Characteristics of Exceptionally Good Doctors: A Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Survey of Adults

References

• Curran J. The doctor, his patient and the illness. BMJ. 2007;335(7626):941. doi:10.1136/bmj.39384.467928.94
   Google Scholar
• Balint M. The doctor, his patient, and the illness. Lancet. 1955;265(6866):683–688. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(55)91061-8
   Google Scholar
• Health AGDo. Medicare in Australia. Australians make more than 150 million visits to a GP every year; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Begg CB, Riedel ER, Bach PB, et al. Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. New Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1138–1144. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa011788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ Jr., Riedel ER, Begg CB, Kattan MW, Scardino PT. Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters. J Urol. 2005;173(6):2099–2103. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000158163.21079.66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ Jr., Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, et al. Variations among experienced surgeons in cancer control after open radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2010;183(3):977–983. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown EC, Robicsek A, Billings LK, et al. Evaluating primary care physician performance in diabetes glucose control. Am J Med Qual. 2016;31(5):392–399. doi:10.1177/1062860615585138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glance LG, Dick A, Osler TM, Li Y, Mukamel DB. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card. Med Care. 2006;44(4):311–319. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000204106.64619.2a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossl M, Rihal CS, Lennon RJ, Singh M. Assessment of individual operator performance using a risk-adjustment model for percutaneous coronary interventions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013;88(11):1250–1258. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.07.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley M, Mohammed MA, Hussain S, Yates J, Almasri A. Was Rodney Ledward a statistical outlier? Retrospective analysis using routine hospital data to identify gynaecologists’ performance. Br Med J. 2005;330(7497):929–932. doi:10.1136/bmj.38377.675440.8F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunadian B, Dunning J, Roberts AP, Morley R, de Belder MA. Funnel plots for comparing performance of PCI performing hospitals and cardiologists: demonstration of utility using the New York hospital mortality data. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;73(5):589–594. doi:10.1002/ccd.21893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landercasper J, Borgert AJ, Fayanju OM, et al. Factors associated with reoperation in breast-conserving surgery for cancer: a prospective study of American Society of Breast Surgeon members. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(10):3321–3336. doi:10.1245/s10434-019-07547-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudmik L, Xu Y, Alt JA, et al. Evaluating surgeon-specific performance for endoscopic sinus surgery. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;143(9):891–898. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.0752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle C, Clark J, Mascord R, Jones M. Is there a surgeons’ effect on patients’ physical health, beyond the intervention, that requires further investigation? A systematic review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022;18(18):467–490. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S357934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle C, Clark J, Mascord R, Jones M. Is there a doctors’ effect on patients’ physical health, beyond the intervention and all known factors? A systematic review. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022;18:721–737. doi:10.2147/TCRM.S372464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle C, Jones MA. The doctors’ effect on patients’ physical health outcomes beyond the intervention. A methodological review. Clin Epidemiol. 2022;14:851–870. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S35792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, MacDonald R, Kane RL. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;180(3):820–829. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruthappu M, Gilbert BJ, El-Harasis MA, et al. The influence of volume and experience on individual surgical performance: a systematic review. Review. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):642–647. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen P-HA, Cheong JH, Jolly E, Elhence H, Wager TD, Chang LJ. Socially transmitted placebo effects. Nat Hum Behav. 2019;3(12):1295–1305. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0749-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreau A, Boussageon R, Girier P, Figon S. The “doctor” effect in primary care. Presse Med. 2006;35(6I):967–973. doi:10.1016/S0755-4982(06)74729-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckett DJ, Spears M, Thomson E. Reliable consultant level data from an acute medical unit: a powerful tool for improvement. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018;48(2):108–113. doi:10.4997/jrcpe.2018.202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Hilal M, Morgan EC, Lewis G, McPhail M, Malik HZ, Hocken D. What makes a good doctor in the 21st century? A qualitative study. Br J Hosp Med. 2006;67(7):375–377. doi:10.12968/hmed.2006.67.7.21623
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill LR, Schenck D. Healing skills for medical practice. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(10):720–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner-Hofbauer V, Schrank B, Holzinger A. What is a good doctor? Review. Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018;168(15–16):398–405. doi:10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzig S, Biehl L, Stelberg H, Hick C, Schmeißer N, Koerfer A. What makes a doctor a good doctor? A content analysis of assessments by a sample of doctors. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2006;131(51–52):2883–2888. doi:10.1055/s-2006-957216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Tor PC, King J, Seo JS. A Korean survey on qualities and definition of a good psychiatrist. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(5):632–638. doi:10.3346/jkms.2015.30.5.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliems H, Witt CM. The good doctor: a qualitative study of German homeopathic physicians. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17(3):265–270. doi:10.1089/acm.2010.0158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambe P, Bristow D. What are the most important non-academic attributes of good doctors a Delphi survey of clinicians. Med Teach. 2010;32(8):e347–e354. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2010.490603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miratashi Yazdi SN, Nedjat S, Majdzadeh R, Arbabi M. Who is a good doctor? Patients & physicians’ perspectives. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(1):150–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti CR. What makes a good doctor? Clin Cardiol. 2005;28(11):496–498. doi:10.1002/clc.4960281102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates C. The good doctor. Clin Med. 2001;1(2):128–131. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.1-2-128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith DH. How to be a good doctor in the 1990s: stand and deliver. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(6):1724–1728. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70347-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magauran CE, Brennan M. Being a “good doctor”. J Palliat Med. 2008;11(3):506–508. doi:10.1089/jpm.2007.0206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis K, Carbone R, Fredericks J, Lujan J, Basdeo A. What makes a good doctor: a qualitative study of patient perspectives; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson L. What makes a good surgeon? Editorial. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008;100(2):261–264. doi:10.1016/S0027-9684(15)31216-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crile GW. The most important factor in the treatment of war wounds and the most important factor in civilian surgery – the good surgeon. Ann Surg. 1919;70(4):385–387. doi:10.1097/00000658-191910000-00001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darzi A, Smith S, Taffinder N.Assessing operative skill. Needs Become More Objective. BMJ. 1999;318(7188):887–888. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7188.887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandhi J. Making of a surgeon. Al Ameen J Med Sci. 2019;12(2):54–55.
   Google Scholar
• Arora S, Sevdalis N, Suliman I, Athanasiou T, Kneebone R, Darzi A. What makes a competent surgeon?: experts’ and trainees’ perceptions of the roles of a surgeon. Am J Surg. 2009;198(5):726–732. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson B. What makes an excellent surgeon? Note. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1087–1089. doi:10.1007/s11695-019-03778-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones D What are the character strengths of a good doctor? Jubilee centre for character and virtues: insight series; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehead CR. The Good Doctor in Medical Education 1910–2010: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Canada: University of Toronto; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hanyok LA, Hellmann DB, Rand C, Ziegelstein RC. Practicing patient-centered care: the questions clinically excellent physicians use to get to know their patients as individuals. Patient. 2012;5(3):141–145. doi:10.1007/BF03262487
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schenck D, Churchill L. Healers: Extraordinary Clinicians at Work. Oxford University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Schnelle C, Jones MA. Protocol for a qualitative study on doctors’ opinions on and experiences of exceptionally good doctors. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:103–109. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S343554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnelle C, Jones MA. Qualitative study of medical doctors on their experiences and opinions of the characteristics of exceptionally good doctors. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2022;13:717–731. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S370980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3(1):e001570. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson E. The patients who decide what makes a good doctor. BMJ. 2018;361:k1829. doi:10.1136/bmj.k1829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007;4(10):e297. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng M. Conceptualization of cross-sectional mixed methods studies in health science: a methodological review. Int J Qual Methods. 2015;3(2):66–87.
   Google Scholar
• Amazon. Amazon mechanical turk; 2022. Available from: https://www.mturk.com/. Accessed February 5, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Buhrmester MD, Talaifar S, Gosling SD. An evaluation of Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(2):149–154. doi:10.1177/1745691617706516
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boas TC, Christenson DP, Glick DM. Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, mechanical turk, and qualtrics. Political Sci Res Methods. 2020;8(2):232–250. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(1):3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortensen K, Hughes TL. Comparing Amazon’s Mechanical Turk platform to conventional data collection methods in the health and medical research literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(4):533–538. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4246-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson J, Rosenzweig C, Moss AJ, Litman L. Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the mechanical turk participant pool. PLoS One. 2019;14(12):e0226394. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics. Qualtrics website; 2022. Available from: https://qualtrics.com. Accessed February 5, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Moss A, Litman L Demographics of people on amazon mechanical turk. Cloud Research blog post. Available from: https://www.cloudresearch.com/resources/blog/who-uses-amazon-mturk-2020-demographics/. Accessed August 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffermann D. The role of sampling weights when modeling survey data. Int Stat Rev. 1993;61:317–337. doi:10.2307/1403631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valliant R, Dever JA. Survey Weights: A Step-by-Step Guide to Calculation. TX: Stata Press College Station; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Cook C, Heath F, Thompson RL. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60(6):821–836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C, Heath F, Thompson R. A meta-analysis of response rates in web- or internet-based survey. Educ Psychol Meas. 2000;60:821–836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick JA, Narayan S, Smith WR. Satisficing in surveys: initial evidence. New Dir Eval. 1996;1996(70):29–44. doi:10.1002/ev.1033
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using Multivariate Statistics. 7th ed. Pearson Educatoin, Inc.; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Altman NS. An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. Am Stat. 1992;46(3):175–185. doi:10.1080/00031305.1992.10475879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter MJ, Beardah CC, Wright RVS. Some archaeological applications of kernel density estimates. J Archaeol Sci. 1997;24(4):347–354. doi:10.1006/jasc.1996.0119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NVivo (version 12); 2018. Available from: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home?_ga=2.258719299.835966230.1648946019-1691335512.1648946019. Accessed August 9, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Moss AJ, Rosenzweig C, Robinson J, Litman L. Is it ethical to use mechanical turk for behavioral research? Relevant data from a representative survey of MTurk participants and wages. Prepr PsyArXiv Prepr. 2020. doi:10.31234/osf.io/jbc9d
   Google Scholar
• Klingenberg A, Bahrs O, Szecsenyi J. Wie beurteilen Patienten Hausärzte und ihre Praxen? Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1999;93(6):437–445. German.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GC. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure in general practice. Fam Pract. 2005;22(3):328–334. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmh730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schattner A, Rudin D, Jellin N. Good physicians from the perspective of their patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(1):26. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-4-26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar