How Does Psychological Distance Influence Public Risky Behavior During Public Health Emergencies

References

• Wang H, Ye H, Liu L. Constructing big data prevention and control model for public health emergencies in China: a grounded theory study. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1112547. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1112547
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen C, Liu W, He Z, Liu C. Research on emergency management of global public health emergencies driven by digital technology: a bibliometric analysis. Front Public Health. 2023;10:1100401. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.1100401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla S, Mishra SK, Rai H. Optimistic bias, risky behavior, and social norms among Indian college students during COVID-19. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;183:111076. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang QC. Generating mechanism of the public irrational behavior in public health emergencies: based on the analysis of the COVID-19 epidemic by grounded theory. J Univ Electron Sci Technol China. 2021;23(6):65–75.
   Google Scholar
• Keinan R, Idan T, Bereby-Meyer Y. Compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines: active vs. passive risk takers. Judgm Decis Mak. 2021;16(1):20–35. doi:10.1017/S1930297500008287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai J, Sang X, Menhas R, et al. The influence of COVID-19 pandemic on physical health–psychological health, physical activity, and overall well-being: the mediating role of emotional regulation. Front Psychol. 2021;12:667461. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.667461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sang X, Menhas R, Saqib ZA, et al. The psychological impacts of COVID-19 home confinement and physical activity: a structural equation model analysis. Front Psychol. 2021;11:614770. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.614770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Menhas R, Laar RA. Repercussions of pandemic and preventive measures on general well-being, psychological health, physical fitness, and health behavior: mediating role of coping behavior. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:2437–2454. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S405273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JJ, Qiu XY. Research on the mutual influence of internet rumor and panic emotion’s parallel spreading. J Intell. 2021;40(4):200–207+109.
   Google Scholar
• Buelow MT, Kowalsky JM, Brunell AB. Stability of risk perception across pandemic and non-pandemic situations among young adults: evaluating the impact of individual differences. Front Psychol. 2022;13:840284. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.840284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayers JD, Guevara Beltrán D, Van Horn A, et al. COVID-19 and friendships: agreeableness and neuroticism are associated with more concern about COVID-19 and friends’ risky behaviors. Pers Individ Dif. 2023;213:112297. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron LD, Lawler S, Robbins-Hill A, Toor I, Brown PM. Political views, health literacy, and COVID-19 beliefs and behaviors: a moderated mediation model. Soc Sci Med. 2023;320:115672. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115672
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang S, Zhou C, Yuan Q, Chen G, Shen H. How do online users perceive health risks during public health emergencies? Empirical evidence from China. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1087229. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1087229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Huang L. The influence of trait emotion and spatial distance on risky choice under the framework of gain and loss. Front Psychol. 2022;13:592584. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.592584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, Fang X, Zhu J. Citizen environmental behavior from the perspective of psychological distance based on a visual analysis of bibliometrics and scientific knowledge mapping. Front Psychol. 2022;12:766907. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Singh G, Gaur L, Sharma R. Does psychological distance and religiosity influence fraudulent customer behaviour? Int J Consum Stud. 2022;46(4):1468–1487. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Long R, Chen H, Wang J. The influence of risk perception on climate change communication behavior: a dual perspective of psychological distance and environmental values. Nat Hazards. 2023;118(1):785–806. doi:10.1007/s11069-023-06028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SP, Han XY, Fang SJ. Is more always better?The effect of customer engagement behavior on customer irrational behavior. Bus Rev. 2023;35(3):160–171.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lent LGG, Sungur H, Kunneman FA, Van De Velde B, Das E. Too far to care? Measuring public attention and fear for Ebola using twitter. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(6):e193. doi:10.2196/jmir.7219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB. Residential location and psychological distance in Americans’ risk views and behavioral intentions regarding Zika virus. Risk Anal. 2018;38(12):2561–2579. doi:10.1111/risa.13184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauza S, Heuckmann B, Kremer K, Büssing AG. Psychological distance towards COVID-19: geographical and hypothetical distance predict attitudes and mediate knowledge. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(10):8632–8643. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-02415-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Ren H, Zhang H. Understanding consumer panic buying behaviors during the strict lockdown on omicron variant: a risk perception view. Sustain. 2022;14(24):17019. doi:10.3390/su142417019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv W, Zhou W, Gao B, Han Y, Fang H. New insights into the social rumor characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Front Public Health. 2022;10:864955. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.864955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng Z, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Guo Y. What breeds conspiracy theories in COVID-19? The role of risk perception in the belief in COVID-19 conspiracy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(9):5396. doi:10.3390/ijerph19095396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmori de la Miyar JR, Hoehn-Velasco L, Silverio-Murillo A. The U-shaped crime recovery during COVID-19: evidence from national crime rates in Mexico. Crime Sci. 2021;10:14. doi:10.1186/s40163-021-00147-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim NM, Seo YW, Gyu Kwak S. Changes in self-harm attempts after the COVID-19 pandemic based on pre-hospital medical records. Med. 2022;101(37):e30694. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000030694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan AJ, Nishimi K, Tripp P, et al. COVID-19 related moral injury: associations with pandemic-related perceived threat and risky and protective behaviors. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;142:80–88. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.07.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Shao W, Wang Q. Does fear of the new coronavirus lead to low-carbon behaviors: the moderating effect of outcome framing. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:4185–4197. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S320241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadi Y, Yazdanpanah M, Mahmoudi H. Understanding smallholder farmers’ adaptation behaviors through climate change beliefs, risk perception, trust, and psychological distance: evidence from wheat growers in Iran. J Environ Manage. 2019;250(15):109456. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee HM, Li BJ. So far yet so near: exploring the effects of immersion, presence, and psychological distance on empathy and prosocial behavior. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2023;176:103042. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JZ, Dong X. Monkeypox outbreak: psychological distance, risk perception, and support for risk mitigation. J Health Psychol. 2023;29(1):15–27. doi:10.1177/13591053231180457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev. 2003;110(3):403–421. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Long R, Chen H. Public psychological distance and spatial distribution characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Chinese context. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(2):1065–1084. doi:10.1007/s12144-021-01861-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rana IA, Arshad HSH, Jamshed A, et al. The impact of psychological distance to climate change and urban informality on adaptation planning. Urban Clim. 2023;49:101460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus RS. Progress on a cognitive-motivational-relational theory of emotion. Am Psychol. 1991;46(8):819–834. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.8.819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Yang C, Qin X, Sun J, Liu J. The impact of climate change on birder destination loyalty: examining changes in bird resources. Curr Issues Tour. 2022;25(11):1798–1816. doi:10.1080/13683500.2021.1983523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Cai X, Li G, Zou X, Morrison AM. Volunteering and pro-environmental behavior: the relationships of meaningfulness and emotions in protected areas. J Sustain Tour. 2024;32(2):304–321. doi:10.1080/09669582.2022.2141249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron WB, McCormick TC. Concepts of security and insecurity. Am J Sociol. 1954;59(6):554–564. doi:10.1086/221442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao JF, Ma DH, Liu Y, Gao TF, Liu XR. The association between risk perception of COVID-19 and hoarding behavior: the mediating role of security and the moderating role of life history strategy. Chinese J Clin Psychol. 2022;30(4):856–860.
   Google Scholar
• Su RL. Risk preference in diplomatic decision-making: concept and formation. Q J Int Polit. 2021;6(4):77–105.
   Google Scholar
• Chen T, Zhang Y, Ma ZQ, Yuan HL. The relationship between emotional insecurity and aggressive behavior of junior middle school students. J Bingtuan Educ Inst. 2020;30(3):31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wu TJ, Li JM, Wu YJ. Employees’ job insecurity perception and unsafe behaviours in human–machine collaboration. Manag Decis. 2022;60(9):2409–2432. doi:10.1108/MD-09-2021-1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman N, Trope Y. The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: a test of temporal construal theory. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(1):5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Chen H, Feng Y, Chen F, Hou C. Research progress and thematic evolution of psychological distance—A co-word analysis based on bibliometric research. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(3):1569–1583. doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00690-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope Y, Liberman N. Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychol Rev. 2010;117(2):440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twh N, Yam KC, Aguinis H. Employee perceptions of corporate social responsibility: effects on pride, embeddedness, and turnover. Pers Psychol. 2019;72(1):107–137. doi:10.1111/peps.12294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song JB, Qian C, Feng Z, Ma L. Residents’ perception-emotion-intention in housing demolition and relocation: the impacts of risk perception, trust in government, and anxiety on intention to support. J Syst Manag. 2022;2:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Isen AM, Patrick R. The effect of positive feelings on risk taking: when the chips are down. Organ Behav Hum Perform. 1983;31(2):194–202. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(83)90120-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiella R, La Malva P, Marchetti D, et al. The psychological distance and climate change: a systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Front Psychol. 2020;11:568899. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. Perception of risk. Science. 1987;236(4799):280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JZ. Whose risk? Why did the U.S. public ignore information about the Ebola outbreak? Risk Anal. 2019;39(8):1708–1722. doi:10.1111/risa.13282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhou D, Ma L, et al. Changes in emotion-related EEG components and brain lateralization response to negative emotions in adolescents with nonsuicidal self-injury: an ERP study. Behav Brain Res. 2023;445(8):114324. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114324
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu H, Yuan S, Liu S. Call them COVIDiots: exploring the effects of aggressive communication style and psychological distance in the communication of COVID-19. Public Underst Sci. 2021;30(3):240–257. doi:10.1177/0963662521989191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou S. Relationship of Social Security Events and Psychological Security, Subjective Well-Being. China University of Geosciences (Beijing); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Liu HY, Sun YC. Understanding the link between work-related and non-work-related supervisor–subordinate relationships and affective commitment: the mediating and moderating roles of psychological safety. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022;15:1649–1663. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S367282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Liu HY. How supervisor-subordinate guanxi influence employee innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:2001–2014. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S342875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng D, Ji L, Yin Z. Personality, perceived occupational stressor, and health-related quality of life among Chinese judges. Appl Res Qual Life. 2014;9(4):911–921. doi:10.1007/s11482-013-9277-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, Organ DW. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manage. 1986;12(4):69–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brügger A. Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: the limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Glob Environ Chang. 2020;60:102023. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu GQ, Li WW, Yang WY, Qian D. Smallholder farmers’fertilizer reduction behavior and their motivation: based on an integrated CLT-SDT framework. Resour Sci. 2023;45(4):734–749.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs G, Efrat-Treister D, Westphal M. When, where, and with whom during crisis: the effect of risk perceptions and psychological distance on travel intentions. Tour Manag. 2024;100:104809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Hou Y. COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity or challenge: applying psychological distance theory and the co-benefit frame to promote public support for climate change mitigation on social media. Environ Commun. 2023;1–19. doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2205038
   Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Crimmins EM. How does age affect personal and social reactions to COVID-19: results from the national understanding America study. PLoS One. 2020;15:11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar