Gastrointestinal robotic surgery: challenges and developments

References

• Ng AT, Tam PC. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20(3):241–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang SL, Kibel AS, Brooks JD, Chung BI. The impact of robotic surgery on the surgical management of prostate cancer in the United States. BJU Int. Epub June 23, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration, July 2000 510(k) Clearances. Available at: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K990144. Accessed December 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JE, Chang DC, Parsons JK, Talamini MA. The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(1):107–114; discussion 114–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benmessaoud C, Kharrazi H, MacDorman KF. Facilitators and barriers to adopting robotic-assisted surgery: contextualizing the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e16395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JR. Anesthetic considerations for robotic surgery. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2014;66(1):3–11.
   Google Scholar
• Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(3):598–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garas G, Ibrahim A, Ashrafian H, et al. Evidence-based surgery: barriers, solutions, and the role of evidence synthesis. World J Surg. 2012;36(8):1723–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs – the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsui C, Klein R, Garabrant M. Minimally invasive surgery: national trends in adoption and future directions for hospital strategy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(7):2253–2257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, et al. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138(7):777–784.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, et al. Perioperative risk assessment in robotic general surgery: lessons learned from 884 cases at a single institution. Arch Surg. 2012;147(8):701–708.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liberman D, Trinh QD, Jeldres C, Zorn KC. Is robotic surgery cost-effective: yes. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22(1):61–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg. 2013;79(6):553–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutt CN, Oniu T, Mehrabi A, Kashfi A, Schemmer P, BÜchler MW. Robot-assisted abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2004;91(11):1390–1397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes E, Elli E, Giulianotti P. The role of the dual console in robotic surgical training. Surgery. 2014;155(1):1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeders IA. Robotics: The next step? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28(1):225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadzadeh N, Safdari R. Robotic surgery in cancer care: opportunities and challenges. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(3):1081–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Bencini L, Bernini M, Farsi M. Laparoscopic approach to gastrointestinal malignancies: toward the future with caution. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(7):1777–1789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson JA, Johnson MH, Bhayani SB. Application of surgical safety standards to robotic surgery: five principles of ethics for nonmaleficence. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(2):290–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna JM, Onaitis MW. Robotic benign esophageal procedures. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(2):223–229, vii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaligram A, Unnirevi J, Simorov A, Kothari VM, Oleynikov D. How does the robot affect outcomes? A retrospective review of open, laparoscopic, and robotic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1047–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkenback D, Lehane CW, Lord RV. Robot-assisted oesophageal and gastric surgery for benign disease: antireflux operations and Heller’s myotomy. ANZ J Surg. Epub July 9, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Owen B, Simorov A, Siref A, Shostrom V, Oleynikov D. How does robotic anti-reflux surgery compare with traditional open and laparoscopic techniques: a cost and outcomes analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(5):1686–1690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Zheng Q, Jin Z. Meta-analysis of robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. ANZ J Surg. 2012;82(3):112–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCulloch P, Ward J, Tekkis PP, et al. Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2003;327(7425):1192–1197.
   Google Scholar
• Low DE, Bodnar A. Update on clinical impact, documentation, and management of complications associated with esophagectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2013;23(4):535–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9829):1887–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(2):381–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb M, Brower S, Schwaitzberg SD. Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(2):304–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uttley L, Campbell F, Rhodes M, Cantrell A, Stegenga H, Lloyd-Jones M. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy versus open surgery: is there an advantage? Surg Endosc.3 2013;27(11):724–731.
   Google Scholar
• Lehenbauer D, Kernstine KH. Robotic esophagectomy: modified McKeown approach. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(2):203–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kernstine KH, DeArmond DT, Karimi M, et al. The robotic, 2-stage, 3-field esophagolymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127(6):1847–1849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner JC, Zitt M, Ott H, et al. Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) for benign and malignant esophageal tumors. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(4):1202–1206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone J, Schipper ME, Moojen WA, Borel Rinkes IH, Cromheecke GJ, van Hillegersberg R. Robot-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy for cancer. Br J Surg. 2009;96(8):878–886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weksler B, Sharma P, Moudgill N, Chojnacki KA, Rosato EL. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2012;25(5):403–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntambekar SP, Rayate N, Joshi S, Agarwal G. Robotic transthoracic esophagectomy in the prone position: experience with 32 patients with esophageal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011;142(5):1283–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassis ES, Kosinski AS, Ross P Jr, Koppes KE, Donahue JM, Daniel VC. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96(6):1919–1926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP, Finley DJ, et al. Combined thoracoscopic ansd laparoscopic robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy using a four-arm platform: experience, technique and cautions during early procedure development. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(5):e107–e115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkaria IS, Rizk NP. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: the Ivor Lewis approach. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(2):211–222, vii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Fuente SG, Weber J, Hoffe SE, Shridhar R, Karl R, Meredith KL. Initial experience from a large referral center with robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy for oncologic purposes. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(9):3339–3347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Hawn MT. Technical aspects and early results of robotic esophagectomy with chest anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145(1):90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trugeda S, FernÁndez-Díaz MJ, Rodríguez-SanjuÁn JC, Palazuelos CM, FernÁndez-Escalante C, Gómez-Fleitas M. Initial results of robot-assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy with intrathoracic hand-sewn anastomosis in the prone position. Int J Med Robot. 2014;10(4):397–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn DH, Johnson EM, Morphew JA, Dilworth HP, Krueger JL, Banerji N. Robot-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy: a 3-year single-center experience. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26(2):159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark J, Sodergren MH, Purkayastha S, et al. The role of robotic assisted laparoscopy for oesophagogastric oncological resection; an appraisal of the literature. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24(4):240–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei B, D’Amico TA. Thoracoscopic versus robotic approaches: advantages and disadvantages. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(2):177–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Sluis PC, Ruurda JP, van der Horst S, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial). Trials. 2012;13:230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez JM, Dimou F, Weber J, et al. Defining the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(8):1346–1351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma B, Baxter N, Grantcharov T. Outcomes after laparoscopic techniques in major gastrointestinal surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16(4):371–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang Y, Li G, Chen P, Yu J, Zhang C. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for early distal gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2011;81(10):673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HJ, Yang HK. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Dig Surg. 2013;30(2):132–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report – a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):417–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uyama I, Suda K, Satoh S. Laparoscopic surgery for advanced gastric cancer: current status and future perspectives. J Gastric Cancer. 2013;13(1):19–25.
   Google Scholar
• Roviello F, Piagnerelli R, Ferrara F, Caputo E, Scheiterle M, Marrelli D. Assessing the feasibility of full robotic interaortocaval nodal dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer. Int J Med Robot. Epub April 15, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Heemskerk J, van Gemert WG, de Vries J, Greve J, Bouvy ND. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(3):171–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coratti A, Annecchiarico M, Di Marino M, Gentile E, Coratti F, Giulianotti PC. Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2771–2781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83(6):1429–1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kim HJ, Tong Y, Park SS. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic and open resections for gastric carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2013;100(12):1566–1578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc. Epub July 17, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Xiong B, Ma L, Zhang C. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes. Surg Oncol. 2012;21(4):274–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong L, Seto Y, Aikou S, Takahashi T. Efficacy evaluation of subtotal and total gastrectomies in robotic surgery for gastric cancer compared with that in open and laparoscopic resections: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e103312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim KM, An JY, Kim HI, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Noh SH. Major early complications following open, laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(12):1681–1687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G, et al. Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res. 2011;166(2):e113–e120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XX, Jiang ZW, Chen P, Zhao Y, Pan HF, Li JS. Full robot-assisted gastrectomy with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis produces satisfying outcomes. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(38):6427–6437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son T, Lee JH, Kim YM, Kim HI, Noh SH, Hyung WJ. Robotic spleen-preserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic procedure. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(9):2606–2615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg. 2009;249(6):927–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao G, Chen J, Ren C, et al. Robotic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyun MH, Lee CH, Kwon YJ, et al. Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(4):1258–1265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugliese R, Maggioni D, Sansonna F, et al. Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5-year survival. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(10):2594–2602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Reim D. Emerging role of robot-assisted gastrectomy: analysis of consecutive 200 cases. J Gastric Cancer. 2013;13(4):255–262.
   Google Scholar
• Junfeng Z, Yan S, Bo T, et al. Robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: comparison of surgical performance and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(6):1779–1787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marano A, Hyung WJ. Robotic gastrectomy: the current state of the art. J Gastric Cancer. 2012;12(2):63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Reich H, McGlynn F, DeCaprio J, Budin R. Laparoscopic excision of benign liver lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78(5):956–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurence JM, Lam VW, Langcake ME, Hollands MJ, Crawford MD, Pleass HC. Laparoscopic hepatectomy, a systematic review. ANZ J Surg. 2007;77(11):948–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):831–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigano L, Tayar C, Laurent A, Cherqui D. Laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):410–421.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim CH, To H, Usatoff V, Evans PM. Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe procedure for cancer patients. HPB (Oxford). 2009;11(3):247–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuguchi T, Kawamoto M, Meguro M, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and power analysis. Surg Today. 2011;41(1):39–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):825–830.
   Google Scholar
• Belli G, Gayet B, Han HS, et al. Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy a consideration for acceptance as standard of care. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(8):2721–2726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagher I, O’Rourke N, Geller DA, Cherqui D, Belli G, Gamblin TC. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: an evolution in standard of care. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):856–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koffron AJ, Auffenberg G, Kung R, Abecassis M. Evaluation of 300 minimally invasive liver resections at a single institution: less is more. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):385–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao AM, Ahmed I. Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for benign and malignant hepatic lesions in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;5:CD010162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggi U, Moretto C, Vistoli F, D’Imporzano S, Mosca F. Robotic suture of a large caval injury caused by endo-GIA stapler malfunction during laparoscopic wedge resection of liver segments VII and VIII en-bloc with the right hepatic vein. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2009;18(5):306–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen BY, Zhan Q, Deng XX, et al. Radical resection of gallbladder cancer: could it be robotic? Surg Endosc. 2012;26(11):3245–3250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg. 2013;205(6):697–702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CM, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Ito N, Hasegawa Y, Takahara T. Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):732–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti PC, Tzvetanov I, Jeon H, et al. Robot-assisted right lobe donor hepatectomy. Transpl Int. 2012;25(1):e5–e9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Lapalorcia LM, Casciola L. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted one-stage resection of colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases: a pilot study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(4):450–457.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Sbrana F, et al. Robotic liver surgery: results for 70 resections. Surgery. 2011;149(1):29–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakabayashi G, Sasaki A, Nishizuka S, Furukawa T, Kitajima M. Our initial experience with robotic hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(4):481–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH, et al. Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(8):2247–2258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu YM, Hu RH, Lai HS, Lee HP. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive liver resection. Asian J Surg. 2014;37(2):53–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelletier JS, Gill RS, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. Robotic-assisted hepatic resection: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9(3):262–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casciola L, Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Ceribelli C, Spaziani A. Robot-assisted parenchymal-sparing liver surgery including lesion located in the posterosuperior segments. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(12):3815–3824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Coratti A, et al. Totally robotic right hepatectomy: surgical technique and outcomes. Arch Surg. 2011;146(7):844–850.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lai EC, Tang CN, Li MK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan OC, Tang CN, Lai EC, Yang GP, Li MK. Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(4):471–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berber E, Akyildiz HY, Aucejo F, Gunasekaran G, Chalikonda S, Fung J. Robotic versus laparoscopic resection of liver tumours. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12(8):583–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM, Duan WD, Lu F, Dong JH. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):342–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spampinato MG, Coratti A, Bianco L, et al. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic and robot-assisted major hepatectomies: an Italian multi-institutional comparative study. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2973–2979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):549–555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranchart H, Ceribelli C, Ferretti S, Dagher I, Patriti A. Traditional versus robot-assisted full laparoscopic liver resection: a matched-pair comparative study. World J Surg. 2014;38(11):2904–2909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Baek NH, Li G, et al. Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(20):3077–3082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidovszky TJ, Carr AD, Farinholt GN, Ho HS, Smith WH, Ali MR. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy in a broadly inclusive patient population: a prospective study. Ann Surg. 2014;260(1):134–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinoglio G, Priora F, Bianchi PP, et al. Real-time near-infrared (NIR) fluorescent cholangiography in single-site robotic cholecystectomy (SSRC): a single-institutional prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):2156–2162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon W, Jang JY, Park JW, Han IW, Kang MJ, Kim SW. Which method of pancreatic surgery do medical consumers prefer among open, laparoscopic, or robotic surgery? A survey. Ann Surg Treat Res. 2014;86(1):7–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosales-Velderrain A, Bowers SP, Goldberg RF, et al. National trends in resection of the distal pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(32):4342–4349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejaz A, Sachs T, He J, et al. A comparison of open and minimally invasive surgery for hepatic and pancreatic resections using the nationwide inpatient sample. Surgery. 2014;156(3):538–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaraman S, Gonen M, Brennan MF, et al. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: evolution of a technique at a single institution. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(4):503–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pericleous S, Middleton N, McKay SC, Bowers KA, Hutchins RR. Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-matched studies comparing open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: is it a safe procedure? Pancreas. 2012;41(7):993–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkat R, Edil BH, Schulick RD, Lidor AO, Makary MA, Wolfgang CL. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is associated with significantly less overall morbidity compared to the open technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2012;255(6):1048–1059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox AM, Pitzul K, Bhojani F, et al. Comparison of outcomes and costs between laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and open resection at a single center. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(5):1220–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudsi OY, Gagner M, Jones DB. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2013;22(1):59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick ML, Cusati D. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: feasibility and outcome in an early experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(1):19–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ammori BJ, Ayiomamitis GD. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy: a UK experience and a systematic review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2084–2099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcione F, Pirozzi F, Cuccurullo D, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(6):2131–2136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croome KP, Farnell MB, Que FG, et al. Total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: oncologic advantages over open approaches? Ann Surg. 2014;260(4):633–638; discussion 638–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa-Gallego C, Dinkelspiel HE, Sulimanoff I, et al. Minimally-invasive vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):129–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei P, Wei B, Guo W, Wei H. Minimally invasive surgical approach compared with open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis on the feasibility and safety. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24(4):296–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(7):1646–1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Robot-assisted spleen-preserving laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(13):3623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiguchi A, Uyama I, Miyakawa S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011;18(2):287–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH, Secrest A, Dauoudi M, Bartlett D, Moser AJ. Outcomes after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary lesions. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(3):864–870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coratti A, Annecchiarico M. Robot-assisted pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(6):593–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach. Pancreas. 2010;39(2):160–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012;10(9):475–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):128–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh HJ 3rd. 250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258(4):554–559; discussion 559–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, et al. Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100(7):917–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggi U, Palladino S, Massimetti G, et al. Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. Epub August 27, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gagner M, Palermo M. Laparoscopic Whipple procedure: review of the literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2009;16(6):726–730.
   Google Scholar
• Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):810–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wu WM, You L, Zhao YP. Robotic versus open pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1774–1780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirocchi R, Partelli S, Trastulli S, Coratti A, Parisi A, Falconi M. A systematic review on robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surg Oncol. 2013;22(4):238–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi A, Coratti F, Cirocchi R, et al. Robotic distal pancreatectomy with or without preservation of spleen: a technical note. World J Surg Oncol. 2014;12:295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang CM, Lee SH, Lee WJ. Minimally invasive radical pancreatectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer: current status and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(9):2343–2351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Choi SH, Lee WJ, Chi HS. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (>median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2848–2855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Chiaro M, Segersvörd R. The state of the art of robotic pancreatectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:920492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang HK, Kang CM, Chung YE, Kim KA, Choi SH, Lee WJ. Robot-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon’s experiences and proposal of clinical application. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):774–781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martel G, Boushey RP. Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(4):867–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aly EH. Colorectal surgery: current practice and future developments. Int J Surg. 2012;10(4):182–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359(9325):2224–2229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(20):2050–2059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, et al; COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR). Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(7):477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al; MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–1726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al. Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248(5):728–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al; Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(4):655–662; discussion 662–664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, et al. The long term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;248(1):1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group; Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, et al. Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(1):44–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ. Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97(11):1638–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagshaw PF, Allardyce RA, Frampton CM, et al; Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study Group. Long-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial. Ann Surg. 2012;256(6):915–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwenk W, Haase O, Neudecker J, MÜller JM. Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;20(3):CD003145.
   Google Scholar
• Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al; Transatlantic Laparoscopically Assisted vs Open Colectomy Trials Study Group. Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007;142(3):298–303.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhry E, Schwenk WF, Gaupset R, Romild U, Bonjer HJ. Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;16(2):CD003432.
   Google Scholar
• Breukink S, Pierie J, Wiggers T. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(4):CD005200.
   Google Scholar
• van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al; COlorectal cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection II (COLOR II) Study Group. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al. Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(11):637–645.
   Google Scholar
• Lujan J, Valero G, Biondo S, Espin E, Parrilla P, Ortiz H. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):295–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, et al. Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;4:CD005200.
   Google Scholar
• Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW. Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right sided and left sided resections. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlachta CM, Mamazza J, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu M, Gregoire R, Poulin EC. Defining a learning curve of laparoscopic colorectal resections. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(2):217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell MC, Torgerson JL, Kreaden U. The first 100 da Vinci hysterectomies: an analysis of the learning curve for a single surgeon. S D Med. 2009;62(3):91, 93–95.
   Google Scholar
• Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Haas EM. Learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(3):855–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deSouza A, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ, et al. Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(12):1611–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber P, Merola S, Wasielewski A, Ballantyne G. Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(12):1689–1696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel CB, Ragupathi M, Ramos-Valadez DI, Haas EM. A three-arm (laparoscopic, hand-assisted, and robotic) matched-case analysis of intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch GB, Sathyanarayana SA, Gunabushanam V, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an institutional experience. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):956–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung AK, Aly EH. Robotic colonic surgery: is it advisable to commence a new learning curve? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(6):786–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Jafari MD, et al. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg. 2013;37(12):2782–2790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscio F, Bertoglio C, DeLuca A, Frattini P, Scandroglio I. Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg. 2012;10(6):290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek SK, Carmichael JC, Pigazzi A. Robotic surgery: colon and rectum. Cancer J. 2013;19(2):140–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkiewicz W, Zawadzki M, RzĄca M, et al. Robot-assisted right colectomy: surgical technique and review of the literature. Wideochir Inne Tech Malo Inwazyjne. 2013;8(3):253–257.
   Google Scholar
• Ballantyne GH, Ewing D, Pigazzi A, Wasielewski A. Telerobotic assisted laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: lateral to medial or medial to lateral dissection? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16(6):406–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deSouza A, Prasad LM, Park JJ, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Abcarian H. Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role? Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(7):1000–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Choi GS, Park SY, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic right colectomy. Br J Surg. 2012;99(9):1218–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Onc. 2010;17(11):2856–2862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi PP, Pigazzi A, Choi SG. Clinical Robotic Surgery Association Fifth Worldwide Congress, Washington DC, 3–5 October 2013: Robotic Colorectal Surgery. Ecancermedicalscience. 2014;8:385.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(10):1701–1708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirnezami AH, Mirnezami R, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Chandrakumaran K, Cecil TD, Moran BJ. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010;12(11):1084–1093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanji A, Gill RS, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. Robotic-assisted colon and rectal surgery: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7(4):401–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiménez Rodríguez RM, Díaz Pavón JM, de La Portilla de Juan F, et al. Estudio prospectivo, aleatorizado: cirugía laparoscópica con asistencia robótica versus cirugía laparoscópica convencional en la resección del cÁncer colorectal [Prospective randomised study: robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer resection]. Cir Esp. 2011;89(7):432–438. Spanish.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kwak JM. Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2013;17 Suppl 1:S47–S53.
   Google Scholar
• Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(6):1480–1487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara M, Yoo BE, Shin JW, Lee DW, Kim SH. Robotic-assisted surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma: short-term and midterm outcomes from 200 consecutive cases at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(5):570–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park JS, Choi GS, Lim KH, Jang YS, Jun SH. S052: a comparison of robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open surgery in the treatment of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(1):240–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patriti A, Ceccarelli G, Bartoli A, Spaziani A, Biancafarina A, Casciola L. Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection. JSLS. 2009;13(2):176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek JH, Pastor C, Pigazzi A. Robotic and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(2):521–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park IJ, You YN, Schlette E, et al. Reverse-hybrid robotic mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(2):228–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez R, Anaya DA, Li LT, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic rectal resection for rectal cancer in a veteran population. Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):509–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng KH, Lim YK, Ho KS, Ooi BS, Eu KW. Robotic- assisted surgery for low rectal dissection: from better views to better outcome. Singapore Med J. 2009;50(8):763–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh DC, Tsang CB, Kim SH. A new application of the four-arm standard da Vinci surgical system: totally robotic-assisted left-sided colon or rectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(6):1945–1952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong QM, Son DN, Cho JS, et al. Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short term outcome for 29 consecutive patients. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(9):2987–2992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pucci MJ, Beekley AC. Use of robotics in colon and rectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26(1):39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erguner I, Aytac E, Boler DE, et al. What have we gained by performing robotic rectal resection? Evaluation of 64 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection for rectal adenocarcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23(3):316–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi PP, Ceriani C, Locatelli A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(11):2888–2894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin JY. Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between a robotic colectomy and a laparoscopic colectomy during early experience. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Park SY, Choi GS, Park JS, Kim HJ, Ryuk JP. Short-term clinical outcome of robot-assisted intersphinteric resection for low rectal cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezzi TL, Luca F, Valvo M, et al. Robotic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparative study of short and long-term outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(9):1072–1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwak JM, Kim SH, Kim J, Son DN, Baek SJ, Cho JS. Robotic vs laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of a case-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(2):151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang J, Yoon KJ, Min B, et al. The impact of robotic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer: a case matched analysis of a 3-arm comparison-open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg. 2012;36(11):2722–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helvind NM, Eriksen JR, Mogensen A, et al. No differences in short-term morbidity and mortality after robot-assisted laparoscopic versus laparoscopic resection for colonic cancer: a case-control study of 263 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(10):2575–2580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baek JH, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A. Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):882–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A, et al. An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(2):233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A, et al. Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1614–1620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(12):2162–2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speicher PJ, Englum BR, Ganapathi AM, Nussbaum DP, Mantyh CR, Migaly J. Robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a national perspective on short-term oncologic outcomes. Ann Surg. Epub November 17, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bardakcioglu O. Robotic transanal access surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1407–1409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchs NC, Pugin F, Volonte F, Hagen ME, Morel P, Ris F. Robotic transanal endoscopic microsurgery: technical details for the lateral approach. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(10):1194–1198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hompes R, Rauh SM, Ris F, Tuynman JB, Mortensen NJ. Robotic transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms. Br J Surg. 2014;101(5):578–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canda AE, Atmaca AF, Altinova S, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD. Robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical cystectomy with bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and intracorporeal urinary diversion for bladder cancer: initial experience in 27 cases. BJU Int. 2012;110(3):434–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talamini MA. Laparoscopy for benign disease: robotics. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2003;10(4):203–208.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez BR, Mohr CJ, Morton JM, Safadi BY, Alami RS, Curet MJ. Comparison of totally robotic laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and traditional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2005;1(6):549–554.
   Google Scholar
• Cirocchi R, Boselli C, Santoro A, et al. Current status of robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. BMC Surg. 2013;13:53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey JG, Hayden JA, Davis PJ, Liu RY, Haardt D, Ellsmere J. Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysis. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(2):414–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CC, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118(5):1005–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):5–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zygomalas A, Kehagias I, Giokas K, Koutsouris D. Miniature surgical robots in the era of NOTES and LESS: dream or reality? Surg Innov. Epub May 14, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Idrees K, Barlett DL. Robotic liver surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2010;90(4):761–774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diana M, Noll E, Diemunsch P, et al. Enhanced-reality video fluorescence: a real-time assessment of intestinal viability. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):700–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daskalaki D, Fernandes E, Wang X, et al. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent cholangiography during robotic cholecystectomy: results of 184 consecutive cases in a single institution. Surg Innov. 2014;21(6):615–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinno AK, Fader AN, Roche KL, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Tanner EJ. A comparison of colorimetric versus fluorometric sentinel lymph node mapping during robotic surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134(2):281–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddighi S, Yune JJ, Hardesty J. Indocyanine green for intraoperative localization of ureter. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(4):436.e1–e2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellan M, Spinoglio G, Pigazzi A, Lagares-Garcia JA. The influence of fluorescence imaging on the location of bowel transection during robotic left-sided colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(5):1695–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marescaux J, Leroy J, Rubino F, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002;235(4):487–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Lee JY. The da Vinci Surgical System® overcomes innate hand dominance. J Endourol. 2011;25(8):1385–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniar HS, Council ML, Prasad SM, Prasad SM, Chu C, Damiano RJ Jr. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption. J Surg Res. 2011;125(1):23–29.
   Google Scholar