Construct Validity and Test–Retest Reliability of Questionnaires to Assess Workplace Violence Risk Factors (QAWRF): A Tripartite Perspective of Worksite-Specific Determinants in Healthcare Settings

References

• NIOSH. Occupational Violence. Workplace safety & health topics web site; 2021. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/violence/default.html. Accessed 18, January 2021, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• OSHA. Guidelines for Preventing Workplace Violence for Healthcare and Social Service Workers (OSHA, 3148-04R). Washington, DC: OSHA; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Mento C, Silvestri MC, Bruno A, et al. Workplace violence against healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2020:51. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2020.101381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariffin AA. Workplace violence among healthcare workers in a health district and its predicting factors. Int J Public Health Clin Sci. 2020;7(5):65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Saragoza P, White SG. Workplace violence: practical considerations for mental health professionals in consultation, assessment, and management of risk. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2016;39(4):599–610. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2016.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y-L, Li R-Q, Qiu D, Xiao S-Y. Prevalence of workplace physical violence against health care professionals by patients and visitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(1):299. doi:10.3390/ijerph17010299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanctôt N, Guay S. The aftermath of workplace violence among healthcare workers: a systematic literature review of the consequences. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19(5):492–501. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2014.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell D, Di Martino V. Violence at Work. International Labour Organization; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland D, Henry M. The relationship between workplace violence, perceptions of safety, and professional quality of life among emergency department staff members in a level 1 trauma centre. Int Emerg Nurs. 2018;39:26–32. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2018.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourshaikhian M, Abolghasem Gorji H, Aryankhesal A, Khorasani-Zavareh D, Barati A. A systematic literature review: workplace violence against emergency medical services personnel. Arch Trauma Res. 2016;5(1):e28734. doi:10.5812/atr.28734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari A, Kaur T, Ranjan P, Chopra S, Sarkar S, Baitha U. Workplace violence against doctors: characteristics, risk factors, and mitigation strategies. J Postgrad Med. 2020;66(3):149–154. doi:10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_96_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raveel A, Schoenmakers B. Interventions to prevent aggression against doctors: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e028465. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain MM, Sharma R, Tasnim S, Al Kibria GM, Sultana A, Saxena T. Prevalence, characteristics, and associated factors of workplace violence against healthcare professionals in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. medRxiv. 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.01.01.20016295
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albrechtsen E, Solberg I, Svensli E. The application and benefits of job safety analysis. Saf Sci. 2019;113:425–437. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohd Hatta FH, Samsudin EZ, Aimran N, Ismail Z. Development and validation of Questionnaires to Assess Workplace Violence Risk Factors (QAWRF): a tripartite perspective of worksite-specific determinants in healthcare settings. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023;16:1229–1240. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S411335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolarinwa OA. Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195–201. doi:10.4103/1117-1936.173959
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Department TSH. Terengganu state health department directory; 2023. Available from: https://jknterengganu.moh.gov.my/v1/. Accessed September 05, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Hoe SL. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. J Appl Quant Methods. 2008;3(1):76.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Comrey AL, Backer TE, Glaser EM. A sourcebook for mental health measures; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler PM, Chou C-P. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol Methods Res. 1987;16(1):78–117. doi:10.1177/0049124187016001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. Pearson Education; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Awang Z. SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modelling. MPWS Rich Publication; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hair F, Babin C, Black B, Anderson R. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. Cengage; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Arifin WN. A web-based sample size calculator for reliability studies. Educ Med J. 2018;10:67–76. doi:10.21315/eimj2018.10.3.8
   Google Scholar
• Harrington D. Requirements for conducting confirmatory factor analysis: data considerations. In: Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Oxford University Press; 2008. doi10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195339888.003.0003
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S. Structure equation modeling basic assumptions and concepts: a novices guide. Int J Quant Qual Res Methods. 2015;2015:1.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan D. Structural equation modeling (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, California: Foundations and Extensions; 2009. Available from: https://methods.sagepub.com/book/structural-equation-modeling. Accessed September 05, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Aimran A, Ahmad S. Assessing the unidimensionality, reliability, validity and fitness of influential factors of 8th grades students’ mathematics achievement in Malaysia. Int J Adv Res. 2013;1:2320–9143.
   Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Vol. 892. River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall Upper Saddle; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokkema M, Greiff S. How Performing PCA and CFA on the Same Data Equals Trouble. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2017;33(6):399–402. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley AE, Scandura TA, Schriesheim CA, et al. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: guidelines, issues, and alternatives. J Organ Behav. 1997;18(6):667–683. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199711)18:6<667::AID-JOB874>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henson R, Roberts J. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66(3):393–416. doi:10.1177/0013164405282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Martí C, Testor CP. Is Chappell and Di Martino’s interactive model of workplace violence valid? An article analysing workplace violence towards healthcare professionals in Spain. Aggress Violent Behav. 2017;35:83–90. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramacciati N, Ceccagnoli A, Addey B, Lumini E, Rasero L. Violence towards emergency nurses: a narrative review of theories and frameworks. Int Emerg Nurs. 2018;39:2–12. doi:10.1016/j.ienj.2017.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez VA, Paravic TM. A model to investigate workplace violence in the health sector. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2013;34(1):196–200. doi:10.1590/s1983-14472013000100025
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He Y, Holroyd E, Koziol-McLain J. Understanding workplace violence against medical staff in China: a retrospective review of publicly available reports. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23(1):660. doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09577-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard DM, Newnam S, Louis RMS, Perrett MS. Factors contributing to work-related violence: a systematic review and systems perspective. Saf Sci. 2022;154:105859. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad M, Al-Rimawi R, Masadeh A, Atoum M. Workplace violence by patients and their families against nurses: literature review. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2015;2015:1.
   Google Scholar
• Ramacciati N, Ceccagnoli A, Addey B, Rasero L. Violence towards emergency nurses. The Italian national survey 2016: a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;81:21–29. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari A, Ranjan P, Sarkar S, Chopra S, Kaur T, Baitha U. Identifying predictors of workplace violence against healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2022;26(4):207–224. doi:10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_164_21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen RH, Karr JE, Saksvik SB, et al. Examining 3-month test-retest reliability and reliable change using the Cambridge neuropsychological test automated battery. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022;29(2):146–154. doi:10.1080/23279095.2020.1722126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari A, Singh A, Ranjan P, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate workplace violence in healthcare settings. Cureus. 2021;13(11):e19959. doi:10.7759/cureus.19959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI. Workplace Violence in the Health Sector Country Case Studies Research Instruments-Survey Questionnaire. International Labour Organization, International Council of Nurses, World Health Organization, Public Services International; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rouder J, Saucier O, Kinder R, Jans M. What to do with all those open-ended responses? Data visualization techniques for survey researchers. Surv Pract. 2021;14(1):1–9. doi:10.29115/SP-2021-0008
   Google Scholar
• Geer JG. What do open-ended questions measure? Public Opin Q. 1988;52(3):365–367. doi:10.1086/269113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson RB. Controlling social desirability bias. Int J Mark Res. 2019;61(5):534–547. doi:10.1177/1470785318805305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerri J, Thøgersen J, Testa F. Social desirability and sustainable food research: a systematic literature review. Food Qual Preference. 2019;71:136–140. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duijm NJ. Recommendations on the use and design of risk matrices. Saf Sci. 2015;76:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2015.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ettorre G, Caroli A, Pellicani V, Ceccarelli G. Preliminary risk assessment of workplace violence in hospital emergency departments. Ann Ig. 2020;32(2):99–108. doi:10.7416/ai.2020.2334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar