Examining perspectives on telecare: factors influencing adoption, implementation, and usage

References

• Barrett D. Effectiveness of a telehealth and telecare learning resource within an undergraduate nursing curriculum. Journal of the International Society of Telemedicine and eHealth. 2013;1(1):12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsell S, Bradley D. Assistive Technology and Telecare: Forging Solutions for Independent Living. Cambridge, UK: Policy Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Brownsell S, Blackburn S, Hawley MS. An evaluation of second and third generation telecare services in older people’s housing. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):8–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark M, Goodwin N. Sustaining Innovation in Telehealth and Telecare. London, UK: The King’s Fund; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett D. Applying Telecare and Telehealth in Communal Settings (ATTICS): Summary report. 2012. Available from: http://www2.hull.ac.uk/administration/business/centrefortelehealth/evaluations.aspx. Accessed July 8, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson E, Hatton C, Robertson J, et al. People with Learning Disabilities in England 2011. Learning Disabilities Observatory. 2012. Available from: http://www.improvinghealthandlives.org.uk/publications/1063/People_with_Learning_Disabilities_in_England_2011. Accessed July 10, 2014
   Google Scholar
• AgeUK.org.uk. Later life in the United Kingdom: June 2014. Available from: http://www.ageuk.org.uk/Documents/EN-GB/Factsheets/Later_Life_UK_factsheet.pdf?dtrk=true. Accessed July 8, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Office of National Statistics. UK population projected to hit 70m by 2027. 2011. Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp29904_240697.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers A, Kirk S, Gately C, May CR, Finch T. Established users and the making of telecare work in long term condition management: implications for health policy. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(7):1077–1084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow J, Bayer S, Curry R. Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: experiences of ‘telecare’. Technovation. 2006;26(3):396–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner KJ, McGee-Lennon MR. Advances in telecare over the past 10 years. Smart Homecare Technology and Telehealth. 2013;13(1):21–24.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. A concordat between the Department of Health and the Telehealth and Telecare industry. 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/216757/Concordat-3-million-lives.pdf. Accessed July 8, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Improvement Team. Seizing the Opportunity: Telecare Strategy 2008–2010. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Government; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow J, Bayer S, Curry R, Hendy J, Wheelock A. Telecare Capital Grant in Wales: Evaluation of TCG implementation. 2010. Available from: http://www.ssiacymru.org.uk/home.php?page_id=2038. Accessed July 8, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Older People and Disability Division. Building Telecare in England. London, UK: Department of Health; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mort M, Roberts C, Callen B. Ageing with telecare: care or coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2012;35(6):799–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker SG, Hawley MS. Telecare for an aging population? Age Ageing. 2013;42(4):424–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin S, Kelly G, Kernohan WG, McCreight B, Nugent C. Smart home technologies for health and social care support. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD006412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ. 2012;344:e3874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, et al. Effect of telecare on use of health and social care services: findings from the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing. 2013;42(4):501–508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirani SP, Beynon M, Cartwright M, et al. The effect of telecare on the quality of life and psychological well-being of elderly recipients of social care over a 12-month period: the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2014;43(3):334–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernandez JL, et al. Cost-effectiveness of telecare for people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Age Ageing. June 20, 2014. [Epub ahead of print.]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayer S, Barlow J, Curry R. Assessing the impact of a care innovation: telecare. System Dynamics Review. 2007;23(1):61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan C, Roberts C, Mort M. Telecare and older people: who cares where? Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(3):347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Proctor R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin N. The state of telehealth and telecare in the UK: prospects for integrated care. Journal of Integrated Care. 2010;18(6):3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5th ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sethi R, Bagga G, Carpenter D, Azzi D, Khusainov R. Telecare: legal, ethical and socioeconomic factors. 2012. Available from: http://eprints.port.ac.uk/8336/1/Sethi_et_al_Telecare-Legal_Ethical_and_Socioeconomic_Factors_IASTED_2012.pdf. Accessed July 10, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Constitutional Affairs. Mental Capacity Act 2005 Code of Practice. London, UK: TSO (The Stationery Office); 2007. Available from: http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/pls/portallive/docs/1/51771696.PDF. Accessed September 14, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Francis J, Holmes P. Report 30: Ethical Issues in the Use of Telecare. London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Beale S, Sanderson D, Kruger J. Evaluation of the Telecare Development Programme: Final Report. York, UK: York Health Economics Consortium; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hendy J, Chrysanthaki T, Barlow J, et al. An organisational analysis of the implementation of telecare and telehealth: the whole systems demonstrator. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;12:403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe C. O2 to stop selling telecare and telehealth in the UK. 2013. Available from: http://telecareaware.com/o2-to-stop-selling-telecare-telehealth-in-the-uk/. Accessed July 10, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Carr S. The Implementation of Individual Budget Schemes in Adult Social Care. London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lluch M. Incentives for telehealthcare deployment that supports integrated care: a comparative analysis across eight European countries. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar