Patient positioning during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the current best practice?

References

• TürkCPetříkASaricaKEAU Guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasisEur Urol201669347548226344917
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JackmanSVHedicanSPPetersCADocimoSGPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in infants and preschool age children: experience with a new techniqueUrology19985246977019763096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KnollTHegerKHaeckerAPercutaneous nephrolithotomy: experience from 348 proceduresEur Urol2004342
   Google Scholar
• BozziniGVerzePArcanioloDA prospective randomized comparison among SWL, PCNL and RIRS for lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm: a multicenter experience : A better understanding on the treatment options for lower pole stonesWorld J Urol201735121967197528875295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdivia UríaJGLachares SantamaríaEVillarroya RodríguezSTaberner LlopJAbril BaqueroGAranda LassaJMPercutaneous nephrolithectomy: simplified technic (preliminary report)Arch Esp Urol19874031771803619512
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• FernstromIJohanssonBPyelolithotomyPA new extraction techniqueScand J Urol Nephrol19761032572591006190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaneda-ZunigaWRClaymanRSmithARusnakBHerreraMAmplatzKNephrostolithotomy: percutaneous techniques for urinary calculus removalAJR Am J Roentgenol198213947217266981934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LehmanTBagleyDHReverse lithotomy: modified prone position for simultaneous nephroscopic and ureteroscopic procedures in womenUrology19883265295313201661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrassoMNordRBagleyDHProne split leg and flank roll positioning: simultaneous antegrade and retrograde access to the upper urinary tractJ Endourol1993743073108252024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RayAAChungDGHoneyRJPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerationsJ Endourol200923101607161419630486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PakravanMKiavashVMoradianSPosterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy Following Percutaneous NephrolithotomyJ Ophthalmol2006114558563
   Google Scholar
• IbarluzeaGScoffoneCMCraccoCMSupine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological accessBJU Int2007100123323617552975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PapatsorisAGZamanFPanahAMasoodJEl-HusseinyTBuchholzNSimultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourologic access: “the Barts technique”J Endourol200822122665266619025394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BachCGoyalAKumarPThe Barts “flank-free” modified supine position for percutaneous nephrolithotomyUrol Int201289336536823052010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FalahatkarSAsliMMEmadiSAEnshaeiAPourhadiHAllahkhahAComplete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (csPCNL) in patients with and without a history of stone surgery: safety and effectiveness of csPCNLUrol Res201139429530121161518
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SoferMGiustiGProiettiSUpper calyx approachability through a lower calyx access for prone versus supine percutaneous nephrolithotomyJ Urol2016195237738226254723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KumarPBachCKachrilasSSupine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): “in vogue” but in which position?BJU Int201211011 Pt CE101822564784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YuanDLiuYRaoHSupine Versus Prone Position in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Kidney Calculi: A Meta-AnalysisJ Endourol201630775476327072075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangXXiaLXuTWangXZhongSShenZIs the supine position superior to the prone position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)?Urolithiasis2014421879324141694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FalahatkarSMokhtariGTeimooriMAn Update on Supine Versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-analysisUrol J20161352814282227734421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiuLZhengSXuYWeiQSystematic review and meta-analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for patients in the supine versus prone positionJ Endourol201024121941194620858062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FalahatkarSAllahkhahASoltanipourSSupine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: proUrol J20118425726422090042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FalahatkarSKazemnezhadEMoghaddamKGMiddle calyx access in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomyCan Urol Assoc J201375–630631024319507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FalahatkarSMoghaddamKGKazemnezhadEFactors affecting complications according to the modified Clavien classification in complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomyCan Urol Assoc J201591–28392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaramiHRezaeiAMohammadhosseiniMJavanmardBMazloomfardMLotfiBUltrasonography-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the flank position versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the prone position: a comparative studyJ Endourol20102481357136120618100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SanguedolceFBredaAMillanFBrehmerMKnollTLower pole stones: prone PCNL versus supine PCNL in the International Cooperation in Endourology (ICE) group experience201331615751580
   Google Scholar
• Al-DessoukeyAAMoussaASAbdelbaryAMPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the oblique supine lithotomy position and prone position: a comparative studyJ Endourol20142891058106324856575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValdiviaJGScarpaRMDuvdevaniMSupine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global studyJ Endourol201125101619162521877911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MazzucchiEVicentiniFCMarchiniGSPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patients: comparison between the prone and total supine positionJ Endourol201226111437144222721511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amon SesmeroJHdel Valle GonzalezNConde RedondoCComparison between Valdivia position and prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomyActasUrolEsp2008324424429
   Google Scholar
• FalahatkarSMoghaddamAASalehiMNikpourSEsmailiFKhakiNComplete supine percutaneous nephrolithotripsy comparison with the prone standard techniqueJ Endourol200822112513251819046091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de SioMAutorinoRQuartoGModified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access: a prospective randomized trialEur Urol200854119620318262711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShomaAMErakyIEl-KenawyMREl-KappanyHAPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position: technical aspects and functional outcome compared with the prone techniqueUrology200260338839212350467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AslzareMDarabiMRShakibaBMahtajLGGholami-MahtajLColonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An 18-year experienceCan Urol Assoc J201485–632332625408797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-NahasARShokeirAAEl-AssmyAMColonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: study of risk factorsUrology200667593794116635515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaramiHMohammadiRLotfiBA study on comparative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone, supine, and flank positionsWorld J Urol20133151225123022692449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MccahyPRzetelski-WestKGleesonJComplete stone clearance using a modified supine position: initial experience and comparison with prone percutaneous nephrolithotomyJ Endourol201327670570923363334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SievMMotamediniaPLeavittDDoes Peak Inspiratory Pressure Increase in the Prone Position? An Analysis Related to Body Mass IndexJ Urol201519451302130725983193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HengLWangMYSunHLZhuSSAwake nasotracheal fiberoptic intubation and self-positioning followed by anesthesia induction in prone patients: A pilot observational studyMedicine20169532e444027512858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuSDYilmazMTamulPCMeeksJJNadlerRBAwake endotracheal intubation and prone patient self-positioning: anesthetic and positioning considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in obese patientsJ Endourol200923101599160219747057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KooBCBurttGBurgessNAPercutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass indexBJU Int20049391296129915180626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeheilaMLeavittDGalliRPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in super obese patients (body mass index ≥50 kg/m2): overcoming the challengesBJU Int2016117230030625891768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhouXSunXChenXEffect of obesity on outcomes of per-cutaneous nephrolithotomy in renal stone management: a systematic review and meta-analysisUrol Int201798438239028152527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FullerARazviHDenstedtJDThe clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: Outcomes in the morbidly obese patient – a case control analysisCan Urol Assoc J201485–6393397
   Google Scholar
• Torrecilla OrtizCMeza MartínezAIVicens MortonAJObesity in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Is body mass index really important?Urology201484353854325168529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShokeirAAEl-NahasARShomaAMPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneysUrology200464342642915351557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El GhoneimyMNKoderaASEmranAMOrbanTZShabanAMEl GammalMMPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: is rigid nephroscopy sufficient tool for complete clearance? A case series studyBMC Urol200991719917111
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• OtañoNJairathAMishraSGanpuleASabnisRDesaiMPercutaneous nephrolithotomy in pelvic kidneys: is the ultrasound-guided puncture safe?Urology2015851555825440823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TokatlıZGokceMISüerESağlamRSupine or prone position for mini-PNL procedure: does it matterUrolithiasis201543326126425700801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar