Information and communication technology-based cardiac rehabilitation homecare programs

References

• Aboderin I, Kalache A, Ben-Shlomo Y, et al. Life Course Perspectives on Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke and Diabetes: Key Issues and Implications for Policy and Research. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, et al; American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2007;115(20):2675–2682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training in secondary coronary heart disease prevention. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;53(6):397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis S, Oldridge NB, Coyle D, et al. Economic evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005;12(6):513–520.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wenger NK. Current status of cardiac rehabilitation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51(17):1619–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bethell H, Lewin R, Evans J, Turner S, Allender S, Petersen S. Outpatient cardiac rehabilitation attendance in England: variability by region and clinical characteristics. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):386–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TM, Hernandez AF, Bittner V, et al; American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines Investigators. Predictors of cardiac rehabilitation referral in coronary artery disease patients: findings from the American Heart Association’s Get With The Guidelines Program. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(6):515–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Heart Foundation of Australia & Australian Cardiac Rehabilitation Association. Recommended Framework for Cardiac Rehabilitation’04. Canberra: National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Suaya JA, Shepard DS, Normand SL, Ades PA, Prottas J, Stason WB. Use of cardiac rehabilitation by Medicare beneficiaries after myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Circulation. 2007;116(15):1653–1662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas RJ. Cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: a raft for the rapids: why have we missed the boat? Circulation. 2007;116(15):1644–1646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez RS, Salamonson Y, Griffiths R, Juergens C, Davidson P. Sociodemographic predictors and reasons for participation in an outpatient cardiac rehabilitation programme following percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Nurs Pract. 2008;14(3):237–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson NA, Inder KJ, Ewald BD, James EL, Bowe SJ. Association between participation in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation and self-reported receipt of lifestyle advice from a healthcare provider: results of a population-based cross-sectional study. Rehabil Res Pract. 2010;2010:541741.
   Google Scholar
• Nagle A, Wiggers J, Fisher J, Johnson N, Inder K. Prevalence and predictors of being invited, attending and completing phase II outpatient cardiac rehabilitation. Heart Lung Circ. 2000;9(3):A167.
   Google Scholar
• Scott IA, Lindsay KA, Harden HE. Utilisation of outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Queensland. Med J Aust. 2003;179(7):341–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd F, Battye K, Chalmers E. Improving access to cardiac rehabilitation for remote Indigenous clients. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27(6):632–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Heart Foundation. National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation (NACR). 2011. Available from: http://www.cardiacrehabilitation.org.uk/docs/2011.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlay SM, Witt BJ, Allison TG, et al. Barriers to participation in cardiac rehabilitation. Am Heart J. 2009;158(5):852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel K, Lennon RJ, Tilbury RT, Squires RW, Thomas RJ. Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on mortality and cardiovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in the community. Circulation. 2011;123(21):2344–2352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt BJ, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction in the community. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(5):988–996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter DA, Habot J, Grace SL, et al. Ambulatory surveillance of patients referred for cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalization: a feasibility study. Can J Cardiol. 2012;28(4):497–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin BJ, Hauer T, Arena R, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation attendance and outcomes in coronary artery disease patients. Circulation. 2012;126(6):677–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Engen-Verheul M, de Vries H, Kemps H, Kraaijenhagen R, de Keizer N, Peek N. Cardiac rehabilitation uptake and its determinants in the Netherlands. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(2):349–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghisi GL, Polyzotis P, Oh P, Pakosh M, Grace SL. Physician factors affecting cardiac rehabilitation referral and patient enrollment: a systematic review. Clin Cardiol. 2013;36(6):323–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenson KR, Fleury J. Barriers to outpatient cardiac rehabilitation participation and adherence. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2000;20(4):241–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gordon NF, Salmon RD, Mitchell BS, et al. Innovative approaches to comprehensive cardiovascular disease risk reduction in clinical and community-based settings. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2001;3(6):498–506.
   Google Scholar
• Grace SL, Tan Y, Simpson C, Chessex C. Perceptions of cardiac specialists and rehabilitation programs regarding patient access to cardiac rehabilitation and referral strategies. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2012;32(3):135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace SL, Grewal K, Stewart DE. Factors affecting cardiac rehabilitation referral by physician specialty. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(4):248–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurewich D, Prottas J, Bhalotra S, Suaya JA, Shepard DS. System-level factors and use of cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2008;28(6):380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neubeck L, Freedman SB, Clark AM, Briffa T, Bauman A, Redfern J. Participating in cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(3):494–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones LW, Farrell JM, Jamieson J, Dorsch KD. Factors influencing enrollment in a cardiac rehabilitation exercise program. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2003;13(1):11–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooper AF, Jackson G, Weinman J, Horne R. A qualitative study investigating patients’ beliefs about cardiac rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(1):87–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, De Bacquer D; EUROASPIRE III Study Group. Use and effects of cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: results from the EUROASPIRE III survey. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(5):817–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS, Dalal H, Jolly K, Moxham T, Zawada A. Home-based versus centre-based cardiac rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD007130.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal HM, Evans PH, Campbell JL, et al. Home-based versus hospital-based rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: A randomized trial with preference arms – Cornwall Heart Attack Rehabilitation Management Study (CHARMS). Int J Cardiol. 2007;119(2):202–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RA, Conway A, Poulsen V, Keech W, Tirimacco R, Tideman P. Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015;22(1):35–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBusk RF. MULTIFIT: a new approach to risk factor modification. Cardiol Clin. 1996;14(1):143–157.
   Google Scholar
• Kodis J, Smith KM, Arthur HM, Daniels C, Suskin N, McKelvie RS. Changes in exercise capacity and lipids after clinic versus home-based aerobic training in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2001;21(1):31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Vale MJ, Jelinek MV, Best JD, et al; COACH Study Group. Coaching patients On Achieving Cardiovascular Health (COACH): a multicenter randomized trial in patients with coronary heart disease. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163(22):2775–2783.
   Google Scholar
• Arthur HM, Smith KM, Kodis J, McKelvie R. A controlled trial of hospital versus home-based exercise in cardiac patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34(10):1544–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes AL, Patrao TA, Atherton J, et al. Effect of a telephone-delivered coronary heart disease secondary prevention program (proactive heart) on quality of life and health behaviours: primary outcomes of a randomised controlled trial. Int J Behav Med. 2013;20(3):413–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes AL, Atherton J, Taylor CB, et al. Randomised controlled trial of a secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients (‘ProActive Heart’): study protocol. Secondary prevention program for myocardial infarction patients. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2009;9:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ades PA, Pashkow FJ, Fletcher G, Pina IL, Zohman LR, Nestor JR. A controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation in the home setting using electrocardiographic and voice transtelephonic monitoring. Am Heart J. 2000;139(3):543–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körtke H, Stromeyer H, Zittermann A, et al. New East-Westfalian Postoperative Therapy Concept: a telemedicine guide for the study of ambulatory rehabilitation of patients after cardiac surgery. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(4):475–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale MJ, Jelinek MV, Best JD, Santamaria JD. Coaching patients with coronary heart disease to achieve the target cholesterol: a method to bridge the gap between evidence-based medicine and the “real world” – randomized controlled trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(3):245–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil A, Hawkes AL, Atherton JJ, et al. Telephone-delivered health coaching improves anxiety outcomes after myocardial infarction: the ‘ProActive Heart’ trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014;21(1):30–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkstra E, Hawkes AL, Oldenburg B, Scuffham PA. Cost-effectiveness of a coronary heart disease secondary prevention program in patients with myocardial infarction: results from a randomised controlled trial (ProActive Heart). BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2013;13:33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lear SA, Singer J, Banner-Lukaris D, et al. Randomized trial of a virtual cardiac rehabilitation program delivered at a distance via the Internet. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014;7(6):952–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark RA, Tideman P, Tirimacco R, et al. A pilot study of the feasibility of an Internet-based electronic Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation (eOCR) program in rural primary care. Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22(5):352–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury P, Gordon E, Clarke W, Elokda AS. Text-messaging program improves outcomes in outpatient cardiovascular rehabilitation. AACVPR Annual Meeting. 2013. Available from: http://www.aacvpr.org/Portals/0/events_edu/annuallmeeting13/28AMSyllabus/Text%20Messaging%20Program%20-%20Lounsbury.pdf. Accessed February 12, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Dale LP, Whittaker R, Jiang Y, Stewart R, Rolleston A, Maddison R. Improving coronary heart disease self-management using mobile technologies (Text4Heart): a randomised controlled trial protocol. Trials. 2014;15:71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnfield M, Karunanithi M, Lee CK, et al. Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2014;100(22):1770–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotb A, Hsieh S, Wells GA. The effect of telephone support interventions on coronary artery disease (CAD) patient outcomes during cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e96581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piette JD. Using Telephone Support to Manage Chronic Disease. Oakland, CA: California HealthCare Foundation; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Munro J, Angus N, Leslie SJ. Patient focused Internet-based approaches to cardiovascular rehabilitation – a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19(6):347–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty AL, Fukuoka Y, Whooley MA. Using mobile technology for cardiac rehabilitation: a review and framework for development and evaluation. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(6):e000568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaeffli L, Maddison R, Whittaker R, et al. A mHealth cardiac rehabilitation exercise intervention: findings from content development studies. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2012;12:36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters DL, Sarela A, Fairfull A, et al. A mobile phone-based care model for outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: the care assessment platform (CAP). BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010;10:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila E, Pärkkä, Hermersdorf M, et al. Mobile diary for wellness management – results on usage and usability in two user studies. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008;12(4):501–512.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization; World Heart Federation; World Stroke Organization, editors. Global Atlas on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Control: Policies, Strategies and Interventions. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Clark AM, Hartling L, Vandermeer B, McAlister FA. Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(9):659–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly K, Taylor RS, Lip GY, Stevens A. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation compared with centre-based rehabilitation and usual care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2006;111(3):343–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dew MA, Goycoolea JM, Harris RC, et al. An internet-based intervention to improve psychosocial outcomes in heart transplant recipients and family caregivers: development and evaluation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2004;23(6):745–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid RD, Morrin LI, Beaton LJ, et al. Randomized trial of an internet-based computer-tailored expert system for physical activity in patients with heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(6):1357–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southard BH, Southard DR, Nuckolls J. Clinical trial of an Internet-based case management system for secondary prevention of heart disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2003;23(5):341–348.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher L, Dickinson WP. New technologies to advance self-management support in diabetes: not just a bunch of cool apps! Diabetes Care. 2011;34(1):240–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnusson L, Hanson E. Supporting frail older people and their family carers at home using information and communication technology: cost analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2005;51(6):645–657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldenburg B, Glanz K. Diffusion of innovations. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th ed. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons; 2008.
   Google Scholar