Robot-assisted hysterectomy: a critical evaluation

References

• Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(1):92–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):1041–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Barrena Medel NI, Sehouli J, Fujiwara K, Herzog TJ. Contemporary management of endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2012;7;379(9823):1352–1360.
   Google Scholar
• Roque DR, Wysham WZ, Soper JT. The surgical management of cervical cancer: an overview and literature review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014;69(7):426–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabrouk M, Frumovitz M, Greer M, et al. Trends in laparoscopic and robotic surgery among gynecologic oncologists: A survey update. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;112(3):501–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smorgick N, Patzkowsky KE, Hoffman MR, Advincula AP, Song AH, As-Sanie S. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(1):101–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(11):1210–1217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarlos D, Kots LA. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011;23(4):283–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, von Felten S, Schär G. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(3):604–611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JD, Ananth CV, Tergas AI, et al. An economic analysis of robotically assisted hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(5):1038–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavone MB, Kuo EC, Naumann RW, et al. The commercialization of robotic surgery: unsubstantiated marketing of gynecologic surgery by hospitals. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(3):174. e1–e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubeshter B, Angel C, Toy E, Thomas S, Glantz JC. Current role of robotic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 2013;29(4):174–178.
   Google Scholar
• Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(5):368. e1–e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosero EB, Kho KA, Joshi GP, Giesecke M, Schaffer JI. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(4):778–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs – the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):701–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith AL, Krivak TC, Scott EM, et al. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;126(3):432–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sari V, Nieboer TE, Vierhout ME, Stegeman DF, Kluivers KB. The operation room as a hostile environment for surgeons: physical complaints during and after laparoscopy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(2):105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zihni AM, Ohu I, Cavallo JA, Cho S, Awad MM. Ergonomic analysis of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(12):3379–3384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166(3):864–865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Moreno A, Puig O, Pérez-Benavente MA, et al. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005;12(2):113–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogani G, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open abdominal management of cervical cancer: long-term results from a propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(5):857–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin XH, Wang ZQ, Yang SZ, Jia HY, Shi M. Clinical observation of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7(5):1373–1377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni A, Minig L, Zanagnolo V, et al. Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115(1):60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199(4):357. e1–e7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, Zweemer RP. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121(12):1538–1545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodurka-Bevers D, Morris M, Eifel PJ, et al. Posttherapy surveillance of women with cervical cancer: an outcomes analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78(2):187–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim KC, Howells RE, Evans AS. The role of clinical follow up in early stage cervical cancer in South Wales. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1444–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117(2):260–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seamon LG, Bryant SA, Rheaume PS, et al. Comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer in obese patients: comparing robotics and laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):16–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höckel M. [Total mesometrial resection: nerve-sparing extended radical abdominal hysterectomy]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2001;123(5):245–249. German.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmig R, Wimberger P, Buderath P, Aktas B, Iannaccone A, Heubner M. Definition of compartment-based radical surgery in uterine cancer: radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer as ‘total mesometrial resection (TMMR)’ by M Höckel translated to robotic surgery (rTMMR). World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmig R, Aktas B, Buderath P, Wimberger P, Iannaccone A, Heubner M. Definition of compartment-based radical surgery in uterine cancer: modified radical hysterectomy in intermediate/high-risk endometrial cancer using peritoneal mesometrial resection (PMMR) by M Höckel translated to robotic surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramirez PT, Adams S, Boggess JF, et al. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology consensus statement. Developed by the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s Clinical Practice Robotics Task Force. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124(2):180–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkin RM. Abdominal hysterectomy in obese women. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;142(4):532–536.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson A, Young D, Reilly J. Caesarean section surgical site infection surveillance. J Hosp Infect. 2006;64(1):30–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeybek B, Oge T, Kiliç CH, Borahay MA, Kiliç GS. A financial analysis of operating room charges for robot-assisted gynaecologic surgery: Efficiency strategies in the operating room for reducing the costs. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2014;15(1):25–29.
   Google Scholar