Exploring the Association Between Textual Parameters and Psychological and Cognitive Factors

References

• Iliev R, Dehghani M, Sagi E. Automated text analysis in psychology: methods, applications, and future developments. Lang Cognit. 2014;7(2):265–290. doi:10.1017/langcog.2014.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichstaedt JC, Kern ML, Yaden DB, et al. Closed-and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: a review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2021;26(4):398. doi:10.1037/met0000349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keeffe A, Walsh S. Applying corpus linguistics and conversation analysis in the investigation of small group teaching in higher education. Corpus Linguist Linguist Theory. 2012;8(1):159–181. doi:10.1515/cllt-2012-0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung C, Pennebaker J. The psychological functions of function words. In: Social Communication. Psychology Press; 2011:343–359.
   Google Scholar
• Manchaiah V, Swanepoel DW, Bennett RJ. Online consumer reviews on hearing health care services: a textual analysis approach to examine psychologically meaningful language dimensions. Am J Audiol. 2021;30(3):669–675. doi:10.1044/2021_AJA-20-00223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman ML, Pennebaker JW, Berry DS, Richards JM. Lying words: predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2003;29(5):665–675. doi:10.1177/0146167203029005010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook BL, Progovac AM, Chen P, Mullin B, Hou S, Baca-Garcia E. Novel use of natural language processing (NLP) to predict suicidal ideation and psychiatric symptoms in a text-based mental health intervention in Madrid. Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:1–8. doi:10.1155/2016/8708434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarzynska-Wawer J, Wawer A, Pawlak A, et al. Detecting formal thought disorder by deep contextualized word representations. Psychiatry Res. 2021;304:114135. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathje S, Mirea D-M, Sucholutsky I, Marjieh R, Robertson C, Van Bavel JJ. GPT is an effective tool for multilingual psychological text analysis; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Korkmaz A, Aktürk C, Talan T. Analyzing the user’s sentiments of ChatGPT using twitter data. Iraqi J Comput Sci Math. 2023;4(2):202–214. doi:10.52866/ijcsm.2023.02.02.018
   Google Scholar
• Turney PD, Pantel P. From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics. J Artif Intell Res. 2010;37:141–188. doi:10.1613/jair.2934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roumeliotis KI, Tselikas ND, Nasiopoulos DK. LLMs in e-commerce: a comparative analysis of GPT and LLaMA models in product review evaluation. Nat Lang Proces J. 2024;6:100056. doi:10.1016/j.nlp.2024.100056
   Google Scholar
• Chowdhery A, Narang S, Devlin J, et al. Palm: scaling language modeling with pathways. J Mach Learn Res. 2023;24(240):1–113.
   Google Scholar
• Radford A, Narasimhan K, Salimans T, Sutskever I. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Uludag K. Testing creativity of ChatGPT in psychology: interview with ChatGPT. Available at SSRN 4390872; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Binz M, Schulz E. Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2023;120(6):e2218523120. doi:10.1073/pnas.2218523120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz DM. Can generative AI infer thinking style from language? Evaluating the utility of AI as a psychological text analysis tool. Behav Res Methods. 2024;1–12. doi:10.3758/s13428-022-02040-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilperoord J. It’s about time: temporal aspects of cognitive processes in text production. In: It’s About Time. Brill; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JC, Watts J, List J-M, Puryear C, Drabble R, Lindquist KA. From text to thought: how analyzing language can advance psychological science. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021;17(3):805–826. doi:10.1177/17456916211004899
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson T, Wiebe J, Hoffmann P. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis; 2005:347–354.
   Google Scholar
• Riloff E, Wiebe J. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions; 2003:105–112.
   Google Scholar
• Kuperus W. Classifying Deceptive Emails with First and Third Person Pronouns: Applying Support Vector Machine on. Tilburg University; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Orvell A, Vickers BD, Drake B, et al. Does distanced self-talk facilitate emotion regulation across a range of emotionally intense experiences? Clin Psychol Sci. 2020;9(1):68–78. doi:10.1177/2167702620951539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder S, Milbury K, Wagner R, Cohen L. Words matter: the use of generic “you” in expressive writing in an oncology setting. J Health Psychol. 2023;13591053231182218. doi:10.1177/13591053231182218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Battisti F, Ferrara A, Salini S. A decade of research in statistics: a topic model approach. Scientometrics. 2015;103(2):413–433. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1554-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Prakash N, Hoang NK, Hee MS, Naseem U, Lee RK-W. Prompting Large Language Models for Topic Modeling. IEEE. 2023;1236–1241. doi:10.1109/JPROC.2023.3273517
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McFarland DA, Ramage D, Chuang J, Heer J, Manning CD, Jurafsky D. Differentiating language usage through topic models. Poetics. 2013;41(6):607–625. doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2013.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khemani B, Adgaonkar A. A review on reddit news headlines with nltk tool. SSRN Electr J. 2021. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3834240
   Google Scholar
• Farkiya A, Saini P, Sinha S, Desai S. Natural language processing using NLTK and wordNet. Int J Comput Sci Inf Technol. 2015;6(6):5465–5469.
   Google Scholar
• Yogish D, Manjunath T, Hegadi RS. Review on Natural Language Processing Trends and Techniques Using NLTK. Springer; 2019:589–606.
   Google Scholar
• Mehl MR, Raison CL, Pace TW, Arevalo JM, Cole SW. Natural language indicators of differential gene regulation in the human immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(47):12554–12559. doi:10.1073/pnas.1707373114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesnil G, Mikolov T, Ranzato MA, Bengio Y. Ensemble of generative and discriminative techniques for sentiment analysis of movie reviews. arXiv. 2014. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1412.5335
   Google Scholar
• Boals A, Klein K. Word use in emotional narratives about failed romantic relationships and subsequent mental health. J Lang Soc Psychol. 2005;24(3):252–268. doi:10.1177/0261927X05278386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelwall M, Buckley K, Paltoglou G. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol. 2012;63(1):163–173. doi:10.1002/asi.21662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualit Psychol. 2022;9(1):3–26. doi:10.1037/qup0000196
   Google Scholar
• Pennebaker JW, Mehl MR, Niederhoffer KG. Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Ann Rev Psychol. 2003;54(1):547–577. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdowson HG. Discourse Analysis. Vol. 133. Oxford University Press Oxford; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser AC, McNamara DS, Louwerse MM, Cai Z. Coh-Metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behav Res Methods Instr Comput. 2004;36(2):193–202. doi:10.3758/BF03195564
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evangelopoulos NE. Latent semantic analysis. WIREs Cognit Sci. 2013;4(6):683–692. doi:10.1002/wcs.1254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondracki NL, Wellman NS, Amundson DR. Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2002;34(4):224–230. doi:10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu D, Li M, Yang X, et al. An analysis of cognitive change in online mental health communities: a textual data analysis based on post replies of support seekers. Inform Proc Manag. 2023;60(2):103192. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreotta M, Nugroho R, Hurlstone MJ, et al. Analyzing social media data: a mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis. Behav Res Methods. 2019;51(4):1766–1781. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01202-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasukawa T, Yi J. Sentiment analysis: capturing favorability using natural language processing; 2003:70–77.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y-X, Santamaría R, Butz A, Therón R. Tagclusters: Semantic Aggregation of Collaborative Tags Beyond Tagclouds. Springer; 2009:56–67.
   Google Scholar
• Shi F, Chen L, Han J, Childs P. A data-driven text mining and semantic network analysis for design information retrieval. J Mech Design. 2017;139(11). doi:10.1115/1.4037649
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khusro S, Jabeen F, Khan A. Tag clouds: past, present and future. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sec A Phys Sci. 2021;91(2):369–381. doi:10.1007/s40010-018-0571-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar