382
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 355-372 | Published online: 10 Dec 2019

References

  • Black N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ. 2013;346:f167. doi:10.1136/bmj.f116423358487
  • Klose K, Kreimeier S, Tangermann U, Aumann I, Damm K. Patient- and person-reports on healthcare: preferences, outcomes, experiences, and satisfaction - an essay. Health Econ Rev. 2016;6(1):18. doi:10.1186/s13561-016-0094-627209027
  • Williams K, Sansoni J, Morris D, Grootemaat P. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Literature Review. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2016.
  • Emilsson L, Lindahl B, Koster M, Lambe M, Ludvigsson JF. Review of 103 Swedish healthcare quality registries. J Intern Med. 2015;277(1):94–136. doi:10.1111/joim.2014.277.issue-125174800
  • Wilcox N, McNeil JJ. Clinical quality registries have the potential to drive improvements in the appropriateness of care. Med J Aust. 2016;205(10):S27–S29. doi:10.5694/mja15.0092127852198
  • Lannin NA, Anderson C, Lim J, et al. Telephone follow-up was more expensive but more efficient than postal in a national stroke registry. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66(8):896–902. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.00523810029
  • The Dutch institute for clinical auditing. Available from: https://dica.nl/.Accessed 125, 2019.
  • Brandal A, Eriksson M, Glader EL, Wester P. Effect of early supported discharge after stroke on patient reported outcome based on the Swedish Riksstroke registry. BMC Neurol. 2019;19(1):40. doi:10.1186/s12883-019-1268-830866844
  • Cadilhac DA, Kilkenny MF, Levi CR, et al. Risk-adjusted hospital mortality rates for stroke: evidence from the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry (AuSCR). Med J Aust. 2017;206(8):345–350. doi:10.5694/mja16.0052528446116
  • Corbalan R, Bassand JP, Illingworth L, et al. Analysis of outcomes in ischemic vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the GARFIELD-AF registry. JAMA Cardiol. 2019. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2018.4729
  • Smith EE, Fang J, Alibhai SM, et al. Derivation and external validation of a scoring system for predicting fracture risk after ischemic stroke in a Canadian cohort. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76:925. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1114
  • Hoque DE, Ruseckaite R, Lorgelly P, McNeil JJ, Evans SM. Cross-sectional study of characteristics of clinical registries in Australia: a resource for clinicians and policy makers. Int j Qual Health Care. 2018;30(3):192–199. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzx19629385457
  • Ekegren CL, de Steiger R, Edwards ER, et al. Using patient-reported outcomes to predict revision arthroplasty following femoral neck fracture: enhancing the value of clinical registries through data linkage. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(8):1325. doi:10.3390/ijerph16081325
  • Hoque DME, Earnest A, Ruseckaite R, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing completeness of responses of three methods of collecting patient-reported outcome measures in men diagnosed with prostate cancer. Qual Life Res. 2018. doi:10.1007/s11136-11018-12061-11137
  • Churches T, Naylor J, Harris I. Arthroplasty Clinical Outcomes Registry National (ACORN) Annual Report 2017. Sydney: Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre; 2018.
  • Vishwanath S, Ng N, Cooter R, et al. Establishing patient-reported outcome measures for the Breast Device Registry. ANZ J Surg. 2019;89(3):266–267. doi:10.1111/ans.2019.89.issue-3
  • Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user’s guide. 3rd edition. Two volumes. (Prepared by the Outcome DEcIDE Center [Outcome Sciences, Inc., a Quintiles company] under Contract No. 290 2005 00351 TO7.). AHRQ Publication No.13(14)-EHC111. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 4 2014 Available from: http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/420/1897/registries-guide-3rd-edition-vol-1-140430.pdf. Accessed 125, 2019.
  • Ahern S, Evans SM, Hopper I, Earnest A. Clinical quality registries for clinician-level reporting: strengths and limitations. Med J Aust. 2018;208(7):323. doi:10.5694/mja2.2018.208.issue-729642822
  • de Groot S, van der Linden N, Franken MG, et al. Balancing the optimal and the feasible: a practical guide for setting up patient registries for the collection of real-world data for health care decision making based on Dutch experiences. Value Health. 2017;20(4):627–636. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.00728408005
  • Franklin P, Chenok K, Lavalee D, et al. Framework to guide the collection and use of patient-reported outcome measures in the learning healthcare system. EGEMS. 2017;5(1):17.29881737
  • Gemmen E, Tomaszewski EL. Collecting PROs in patient registries: the need for and potential impact of providing PRO data to the treating physician – and when. Poster at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). 19th Annual International Meeting 6 2014; Montreal, Canada.
  • Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded !sourcebook. London: Sage; 1994.
  • Eton DT, Shevrin DH, Beaumont J, Victorson D, Cella D. Constructing a conceptual framework of patient-reported outcomes for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Value Health. 2010;13(5):613–623. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2010.00702.x20230544
  • Breckenridge K, Bekker HL, Gibbons E, et al. How to routinely collect data on patient-reported outcome and experience measures in renal registries in Europe: an expert consensus meeting. Nephrol Dialysis Transplant. 2015;30(10):1605–1614. doi:10.1093/ndt/gfv209
  • Rolfson O, Bohm E, Franklin P, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis. Acta Orthop. 2016;87(Suppl 1):9–23. doi:10.1080/17453674.2016.118181627228230
  • Franklin PD, Lewallen D, Bozic K, Hallstrom B, Jiranek W, DC A. Implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in US total joint replacement registries: rationale, status, and plans. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(Supplement 1):104–109. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.0032825520425
  • Azad TD, Kalani M, Wolf T, et al. Building an electronic health record integrated quality of life outcomes registry for spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24(1):176–185. doi:10.3171/2015.3.SPINE14112726431073
  • Helsten DL, Ben Abdallah A, Avidan MS, et al. Methodologic considerations for collecting patient-reported outcomes from unselected surgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2016;125(3):495–504. doi:10.1097/ALN.000000000000121727355128
  • Rana AJ. Building a patient-reported outcome metric database: one hospital’s experience. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(6):1151–1154. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.01727215139
  • Ashley L, Jones H, Thomas J, et al. Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(10):e230. doi:10.2196/jmir.276424161667
  • Morris S, Booth J, Hegarty J. Spine Tango registry data collection in a conservative spinal service: a feasibility study. Eur Spine j. 2016;25(9):2984–2992. doi:10.1007/s00586-016-4697-827439415
  • Moloczij N, Gough K, Solomon B, et al. Development of a hospital-based patient-reported outcome framework for lung cancer patients: a study protocol. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):10. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0837-z29325571
  • Franklin PD, Harrold L, Ayers DC. Incorporating patient-reported outcomes in total joint arthroplasty registries: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(11):3482–3488. doi:10.1007/s11999-013-3193-223897504
  • Schamber EM, Takemoto SK, Chenok KE, Bozic KJ. Barriers to completion of patient reported outcome measures. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1449–1453. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.06.02523890831
  • Thompson CJ, Morris D, Sansoni JE, Capell JT, Williams K. Patient Reported Outcome Measures: An Environmental Scan of the Australian Health Care Sector. Wollongong: Australian Health Services Research Institute; 2016.
  • Ahern S, Evans S, Hopper I, Zalcberg J. Towards a strategy for clinical quality registries in Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2018. doi:10.1071/AH17201
  • Clinical Oncology Society of Australia. Implementing monitoring of patient-reported outcomes into cancer care in Australia. 2018 Available from: https://www.cosa.org.au/media/332504/cosa_pros_think_tank_report_final.pdf.Accessed 125, 2019.
  • Ahern S, Ruseckaite R, Ackerman IN. Collecting patient-reported outcome measures. Intern Med J. 2017;47(12):1454–1457. doi:10.1111/imj.1363329224197
  • Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013;6:61–68. doi:10.4137/HSI.S1109325114561
  • Gabbe BJ, Sutherland AM, Hart MJ. Population-based capture of long term functional and quality of life outcomes following major trauma – the experiences of the Victorian State Trauma Registry. J Trauma. 2010;69(3):532–536. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e5125b20838122
  • Bariatric Surgery Registry Sixth Annual Report: 2017/18. Monash University; 2018.
  • Gomes M, Gutacker N, Bojke C, Street A. Addressing missing data in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS): implications for the use of PROMS for comparing provider performance. Health Econ. 2016;25(5):515–528. doi:10.1002/hec.v25.525740592
  • Wheat H, Horrell J, Valderas JM, Close J, Fosh B, Lloyd H. Can practitioners use patient reported measures to enhance person centred coordinated care in practice? A qualitative study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018;16(1):223. doi:10.1186/s12955-018-1045-130509311
  • Basch E, Abernethy AP, Mullins CD, et al. Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(34):4249–4255. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.42.596723071244
  • Reeve BB, Wyrwich KW, Wu AW, et al. ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(8):1889–1905. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y23288613
  • Wiering B, de Boer D, Delnoij D. Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review. Health Expectations. 2017;20(1):11–23. doi:10.1111/hex.2017.20.issue-126889874
  • Coons SJ, Rao S, Keininger DL, Hays RD. A comparative review of generic quality-of-life instruments. PharmacoEconomics. 2000;17(1):13–35. doi:10.2165/00019053-200017010-0000210747763
  • Payakachat N, Ali MM, Tilford JM. Can the EQ-5D detect meaningful change? A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics. 2015;33(11):1137–1154. doi:10.1007/s40273-015-0295-626040242
  • Rowe G, Wright G. The Delphi technique: past, present, and future prospects - introduction to the special issue. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2011;78(9):1487–1490. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.09.002