Could the link between drug addiction in adulthood and substance use in adolescence result from a blurring of the boundaries between incentive and hedonic processes?

References

• Kloep M, Hendry LB, Taylor R, Stuart-Hamilton I. Health in adolescence: a lifespan perspective In: Development from Adolescence to Early Adulthood: A Dynamic Systemic Approach to Transitions and Transformations. Psychology Press: 2016:74–96.
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg LD. The adolescent brain In: Adolescence. NY: McGraw-Hil; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman JC. The Nature of Adolescence. UK: Routledge; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson JL, Nelson AJ. Middle childhood and modern human origins. Hum Nat. 2011;22(3):249–280. doi:10.1007/s12110-011-9119-322388876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harden KP, Tucker-Drob EM. Individual differences in the development of sensation seeking and impulsivity during adolescence: further evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol. 2011;47(3):739–746. doi:10.1037/a002327921534657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urošević S, Collins P, Muetzel R, Lim K, Luciana M. Longitudinal changes in behavioral approach system sensitivity and brain structures involved in reward processing during adolescence. Dev Psychol. 2012;48(5):1488–1500. doi:10.1037/a002750222390662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Philadelphia, USA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. Substance abuse. Available from: http://www.who.int/topics/substance_abuse/en/. Published 2016 Accessed 422, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ersche KD, Jones PS, Williams GB, Smith DG, Bullmore ET, Robbins TW. Distinctive personality traits and neural correlates associated with stimulant drug use versus familial risk of stimulant dependence. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74(2):137–144. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.01623273722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin D, Mar AC, Dalley JW, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. High impulsivity predicts the switch to compulsive cocaine-taking. Science. 2008;320(5881):1352–1355. doi:10.1126/science.115813618535246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin D, Belin-Rauscent A, Everitt BJ, Dalley JW. In search of predictive endophenotypes in addiction: insights from preclinical research. Genes Brain Behav. 2016;15(1):74–88. doi:10.1111/gbb.1226526482647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML. Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron. 2015;86(3):646–664. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.02.01825950633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel N Cross-national comparison of youth justice; 2008 Available from: www.yjb.gov.uk. Accessed April 1, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Spanagel R. Animal models of addiction. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2017;19(3):247–258. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29302222. Accessed April 1, 2019.29302222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise RA. Dopamine and reward : the anhedonia hypothesis 30 years on. Neurotox Res. 2008;14:169–183. doi:10.1007/BF03033808.Dopamine19073424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telzer EH. Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: a new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016;17:57–67. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2015.10.01026708774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrer JLE. Reward processing by the opioid system in the brain. Physiol Rev.2009:1379–1412. DOI:10.1152/physrev.00005.2009
   Google Scholar
• Alcaro A, Huber R, Panksepp J. Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: an affective neuroethological perspective. Brain Res Rev. 2007;56(2):283–321. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.01417905440
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berridge KC, Robinson TE. What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonics, learning, or incentive salience? Brain Res Rev. 1998;28:308–367. doi:10.1016/S0165-0173(98)00019-8
   Google Scholar
• Wassum KM, Cely IC, Balleine BW, Maidment NT. Opioid receptor activation in the basolateral amygdala mediates the learning of increases but not decreases in the incentive value of a food reward. J Neurosci. 2011;31(5):1591–1599. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3102-10.201121289167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olds J, Milner P. Positive reinforcement produced by electrical stimulation of septal area and other regions of rat brain. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1954;47:419–427. doi:10.1037/h005877513233369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez G, Rajabi H, Stewart J, Arvanitogiannis A, Shizgal P. Dopamine tone increases similarly during predictable and unpredictable administration of rewarding brain stimulation at short inter-train intervals. Behav Brain Res. 2008;188(1):227–232. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2007.10.03518068824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Chiara G, Imperato A. Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988;85(July):5274–5278. doi:10.1073/pnas.85.14.52742899326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaus JG, Damsma G, Nomikos GG, et al. Sexual behavior enhances central dopamine transmission in the male rat. Brain Res. 1990;530(2):345–348. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(90)91309-52176121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoebel BG, Monaco AP, Hernandez L, Aulisi EF, Stanley BG, Lenard L. Self-injection of amphetamine directly into the brain. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1983;81(2):158–163. doi:10.1007/BF004290126415748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokel R, Wise R. Attenuation of intravenous amphetamine reinforcement by central dopamine blockade in rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1976;48(3):311–318. doi:10.1007/bf00496868823588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ettenberg A, Pettit HO, Bloom FE, Koob GF. Heroin and cocaine intravenous self-administration in rats: mediation by separate neural systems. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1982;78(3):204–209. doi:10.1007/BF004281516296898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro DC, Cole SL, Berridge KC. Lateral hypothalamus, nucleus accumbens, and ventral pallidum roles in eating and hunger: interactions between homeostatic and reward circuitry. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:(June):90. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2015.00090
   Google Scholar
• Pecina S, Berridge KC, Parker LA. Pimozide does not shift palatability: separation of anhedonia from sensorimotor suppression by taste reactivity. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;58(3):801–811. doi:10.1016/S0091-3057(97)00044-09329075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle TG, Berridge KC, Gosnell BA. Morphine enhances hedonic taste palatability in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1993;46(3):745–749. doi:10.1016/0091-3057(93)90572-B8278455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liggins J, Pihl RO, Benkelfat C, Leyton M. The dopamine augmenter l-dopa does not affect positive mood in healthy human volunteers. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):0–5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson TE, Berridge KC. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1507):3137–3146. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.009318640920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlaepfer TE, Cohen MX, Frick C, et al. Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(2):368–377. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.130140817429407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callesen MB, Scheel-Krüger J, Kringelbach ML, Møller A. A systematic review of impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2013;3(2):105–138. doi:10.3233/JPD-12016523938342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Difeliceantonio AG, Berridge KC. Dorsolateral neostriatum contribution to incentive salience: opioid or dopamine stimulation makes one reward cue more motivationally attractive than another. Eur J Neurosci. 2016;43(9):1203–1218. doi:10.1111/ejn.1322026924040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassum KM, Ostlund SB, Maidment NT, Balleine BW. Distinct opioid circuits determine the palatability and the desirability of rewarding events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(30):12512–12517. doi:10.1073/pnas.090587410619597155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro DC, Berridge KC. Opioid hedonic hotspot in nucleus accumbens shell: mu, delta, and kappa maps for enhancement of sweetness “liking” and “wanting”. J Neurosci.2014;34(12):4239–4250. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4458-13.2014
   Google Scholar
• Russo SJ, Nestler EJ. The brain reward circuitry in mood disorders. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;14(9):1–34. doi:10.1038/nrn3381.The
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziauddeen H, Chamberlain S, Nathan P, et al. Effects of the mu-opioid receptor antagonist GSK1521498 on hedonic and consummatory eating behavior: a proof of mechanism study in binge-eating obese subjects. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;18154:1287–1293. doi:10.1038/mp.2012.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamone JD, Correa M. The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron. 2012;76(3):470–485. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.02123141060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano C, Robbins TW, Wille DR, Bullmore ET, Everitt BJ. Attenuation of cocaine and heroin seeking by μ-opioid receptor antagonism. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013;227(1):137–147. doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2949-923299095
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignar DM, Goetz AS, Noble KN, et al. Regulation of ingestive behaviors in the rat by GSK1521498, a novel-opioid receptor-selective inverse agonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;339(1):24–34. doi:10.1124/jpet.111.18094321712426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkow ND, Fowler JS, Wang GJ, Baler R, Telang F. Imaging dopamine’s role in drug abuse and addiction. Neuropharmacology. 2009;56(1):3–8. doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2008.05.02218617195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brauer LH, De Wit H. High dose pimozide does not block amphetamine-induced euphoria in normal volunteers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1997;56(2):265–272. doi:10.1016/S0091-3057(96)00240-79050084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colasanti A, Searle GE, Long CJ, et al. Endogenous opioid release in the human brain reward system induced by acute amphetamine administration. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(5):371–377. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.01.02722386378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano C, Robbins TW, Nathan PJ, Bullmore ET, Everitt BJ. Inhibition of opioid transmission at the μ-opioid receptor prevents both food seeking and binge-like eating. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(12):2643–2652. doi:10.1038/npp.2012.12822805601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nestler EJ. Is there a common molecular pathway for addiction? Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1445–1449. doi:10.1038/nn157816251986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambridge VC, Ziauddeen H, Nathan PJ, et al. Neural and behavioral effects of a novel μ-opioid receptor antagonist in binge-eating obese people. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;73(9):887–894. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.10.02223245760
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton CL, Noble K, Fletcher PJ. Enhanced incentive motivation for sucrose-paired cues in adolescent rats: possible roles for dopamine and opioid systems. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36(8):1631–1643. doi:10.1038/npp.2011.4421508935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman MH, Jedd K, Luciana M. Neural networks involved in adolescent reward processing: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies. Neuroimage. 2015;122:427–439. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.08326254587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris CR, Jenkins M, Glaser D. Gender differences in risk assessment: why do women take fewer risks than men? Judgm Decis Mak. 2006;1(1):48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alarcón G, Cservenka A, Nagel BJ. Adolescent neural response to reward is related to participant sex and task motivation. Brain Cogn. 2017;111:51–62. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.10.00327816780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JR, Asarnow RF, Sabb FW, et al. A unique adolescent response to reward prediction errors. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(6):669–671. doi:10.1038/nn.255820473290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjork JM, Smith AR, Chen G, Hommer DW. Adolescents, adults and rewards: comparing motivational neurocircuitry recruitment using fMRI. PLoS One. 2010;5:7. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier CF, Terwilliger R, Teslovich T, Velanova K, Luna B. Immaturities in reward processing and its influence on inhibitory control in adolescence. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20(7):1613–1629. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp22519875675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luijten M, Schellekens AF, Kühn S, Machielse MWJ, Sescousse G. Disruption of reward processing in addiction: an image-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):387–398. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.308428146248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz W. Updating dopamine reward signals. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(2):229–238. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.01223267662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish AD. Addiction as a computational process gone awry. Science. 2004;306(5703):1944–1947. doi:10.1126/science.110238415591205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoll LJ, Fuhrmann D, Sakhardande AL, Stamp F, Speekenbrink M, Blakemore S-J. A window of opportunity for cognitive training in adolescence. Psychol Sci. 2016;27(12):1620–1631. doi:10.1177/095679761667132727815519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huizinga M, Dolan CV, van der Molen MW. Age-related change in executive function: developmental trends and a latent variable analysis. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2017–2036. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.01016527316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg L. The influence of neuroscience on US supreme court decisions about adolescents’ criminal culpability. Nat Publ Gr. 2013;14(7):513–518. doi:10.1038/nrn3509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalley JW, Robbins TW. Fractionating impulsivity: neuropsychiatric implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(3):158–171. doi:10.1038/nrn.2017.8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardinal RN, Pennicott DR, Lakmali CL, Robbins TW, Everitt BJ. Impulsive choice induced in rats by lesions of the nucleus accumbens core. Science. 2001;292(5526):2499–2501. doi:10.1126/science.106081811375482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson M, Pelloux Y, Dilleen R, et al. Cocaine modulation of frontostriatal expression of Zif268, D2, and 5-HT2c receptors in high and low impulsive rats. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013;38(10):1963–1973. doi:10.1038/npp.2013.9523632436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besson M, Belin D, McNamara R, et al. Dissociable control of impulsivity in rats by dopamine D2/3 receptors in the core and shell subregions of the nucleus accumbens. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;35(2):560–569. doi:10.1038/npp.2009.162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmstead MC, Ouagazzal AM, Kieffer BL. Mu and delta opioid receptors oppositely regulate motor impulsivity in the signaled nose poke task. PLoS One. 2009;4:2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan CJ, Andersen SL. Sensitive periods of substance abuse: early risk for the transition to dependence. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2016. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin D, Belin-Rauscent A, Murray JE, Everitt BJ. Addiction: failure of control over maladaptive incentive habits. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(4):564–574. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.02523452942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boileau I, Dagher A, Leyton M, Al E. Modeling sensitization to stimulants in humans: an [11c]raclopride/positron emission tomography study in healthy men. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(12):1386–1395. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.63.12.138617146013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Ciano P, Underwood RJ, Hagan JJ, Everitt BJ. Attenuation of cue-controlled cocaine-seeking by a selective d3 dopamine receptor antagonist SB-277011-A. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2003;28(2):329–338. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.130014812589386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin D, Berson N, Balado E, Piazza PV, Deroche-Gamonet V. High-novelty-preference rats are predisposed to compulsive cocaine self-administration. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2011;36(3):569–579. doi:10.1038/npp.2010.18820980989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbit LH, Nie H, Janak PH. Habitual alcohol seeking: time course and the contribution of subregions of the dorsal striatum. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;72(5):389–395. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.02.02422440617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapata A, Minney VL, Shippenberg TS. Shift from goal-directed to habitual cocaine seeking after prolonged experience in rats. J Neurosci. 2010;30(46):15457–15463. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4072-10.201021084602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt BJ, Belin D, Economidou D, Pelloux Y, Dalley JW, Robbins TW. Neural mechanisms underlying the vulnerability to develop compulsive drug-seeking habits and addiction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1507):3125–3135. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.008918640910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belin D, Everitt BJ. Cocaine seeking habits depend upon dopamine-dependent serial connectivity linking the ventral with the dorsal striatum. Neuron. 2008;57(3):432–441. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.12.01918255035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander AC, Mar A, Norbury A, et al. High impulsivity predicting vulnerability to cocaine addiction in rats: some relationship with novelty preference but not novelty reactivity, anxiety or stress. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011;215(4):721–731. doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2167-x21274702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein RZ, Volkow ND. Dysfunction of the prefrontal cortex in addiction: neuroimaging findings and clinical implications. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012;12(11):652–669. doi:10.1038/nrn3119.Dysfunction
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrod PJ, Castellanos-Ryan N, Strang J. Brief, personality-targeted coping skills interventions and survival as a non-drug user over a 2-year period during adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(1):85. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.17320048226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everitt BJ, Robbins TW. Neural systems of reinforcement for drug addiction: from actions to habits to compulsion. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1481–1489. doi:10.1038/nn157916251991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5. Philadelphia, USA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz W. Neuronal reward and decision signals: from theories to data. Physiol Rev. 2015;95(3):853–951. doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.201426109341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond A, Barnett SW, THomas J, Munro S. Preschool program improves cognitive control. Science. 2007;30:1387–1388. doi:10.1126/science.1151148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz W. Multiple dopamine functions at different time courses. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30(1):259–288. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.13572217600522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar