Open and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: Comparison and Validation of Preoperative Scoring Systems, Including PADUA, RENAL, ABC Nephrometric Scores and Perinephric Fat Evaluation with Mayo Adhesive Probability Score

References

• Lesage K, Joniau S, Fransis K, Van Poppel H. Comparison between open partial and radical nephrectomy for renal tumours: perioperative outcome and health-related quality of life. Eur Urol. 2007;51(3):614–620. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W. A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup Phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2011;59(4):543–552. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.12.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark ATD, Breau RH, Morash C. Preservation of renal function following partial or radical nephrectomy using 24-hour creatinine clearance. Eur Urol. 2008;54(1):143–149. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2008.03.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reix B, Bernhard JC, Patard JJ, et al. Overall survival and oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for cT2a renal tumors: a collaborative international study from the French kidney cancer research network UroCCR. Prog Urol. 2018;28(3):146–155. doi:10.1016/j.purol.2017.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, Blute ML, Babineau D, Colombo JR. Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol. 2007;178(1):41–46. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittori G. Open versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multicenter comparison study of peri-operative outcomes and complications. World J Urol. 2014;32(1):287–293. doi:10.1007/s00345-013-1136-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klatte T, Ficarra V, Gratzke C, Kaouk J, Kutikov A, Macchi A. A literature review of renal surgical anatomy and surgical strategies for partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;68(6):980–992. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher Neil J, Kunchala S, Reynolds C, Lehman E, Nie S, Raman JD. Adherent perinephric fat at minimally invasive partial nephrectomy is associated with adverse peri-operative outcomes and malignant renal histology. BJU Int. 2016;117(4):636–641. doi:10.1111/bju.13378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel DD, Davidiuk AJ, Meschia C, et al. Mayo Adhesive probability score is associated with localized renal cell carcinoma progression-free survival. Urology. 2016;89:54–60. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2015.10.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidiuk Andrew J, Parker Alexander S, Thomas Colleen S, et al. Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2014;66(6):1165–1171. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009;182(3):844–853. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56(5):786–793. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B. Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology. 2011;78(5):1089–1094. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavallée LT, Desantis D, Kamal F. The association between renal tumor scoring systems and ischemia time during open partial nephrectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2012;6(3):1–8. doi:10.5489/cuaj.11202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroup SP, Palazzi K, Kopp RP. RENAL nephrometry score is associated with operative approach for partial nephrectomy and urine leak. Urology. 2012;80(1):151–156. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hew MN, Baseskioglu B, Barwari K. Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 2011;186(1):42–46. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desantis D, Lavallée Luke T, Witiuk K, et al. The association between renal tumour scoring system components and complications of partial nephrectomy. Can Urol Assoc J. 2015;9(1–2):39–45. doi:10.5489/cuaj.2303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou W, Yan W, Ji Z. Anatomic features involved in technical complexity of partial nephrectomy. Urology. 2015;85(1):1–7. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaliviero M, Poon BY, Karlo Christoph A, et al. An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) scoring system to assess the morbidity profile of partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol. 2016;69(1):72–79. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–383. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–213. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier S, Aufderklamm S, Todenhöfer T, et al. Prediction of postoperative risks in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using RENAL, Mayo adhesive probability and renal pelvic score. Anticancer Res. 2017;37(3):1369–1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishiyama R, Kondo T, Takagi T, et al. Impact of the Mayo adhesive probability score on the complexity of robo-assisted partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2018;32(10):928–933. doi:10.1089/end.2017.0779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maida F, Vittori G, Campi R, et al. Clinical predictors and significance of adherent perinephric fat assessed with Mayo Adhesive Probability (MAP) score and Perinephric Fat Surface Density (PnFSD) at the time of partial nephrectomy for localized renal mass. A single high-volume referral center experience. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Salah M, Elsheemy M, Ghoneima M, et al. Modified R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score for predicting the outcome following partial nephrectomy. Afr J Urol. 2020;26(45). doi:10.1186/s12301-020-00056-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corradi R, Vertosick E, Nguyen D, et al. Nephrometry scores and perioperative outcomes following robotic partial nephrectomy. Int Braz J Urol. 2017;43(6):1075–1083. doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Porpiglia F, Crestani A, et al. The Simplified PADUA REnal (SPARE) nephrometry system: a novel classification of parenchymal renal tumours suitable for partial nephrectomy. BJU Int. 2019;124(4):621–628. doi:10.1111/bju.14772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CP, Chang CH, Wu HC, et al. External validation of the Simplified PADUA REnal (SPARE) nephrometry system in predicting surgical outcomes after partial nephrectomy. BMC Urol. 2020;20(1):146. doi:10.1186/s12894-020-00702-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, et al. Current Use of three-dimensional model technology in urology: a road map for personalised surgical planning. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(5):652–656. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2018.09.012
   Google Scholar
• Checcucci E, Amparore D, Pecoraro A, et al. 3D mixed reality holograms for preoperative surgical planning of nephron-sparing surgery: evaluation if surgeons’perception. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Checcucci E, et al. Three-dimensional virtual imaging of renal tumours: a new tool to improve the accuracy of nephrometry scores. BJU Int. 2019;124(6):945–954. doi:10.1111/bju.14894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar