
  • Johnson PO, Neyman J. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Stat Res Mem. 1936;1:57–93.
  • Arslan G. Psychological maltreatment, forgiveness, mindfulness, and internet addiction among young adults: a study of mediation effect. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;72:57–66. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.037
  • Kim K, Milne GR, Bahl S. Smart phone addiction and mindfulness: an intergenerational comparison. Int J Pharm Healthc. 2018;12(1):25–43. doi:10.1108/IJPHM-08-2016-0044
  • Du H, Liang Y, Chi P, King RB. Chinese perceive upward social mobility: how future mobility is influenced, but not limited by past mobility. Int J Psychol. 2021;56(6):951–960. doi:10.1002/ijop.12771
  • Ke GN, Wong SF. A healthy mind for problematic internet use. Cyberpsych Beh Soc N. 2018;21(10):637–645. doi:10.1089/cyber.2018.0072
  • Wang X, Chen WF, Hong YY, Chen ZS. Perceiving high social mobility breeds materialism: the mediating role of socioeconomic status uncertainty. J Bus Res. 2022;139:629–638. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.014
  • Shariff AF, Wiwad D, Aknin LB. Income mobility breeds tolerance for income inequality: cross-national and experimental evidence. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016;11(3):373–380. doi:10.1177/1745691616635596
  • Wiwad DCM. The Rags-To-Riches Story of Income Mobility and Its Impact on Emotional Well-Being [ Doctoral dissertation]; 2015.
  • Zhao S, Du HF, Li QF, Wu QL, Chi PL. Growth mindset of socioeconomic status boosts subjective well-being: a longitudinal study. Pers Indiv Differ. 2021;168:110301. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110301
  • Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Oettingen G. Pragmatic prospection: how and why people think about the future. Rev Gen Psychol. 2016;20(1):3–16. doi:10.1037/gpr0000060
  • Yoon S, Kim HC. Feeling economically stuck: the effect of perceived economic mobility and socioeconomic status on variety seeking. J Consum Res. 2018;44(5):1141–1156. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucx091
  • Sagioglou C, Forstmann M, Greitemeyer T. Belief in social mobility mitigates hostility resulting from disadvantaged social standing. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2019;45(4):541–556. doi:10.1177/0146167218789073
  • Eom K, Kim HS, Sherman DK. Social class, control, and action: socioeconomic status differences in antecedents of support for pro-environmental action. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;77:60–75. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.009
  • Satici SA. Psychological vulnerability, resilience, and subjective well-being: the mediating role of hope. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;102:68–73. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.057
  • Jenaro C, Flores N, Gómez-Vela M, González-Gil F, Caballo C. Problematic internet and cell-phone use:: psychological, behavioral, and health correlates. Addict Res Theory. 2007;15(3):309–320. doi:10.1080/16066350701350247
  • van Deursen AJAM, Bolle CL, Hegner SM, Kommers PAM. Modeling habitual and addictive smartphone behavior The role of smartphone usage types, emotional intelligence, social stress, self-regulation, age, and gender. Comput Hum Behav. 2015;45:411–420. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.12.039
  • Shane J, Heckhausen J. University students’ causal conceptions about social mobility: diverging pathways for believers in personal merit and luck. J Vocat Behav. 2013;82(1):10–19. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2012.08.003