Flexible ureteroscopy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy as primary treatment for renal stones 2 cm or greater

References

• Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol. 2005;173:1991–2000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, et al. Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 1985;134:1077–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlaga BR, Lingeman JE.. Surgical management of upper urinary tract calculi. In: Wein AJ, editor. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2011:1357–1410.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom D, Morgan R, Scardino P. Thomas Hillier and percutaneous nephrostomy. Urology. 1989;33:346–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W. Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. J Am Med Assoc. 1955;157:891–894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernström I, Johansson B. Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1976;10:257–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen CC, Nakada SY. Treatment selection and outcomes: renal calculi. Urol Clin Norm Am. 2007;34:409–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis AW, Woods JR. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol. 1994;151:663–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al. Lower pole 1: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - initial results. J Urol. 2001;166:2072–2080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue W, Pacik D, Boellaard W, et al. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study. J Urol. 2012;187:1293–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, et al. 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1610–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, Sarica K, Straub M, Seitz C. Guidelines on urolithasis. 2012. Available from: http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/20_Urolithiasis_LR%20March%2013%202012.pdf. Accessed May 15, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Conlin M, Marberber M, Bagley DH. Ureteroscopy development and instrumentation. Urol Clin North Am. 1997;24:25–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T, Go T. Clinical application of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscope. Urol Int. 1971;26:97–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt-Nordahl G, Mut T, Krombach P, Michel MS, Knoll T. Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors? Urol Res. 2011;39:185–188.
   Google Scholar
• Beiko DT, Denstedt JD. Advances in ureterorenoscopy Urol Clin N Am. 2007;34:397–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourambas J, Byrne RR, Preminger GM. Does a ureteral access sheath facilitate ureteroscopy? J Urology. 2001;165:789–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L’esperance JO, Ekeruo WO, Scales CD Jr, et al. Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. Urology. 2005;66:252–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird VG, Uberoi J, Shah O. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm:a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol. 2010;24:1583–1588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley JM, Stearman L, Troxel S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J Endourol. 2009;23:1395–1398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ. Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51:899–906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolarikos A, de la Rosette J. Prevention and treatment of complications following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Curr Opin Urol. 2008;18:229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M. Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. JEndourol. 2004;18:715–723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoller, ML, Wold JS, St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1994;152:1977–1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F, et al. Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2–4 cm stones: matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. 2011;109:1384–1389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5803 patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soucy F, Ko R, Duvdevani M, Nott L, Denstedt JD, Razvi H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center’s experience over 15 years. J Endourol. 2009;23:1669–1673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonian S, Scoffone CM, Louie MK, et al. Does imaging modality used for percutaneous renal access make a difference? A matched case analysis. J Endourol. Epub October 17, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller A, Razvi H, Denstedt JD, et al. The CROES Percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: the influence of body mass index on outcome. J Urol. 2012;188:138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Powell CR, Stoller ML, Schwartz BF, et al. Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology. 2000;55:825–830.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Assmy AM, Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR, et al. Outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: effect of body mass index. Eur Urol. 2007;52:199–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B, et al. The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol. 2011 ;25: 1263–1268.
   Google Scholar
• Robert M, A’Ch S, Lanfrey P, Guiter J, Navratil H. Piezoelectric shockwave lithotripsy of urinary calculi: comparative study of stone depth in kidney and ureter treatments. J Endourol 1999;13:699–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis R, Thorpe AC, March R. Modification of the technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the morbidly obese patient. Br J Urol. 1997;79:138–140.
   Google Scholar
• Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Womack JS, Kryger JV. Outcomes of contemporary percutaneous nephrolithotomy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol. 1998;160:669–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucchi E, Vicentini FC, Marchini GS, Danilovic A, Brito AH, Srougi M. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients: comparison between the prone and total supine position. J Endourol. 2012;26:1437–1442.
   Google Scholar
• Paffen ML, Keizer JG, de Winter GV Arends AJ, Hendrikx AJ. A comparison of the physical properties of four new generation flexible ureteroscopes: (de)flection, flow properties, torsion stiffness, and optical characteristics. J Endourol. 2008;22:2227–2234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D. Retrograde ureteropyloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi. J Urol. 1998;160:346–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - is this the new frontier? J Urol. 2008;179:981–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Anany FG, Hammouda HM, Maghraby HA, Elakkad MA. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotropsy for large renal calculi. BJU Int. 2001;88:850–853.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and Holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (>2 cm) renal calculi. Indian J Urol. 2008;24:521–525.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy for 20 to 40 mm renal calculi. J Urol. 2004;172:170–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariani AJ. Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. J Urol. 2007;177:168–173.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar M. Retrograde ureteroscopic intrarenal surgery for large (1.6–3.5 cm) upper ureteric/renal calculus. Indian J Urol. 2010;26(1):46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Takazawa R, Kitayama S, Tsujoo T. Successful outcome of flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Int J Urol. 2012;19:264–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryniarski P, Paradysz A, Zyczkowski M, Kupilas A, Nowakowski K, Bogacki R. A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter. J Endourol. 2012;26:52–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricchiuti DJ, Smaldone MC, Jacobs BL, Smaldone AM, Jackman SV, Averch TD. Staged retrograde endoscopic lithotripsy as alternative to PCNL in select patients with large renal calculi. J Endourol. 2007;21:1421–1424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevzner M, Stisser BC, Luskin J, Yeamans JC, Cheng-Lucey M, Pahira JJ. Alternative management of complex renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2011;43:631–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddik MA, Sejiny SAQ, Ndoye M, et al. Flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of kidney stone between 2 and 3 cm. Prog Urol. 2011;21:327–332. French.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akman T, Binbay M, Ugurlu M, et al. Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with percutaneous nephrolithotomy in elderly patients with moderate-size kidney stones: a matched-pair analysis. JEndourol. 2012;26:625–629.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen TA, Belis JA. Endoscopic management of urolithiasis in the morbidly obese patient. J Endourol. 1998;12:33–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogan K, Corwin TS, Smith T, et al. Sensitivity of chest fluoroscopy compared with chest CT and chest radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology. 2003;62:988–992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper KD, Yakes WF. The posterior intercostal approach for percutaneous renal procedures: risk of puncturing the lung, spleen, and liver as determined by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:115–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboumarzouk OM, Monga M, Kata SG, Traxer O, Somani BK. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for stones > 2 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol. 2012;26:1257–1263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingler HC, Kramer G, Lodde M, Dorfinger K, Hofbauer J, Marberger M. Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol. 2003;43:75–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboumarzouk OM, Somani BK, Monga M. Flexible ureteroscopy and holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for stone disease in patients with bleeding diathesis: a systematic review of the literature. IntBraz J Urol. 2012;38:298–306.
   Google Scholar
• Hyams ES, Shah O. Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcomes analysis. J Urol. 2009;182:1012–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar