The Effect of Teratozoospermia on Sex Chromosomes in Human Embryos

References

• Brahem S, Mehdi M, Elghezal H, et al. Detection of DNA fragmentation and meiotic segregation in human with isolated teratozoospermia. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28(1):41–48. doi:10.1007/s10815-010-9482-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehdi M, Gmidène A, Brahem S, et al. Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with severe teratozoospermia. Andrologia. 2012;44:139–143. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammar O, Mehdi M, Muratori M. Teratozoospermia: its association with sperm DNA defects, apoptotic alterations, and oxidative stress. Andrology. 2020;8(5):1095–1106. doi:10.1111/andr.12778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oumaima A, Tesnim A, Zohra H, et al. Investigation on the origin of sperm morphological defects: oxidative attacks, chromatin immaturity, and DNA fragmentation. Environ Sci Poll Res. 2018;25(14):13775–13786. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1417-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo H, Tavares A, Ferrás L, et al. Isolated teratozoospermia and in vitro fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1996;13(1):64–68. doi:10.1007/BF02068872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin K, Söderlund B, Hamberger L. The relationship between sperm morphology and rates of fertilization, pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in an in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection programme. Human Reprod (Oxford England). 1997;12(12):2676–2681.
   Google Scholar
• Terriou P, Giorgetti C, Auquier P, et al. Teratozoospermia influences fertilization rate in vitro but not embryo quality. Human Reprod (Oxford, England). 1997;12(5):1069–1072. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.5.1069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Fourie FL, Vandeput H, et al. Teratozoospermia and in-vitro fertilization: a randomized prospective study. Human Reproduction. 1994;9(8):1479–1484. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grow DR, Oehninger S, Seltman HJ, et al. Sperm morphology as diagnosed by strict criteria: probing the impact of teratozoospermia on fertilization rate and pregnancy outcome in a large in vitro fertilization population. Fertility and Sterility. 1994;62(3):559–567. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)56946-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşdemir I, Tasdemir M, Tavukcuoglu S, et al. Effect of abnormal sperm head morphology on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humans. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 1997;12(6):1214–1217. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.6.1214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun F, Ko E, Martin RH. Is there a relationship between sperm chromosome abnormalities and sperm morphology? Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2006;4(1):1–5. doi:10.1186/1477-7827-4-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calogero AE, et al. Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with abnormal semen parameters. Human Reproduction. 2001;16(6):1172–1179. doi:10.1093/humrep/16.6.1172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Härkönen K, Suominen J, Lähdetie J. Aneuploidy in spermatozoa of infertile men with teratozoospermia. Int J Androl. 2001;24(4):197–205. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2605.2001.00280.x
   Google Scholar
• Van Opstal D, Los FJ, Ramlakhan S, et al. Determination of the parent of origin in nine cases of prenatally detected chromosome aberrations found after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reprod. 1997;12(4):682–686. doi:10.1093/humrep/12.4.682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels I, Schlosser M, Bartz UG, et al. Paternal origin of trisomy 21 following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Human Reprod. 1998;13(12):3345–3346. doi:10.1093/humrep/13.12.3345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonduelle M, Aytoz A, Van Assche E, et al. Incidence of chromosomal aberrations in children born after assisted reproduction through intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Human Reprod. 1998;13(4):781–782. doi:10.1093/humrep/13.4.781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramasamy R, Scovell JM, Kovac JR, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detects increased sperm aneuploidy in men with recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertility and Sterility. 2015;103(4):906–909. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti E, Collodel G. Fluorescence in situ hybridization studies of sperm aneuploidies in infertile men. Open Androl J. 2009;1(1):1. doi:10.2174/1876827X00901010020
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo L, Peinado V, Mateu E, et al. Impact of different patterns of sperm chromosomal abnormalities on the chromosomal constitution of preimplantation embryos. Fertil Steril. 2010;94(4):1380–1386. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson JA. Extending preimplantation genetic diagnosis: the ethical debate: ethical issues in new uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(3):465–471. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soini S, Ibarreta D, Anastasiadou V, et al. The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14(5):588–645. doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SE, Toledo AA, Massey JB, et al. Simultaneous detection of chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18, and 21 by fluorescence in situ hybridization in blastomeres obtained from preimplantation embryos. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15(5):314–319. doi:10.1023/A:1022504829854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check J, Adelson HG, Schubert BR, et al. Evaluation of sperm morphology using Kruger’s strict criteria. Arch Androl. 1992;28(1):15–17. doi:10.3109/01485019208987674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman S, et al. Preliminary FISH studies on spermatozoa and embryos in patients with variable degrees of teratozoospermia and a history of poor prognosis. 2006;12(6):752–761.
   Google Scholar
• Kiseleva Y, Abubakirov AJF. Teratozoospermia is Associated with the Embryo Aneuploidy and Leads to the Sex Ratio Imbalance. Sterility. 2017;108(3):e127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killeen PR. An alternative to null-hypothesis significance tests. Psychological Science. 2005;16(5):345–353. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01538.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel WW. Biostatistics:A foundation for analysis in the health sciences. 5th edition. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 1991:209–215.
   Google Scholar
• Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG. Identifying and avoiding bias in research. Plastic Reconstruct Surg. 2010;126(2):619. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menkveld R, Holleboom CA, Rhemrev JP. Measurement and significance of sperm morphology. Asian J Androl. 2011;13(1):59. doi:10.1038/aja.2010.67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charan J, Biswas T. How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian J Psychol Med. 2013;35(2):121. doi:10.4103/0253-7176.116232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, et al. Analysis of implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates following the transfer of mosaic diploid-aneuploid blastocysts. Hum Genet. 2017;136(7):805–819. doi:10.1007/s00439-017-1797-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, et al. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015;13(1):37. doi:10.1186/s12958-015-0032-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Ferreyra J, et al. High aneuploidy rates observed in embryos derived from donated oocytes are related to male aging and high percentages of sperm DNA fragmentation. Clin Med Insights. 2015;9:S32769.
   Google Scholar
• Hann MC, Lau PE, Tempest HG. Meiotic recombination and male infertility: from basic science to clinical reality? Asian J Androl. 2011;13(2):212. doi:10.1038/aja.2011.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouston HJ, Fenwick J, Webb AL, et al. Detection of mosaic and non-mosaic chromosome abnormalities in 6- to 8-day old human blastocysts. Hum Genet. 1997;101(1):30–36. doi:10.1007/s004390050581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Fragouli E, Colls P, et al. Improved detection of aneuploid blastocysts using a new 12-chromosome FISH test. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20(1):92–97. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levron J, Aviram-Goldring A, Rienstien S, et al. Aneuploidy rates for chromosomes X/Y and 18 among preselected spermatozoa in men with severe teratospermia. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013;27(3):280–285. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egozcue S, et al. Human male infertility: chromosome anomalies, meiotic disorders, abnormal spermatozoa and recurrent abortion. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(1):93–105. doi:10.1093/humupd/6.1.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi Q, Martin RH. Aneuploidy in human spermatozoa: FISH analysis in men with constitutional chromosomal abnormalities, and in infertile men. Reproduction. 2001;121(5):655–666. doi:10.1530/rep.0.1210655
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, et al. The impact of biopsy on human embryo developmental potential during preimplantation genetic diagnosis. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:2016. doi:10.1155/2016/7193075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Canada. 2015;37(5):451–463. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30261-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott KL, Hong KH, Scott RT. Jr, Selecting the optimal time to perform biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing. Fertility Sterility. 2013;100(3):608–614. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, van Echten-arends J, et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(1):9–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa067744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman S, Findikli N, Berkil H, et al. Results of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with Klinefelter’s syndrome. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7(3):346–352. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61876-7
   Google Scholar
• Kahraman S, Findikli N, Biricik A, et al. Preliminary FISH studies on spermatozoa and embryos in patients with variable degrees of teratozoospermia and a history of poor prognosis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(6):752–761. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61087-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somova O, et al. The choice of the best embryo originating from spermatozoa of men with severe male factor infertility: morphokinetics and Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) results. In Human reproduction. Oxford, England: Oxford Univ Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzilli R, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, et al. Effect of the male factor on the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection combined with preimplantation aneuploidy testing: observational longitudinal cohort study of 1,219 consecutive cycles. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(6):961–972. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.08.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiseleva YY, Azova MM, Kodyleva TA, et al. The increase in aneuploidy of embryos Is associated with pathological morphology of the sperm. Russian J Genetics. 2017;53(12):1378–1381. doi:10.1134/S1022795417120055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Purata J, Sekhon L, Lee JA, et al. Does severe teratozoospermia is correlated with embryonic aneuploidy rates? Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):e227–e228. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ferreyra J, Luna D, Villegas L, et al. High aneuploidy rates observed in embryos derived from donated oocytes are related to male aging and high percentages of sperm DNA fragmentation. Clin Med Insights. 2015;9:21–27. doi:10.4137/CMRH.S32769
   Google Scholar
• Silber S, Escudero T, Lenahan K, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos derived from testicular sperm extraction. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(1):30–38. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04407-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatzimeletiou K, Morrison EE, Prapas N, et al. The centrosome and early embryogenesis: clinical insights. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;16(4):485–491. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60455-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King RW. When 2+2=5: the origins and fates of aneuploid and tetraploid cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1786(1):4–14. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2008.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantikou E, Wong KM, Repping S, et al. Molecular origin of mitotic aneuploidies in preimplantation embryos. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822(12):1921–1930. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantzouratou A, Mania A, Fragouli E, et al. Variable aneuploidy mechanisms in embryos from couples with poor reproductive histories undergoing preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(7):1844–1853. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, et al. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(1):256–264. doi:10.1093/humrep/des362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Wells D. Human Embryonic Aneuploidy. Chichester:: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wong EC, Ferguson KA, Chow V, et al. Sperm aneuploidy and meiotic sex chromosome configurations in an infertile XYY male. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(2):374–378. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakharova EE, Zaletova VV, Krivokharchenko AS. Biopsy of human morula-stage embryos: outcome of 215 IVF/ICSI cycles with PGS. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106433. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0106433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magli M, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, et al. Paternal contribution to aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2009;18(4):536–542. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60131-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruangvutilert P, Delhanty JDA, Serhal P, et al. FISH analysis on day 5 post-insemination of human arrested and blastocyst stage embryos. Prenat Diagn. 2000;20(7):552–560. doi:10.1002/1097-0223(200007)20:7<552::AID-PD871>3.0.CO;2-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado A, De los Santos M, Buendia P, et al. Increased incidence of mosaic embryos with the microinjection of spermatozoa with abnormal morphology. Fertil Steril. 2007;88:S229–S230. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.07.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhanty JD. Mechanisms of aneuploidy induction in human oogenesis and early embryogenesis. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2005;111(3–4):237–244. doi:10.1159/000086894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Grifo J, Cohen J, et al. Chromosome abnormalities in human arrested preimplantation embryos: a multiple-probe FISH study.. Am J Hum Genet. 1994;55(1):150–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkhalifa M, Janny L, Vye P, et al. Assessment of polyploidy in human morulae and blastocysts using co-culture and fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(6):895–902. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Alikani M, Ribustello L, et al. Euploidy rates in donor egg cycles significantly differ between fertility centers. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(4):743–749. doi:10.1093/humrep/dex031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Echten-arends J, Mastenbroek S, Sikkema-Raddatz B, et al. Chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(5):620–627. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baart EB, Martini E, van den Berg I, et al. Preimplantation genetic screening reveals a high incidence of aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos from young women undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(1):223–233. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielanska M, Tan SL, Ao A. Chromosomal mosaicism throughout human preimplantation development in vitro: incidence, type, and relevance to embryo outcome. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(2):413–419. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Grifo J, Wells D. Mosaicism: “survival of the fittest” versus “no embryo left behind”. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1146–1149. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgar DH, Archer J, McBain J, et al. Embryonic factors affecting outcome from single cryopreserved embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(6):718–723. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60674-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggan K, Rode A, Jentsch I, et al. Male and female mice derived from the same embryonic stem cell clone by tetraploid embryo complementation. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20(5):455–459. doi:10.1038/nbt0502-455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanneste E, Voet T, Melotte C, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(11):2679–2682. doi:10.1093/humrep/dep266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziebe S, et al. FISH analysis for chromosomes 13, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y in all blastomeres of IVF pre-embryos from 144 randomly selected donated human oocytes and impact on pre-embryo morphology. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2575–2581. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer CE, Willats E. Natural selection between day 3 and day 5/6 PGD embryos in couples with reciprocal or Robertsonian translocations. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(11):1483–1492. doi:10.1007/s10815-017-1009-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekel-Naftali M, Aviram-Goldring A, Litmanovitch T, et al. Chromosomal integrity of human preimplantation embryos at different days post fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(5):633–648. doi:10.1007/s10815-013-9988-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132(9):1001–1013. doi:10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy RC, Demko ZP, Ryan A, et al. Evidence of selection against complex mitotic-origin aneuploidy during preimplantation development. PLOS Genetics. 2015;11(10):e1005601. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar