Patient Reported Outcome Measures After Breast Augmentation – Using the BREAST-Q IS

References

• Hopper I, Parker E, Pellegrini B, Mulvany C, Pace M, Ahern S, Earnest A, Cooter RD, Farrell G, Elder E, Moore CM, McNeil JJ on behalf of the ABDR. The Australian Breast Device Registry 2018 Annual Report. Monash University, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, October 2019 Report No 3, 68 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Caouette-Laberge L, Borsuk D. Congenital anomalies of the breast. Semin Plast Surg. 2013;27(1):36–41. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1343995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper I, Best RL, McNeil JJ, et al. Pilot for the Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR): a national opt-out clinical quality registry for breast device surgery. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):1–7. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deva AK, Cuss A, Magnusson M, Cooter R. The “game of implants”: a perspective on the crisis-prone history of breast implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(Suppl_1):S55–S65. doi:10.1093/asj/sjy310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitry MA, Sogani J, Sutton EJ, et al. Rare cancer on the rise: an educational review of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. J Breast Imaging. 2020;2(4):398–407. doi:10.1093/jbi/wbaa041
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. Department of Health and Ageing. Therapeutic Goods Administration. Australian regulatory guidelines for medical devices (ARGMD). 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ng S, Kirkman M, Fisher J, et al. Establishing the acceptability of a brief patient reported outcome measure and feasibility of implementing it in a breast device registry - a qualitative study. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019;3(1):63. doi:10.1186/s41687-019-0152-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibrahim AM, Ayeni OA, Hughes KB, Lee BT, Slavin SA, Lin SJ. Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70(6):732–738. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824b3d30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallberg H, Rafnsdottir S, Selvaggi G, et al. Benefits and risks with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) and mesh support in immediate breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2018;52(3):130–147. doi:10.1080/2000656X.2017.1419141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng S, Parker E, Pusic A, et al. Lessons learned in implementing Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in the Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR). Aesthet Surg J. 2020;42:sjaa376. doi:10.1093/asj/sjaa376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella D, Hahn E, Jensen S, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Ahern S, Ruseckaite R, Ackerman IN. Collecting patient-reported outcome measures. Intern Med J. 2017;47(12):1454–1457. doi:10.1111/imj.13633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldring T, Smith SM. Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Health Services Insights. 2013;6(1):61–68. doi:10.4137/HSI.S11093
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyce MB, Browne JP. Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(9):2265–2278. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0390-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O. Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. SAGE. 2017;4:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi M, Turunen H, Bondas T. Content analysis and thematic analysis: implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nurs Health Sci. 2013;15(3):398–405. doi:10.11111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morley R, Leech T. Optimal assessment tools in assessing breast surgery: patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) vs. objective measures. Gland Surg. 2019;8(4):416–424. doi:10.21037/gs.2019.02.04
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow A, Mayer EK, Darzi AW, Athanasiou T. Patient-reported outcome measures: the importance of patient satisfaction in surgery. Surgery. 2009;146(3):435–443. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Scott A, Klok J, Cano SJ. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:11. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-9-11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarwer DB, LaRossa D, Bartlett SP, Low DW, Bucky LP, Whitaker LA. Body image concerns of breast augmentation patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(1):83–90. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000066005.07796.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit Roig FB. Management of emerging public health issues and risks. In: Benoit Roig KW, Thireau V, editors. Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Changing Environment. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science and Technology; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Adidharma W, Latack KR, Colohan SM, Morrison SD, Cederna PS. Breast implant illness: are social media and the internet worrying patients sick? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(1):225e–227e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz JF. Review of 494 consecutive breast augmentation patients: system to improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017;5(10):e1526. doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000001526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pantelides NM, Srinivasan JR. Rippling following breast augmentation or reconstruction: aetiology, emerging treatment options and a novel classification of severity. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(4):980–985. doi:10.1007/s00266-018-1117-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell ML, Jewell HL. breast implant-associated illness: medicine by belief, so says Dr. Google. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(4):NP87–NP89. doi:10.1093/asj/sjz007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar