Update on non-invasive imaging for congenital heart disease: an additional dimension

References

• Lang RM, Badano LP, Tsang W, et al. EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(1):3–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez de Isla L, Casanova C, Almería C, et al. Which method should be the reference method to evaluate the severity of rheumatic mitral stenosis? Gorlin’s method versus 3D-echo. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2007;8(6):470–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie MX, Wang XF, Cheng TO, Wang J, Lu Q. Comparison of accuracy of mitral valve area in mitral stenosis by real-time, three-dimensional echocardiography versus two-dimensional echocardiography versus Doppler pressure half-time. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(12):1496–1499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamorano J, Cordeiro P, Sugeng L, et al. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for rheumatic mitral valve stenosis evaluation: an accurate and novel approach. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):2091–2096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar AM, Attia WM, Nosir YF, et al. Validation of a new score for the assessment of mitral stenosis using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010;23(1):13–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutty S, Colen TM, Smallhorn JF. Three-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of congenital mitral valve disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;27(2):142–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng X, Levine RA, Hua L, et al. Diagnostic value of vena contracta area in the quantification of mitral regurgitation severity by color Doppler 3D echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(5):506–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge S, Bu L, Zhang H, et al. A real-time 3-dimensional digital Doppler method for measurement of flow rate and volume through mitral valve in children: a validation study compared with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Nadvoretskiy V, Klas B, et al. Measurement of volumetric flow by real-time 3-dimensional Doppler echocardiography in children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007;20(8):915–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Chico JL, Zamorano Gómez JL, Rodrigo-López JL, et al. Accuracy of real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography in the assessment of mitral prolapse. Is transesophageal echocardiography still mandatory? Am Heart J. 2008;155(4):694–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benenstein R, Saric M. Mitral valve prolapse: role of 3D echocardiography in diagnosis. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012;27(5):465–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom FJ, van den Bosch A, McGhie J. 3D Echocardiography. In: WW Lai, LL Mertens, MS Cohen, T Geva, editors. Echocardiography in Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease: From Fetus to Adult. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Vettukattil JJ, Bharucha T, Anderson RH. Defining Ebstein’s malformation using three-dimensional echocardiography. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2007;6(6):685–690.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bharucha T, Anderson RH, Lim ZS, Vettukattil JJ. Multiplanar review of three-dimensional echocardiography gives new insights into the morphology of Ebstein’s malformation. Cardiol Young. 2010;20(1):49–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bosch AE, Ten Harkel DJ, McGhie JS, et al. Characterization of atrial septal defect assessed by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(6):815–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perk G, Lang RM, Garcia-Fernandez MA, et al. Use of real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in intracardiac catheter based interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2009;22(8):865–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen FL, Hsiung MC, Nanda N, et al. Real time three-dimensional echocardiography in assessing ventricular septal defects: an echocardiographic-surgical correlative study. Echocardiography. 2006;23(7):562–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hlavacek AM, Crawford FA Jr, Chessa KS, Shirali GS. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography is useful in the evaluation of patients with atrioventricular septal defects. Echocardiography. 2006;23(3):225–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrea C, Levasseur S, Roman K, et al. Three-dimensional echocardiography improves the understanding of left atrioventricular valve morphology and function in atrioventricular septal defects undergoing patch augmentation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129(4):746–753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutty S, Smallhorn JF. Evaluation of atrioventricular septal defects by three-dimensional echocardiography: benefits of navigating the third dimension. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2012;25(9):932–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi K, Guerra V, Roman KS, Nii M, Redington A, Smallhorn JF. Three-dimensional echocardiography improves the understanding of the mechanisms and site of left atrioventricular valve regurgitation in atrioventricular septal defect. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(12):1502–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bu L, Munns S, Zhang H, et al. Rapid full volume data acquisition by real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of left ventricular indexes in children: a validation study compared with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005;18(4):299–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibayama K, Watanabe H, Iguchi N, et al. Evaluation of automated measurement of left ventricular volume by novel real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic system: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 2-dimensional echocardiography. J Cardiol. 2013;61(4):281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Bosch AE, Robbers-Visser D, Krenning BJ, et al. Real-time transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction in congenital heart disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006;19(1):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riehle TJ, Mahle WT, Parks WJ, Sallee D 3rd, Fyfe DA. Real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic acquisition and quantification of left ventricular indices in children and young adults with congenital heart disease: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008;21(1):78–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedberg MK, Su X, Tworetzky W, Soriano BD, Powell AJ, Marx GR. Validation of 3D echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease a comparison study with cardiac MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(6):735–742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann K, Shen Z, Boxt LM, et al. Comparison of three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of volume, mass, and function in children with functionally single left ventricles with two-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(8):1060–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano BD, Hoch M, Ithuralde A, et al. Matrix-array 3-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of volumes, mass, and ejection fraction in young pediatric patients with a functional single ventricle a comparison study with cardiac magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2008;117(14):1842–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaku K, Takeuchi M, Tsang W, et al. Age-related normal range of left ventricular strain and torsion using three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;27(1):55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Gao J, Xie M, et al. Left ventricular three-dimensional global systolic strain by real-time three-dimensional speckle tracking in children: feasibility, reproducibility, maturational changes, and normal ranges. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;26(8):853–859.
   Google Scholar
• Herberg U, Gatzweiler E, Breuer T, Breuer J. Ventricular pressure-volume loops obtained by 3D real-time echocardiography and mini pressure wire – a feasibility study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2013;102(6):427–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrin DP, Vasilyev NV, Marx GR, del Nido PJ. Temporal enhancement of 3D echocardiography by frame reordering. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(3):300–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltijeral A, Isla LP, Pérez-Rodríguez O, et al. Early myocardial deformation changes associated to isolated obesity: a study based on 3D-wall motion tracking analysis. Obesity. 2011;19(11):2268–2273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayat E, Ahmad H, Weinert L, Lang RM, Mor-Avi V. Reproducibility and inter-vendor variability of left ventricular deformation measurements by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011;24(8):878–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope MD, Sedlic T, Dyverfeldt P. Cardiac magnetic resonance flow imaging. J Thorac Imaging. 2013;28:217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkoen EE, Roest AA, van derGeest RJ, de Roos A, Westenberg JJ. Cardiovascular function and flow by 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging techniques: new applications. J Thorac Imaging. 2014;29(3):185–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovic Z, Allen BD, Garcia J, et al. 4D flow imaging with CMR. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014;4(2):173–192.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Markl M, Schnell S, Barker AJ. 4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16:481.
   Google Scholar
• Markl M, Kilner PJ, Ebbers T. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buonocore MH. Visualizing blood flow patterns using streamlines, arrows, and particle paths. Magn Reson Med. 1998;40:210–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalder AF, Russe MF, Frydrychowicz A, Bock J, Hennig J, Markl M. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast CMR: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60:1218–1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Frydrychowicz A, Kozerke S, et al. 4D flow CMR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:1015–1036.
   Google Scholar
• Bock J, Frydrychowicz A, Lorenz R, et al. In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66:1079–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebbers T, Wigström L, Bolger AF, Engvall J, Karlsson M. Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast CMR. Magn Reson Med. 2001;45:872–879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde I, Nordmeyer S, Uribe S, et al. Systemid-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van derHulst AE, Westenberg JJ, Kroft LJ, et al. Tetralogy of Fallot: 3D velocity-encoded MR imaging for evaluation of right ventricular valve flow and diastolic function in patients after correction. Radiology. 2010;256(3):724–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger J, Markl M, Jung B, et al. 4D-MR flow analysis in patients after repair for tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1651–1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• François CJ, Srinivasan S, Schiebler ML, et al. 4D cardiovascular magnetic resonance velocity mapping of alterations of right heart flow pattenrs and main pulmonary artery hemodynamics in tetralogy of Fallot. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker AJ, Markl M, Bürk J, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve is associated with altered wall shear stress in the ascending aorta. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(4):457–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope MD, Meadows AK, Hope TA, et al. Evaluation of bicuspid aortic valve and aortic coarctation with 4d flow magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2008;117(21):2818–2819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope MD, Hope TA, Meadows AK, et al. Bicuspid aortic valve: four-dimensional MR evaluation of ascending aortic systolic flow patterns. Radiology. 2010;255:53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frydrychowicz A, Markl M, Hirtler D. Aortic hemodynamics in patients with and without repair of aortic coarctation: in vivo analysis by 4D flow-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(5):317–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger J, Markl M, Herzer L, et al. Aortic flow patterns in patients with Marfan syndrome assessed by flow-sensitive four-dimensional CMR. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35:594–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope TA, Kvitting JP, Hope MD, Miller DC, Markl M, Herfkens RJ. Evaluation of Marfan patients status post valve-sparing aortic root replacement with 4D flow. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31(9):1479–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Geiger J, Kilner PJ, et al. Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of cardiovascular flow paths in volunteers and patients with Fontan circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39(2):206–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markl M, Geiger J, Jung B, Hirtler D, Arnold R. Noninvasive evaluation of 3D hemodynamics in a complex case of single ventricle physiology. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;35(4):933–937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundareswaran KS, Haggerty CM, de Zélicourt D, et al. Visualization of flow structures in Fontan patients using 3-dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(5):1108–1116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundareswaran KS, de Zélicourt D, Sharma S, et al. Correction of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation using image-based surgical planning. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(8):1024–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uribe S, Bächler P, Valverde I, et al. Hemodynamic assessment in patients with one-and-a-half ventricle repair revealed by four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(2):447–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar