Telecare technologies and isolation: some ethical issues

References

• Pols J. Care at a Distance. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Hinder S, Procter R, Stones R. What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;93:86–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright M, Hirani S, Rixon L, et al. Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological outcomes over 12 months (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): Nested study of patient reported outcomes in a pragmatic, cluster randomised control trial. BMJ. 2013;346:f653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Whole System Demonstrator trial: policy, politics, and publication ethics. BMJ. 2012;345:e5280.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Improving quality of life for people with long term conditions. [webpage on the Internet]. GOV.UK; 2013 [cited March 25, 2013]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/improving-quality-of-life-for-people-with-long-term-conditions. Accessed July 15, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. Telehealth and Telecare. Paper no 456. London: POST; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mort M, Roberts C, Milligan C. Ageing, technology and the home: A critical project. European Journal of Disability Research. 2009;3(2):85–89.
   Google Scholar
• Bouma H. Professional ethics in gerontechnology: A pragmatic approach. Gerontechnology. 2010;9(4):429–432.
   Google Scholar
• Ganyo M, Dunn M, Hope T. Ethical issues in the use of fall detectors. Ageing and Society. 2011;31(8):1350–1367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratto M. Ethics of seamless infrastructures: Resources and future directions. International Review of Information Ethics. 2007;8(12):21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles A. Ethical considerations around the implementation of telecare technologies. Journal of Technology in Human Services. 2010;28(1–2):44–59.
   Google Scholar
• Perry J, Beyer S, Holm S. Assistive technology, telecare and people with intellectual disabilities: ethical considerations. J Med Ethics. 2009;35(2):81–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe C. Beyond telecare: The future of independent living. Journal of Assistive Technologies. 2009;3(1):21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. A National Telehealth and Telecare Delivery Plan for Scotland to 2015: Driving Improvement, Integration and Innovation. Scotland: Scottish Government; 2012. Available from: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/resource/0041/00411586.pdf. Accessed October 29, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barnette H. Exploring Medical Ethics. Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Alspach JG. Loneliness and social isolation: Risk factors long overdue for surveillance. Crit Care Nurse. 2013;33(6):8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steptoe A, Shankar A, Demakalos P, Wardle J. Social isolation, loneliness and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2013;110(15):5797–5801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkley L, Cacioppo J. Loneliness Matters: A Theoretical and Empirical Review of Consequences and Mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2010;40(2):218–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holwerda TJ, Deeg D, Beekman A, et al. Feelings of loneliness, but not social isolation, predict dementia onset: Results from the Amsterdam Study of the Elderly [AMSTEL]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;85(2):135–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht GL, Devlieger PJ. The disability paradox: high quality of life against all odds. Soc Sci Med. 1998;48(8):977–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles A, Damadoran L, Harding I, Olphert W, Gilhooly M. Assistive technologies: Ethical practice, ethical research and quality of life. In: Sixsmith A, Gutman G, editors. Assistive technologies for active aging. New York: Springer; 2013:47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles A. Ethical considerations around the use of telecare technologies. Presented at: SICSA Socio-Technical Systems Conference; Apr 2010; Glasgow, University of Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles A. Assistive Technologies: ethical issues and policy implementation. ESRC: Making Research Count; December 5, 2012; University of Keele, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles A. The complexities of technology-based care: Telecare as perceived by care practitioners. Issues in Social Science. 2013;1(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• 2009 Ageing Report:Economic and budgetary projections for the EU-27 Member States (2008-2060). Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication14992_en.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Audit Commission. Implementing telecare. London: Audit Commission; 2004. Available from: http://archive.audit-commission.gov.uk/auditcommission/SiteCollectionDocuments/AuditCommissionReports/NationalStudies/Telecare.pdf. Accessed May 10, 2014
   Google Scholar
• kingsfund.org.uk [homepage on the Internet]. Insight into the WSD programme [video presentation]. 2011. Available from: http://www.kingsfund.org.uk/audio-video/stan-newman-insight-wsd-programme. Accessed on May 10, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Söderlund R. The role of information and communication technology in home services: Telecare does not satisfy the needs of the elderly. Health Informatics Journal. 2004;10(2):127–137.
   Google Scholar
• Oudshoorn N. Telecare Technologies and the Transformation of Healthcare. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus G. The Age of Aging. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Pilling D. Bending Adversity: Japan and the Art of Survival. London: Allen Lane; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Coping with an ageing population: Learning from good eHealth and telecare practices: The eCare benchmarking study. 2013. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/ecare-benchmarking-coping-ageing-population-%E2%80%93-learning-good-ehealth-and-tele-care-practices. Accessed May 10, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pols J, Willems D. Innovation and evaluation: Taming and unleashing telecare technology. Sociol Health Ill. 2011;33(3):484–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchamp L, Childress AF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot S. The Ethics of Community Care. London: Cassell; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Factsheet: Telecare and ethics [webpage on the Internet] Care Services Improvement Partership [cited July 19, 2005]. Available from: http://www.telecarelin.org.uk/_library/Resources/Telecare/Telecare_advice/Factsheet-Telecare-Ethics19July2005.doc. Accessed July 13, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel SK, Remmers H. Self-Perception and Self-Determination in Surveillance Conditions. The American Journal of Bioethics. 2012;12(9):53–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan C. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings N. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto J. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. London: Routledge; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Held V. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, Global. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M. Struggling for, with, and against care. Critical care: advancing an ethic of care in theory and practice; September 13, 2012; University of Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes M. Caring and Social Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto J. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality and Justice. New York: NYU Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tao J, Drover G. Chinese and Western notions of need. Critical Social Policy. 1997;17(50):5–25.
   Google Scholar
• Pols J, Moser I. Cold technologies versus warm care? On affective and social relations with and through care technologies. European Journal of Disability Research. 2009;3(2):159–178.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T, Procter R, Wherton J, Sugarhood P, Shaw S. The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis. BMJ. 2012;2(4). pii:e001574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphof I. The observation of technology users using technologies. The Use of Assistive Technologies in Social Care: Addressing the Social Dimensions. Presented at: Symposium of the Scottish Universities Insight Institute; May 2013; Glasgow, University of Strathclyde.
   Google Scholar
• Equality and Human Rights Commission [homepage on the Internet]. Close to home: An inquiry into older people and human rights in home care. 2011. Available from: http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/legal-and-policy/our-legal-work/inquiries-and-assessments/inquiry-into-home-care-of-older-people/close-to-home-report. Accessed October 29, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Mort M, Roberts C, Callén B. Ageing with telecare: Care of coercion in austerity? Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35(6):799–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser I. Telecare: New values, ideals and modes of caring. Critical care: Advancing an ethic of care in theory and practice; September 14, 2012; Brighton, University of Brighton.
   Google Scholar
• Macnish K. Unblinking eyes: the ethics of automating surveillance. Ethics Inf Technol. 2012;14(2):151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein JM. Public Safety and Online Privacy-Myth Versus Reality. Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property. 2013;11(2):33–39.
   Google Scholar
• Blaschke C, Freddolino P, Mullen E. Ageing and technology: A review of the research literature. British Journal of Social Work. 2009;39(4):641–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White D. Across the Divide: Tackling Digital Exclusion in Glasgow. Dunfermline: Carnegie UK Trust; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. European Comparisons of Wellbeing. London: Office for National Statistics; 2014. Accessed June 24, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil C, Hunter J. The Generation Strain: Collective Solutions to Care in an Aging Society. London: DEMOS; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Bazalgette L, Salter J. Sociable Housing in Later life. London: DEMOS; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• theguardian.com [homepage on the Internet]. Fox A. We need to learn from Germany’s experiments in shared care. May 3, 2014. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/may/03/learn-germany-experiments-shared-care. Accessed October 29, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher G, Parton N. Modernising social work and the ethics of care. Social Work and Society. 2004;2(1):10–27.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders P. A Nation of Homeowners. London: Routledge; 1990.
   Google Scholar