Navigating Quality Assessment Hurdles in Clinical Laboratory Services: A Comprehensive Review in Resource-Limited Settings

References

• World Health Organization. SEA/RC49/12-Quality Assurance in Laboratory Practices. WHO Regional Office for South‒East Asia; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Peter TF, Shimada Y, Freeman RR, Ncube BN, Khine -A-A, Murtagh MM. The need for standardization in laboratory networks. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(6):867–874. doi:10.1309/AJCPCBMOHM7SM3PJ
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini P, Plebani M, Ceriotti F, Rubboli F. Errors in laboratory medicine. Clin Chem. 2002;48(5):691–698. doi:10.1093/clinchem/48.5.691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. SEA/RC49/20-Report of the Forty-Ninth Session, Chiang Mai, Thailand. World Health Organization; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ceriotti F. The role of external quality assessment schemes in monitoring and improving the standardization process. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;432:77–81. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2013.12.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World health Organization. WHO Manual for Organizing a National External Quality Assessment Programme for Health Laboratories and Other Testing Sites. World health Organization; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Grimont PA, Weill F-X. Antigenic formulae of the Salmonella serovars. In: WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella. Vol. 9. World Health Organization; 2007:1–166.
   Google Scholar
• Banoo S, Bell D, Bossuyt P, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases: general principles. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007;5(Suppl 11):S21–S31. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1523x
   Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Harmonization in laboratory medicine: the complete picture. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(4):741–751. doi:10.1515/cclm-2013-0075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceriotti F, Cobbaert C. Harmonization of external quality assessment schemes and their role–clinical chemistry and beyond. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(10):1587–1590. doi:10.1515/cclm-2018-0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D, Ames D, Lopez B, Still R, Simpson W, Twomey P. External quality assessment: best practice. J Clin Pathol. 2014;67(8):651–655. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2013-201621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG. The role of proficiency testing in achieving standardization and harmonization between laboratories. Clin Biochem. 2009;42(4–5):232–235. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez A, Balandrano S, Parissi A, et al. Evaluation of new external quality assessment guidelines involving random blinded rechecking of acid-fast bacilli smears in a pilot project setting in Mexico. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2005;9(3):301–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim F, Dosoo D, Kronmann KC, et al. Good clinical laboratory practices improved proficiency testing performance at clinical trials centers in Ghana and Burkina Faso. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39098. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Padoan A, Plebani M. External quality assessment programs in the context of ISO 15189 accreditation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2018;56(10):1644–1654. doi:10.1515/cclm-2017-1179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QMS24 C. Using proficiency testing and alternative assessment to improve medical laboratory quality. In: Madison. WI, USA: CLSI; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Nah E-H, Cho S, Kim S, et al. International organization for standardization (ISO) 15189. Ann Lab Med. 2017;37(5):365–370. doi:10.3343/alm.2017.37.5.365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods GL, Ridderhof JC. Quality assurance in the mycobacteriology laboratory: quality control, quality improvement, and proficiency testing. Clinics Lab Med. 1996;16(3):657–675. doi:10.1016/S0272-2712(18)30260-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings RJ, Maher EJ, Quellhorst-Pawley B, Howell RT. An internet-based external quality assessment in cytogenetics that audits a laboratory’s analytical and interpretative performance. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008;16(10):1217–1224. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2008.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell R, Hastings R. The current scope of cytogenetics external quality assessment schemes and key recommendations for harmonization of external quality assessment in Europe. In: EuroGentest Network of Excellence Project; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baldeshwiler AM. History of FDA good laboratory practices. Qual Assur J. 2003;7(3):157–161. doi:10.1002/qaj.228
   Google Scholar
• Co-operation OfE, Development. OECD Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Molecular Genetic Testing. OCDE; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Ghernaout D, Aichouni M, Alghamdi A. Overlapping ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 into big data: a review and perspectives. Int J Sci Qual Anal. 2018;4(3):83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Laboratories WHOWGo QAoH. External Quality Assessment of Health Laboratories: Report on a WHO Working Group, Brussels, 4–7 December 1979. Vol. 36. Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens W, Gous N, Ford N, Scott LE. Feasibility of HIV point-of-care tests for resource-limited settings: challenges and solutions. BMC Med. 2014;12(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12916-014-0173-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petti CA, Polage CR, Quinn TC, Ronald AR, Sande MA. Laboratory medicine in Africa: a barrier to effective health care. Clinl Infect Dis. 2006;42(3):377–382. doi:10.1086/499363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurmessa A, Sisay A. Proficiency test feedback utilization at government hospitals laboratory, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Med Diagn Methods. 2017;6(258):2.
