222
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factors Associated with Varicocele Recurrence After Microscopic Sub-Inguinal Varicocelectomy

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 651-657 | Published online: 15 Dec 2020

References

  • Kupis Ł, Dobroński PA, Radziszewski P. Varicocele as a source of male infertility – current treatment techniques. Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(3):365–370. doi:10.5173/ceju.2015.642
  • Alsaikhan B, Alrabeeah K, Delouya G, Zini A. Epidemiology of varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):179–181. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.17264026763551
  • Eisenberg ML, Lipshultz LI. Varicocele-induced infertility: newer insights into its pathophysiology. Indian J Urol. 2011;27(1):58. doi:10.4103/0970-1591.7842821716891
  • Binsaleh S, Lo KC. Varicocelectomy: microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is the treatment of choice. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007;1(3):277–278.18542804
  • Zini A. Varicocelectomy: microsurgical subinguinal technique is the treatment of choice. Can Urol Assoc J. 2007;1(3):273–276.18542803
  • Krishna Reddy S, Basha Shaik A, Sailaja S, Venkataramanaiah M. Outcome of varicocelectomy with different degrees of clinical varicocele in infertile male. Adv Androl. 2015;2015.
  • Rotker K, Sigman M. Recurrent varicocele. Asian J Androl. 2016;18(2):229–233. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.17157826806078
  • Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on varicocele and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(6):1556–1560. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.00725458620
  • Amelar RD, Dubin L. Therapeutic implications of left, right, and bilateral varicocelectomy. Urology. 1987;30(1):53–59. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(87)90573-53603911
  • Dubin L, Amelar RD. Varicocele size and results of varicocelectomy in selected subfertile men with varicocele. Fertil Steril. 1970;21(8):606–609. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)37684-15433164
  • Gat Y, Bachar GN, Zukerman Z, Belenky A, Gornish M. Varicocele: a bilateral disease. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(2):424–429. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.01014967384
  • Cayan S, Shavakhabov S, Kadioğlu A. Treatment of palpable varicocele in infertile men: a meta-analysis to define the best technique. J Androl. 2008;30(1):33–40. doi:10.2164/jandrol.108.00596718772487
  • Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R. Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome. Urology. 2004;64(5):1005–1009. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.06015533495
  • Goldstein M, Gilbert BR, Dicker AP, Dwosh J, Gnecco C. Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with delivery of the testis: an artery and lymphatic sparing technique. J Urol. 1992;148(6):1808–1811. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37035-01433614
  • Ito H, Kotake T, Hamano M, Yanagi S. Results obtained from microsurgical therapy of varicocele. Urol Int. 1993;51(4):225–227. doi:10.1159/0002825498266615
  • Jungwirth A, Gögüs C, Hauser G, et al. Clinical outcome of microsurgical subinguinal varicocelectomy in infertile men. Andrologia. 2001;33(2):71–74. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0272.2001.00407.x11350369
  • Kumar R, Gupta NP. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: evaluation of the results. Urol Int. 2003;71(4):368–372. doi:10.1159/00007408714646434
  • Marmar JL, Kim Y. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: a technical critique and statistical analysis of semen and pregnancy data. J Urol. 1994;152(4):1127–1132. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32521-18072081
  • Orhan I, Onur R, Semerciöz A, Firdolas F, Ardicoglu A, Köksal IT. Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele. Arch Androl. 2005;51(3):213–220. doi:10.1080/0148501059091964816025860
  • Watanabe M, Nagai A, Kusumi N, Tsuboi H, Nasu Y, Kumon H. Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches. Int J Urol. 2005;12(10):892–898. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2005.01142.x16323983
  • Ding H, Tian J, Du W, Zhang L, Wang H, Wang Z. Open non-microsurgical, laparoscopic or open microsurgical varicocelectomy for male infertility: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BJU Int. 2012;110(10):1536–1542. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11093.x22642226
  • Wang J, Xia S-J, Liu Z-H, et al. Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis. Asian J Androl. 2015;17(1):74–80. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.13644325248652
  • Al-Kandari AM, Khudair A, Arafa A, Zanaty F, Ezz A, El-Shazly M. Microscopic subinguinal varicocelectomy in 100 consecutive cases: spermatic cord vascular anatomy, recurrence and hydrocele outcome analysis. Arab J Urol. 2018;16(1):181–187. doi:10.1016/j.aju.2017.12.00229713549
  • Demirdöğen ŞO, Özkaya F, Cinislioğlu AE, et al. A comparison between the efficacy and safety of microscopic inguinal and subinguinal varicocelectomy. Turk J Urol. 2019;45(4):254–260. doi:10.5152/tud.2019.7254731291187
  • Beck EM, Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Intraoperative varicocele anatomy: a macroscopic and microscopic study. J Urol. 1992;148(4):1190–1194. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)36857-X1404635
  • Coolsaet BL. The varicocele syndrome: venography determining the optimal level for surgical management. J Urol. 1980;124(6):833–839. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)55688-87441834
  • Lund L, Roebuck DJ, Lee KH, Sørensen HT, Yeung CK. Clinical assessment after varicocelectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2000;34(2):119–122. doi:10.1080/00365590075001673310903073
  • Gorur S, Candan Y, Helli A, et al. Low body mass index might be a predisposing factor for varicocele recurrence: a prospective study. Andrologia. 2015;47(4):448–454. doi:10.1111/and.1228724811266