354
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Technology Meets Tradition: CO2 Laser Circumcision versus Conventional Surgical Technique

, &
Pages 255-260 | Published online: 16 Jul 2020

References

  • Dunsmuir WD, Gordon EM. The history of circumcision. BJU Int. 1999;83:1–12.
  • Gargollo PC, Kozakewich HP, Bauer SB, et al. Balanitis xerotica obliterans in boys. J Urol. 2005;174:1409–1412. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000173126.63094.b316145451
  • Hirji H, Charlton R, Sarmah S. Male circumcision: a review of the evidence. JMHG. 2005;2:21–30.
  • Ohshiro T. The laser apple: a new graphic representation of medical laser applications. Laser Ther. 1995;8:185–190. doi:10.5978/islsm.8.185
  • Jensen MP, Castarlenas E, Roy R, et al. The utility and construct validity of four measures of pain intensity: results from a University-Based Study in Spain. Pain Med. 2019;20:2411–2420. doi:10.1093/pm/pny31930877801
  • Tobian AA, Gray RH. The medical benefits of male circumcision. JAMA. 2011;306:1479–1480. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.143121972310
  • Kim HH, Goldstein M. High complication rates challenge the implementation of male circumcision for HIV prevention in Africa. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2009;6:64–65. doi:10.1038/ncpuro127919107114
  • Dell’Atti L, Polito M, Galosi AB. Is degloving the best method to approach the penile corporoplasty with Yachia’s technique? Urology. 2019;126:204–208. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2018.12.04030677456
  • Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I. Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urol. 2010;10:2. doi:10.1186/1471-2490-10-220158883
  • Xu Y, Li F, Li Z, et al. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of circumcision in adult males using the CO2 laser: modified technique compared with the conventional dorsal-slit technique. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013;31(9):422–427. doi:10.1089/pho.2013.355023869518
  • Kaplan I. The CO2 surgical laser. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28:847–848. doi:10.1089/pho.2010.992621142727
  • Omi T, Numano K. The role of the CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser in dermatology. Laser Ther. 2014;23:49–60. doi:10.5978/islsm.14-RE-0124771971
  • Kaplan I. The CO2 laser as a versatile surgical modality. Laser Ther. 2007;16:25–38. doi:10.5978/islsm.16.25
  • Gorgulu T, Olgun A, Torun M, et al. A fast, easy circumcision procedure combining a CO2 laser and cyanoacrylate adhesive: a non-randomized comparative trial. Int Braz J Urol. 2016;42:113–117. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.028427136476
  • How AC, Ong CC, Jacobsen A, et al. Carbon dioxide laser circumcisions for children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003;19:11–13. doi:10.1007/s00383-002-0894-012721714
  • Tuncer I, Ozcakir–Tomruk C, Sencift K, et al. Comparison of conventional surgery and CO2 laser on intraoral soft tissue pathologies and evaluation of the collateral thermal damage. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010;28:75–79. doi:10.1089/pho.2008.235319715451
  • Kelly BD, Lundon DJ, Timlin ME, et al. Paediatric sutureless circumcision – an alternative to the standard technique. Pediatr Surg Int. 2012;28:305–308. doi:10.1007/s00383-011-3015-022009213
  • Lane V, Vajda P, Subramaniam R. Paediatric sutureless circumcision: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2010;26:141–144. doi:10.1007/s00383-009-2475-y19707772
  • D’Arcy FT, Jaffry SQ. A review of 100 consecutive sutureless child and adult circumcisions. Ir J Med Sci. 2011;180:51–53. doi:10.1007/s11845-010-0545-820694750
  • Mattos LS, Deshpande M, Barresi G, et al. A novel computerized surgeon-machine interface for robot-assisted laser phonomicrosurgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;128:1887–1894. doi:10.1002/lary.24566