   Google Scholar
• Walshe K, Smith J. Healthcare Management. McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2011.
   Google Scholar
• van Limburg M, van Gemert-Pijnen JE, Nijland N, Ossebaard HC, Hendrix RM, Seydel ER. Why business modeling is crucial in the development of eHealth technologies. J Med Int Res. 2011;13(4):e124. doi:10.2196/jmir.1674
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Papoutsi C, et al. Beyond adoption: a new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. J Med Int Res. 2017;19(11):e8775. doi:10.2196/jmir.8775
   Google Scholar
• Mate KS, Rooney AL, Supachutikul A, Gyani G. Accreditation as a path to achieving universal quality health coverage. Globalization Health. 2014;10(1):1–8. doi:10.1186/s12992-014-0068-6
   Google Scholar
• Belete R, Cheneke W, Getachew A, Abdu A. Challenges of Clinical chemistry analyzers utilization in public hospital laboratories of selected zones of Oromia Region, Ethiopia: a Mixed Methods Study. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2021;34(4):26957–26964. doi:10.26717/BJSTR.2021.34.005584
   Google Scholar
• Mekonnen A, Gurmessa A, Kebede A, Kedir S, Likinew W, Yenealem D. Performance of international external quality assessment scheme participant laboratories in Ethiopia (2016–2018). Am J Lab Med. 2020;5(5):131–138. doi:10.11648/j.ajlm.20200505.11
   Google Scholar
• Perry L, Malkin R. Effectiveness of Medical Equipment Donations to Improve Health Systems: How Much Medical Equipment is Broken in the Developing World? Vol. 49. Springer; 2011:719–722.
   Google Scholar
• Wamai RG. Reviewing Ethiopia’s health system development. Population. 2004;75:31.
   Google Scholar
• Norling A, Bökman CF, Göransson E, et al. Evaluating commutability of control materials in three nordic external quality assessment schemes for lipoproteins. J Appl Lab Med. 2021;6(6):1580–1591. doi:10.1093/jalm/jfab058
   Google Scholar
• Badrick T, Miller WG, Panteghini M, et al. Interpreting EQA—understanding why commutability of materials matters. Clin Chem. 2022;68(4):494–500. doi:10.1093/clinchem/hvac002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandle LN. The management of external quality assurance. J Clin Pathol. 2005;58(2):141–144. doi:10.1136/jcp.2003.015545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Jones GR, Horowitz GL, Weykamp C. Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. Clin Chem. 2011;57(12):1670–1680. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2011.168641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattal C, Oberoi JK, Goel N, Datta S, Raveendran R, Prasad KJ. Experience of Indian association of medical microbiology external quality assurance scheme center, New Delhi: challenges and quality assessment of clinical microbiology laboratories. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2019;37(2):163–172. doi:10.4103/ijmm.IJMM_19_356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge Kristensen GB, Meijer P. Interpretation of EQA results and EQA-based trouble shooting. Biochem Med. 2017;27(1):49–62. doi:10.11613/BM.2017.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Salle B. Survey material choices in hematology EQA: a confounding factor in automated counting performance assessment. Biochem Med. 2017;27(1):63–72. doi:10.11613/BM.2017.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings RJ, Howell RT. The importance and value of EQA for diagnostic genetic laboratories. J Community Genet. 2010;1(1):11–17. doi:10.1007/s12687-010-0009-x
   Google Scholar
• Valdivieso-Gómez V, Aguilar-Quesada R. Quality management systems for laboratories and external quality assurance programs. InTech. 2018;22:21.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Myers GL, Rej R. Why Commutability Matters. Vol. 52. Oxford University Press; 2006:553–554.
   Google Scholar
• Miller WG. Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. Clin Chim Acta. 2003;327(1–2):25–37. doi:10.1016/S0009-8981(02)00370-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller WG, Myers GL, Ashwood ER, et al. State of the art in trueness and interlaboratory harmonization for 10 analytes in general clinical chemistry. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132(5):838–846. doi:10.5858/2008-132-838-SOTAIT
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesper HW, Miller WG, Myers GL. Reference materials and commutability. Clin Biochem Rev. 2007;28(4):139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timan IS, Aulia D, Santoso W. External quality assessment scheme and laboratory accreditation in Indonesia. Rinsho Byori Jap J Clin Pathol. 2002;50(2):126–130.
   Google Scholar
• Braga F, Infusino I, Panteghini M. Performance criteria for combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):905–912. doi:10.1515/cclm-2014-1240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gun-Munro J. The challenges and benefits of implementing the requirements of ISO/IEC 17043 by PT/EQA providers. Accredit Qual Assur. 2012;17(4):363–370. doi:10.1007/s00769-012-0887-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong S-K. Performance evaluation for proficiency testing with a limited number of participants. Accredit Qual Assur. 2011;16(11):539–544. doi:10.1007/s00769-011-0816-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Albano FM, ten Caten CS. Proficiency tests for laboratories: a systematic review. Accredit Qual Assur. 2014;19(4):245–257. doi:10.1007/s00769-014-1061-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbireer A, Gable AR, Jackson JB. Cost of quality at a clinical laboratory in a resource-limited country. Lab Med. 2010;41(7):429–433. doi:10.1309/LMCZ0ZFR80QWIBEM
   Google Scholar
• Thompson M, Ellison SL, Wood R. The International Harmonized Protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem. 2006;78(1):145–196. doi:10.1351/pac200678010145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thunnissen E, Bubendorf L, Dietel M, et al. EML4-ALK testing in non-small cell carcinomas of the lung: a review with recommendations. Virchows Archiv. 2012;461:245–257. doi:10.1007/s00428-012-1281-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tembuyser L, Dequeker EM. Endorsing good quality assurance practices in molecular pathology: risks and recommendations for diagnostic laboratories and external quality assessment providers. Virchows Archiv. 2016;468:31–41. doi:10.1007/s00428-015-1839-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saxena R, Katoch S, Srinivas U, Rao S, Anand H. Impact of external hematology proficiency testing programme on quality of laboratories. Indian J Med Res. 2007;126(5):428–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birx D, de Souza M, Nkengasong JN. Laboratory challenges in the scaling up of HIV, TB, and malaria programs: the interaction of health and laboratory systems, clinical research, and service delivery. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(6):849–851. doi:10.1309/AJCPGH89QDSWFONS
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitoria M, Granich R, Gilks CF, et al. The global fight against HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malariacurrent status and future perspectives. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131(6):844–848. doi:10.1309/AJCP5XHDB1PNAEYT
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guide I. Annex A: Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons–Part 1: Development and Operation of Proficiency Testing Schemes. Genf: International Standard Organization; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Middle JG, Libeer J-C, Malakhov V, Penttilä I. Characterisation and evaluation of external quality assessment scheme serum. Discussion paper from the European External Quality Assessment (EQA) Organisers Working Group C. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998;36(2):119–130. doi:10.1515/CCLM.1998.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunnström H, Johansson A, Westbom-Fremer S, et al. PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in clinical diagnostics of lung cancer: interpathologist variability is higher than assay variability. Mod Pathol. 2017;30(10):1411–1421. doi:10.1038/modpathol.2017.59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• England N. Pathology Quality Assurance Review. Leeds, UK: NHS England; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• K-h Y, Zhang C, Berry GJ, et al. Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12474. doi:10.1038/ncomms12474
   Google Scholar
• Akbar S, Peikari M, Salama S, Panah AY, Nofech-Mozes S, Martel AL. Automated and manual quantification of tumor cellularity in digital slides for tumor burden assessment. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14099. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50568-4
   Google Scholar
• Bera K, Schalper KA, Rimm DL, Velcheti V, Madabhushi A. Artificial intelligence in digital pathology—new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2019;16(11):703–715. doi:10.1038/s41571-019-0252-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar