Neonatal cranial ultrasound: current perspectives

References

• Sims ME, Halterman G, Jasani N, Vachon L, Wu PY. Indications for routine cranial ultrasound scanning in the nursery. J Clin Ultrasound. 1986;14(6):443–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Allmen D, Babcock D, Matsumoto J, et al. The predictive value of head ultrasound in the ECMO candidate. JPediatr Surg. 1992;27(1):36–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulas DI, Taylor GA, O’Donnell RM, Short BL, Fitz CR, Vezina G. Intracranial abnormalities in infants treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: update on sonographic and CT findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(2):287–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelants-van Rijn AM, Groenendaal F, Beek FJ, Eken P, van Haastert IC, de Vries LS. Parenchymal brain injury in the preterm infant: comparison of cranial ultrasound, MRI and neurodevelopmental outcome. Neuropediatrics. 2001;32(2):80–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandy S, Obaldo RE, Walsh IR, Lowe LH. Neuroimaging of nonaccidental head trauma: pitfalls and controversies. Pediatric Radiology. 2008;38(8):827–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epelman M, Daneman A, Kellenberger CJ, et al. Neonatal encephalopathy: a prospective comparison of head US and MRI. Pediatr Radiol. 2010;40(10):1640–1650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seigel M, editor. Pediatric Sonography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rumack C, Wilson S, Charboneau J. Diagnostic Ultrasound. St Louis: Mosby; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Lowe LH, Bailey Z. State-of-the-art cranial sonography: Part 1, modern techniques and image interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):1028–1033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley KM, Taylor GA, Estroff JA, Barnewolt CE, Share JC, Paltiel HJ. Use of the mastoid fontanelle for improved sonographic visualization of the neonatal midbrain and posterior fossa. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168(4):1021–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NG, Hay R, Hutchings M, Whitehead M, Darlow B. Posterior fontanelle cranial ultrasound: anatomic and sonographic correlation. Early Hum Dev. 1995;42(2):141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North K, Lowe L. Modern head ultrasound: normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls that may simulate disease. Ultrasound Clin. 2009;4:497–512.
   Google Scholar
• Huang CC. Sonographic cerebral sulcal development in premature newborns. Brain Dev. 1991;13(1):27–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy NP, Rennie J, Cooke RW. Cranial ultrasound assessment of gestational age in low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64(4):569–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toi A, Lister WS, Fong KW. How early are fetal cerebral sulci visible at prenatal ultrasound and what is the normal pattern of early fetal sulcal development? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:706–715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Development of fetal gyri, sulci and fissures: a transvaginal sonographic study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997;9:222–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghai S, Fong KW, Toi A, Chitayat D, Pantazi S, Blaser S. Prenatal US and MR imaging findings of lissencephaly: review of fetal cerebral sulcal development. Radiographics. 2006;26(2):389–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plasencia W, Dagklis T, Borenstein M, Csapo B, Nicolaides KH. Assessment of the corpus callosum at 20–24 weeks’ gestation by three-dimensional ultrasound examination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30(2):169–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter TC, Kennedy AM, Byrne J, Woodward PJ. The cavum septi pellucidi: why is it important? J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29(3):427–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw CM, Alvord EC Jr. Cava septi pellucidi et vergae: their normal and pathological states. Brain. Mar 1969;92(1):213–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rumack C, Drose J. Neonatal and infant brain imaging. In: Rumack C, Wilson S, Charboneau J, editors. Diagnostic Ultrasound. St Louis: Elsevier; 2005:1623–1702.
   Google Scholar
• Mack LA, Rumack CM, Johnson ML. Ultrasound evaluation of cystic intracranial lesions in the neonate. Radiology. 1980;137(2):451–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowie JD, Kirks DR, Rosenberg ER, Clair MR. Caudothalamic groove: value in identification of germinal matrix hemorrhage by sonography in preterm neonates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(6):1317–1320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld DL, Schonfeld SM, Underberg-Davis S. Coarctation of the lateral ventricles: an alternative explanation for subependymal pseudocysts. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27(12):895–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enriquez G, Correa F, Lucaya J, Piqueras J, Aso C, Ortega A. Potential pitfalls in cranial sonography. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(2):110–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makhoul IR, Zmora O, Tamir A, Shahar E, Sujov P. Congenital subependymal pseudocysts: own data and meta-analysis of the literature. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001;3(3):178–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fickenscher K, Bailey Z, Saettele M, Dahl A, Lowe L. Pediatric Cranial Ultrasound: Techniques, Variants and Pitfalls. In: Bright P, editor. Neuroimaging - Methods. InTech; 2012:217–232.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton WD, Kurtz AB, Hertzbert BS. Ultrasound: the requisites. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard JP, Moscoso G, Renier D, Ville Y. Cystic malformations of the posterior fossa. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:1064–1069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowerman RA. Tangential sulcal echoes: potential pitfall in the diagnosis of parenchymal lesions on cranial sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 1987;6:685–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franco A, Lewis KN, Maresky H, Shelef I. Increased echogenicity of the interhemispheric sulcus: a potential diagnostic pitfall on cranial ultrasound of the newborn. Isr Med Assoc J. 2012;14(6):403–404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant EG, Schellinger D, Richardson JD, Coffey ML, Smirniotopoulous JG. Echogenic periventricular halo: normal sonographic finding or neonatal cerebral hemorrhage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;140(4):793–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe LH, Bailey Z. State-of-the-art cranial sonography: Part 2, pitfalls and variants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(5):1034–1039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Towbin A. Central nervous system damage in the human fetus and newborn infant. Mechanical and hypoxic injury incurred in the fetalneonatal period. Am J Dis Child. 1970;119(6):529–542.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein J, Papile LA, Burstein R. Intraventricular hemorrhage and hydrocephalus in premature newborns: a prospective study with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;132(4):631–635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe JJ. Neurology of the Newborn. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Volpe JJ. Neurobiology of periventricular leukomalacia in the premature infant. Pediatr Res. 2001;50:553–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries LS, Eken P, Dubowitz LM. The spectrum of leukomalacia using cranial ultrasound. Behav Brain Res. 1992;49(1):1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epelman M, Daneman A, Blaser SI, et al. Differential diagnosis of intracranial cystic lesions at head US: correlation with CT and MR imaging. Radiographics. 2006;26(1):173–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resch B, Vollaard E, Maurer U, Haas J, Rosegger H, Muller W. Risk factors and determinants of neurodevelopmental outcome in cystic periventricular leucomalacia. Eur JPediatr. 2000;159:663–670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenthal I. Periventricular leucomalacia: a review. Eur J Pediatr. 2004;163:435–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley BD, Hogan MJ. Cystic periventricular leukomalacia of the corpus callosum. Pediatr Radiol. 1997;27:583–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larroche JC, Amiel C. Thrombosis of the sylvian artery during the neonatal period. Anatomical study and pathogenic discussion of so- called congenital hemiplegia. Arch Fr Pediatr. 1966;23(3):257–274.
   Google Scholar
• Mannino FL, Trauner DA. Stroke in neonates. J Pediatr. 1983;102(4):605–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenghoefer M, Ettema AM, Sina F, et al. Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis in 51 cases of holoprosencephaly: craniofacial anatomy, associated malformations, and genetics. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47(1):15–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubourg C, Bendavid C, Pasquier L, Henry C, Odent S, David V Holoprosencephaly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske CE, Filly RA. Ultrasound evaluation of the normal and abnormal fetal neural axis. Radiol Clin NAm. 1982;20:285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manelfe C, Sevely A. Neuroradiological study of holoprosencephalies. J Neuroradiol. 1982;9:15–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babcock DS. The normal, absent, and abnormal corpus callosum: sonographic findings. Radiology. 1984;151(2):449–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Salvo DN. A new view of the neonatal brain: clinical utility of supplemental neurologic US imaging windows. Radiographics. 2001;21(4):943–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeary RD, Kuhns LR, Barr M Jr. Ultrasonography of the fetal cerebellum. Radiology. 1984;151(2):439–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson ME, Lindsay DJ, Levi CS, Ackerman TE, Gordon WL. US case of the day. Dandy-Walker variant with agenesis of the corpus callosum. Radiographics. 1994;14(3):678–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin L, Quisling RG. The neonatal cisterna magna: ultrasonic evaluation. Radiology. 1983;149(3):691–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean G, Coombs P, Sehgal A, et al. Measurement of the lateral ventricles in the neonatal head: comparison of 2-D and 3-D techniques. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2012;38(12):2051–2057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal P, Mukhopadhyay J, Sural S, et al. A robust method for ventriculomegaly detection from neonatal brain ultrasound images. J Med Syst. 2012;36(5):2817–2828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Chuang SL, Betheras FR. Reference ranges for the linear dimensions of the intracranial ventricles in preterm neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000;82(3):F218-F223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer MJ, de Vries LS, Groenendaal F, et al. New reference values for the neonatal cerebral ventricles. Radiology. 2012;262(1):224–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson NG, Laurent I, Cook N, Woodward L, Inder TE. Growth rate of corpus callosum in very premature infants. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26(10):2685–2690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong RK, Fox LM, Cheong JL, Davis PG, Rogerson SK. Postnatal ultrasound reliability in cerebellar vermis assessment. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012;97(4):F307-F309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer A, Ozaksit G, Kanat-Pektas M, Ozer S. First trimester examination of fetal nasal bone in the Turkish population. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2010;36(4):739–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxma A, Lequin M, Ramenghi LA, Kros M, Govaert P. Sonographic detection of the optic radiation. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(10):1455–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong DL, Bagnall C, Harding JE, Teele RL. Measurement of the subarachnoid space by ultrasound in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002;86(2):F124-F126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies MW, Swaminathan M, Betheras FR. Measurement of the transverse cerebellar diameter in preterm neonates and its use in assessment of gestational age. Australas Radiol. 2001;45(3):309–312.
   Google Scholar
• Wu YC, Hsieh WS, Hsu CH, et al. Relationship of neonatal cerebral blood flow velocity asymmetry with early motor, cognitive and language development in term infants. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(5):797–803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicenzini E, Pulitano P, Cicchetti R, et al. Transcranial Doppler for brain death in infants: the role of the fontanelles. Eur Neurol. 2010;63(3):164–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyberg-Solomayer GC, Soen M, Speer R, et al. Pathological prenatal Doppler sonography findings and their association with neonatal cranial ultrasound abnormalities in a high risk collective. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34(8):1193–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsch S, Skiöld B, Hallberg B, et al. Cranial ultrasound and MRI at term age in extremely preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(5):F310-F314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalouf EF, Duggan PJ, Counsell SJ, et al. Comparison of findings on cranial ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):719–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijser LM, de Bruine FT, Steggerda SJ, van der Grond J, Walther FJ, van Wezel-Meijler G. Brain imaging findings in very preterm infants throughout the neonatal period: part I. Incidences and evolution of lesions, comparison between ultrasound and MRI. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(2):101–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirmiran M, Barnes PD, Keller K, et al. Neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging before discharge is better than serial cranial ultrasound in predicting cerebral palsy in very low birth weight preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2004;114(4):992–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries LS, van Haastert IC, Benders MJ, Groenendaal F. Myth: cerebral palsy cannot be predicted by neonatal brain imaging. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;16(5):279–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor GA. Recent advances in neonatal cranial ultrasound and Doppler techniques. Clin Perinatol. 1997;24(3):677–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM, Walther FJ, van Wezel-Meijler G. Neonatal cranial ultrasonography: how to optimize its performance. Early Hum Dev. 2009;85(2):93–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wezel-Meij ler [webpage on the Internet], Steggerda SJ, Leijser LM. Cranial ultrasonography in neonates: role and limitations. Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(1):28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar