Synonymous codons influencing gene expression in organisms

References

• Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Mercier R, Pave A. Codon catalog usage and the genome hypothesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 1980;8(1):r49–r62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermolaeva MD. Synonymous codon usage in bacteria. Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2001;3(4):91–97.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baruah VJ, Satapathy SS, Powdel BR, Konwarh R, Buragohain AK, Ray SK. Comparative analysis of codon usage bias in Crenarchaea and Euryarchaea genome reveals differential preference of synonymous codons to encode highly expressed ribosomal and RNA polymerase proteins. J Genet. (2016). doi:10.1007/s12041-016-0667-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satapathy SS, Ray SK, Sahoo AK, Begum T, Ghosh TC. Codon usage bias is not significantly different between the high and the low expression genes in human. Int J Mol Genet Gene Ther. 2015;1(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Belalov IS, Lukashev AN. Causes and implications of codon usage bias in RNA viruses. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian S. Nearly neutrality and the evolution of codon usage bias in eukaryotic genomes. Genetics. 2008;178(4):2429–2432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemura T. Correlation between the abundance of yeast tRNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol. 1982;158(4):573–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennetzen JL, Hall BD. Codon selection in yeast. J Biol Chem. 1982;257(6):3026–3031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouy M, Gautier C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 1982;10(22):7055–7074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikemura T. Codon usage and tRNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol. 1985;2(1):13–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muto A, Osawa S. The guanine and cytosine content of genomic DNA and bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84(1):166–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marfn A, Bertranpetit’ J, Oliver JL, Medina JR. Variation in G+C-content and codon choice: differences among synonymous codon groups in vertebrate genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1989;17(15):6181–6189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics. 1991;129(3):897–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong H, Nilsson L, Kurland CG. Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. J Mol Biol. 1996;260(5):649–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duret L, Mouchiroud D. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(8):4482–4487.
   Google Scholar
• McInerney JO. Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:10698–10703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton BR. Strand asymmetry and codon usage bias in the chloroplast genome of Euglena gracilis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(9):5123–5128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon adaptation index- a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 1987;15(3):1281–1295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Li WH. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(3):222–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C. Understanding the contribution of synonymous mutations to human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(10):683–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaney JL, Clark PL. Roles for synonymous codon usage in protein biogenesis. Annu Rev Biophys. 2015;44:143–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray SK, Baruah VJ, Satapathy SS, Banerjee R. Cotranslational protein folding reveals the selective use of synonymous codons along the coding sequence of a low expression gene. J Genet. 2014;93(3):613–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park C, Chen X, Yang J-R, Zhang J. Differential requirements for mRNA folding partially explain why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(8):E678–E686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouskin S, Zubradt M, Washietl S, Kellis M, Weissman JS. Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo. Nature. 2014;505(7485):701–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varenne S, Buc J, Lloubes R, Lazdunski C. Translation is a non-uniform process. Effect of tRNA availability on the rate of elongation of nascent polypeptide chains. J Mol Biol. 1984;180(3):549–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevance FF, Le Guyon S, Hughes KT. The effects of codon context on in vivo translation speed. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(6):e1004392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G-W, Oh E, Weissman JS. The anti Shine–Dalgarno sequence drives translational pausing and codon choice in bacteria. Nature. 2012;484:538–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatfield D, Unterholzner L, Ciccarelli FD, Bork P, Izaurralde E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in Drosophila: at the intersection of the yeast and mammalian pathways. EMBO J. 2003;22(15):3960–3970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Maquat LE. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) in animal embryogenesis: to die or not to die, that is the question. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2011;21(4):422–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doma MK, Parker R. Endonucleolytic cleavage of eukaryotic mRNAs with stalls in translation elongation. Nature. 2006;440:561–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Zhou L, Hu L, et al. Nonsense-mediated decay targets have multiple sequence-related features that can inhibit translation. Mol Syst Biol. 2010;6:442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Saha S, Shabalina SA, Kashina A. Differential arginylation of actin isoforms is regulated by coding sequence-dependent degradation. Science. 2010;329(5998):1534–1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brest P, Lapaquette P, Souidi M, et al. A synonymous variant in IRGM alters a binding site for miR-196 and causes deregulation of IRGM-dependent xenophagy in Crohn’s disease. Nat Genet. 2011;43(3):242–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalina SA, Spiridonov NA, Kashina A. Sounds of silence: synonymous nucleotides as a key to biological regulation and complexity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(4):2073–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venetianer P. Are synonymous codons indeed synonymous? Biomol Concepts. 2012;3(1):21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Zafrir Z, Tuller T. Nucleotide sequence composition adjacent to intronic splice sites improves splicing efficiency via its effect on pre-mRNA local folding in fungi. RNA. 2015;21(10):1704–1718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plotkin JB, Kudla G. Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(1):32–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberg R, Petrov DA. Selection on codon bias. Annu Rev Genet. 2008;42:287–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bali V, Bebok Z. Decoding mechanisms by which silent codon changes influence protein biogenesis and function. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2015;64:58–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López D, Pazos F. Protein functional features are reflected in the patterns of mRNA translation speed. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anfinsen CB. The formation and stabilization of protein structure. Biochem J. 1972;128(4):737–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri Rao VH, Gosavi S. Using the folding landscapes of proteins to understand protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2016;36:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M. Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. 2011;475(7356):324–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartl FU, Hayer-Hartl M. Converging concepts of protein folding in vitro and in vivo. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(6):574–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Emery LR, Zeng K. Forces that influence the evolution of codon bias. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010;365(1544):1203–1212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp PM, Bailes E, Grocock RJ, Peden JF, Sockett RE. Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33(4):1141–1153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satapathy SS, Dutta M, Buragohain AK, Ray SK. Transfer RNA gene numbers may not be completely responsible for the codon usage bias in asparagine, isoleucine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine in the high expression genes in bacteria. J Mol Evol. 2012;75(3–4):151–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satapathy SS, Powdel BR, Dutta M, Buragohain AK, Ray SK. Selection on GGU and CGU codons in the high expression genes in bacteria. J Mol Evol. 2014;78(1):13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgs PG, Ran W. Coevolution of codon usage and tRNA genes leads to alternative stable states of biased codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25(11):2279–2291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran W, Higgs PG. The influence of anticodon-codon interactions and modified bases on codon usage bias in bacteria. Mol Biol Evol. 2010;27(9):2129–2140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hershberg R, Petrov DA. General rules for optimal codon choice. PLoS Genet. 2009;5(7):e1000556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Shao Z-Q, Xu Y, et al. Optimal codon identities in bacteria: implications from the conflicting results of two different methods. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e22714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigh F. The ‘effective number of codons’ used in a gene. Gene. 1990;87(1):23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novembre JA. Accounting for background nucleotide composition when measuring codon usage bias. Mol Biol Evol. 2002;19(8):1390–1394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha EP. Codon usage bias from tRNA’s point of view: redundancy, specialization, and efficient decoding for translation optimization. Genome Res. 2004;14(11):2279–2286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wald N, Alroy M, Botzman M, Margalit H. Codon usage bias in prokaryotic pyrimidine-ending codons is associated with the degeneracy of the encoded amino acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(15):7074–7083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komar AA. A pause for thought along the co-translational folding pathway. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34(1):16–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komar AA, Lesnik T, Reiss C. Synonymous codon substitutions affect ribosome traffic and protein folding during in vitro translation. FEBS Lett. 1999;462(3):387–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimchi-Sarfaty C, Oh JM, Kim IW, et al. A ‘silent’ polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science. 2007;315(5811):525–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen M, Kurland CG, Pedersen S. Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol. 1989;207(2):365–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen MA, Pedersen S. Absolute in vivo translation rates of individual codons in Escherichia coli. The two glutamic acid codons GAA and GAG are translated with a threefold difference in rate. J Mol Biol. 1991;222(2):265–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudla G, Murray AW, Tollervey D, Plotkin JB. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science. 2009;324(5924):255–258.
   Google Scholar
• Hu S, Wang M, Cai G, He M. Genetic code-guided protein synthesis and folding in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(43):30855–30861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akashi H. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics. 1994;136(3):927–935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drummond DA, Wilke CO. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell. 2008;134(2):341–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou M, Guo J, Cha J, et al. Non-optimal codon usage affects expression, structure and function of FRQ clock protein. Nature. 2013;495(7439):111–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Ma PJ, Shah P, Rokas A, Liu Y, Johnson CH. Non-optimal codon usage is a mechanism to achieve circadian clock conditionality. Nature. 2013;495(7439):116–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu CH, Dang Y, Zhou Z, et al. Codon usage influences the local rate of translation elongation to regulate co-translational protein folding. Mol Cell. 2015;59(5):744–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingolia NT. Ribosome profiling: new views of translation, from single codons to genome scale. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(3):205–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian W, Yang JR, Pearson NM, Maclean C, Zhang J. Balanced codon usage optimizes eukaryotic translational efficiency. PLoS Genet. 2012;8(3):e1002603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutmou KS, Radhakrishnan A, Green R. Synthesis at the speed of codons. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40(12):717–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhr F, Jha S, Thommen M, et al. Synonymous codons direct cotranslational folding toward different protein conformations. Mol Cell. 2016;61(3):341–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angov E, Hillier CJ, Kincaid RL, Lyon JA. Heterologous protein expression is enhanced by harmonizing the codon usage frequencies of the target gene with those of the expression host. PLoS One. 2008;3(5):e2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Marco A, Vigh L, Diamant S, Goloubinoff P. Native folding of aggregation-prone recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli by osmolytes, plasmid- or benzyl alcohol-overexpressed molecular chaperones. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2005;10(4):329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang E, Wang J, Chen C, Xiao Y. Computational evidence that fast translation seed can increase the probability of cotranslational protein folding. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissley DA, Sharma AK, Ahmed N, et al. Accurate prediction of cellular co-translational folding indicates proteins can switch from post- to co-translational folding. Nature Commun. 2015;7:10341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma AK, Bukau B, O’Brien EP. Physical origins of codon positions that strongly influence co-translational folding: a framework for controlling nascent protein folding. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;138(4):1180–1195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders R, Deane CM. Synonymous codon usage influences the local protein structure observed. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(19):6719–6728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar