Comparison of Safety, Efficacy and Outcomes of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty vs Conventional Laparoscopy

References

• Paraboschi I, Mantica G, Dalton NR, Turner C, Garriboli M. Urinary biomarkers in pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: a systematic review. Translational Andrology Urology. 2020;9(2):722–742. doi:10.21037/tau.2020.01.0132420179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kausik S, Segura JW. Surgical management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Int Braz j Urol. 2003;29(1):3–10. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538200300010000215745460
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eden CG. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a critical analysis of results. Eur Urol. 2007;52(4):983–989.17629395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, Preminger GM. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1993;150(6):1795–1799.8230507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):430–452.23856037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology. 2002;60(3):509–513.12350499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergersen A, Thomas R, Lee BR. Robotic Pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2018;32(S1):S68–S72.29774814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RG, Averch TD, Schulam PG, Adams JB. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases. J Urol. 1997;157(2):459–462.8996331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Forster T, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties. Eur Urol. 2006;49(2):264–272. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.03616439056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelit ES, Ciftci H, Kati B, et al. Mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: functional and cosmetic results. Urol J. 2018;15(6):339–343.30251752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rane A, Rao P, Rao P. Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port). Urology. 2008;72(2):260–263. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2008.01.07818468664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han HH, Ham WS, Kim JH, et al. Transmesocolic approach for left side laparoscopic pyeloplasty: comparison with laterocolic approach in the initial learning period. Yonsei Med J. 2013;54(1):197–203. doi:10.3349/ymj.2013.54.1.19723225819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters CA, Schlussel RN, Retik AB. Pediatric laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol. 1995;153(6):1962–1965. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67378-67752371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakada SY, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: preliminary experience. Urology. 1995;46(2):257–260. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80205-27624999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammady A, Abdelgalil W, Rashed E, Elbadry MS. Upper urinary tract retroperitoneoscopic surgery under epidural anesthesia: shifting towards outpatient treatment. Scand J Urol. 2015;49(2):181–184. doi:10.3109/21681805.2014.97142625356788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan AK, Shrivastava D, Kurzweil RE, Weiss DA, Long CJ, Shukla AR. Port Site Local Anesthetic Infiltration Vs Single-dose Intrathecal Opioid Injection to Control Perioperative Pain in Children Undergoing Minimal Invasive Surgery: A Comparative Analysis. Urology. 2016;97:179–183. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.06427450349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cestari A, Buffi NM, Lista G, et al. Retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robot-assisted pyeloplasty in adults: techniques and results. Eur Urol. 2010;58(5):711–718. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.07.02020800338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo JE, Kang SK, Koh DH, et al. Pure single-site robot-assisted pyeloplasty with the da Vinci SP surgical system: initial experience. Invest Clin Urol. 2019;60(4):326–330. doi:10.4111/icu.2019.60.4.326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaboardi F, Smelzo S, Mantica G, et al. Minimally-invasive robotic pyeloplasty: the ‘window technique’. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(3):331.
   Google Scholar
• Gaboardi F, Mantica G, Smelzo S, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with the use of the Contour™ stent: description of the technique and analysis of outcomes after the first 30 cases. Cent European J Urol. 2019;72(1):51–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2009;104(11):1722–1729.19519760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citgez S, Demirdag C, Ozman O, Ozden SB, Derekoylu E, Onal B. Comparison of a Modified Antegrade and Retrograde Ureteral Double-J Stenting Techniques during Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty. Urol Int. 2020;104(1–2):87–93.31537008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arumainayagam N, Minervini A, Davenport K, et al. Antegrade versus retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2008;22(4):671–674.18419213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas TO, Ali M, Moog R. “Double-Lumen Valve-Controlled Intra-Operative Pyeloplasty Stent (VIPs)”: A New Technology for Post-Pyeloplasty Stenting - Proof of Concept Study in a Preclinical Large Animal Model. Res Rep Urol. 2020;12:61–74.32161727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilen CY, Bayazit Y, Güdeloğlu A, Abat D, Inci K, Doran S. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in adults: stented versus stentless. J Endourol. 2011;25(4):645–650.21381956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe A, Kozel Z, Palmer L. Robotic surgery in pediatric urology. Asian J Urol. 2017;4(1):55–67.29264208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito C, Masieri L, Castagnetti M, et al. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15(6):667.e1-667.e8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong P, Ding G, Zhu D, et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China. Urol Int. 2018;101(3):337–344.30231235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light A, Karthikeyan S, Maruthan S, Elhage O, Danuser H, Dasgupta P. Peri-operative outcomes and complications after laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018;122(2):181–194.29453902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlig A, Uhlig J, Trojan L, Hinterthaner M. Von Hammerstein-Equord A and Strauss A. Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction – a systematic review and network meta- analysis. BMC Urol. 2019;19:112.31711468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khoder WY, Waidelich R, Ghamdi AMA, Schulz T, Becker A, Stief CG. A prospective randomised comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in a single surgeon, single centre study. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):131–137.28534190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amón Sesmero JH, Delgado MC, de la Cruz Martín B, Serrano MR, Mainez Rodríguez JA, Tapia Herrero AM. Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: always Dismembered? J Endourol. 2016;30(7):778–782.26976065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen MD, Delostrinos C, Johnson MH, Grady RW, Lendvay TS. Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2011;185(6 Suppl):2517–2522.21555027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andolfi C, Adamic B, Oommen J, Gundeti MS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy? World J Urol. 2020;38(8):1827–1833.31506749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aksenov LI, Granberg CF, Gargollo PC. A Systematic Review of Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Pediatric Urological Literature. J Urol. 2020;203(5):1010–1016.31855124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamedanchi S, Sedokani A. Color Doppler Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Outcomes of Pyeloplasty in Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Res Rep Urol. 2020;12:53–59.32158722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnawaz R, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot‐assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:325–329.31222624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T. Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol. 2008;26:539–547.18470516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf HL, Bahler CD, Sundaram CP. Long-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction. Urology. 2016;90:106–110.26801810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taktak S, Llewellyn O, Aboelsoud M, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in the paediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Urol. 2019;11:1756287219835704.30923575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlig A, Uhlig J, Trojan L, Hinterthaner M. Von Hammerstein-Equord A and Strauss A. Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction – a systematic review and network meta- analysis. BMC Urol. 2019;19:112.31711468
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li HZ, Ma X, et al. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2006;176:1077–1080.16890694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasool S, Singh M, Jain S, et al. Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(2):325–329.31222624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendrek M, Vögeli TA, Bach C. Recent advances in urologic surgical techniques for pyeloplasty. F1000Res. 2019;85.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Ouyang W, Xu H, et al. Secondary Management for Recurrent Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction after Pyeloplasty: A Comparison of Re-Do Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Conventional Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Urol Int. 2019;103(4):466–472.31537001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio M, Gander R, Royo GF, Lloret J. Failed pyeloplasty in children: is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible? J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11(2):69.e1-69.e696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc T, Koulouris E, Botto N, Paye-Jaouen A, El-Ghoneimi A. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with horseshoe kidney. J Urol. 2014;191(4):1097–1103.24140844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito C, Masieri L, Blanc T, Manzoni G, Silay S, Escolino M. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children with horseshoe kidneys: results of a multicentric study. World J Urol. 2019;37(10):2257–2263.30643972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR, Kowalczyk KJ, Hu JC. Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol. 2012;187(4):1392–1398.22341274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link RE, Bhayani SB, Kavoussi LR. A prospective comparison of robotic and laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Ann Surg. 2006;243:486–491.16552199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junejo NN, Alotaibi A, Alshahrani SM, et al. The learning curve for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in children: our initial experience from a single center. Urol Ann. 2020;12(1):19–24.32015612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pio L, Musleh L, Paraboschi I, et al. Learning curve for robotic surgery in children: a systematic review of outcomes and fellowship programs. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(4):531–541.31531753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chammas MF, Mitre AI, Arap MA, Hubert N, Hubert J. Learning robotic pyeloplasty without simulators: an assessment of the learning curve in the early robotic era. Clinics. 2019;74:e777.31271586
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassite I, Braik K, Villemagne T, Lardy H, Binet A. The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a multi-outcome approach. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(6):570.e1-570.e10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dothan D, Raisin G, Jaber J, Kocherov S, Chertin B. Learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) in children: how to reach a level of excellence? [published online ahead of print, 2020 Apr 24]. J Robot Surg. 2020;10.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen DK, Lindgren BW, Cheng EY, Gong EM. Can proctoring affect the learning curve of robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty? Experience at a high-volume pediatric robotic surgery center. J Robot Surg. 2017;11(1):63–67.27342871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panek W, Szmer J, Kuijper CF, Chrzan R. Learning curve or experience-related outcome: what really matters in paediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020;15(2):377–381.32489500
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu H, Shen C, Li X, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approach during the learning curve. Urol Int. 2013;90(2):130–135.23171701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar