Implementation of Telemonitoring in Health Care: Facilitators and Barriers for Using eHealth for Older Adults with Chronic Conditions

References

• Hajek A, Brettschneider C, Scherer M, et al. Needs and health care costs in old age: a longitudinal perspective: results from the AgeMooDe study. Aging Ment Health. 2020;24(10):1763–1768. doi:10.1080/13607863.2019.1673310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehnert T, Heider D, Leicht H, et al. Review: health care utilization and costs of elderly persons with multiple chronic conditions. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(4):387–420. doi:10.1177/1077558711399580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380(9836):37–43. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60240-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saedi AA, Feehan J, Phu S, Duque G. Current and emerging biomarkers of frailty in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:389–398. doi:10.2147/CIA.S168687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBrasseur NK, de Cabo R, Fielding R, et al. Identifying biomarkers for biological age: geroscience and the ICFSR task force. J Frailty Aging. 2021;10(3):196–201. doi:10.14283/jfa.2021.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. (US) Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications for Health Care. Field MJ, editor. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 1996. doi:10.17226/5296
   Google Scholar
• Farias FAC, Dagostini CM, Bicca YA, Falavigna VF, Falavigna A. Remote patient monitoring: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health. 2020;26(5):576–583. doi:10.1089/tmj.2019.0066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aamodt IT, Lycholip E, Celutkiene J, et al. Health care professionals’ perceptions of home telemonitoring in heart failure care: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(2):e10362. doi:10.2196/10362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do Nascimento LMSD, Bonfati LV, Freitas MB, Mendes JJA, Siqueira HV, Stevan SL. Sensors and systems for physical rehabilitation and health monitoring—a review. Sensors. 2020;20(15):4063. doi:10.3390/s20154063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund E, Lyngå P, Frie F, et al. Patient-centred home-based management of heart failure. Findings from a randomised clinical trial evaluating a tablet computer for self-care, quality of life and effects on knowledge. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015;49(4):193–199. doi:10.3109/14017431.2015.1035319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland-Tånneryd A, Melin M, Hägglund E, Hagerman I, Persson HE. From randomised controlled trial to real world implementation of a novel home-based heart failure tool: pooled and comparative analyses of two clinical controlled trials. Open Heart. 2019;6(1):e000954. doi:10.1136/openhrt-2018-000954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt Udsen F, Lilholt PH, Hejlesen O, Ehlers L. Cost-effectiveness of telehealth care to patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: results from the Danish “TeleCare North” cluster-randomised trial. BMJ. 2017;7(5):e014616. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management – an evidence synthesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18(4):211–220. doi:10.1258/jtt.2012.120219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljeroos M, Thylén I, Strömberg A. Patients’ and nurses’ experiences and perceptions of remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillators in heart failure: cross-sectional, descriptive, mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e19550. doi:10.2196/19550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen MC, Remler D. Information and communications technology in U.S. health care: why is adoption so slow and is slower better? J Health Polit Policy Law. 2009;34(6):1011–1034. doi:10.1215/03616878-2009-034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Burns J, May C, et al. Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study. Implement Sci. 2011;6:6. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-6-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivunen M, Saranto K. Nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators and barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(1):24–44. doi:10.1111/scs.12445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217–226. doi:10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers DC, Durlak JA, Wandersman A. The quality implementation framework: a synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. Am J Commun Psychol. 2012;50(3–4):462–480. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillippi J, Lauderdale J. A guide to field notes for qualitative research: context and conversation. Qual Health Res. 2018;28(3):381–388. doi:10.1177/1049732317697102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landes SJ, McBain SA, Curran GM. Reprint of: an introduction to effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs. Psychiatry Res. 2020;283:112630. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashton T. Implementing integrated models of care: the importance of the macro-level context. Int J Integr Care. 2015;15:e019. doi:10.5334/ijic.2247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auschra C. Barriers to the integration of care in inter-organisational settings: a literature review. Int J Integr Care. 2018;18(1):5. doi:10.5334/ijic.3068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte E, Pitchforth E. What is the evidence on the economic impacts of integrated care? [Technical report]. Denmark: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/2530944. Accessed January 6, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Coughlan C, Manek N, Razak Y, Klaber RE. How to improve care across boundaries. BMJ. 2020;369:m1045. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granja C, Janssen W, Johansen MA. Factors determining the success and failure of ehealth interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(5):e10235. doi:10.2196/10235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujnowska-Fedak MM, Grata-Borkowska U. Use of telemedicine-based care for the aging and elderly: promises and pitfalls. Smart Homecare Technol TeleHealth. 2015;3:91–105. doi:10.2147/SHTT.S59498
   Google Scholar
• Peek STM, Wouters EJ, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJ. What it takes to successfully implement technology for aging in place: focus groups with stakeholders. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e98. doi:10.2196/jmir.5253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerke S, Shachar C, Chai PR, Cohen IG. Regulatory, safety, and privacy concerns of home monitoring technologies during COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020;26(8):1176–1182. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0994-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glock H, Nymberg VM, Borgström BB, et al. Attitudes, Barriers, and Concerns Regarding Telemedicine Among Swedish Primary Care Physicians: a Qualitative Study. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:9237–9246. doi:10.2147/IJGM.S334782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruse C, Fohn J, Wilson N, Nunez Patlan E, Zipp S, Mileski M. Utilization barriers and medical outcomes commensurate with the use of telehealth among older adults: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2020;8(8):e20359. doi:10.2196/20359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pais B, Buluschek P, DuPasquier G, et al. Evaluation of 1-year in-home monitoring technology by home-dwelling older adults, family caregivers, and nurses. Front Public Health. 2020;8:518957. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.518957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xyrichis A, Iliopoulou K, Mackintosh NJ, et al. Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;2:CD012876. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malterud K, Kamps H. General practice – a fertile lagoon in the ocean of medical knowledge. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021;39(4):515–518. doi:10.1080/02813432.2021.2004831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkola I, Morgan S, Winell K, et al. Association of personalised care plans with monitoring and control of clinical outcomes, prescription of medication and utilisation of primary care services in patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational real-world study. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2022;40(1):39–47. doi:10.1080/02813432.2022.2036458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peetoom KKB, Lexis MAS, Joore M, Dirksen CD, De Witte LP. Literature review on monitoring technologies and their outcomes in independently living elderly people. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10(4):271–294. doi:10.3109/17483107.2014.961179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Lesende I, Orruño E, Mateos M, et al. Telemonitoring in-home complex chronic patients from primary care in routine clinical practice: impact on healthcare resources use. Eur J Gen Pract. 2017;23(1):135–142. doi:10.1080/13814788.2017.1306516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thulesius H. Increased importance of digital medicine and ehealth during the Covid-19 pandemic. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020;38(2):105–106. doi:10.1080/02813432.2020.1770466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar