A Prognostic Study for the Development of Risk Prediction Model for the Success of Vaginal Birth Following a Cesarean Surgery at Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia

References

• Senturk MB, Cakmak Y, Atac H, Budak MS. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after cesarean section and outcomes in rural area of Anatolia. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:693–697. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S83800
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trojano G, Damiani GR, Olivieri C, et al. VBAC: antenatal predictors of success. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(3):300–309. doi:10.23750/abm.v90i3.7623
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berghella V. Obstetric Evidence Based Guidelines/Edited by Vincenzo Berghella. London: Informa Healthcare; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Sentilhes L, Vayssière C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstetrics Gynecol Reproductive Biol. 2013;170(1):25–32. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao M-J, Hu M-X, Hu M. Temporary bilateral uterine artery occlusion combined with vasopressin in control of hemorrhage during laparoscopic management of cesarean scar pregnancies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(2):205–208. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnwald CP, Mercer BM. Vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery: predicting success, risks of failure. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004;15(6):388–393.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel RM, Jain L: Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes. In: Seminars in perinatology: 2010: Elsevier; 2010. 272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Minh T, Phuoc H. The success rate and associate factors of vaginal birth after cesarean section at Tu Du Hospital in Vietnam. Int J Pregnancy Child Birth. 2018;4(3):129–133.
   Google Scholar
• Metz TD, Stoddard GJ, Henry E, Jackson M, Holmgren C, Esplin S. Simple, validated vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model for use at the time of admission. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(3):571. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829f8ced
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessmer-Tuck JA, El-Nashar SA, Racek AR, Lohse CM, Famuyide AO, Wick MJ. Predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: a cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2014;77(2):121–126. doi:10.1159/000357757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorel E, Melman S, Van Kuijk S, et al. Predicting successful intended vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: external validation of two predictive models in a Dutch nationwide registration‐based cohort with a high intended vaginal delivery rate. BJOG. 2014;121(7):840–847. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella M. Recurrent pregnancy loss. In: Berghella V, editor. Obstetric Evidence-Based Guidelines. London: Taylor & Farancis; 2007:109–115
   Google Scholar
• Metz TD, Allshouse AA, Faucett AM, Grobman WA. Validation of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesareans. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):948. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–1379. doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misgan E, Gedefaw A, Negash S, Asefa A. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in teaching hospitals of Addis Ababa University: a cross-sectional study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–9. doi:10.1155/2020/1540460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filipose Mesay. Available from: http://ir.bdu.edu.et. Accessed January 11, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Horey D, Kealy M, Davey MA, Small R, Crowther CA. Interventions for supporting pregnant women’s decision‐making about mode of birth after a caesarean. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2013;7:548.
   Google Scholar
• Boulvain M, Fraser WD, Brisson‐Carroll G, Faron G, Wallast E. Trial of labour after caesarean section in sub‐Saharan Africa: a meta‐analysis. BJOG. 1997;104(12):1385–1390. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb11008.x
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi JB, Doshi HU, Kotdawala PJ. Vaginal birth after one caesarean section: analysis of indicators of success. J Indian Med Assoc. 2006;104(3):113–115.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siraneh Y, Assefa F, Tesfaye M. Feto-maternal outcome of vaginal birth after cesarean and associated factors among mothers with previous cesarean scar at Attat Lord Merry Primary Hospital, Gurage Zone, South Ethiopia. J Pregnancy Child Health. 2018;5(5):390. doi:10.4172/2376-127X.1000390
   Google Scholar
• Maykin MM, Mularz AJ, Lee LK, Valderramos SG. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery reveals unexpected success in a diverse American population. Am J Perinatology Rep. 2017;7(1):e31–e38. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1599129
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seffah J, Adu-Bonsaffoh K. Vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: current trends and outlook in Ghana. J West Af College Surgeons. 2014;4(2):1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hassan A. Trial of scar and vaginal birth after caesarean section. J Ayub Med College Abbottabad. 2005;17(1):57–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu Y, Kataria Y, Wang Z, Ming W-K, Ellervik C. Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12884-019-2517-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooney SS, Hiscock R, Clarke IDA, Craig S. Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: validation of a prediction model. Australian N Z J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2019;59(1):66–70. doi:10.1111/ajo.12809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fhkcog FO. Developing a pilot model to predict successful vaginal birth after caesarean section for Hong Kong Chinese women. Hong Kong J Gynaecol Obstetrics Midwifery. 2017;17(1):24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Shorten A, Shorten B, Kennedy HP. Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis. Birth. 2014;41(2):178–184. doi:10.1111/birt.12082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berghella M. Recurrent Pregnancy Loss. Berghella V Obstetric evidence based guidelines London Informa UK Ltd; 2007:109–115.
   Google Scholar
• Li Y-X, Bai Z, Long D-J, et al. Predicting the success of vaginal birth after caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMJ open. 2019;9(5):e027807. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoorel E, Van Kuijk S, Melman S, et al. Vaginal birth after a caesarean section: the development of a W estern E uropean population‐based prediction model for deliveries at term. BJOG. 2014;121(2):194–201. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar