Computational Modeling Interpretation Underlying Elevated Risk-Taking Propensity in the Dynamic Risky Investment Process of Non-Labor Income

References

• Gajewski JF, Meunier L, Ohadi S. Do sources of money matter in risk-taking behaviour? Appl Econ. 2022;54(4):443–466. doi:10.1080/00036846.2021.1963412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler RH. Mental accounting matters. J Behav Decis Mak. 1999;12(3):183–206. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199909)12:3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson MM, Rasker R, Gude PH. The importance of non-labor income: an analysis of socioeconomic performance in western counties by type of non-labor income. J Reg Anal Policy. 2014;44(2):175–190.
   Google Scholar
• Kim EL, Tanford S. The windfall gain effect: using a Surprise discount to stimulate add-on purchases. Int J Hosp Manag. 2021;95:102918. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seol M, Kim Y. Hedonic consumption and consumer’s choice under the windfall gains. 한국산업정보학회논문지 [Journal of Korea Society of Industrial Information Systems]. 2022;27(2):83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott M, Binde P, Clark L, et al. Conceptual framework of harmful gambling: an international collaboration revised September 2015. Gambling Research Exchange Ontario (GREO); 2015. Available from: https://prism.ucalgary.ca/items/3cd090fd-a0be-464a-83be-77b660e2e8b3. Accessed October 24, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Arkes HR, Joyner CA, Pezzo MV, Nash JG, Siegel-Jacobs K, Stone E. The psychology of windfall gains. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1994;59(3):331–347. doi:10.1006/obhd.1994.1063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonides G, Ranyard R. Mental accounting and economic behaviour. Econ Psychol. 2017;3:123–138.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson PW, Peterson RA. Mental accounting and categorization. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1992;51(1):92–117. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90006-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang CY, Sussman AB. Perspectives on mental accounting: an exploration of budgeting and investing. Financ Plan Rev. 2018;1:1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Magar EC, Phillips LH, Hosie JA. Self-regulation and risk-taking. Personal Individ Differ. 2008;45(2):153–159. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M Cultural Anthropology: a Contemporary Perspective; 1981. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3317238. Accessed November 3, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Shefrin HM, Thaler RH. Mental accounting, saving, and self-control. Adv Behav Econ. 2004;3:395–428.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler RH, Johnson EJ. Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: the effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Manage Sci. 1990;36(6):643–660. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.6.643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey NT, Ramalingam A, Stoddard BV. Experimental (re-) analysis of the house-money effect in a public goods game. J Econ Sci Assoc. 2023;9(1):1–14. doi:10.1007/s40881-022-00122-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J. House money effects in public good experiments. Exp Econ. 2002;5(3):223–231. doi:10.1023/A:1020832203804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison GW. House money effects in public good experiments: comment. Exp Econ. 2007;10(4):429–437. doi:10.1007/s10683-006-9145-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. In: Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I. World Scientific; 2013:99–127.
   Google Scholar
• Lejuez CW, Read JP, Kahler CW, et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). J Exp Psychol Appl. 2002;8(2):75. doi:10.1037/1076-898X.8.2.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasagna CA, Pleskac TJ, Burton CZ, McInnis MG, Taylor SF, Tso IF. Mathematical modeling of risk-taking in bipolar disorder: evidence of reduced behavioral consistency, with altered loss aversion specific to those with history of substance use disorder. Comput Psychiatry. 2022;6(1). doi:10.5334/cpsy.61
   Google Scholar
• Wallsten TS, Pleskac TJ, Lejuez CW. Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task. Psychol Rev. 2005;112(4):862. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou R, Myung JI, Pitt MA. The scaled target learning model: revisiting learning in the balloon analogue risk task. Cognit Psychol. 2021;128:101407. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aklin WM, Lejuez CW, Zvolensky MJ, Kahler CW, Gwadz M. Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(2):215–228. doi:10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejuez CW, Aklin WM, Jones HA, et al. The balloon analogue risk task (BART) differentiates smokers and nonsmokers. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2003;11(1):26. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.11.1.26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleskac TJ. Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008;34(1):167. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews B, Wilding JM. The relation of depression and anxiety to life‐stress and achievement in students. Br J Psychol. 2004;95(4):509–521. doi:10.1348/0007126042369802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer DM, Meyvis T, Davidenko N. Instructional manipulation checks: detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(4):867–872. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK Beck Depression Inventory. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich New York; 1987. Available from: http://www.med.upenn.edu/cbti/assets/user-content/documents/Beck%20Depression%20Inventory.pdf. Accessed January 25, 2024.
   Google Scholar
• Löwe B, Kroenke K, Herzog W, Gräfe K. Measuring depression outcome with a brief self-report instrument: sensitivity to change of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). J Affect Disord. 2004;81(1):61–66. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(03)00198-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PT, McCrae RR. The Revised Neo Personality Inventory (Neo-Pi-r). Sage Publications, Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger CD, Gonzalez-Reigosa F, Martinez-Urrutia A, Natalicio LF, Natalicio DS. The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Rev Interam Psicol J Psychol. 1971;5:3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51(6):768–774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput. 2017;27:1413–1432. doi:10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElreath R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lejuez CW, Aklin WM, Bornovalova MA, Moolchan ET. Differences in risk-taking propensity across inner-city adolescent ever-and never-smokers. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7(1):71–79. doi:10.1080/14622200412331328484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeel RL, Pilarski C, Pytlak K, Neudecker J. Personality and performance-based measures in the prediction of alcohol use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(3):402. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Q, Zhong R, Ji X, et al. Decision‐making biases in suicide attempters with major depressive disorder: a computational modeling study using the balloon analog risk task (BART). Depress Anxiety. 2022;39(12):845–857. doi:10.1002/da.23291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robles E, Emery NN, Vargas PA, et al. Patterns of responding on a balloon analogue task reveal individual differences in overall risk-taking: choice between guaranteed and uncertain cash. J Gen Psychol. 2014;141(3):207–227. doi:10.1080/00221309.2014.896781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Wang H, Wang C. Paying out one versus paying out all trials and the decrease in behavioral and brain activity in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Psychophysiology. 2020;57(3):e13510. doi:10.1111/psyp.13510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman CM, Nakamoto K, Rao AG. Pleasant surprises: consumer response to unexpected in-store coupons. J Mark Res. 2002;39(2):242–252. doi:10.1509/jmkr.39.2.242.19081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu YL, Chow EH. The house money effect on investment risk taking: evidence from Taiwan. Pac Basin Finance J. 2013;21(1):1102–1115. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2012.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahilevitz MA, Loewenstein G. The effect of ownership history on the valuation of objects. J Consum Res. 1998;25(3):276–289. doi:10.1086/209539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barkan R, Danziger S, Ben-Bashat G, Busemeyer JR. Framing reference points: the effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency. J Behav Decis Mak. 2005;18(3):213–226. doi:10.1002/bdm.496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Soberon-Ferrer H. Consumer vulnerability to fraud: influencing factors. J Consum Aff. 1997;31(1):70–89. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6606.1997.tb00827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar