Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature

References

• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(5):1103–1111. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender Atik R, Christiansen OB, Elson J; ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL. ESHRE guideline: recurrent pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction Open. 2018;2018(2):hoy004. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoy004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijk MM, Kolte AM, Limpens J, et al. Recurrent pregnancy loss: diagnostic workup after two or three pregnancy losses? A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(3):356–367. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahine L, Lathi R. Recurrent pregnancy loss: evaluation and treatment. Obstetrics Gynecol Clin. 2015;42(1):117–134. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2014.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadis E, Menkhorst E, Saito S, Kutteh WH, Brosens JJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6(1):1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu F, Jaslow CR, Kutteh WH. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients. Human Reproduction. 2018;33(4):579–587. doi:10.1093/humrep/dey021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papas RS, Kutteh WH. A new algorithm for the evaluation of recurrent pregnancy loss redefining unexplained miscarriage: review of current guidelines. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2020;32(5):371–379. doi:10.1097/GCO.0000000000000647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahdouh EM, Kutteh WH. Genetic Testing of Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Evaluation. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds DK, Lindsay KS, Miller JF, Williamson E, Wood PJ. Early embryonic mortality in women. Fertil Steril. 1982;38(4):447–453. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)46579-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, Baird DD. Risk factors for early pregnancy loss. Epidemiology. 1990;1(5):382–385. doi:10.1097/00001648-199009000-00008
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van den Berg MM, van Maarle MC, van Wely M, Goddijn M. Genetics of early miscarriage. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2012;1822(12):1951–1959. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maisenbacher MK, Merrion K, Kutteh WH. Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray detects molar pregnancies in 3% of miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(4):700–706. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue NR, Page JM, Silver RM. Genetic abnormalities and pregnancy loss. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(2):66–73. doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(6):1503–1512. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn H, Yan J, Saravelos SH, Li TC. Comparison of reproductive outcome, including the pattern of loss, between couples with chromosomal abnormalities and those with unexplained repeated miscarriages. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(1):109–116. doi:10.1111/jog.12133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaiwy MA, Maithripala SI, Durland US, et al. Reproductive outcomes of couples with recurrent pregnancy loss due to parental chromosome rearrangement. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(3):e343. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikuma S, Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takeda S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and natural conception: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss associated with translocation. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0129958. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0129958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iews M, Tan J, Taskin O, et al. Does preimplantation genetic diagnosis improve reproductive outcome in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss owing to structural chromosomal rearrangement? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):677–685. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardi LA, Plunkett BA, Stephenson MD. Is chromosome testing of the second miscarriage cost saving? A decision analysis of selective versus universal recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):156–161. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezina PR, Kutteh WH. Classic and cutting-edge strategies for the management of early pregnancy loss. Obstetrics Gynecol Clin. 2014;41(1):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2013.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foyouzi N, Cedars MI, Huddleston HG. Cost-effectiveness of cytogenetic evaluation of products of conception in the patient with a second pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(1):151–155. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo T, Dzidic N, Strecker MN, et al. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges. Genetics in Medicine. 2017;19(1):83–89. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathur N, Triplett L, Stephenson MD. Miscarriage chromosome testing: utility of comparative genomic hybridization with reflex microsatellite analysis in preserved miscarriage tissue. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(5):1349–1352. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang BT, Chong TP, Boyar FZ, et al. Abnormalities in spontaneous abortions detected by G-banding and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) at a national reference laboratory. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;7(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/1755-8166-7-33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy B, Sigurjonsson S, Pettersen B, et al. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 PART 1):202–209. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robberecht C, Schuddinck V, Fryns JP, Vermeesch JR. Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Genetics in Medicine. 2009;11(9):646–654. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181abc92a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogasawara M, Aoki K, Okada S, Suzumori K. Embryonic karyotype of abortuses in relation to the number of previous miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):300–304. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00495-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein M, Svirsky R, Reches A, Yaron Y. Does the number of previous miscarriages influence the incidence of chromosomal aberrations in spontaneous pregnancy loss? J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017;30(24):2956–2960. doi:10.1080/14767058.2016.1269317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Li J, Zhu Y, et al. Application of chromosomal microarray analysis in products of miscarriage. Mol Cytogenet. 2018;11(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/s13039-018-0396-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viotti M. Preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal abnormalities: aneuploidy, mosaicism, and structural rearrangements. Genes. 2020;11(6):602. doi:10.3390/genes11060602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho F, Coonen E, Goossens V, et al.; ESHRE PGT Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE PGT Consortium good practice recommendations for the organisation of PGT. Human Reproduction Open. 2020;2020(3):hoaa021. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoaa021
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang C, Jiang W, Zhu Y, et al. Pregnancy outcomes of reciprocal translocation carriers with two or more unfavorable pregnancy histories: before and after preimplantation genetic testing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(11):2325–2331. doi:10.1007/s10815-019-01585-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan YQ, Tan K, Zhang SP, et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis is likely to improve the clinical outcome for translocation carriers. Human Reproduction. 2013;28(9):2581–2592. doi:10.1093/humrep/det271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treff NR, Northrop LE, Kasabwala K, Su J, Levy B, Scott JRT. Single nucleotide polymorphism microarray–based concurrent screening of 24-chromosome aneuploidy and unbalanced translocations in preimplantation human embryos. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(5):1606–1612. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, et al. Technical update: preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Canada. 2015;37(5):451–463. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30261-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson RJ. Hidden in plain sight: the overstated benefits and underestimated losses of potential implantations associated with advertised PGT-A success rates. Human Reproduction. 2020;35(3):490–493. doi:10.1093/humrep/dez280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(6):1071–1079. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.07.1346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng J, Hong HY, Zhao Q, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in poor ovarian responders with four or fewer oocytes retrieved. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(5):1147–1154. doi:10.1007/s10815-020-01765-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XY, Fan Q, Wang J. Higher chromosomal abnormality rate in blastocysts from young patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):853–864. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugappan G, Shahine LK, Perfetto CO, Hickok LR, Lathi RB. Intent to treat analysis of in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic screening versus expectant management in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Human Reproduction. 2016;31(8):1668–1674. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei C, Sui Y, Ye J, et al. Comparison of PGS 2.0 versus conventional embryo morphology evaluation for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a study protocol for a multicentre randomized trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e036252.
   Google Scholar
• Lei C, Sui Y, Ye J, et al. Comparison of PGT-A versus conventional embryo morphology evaluation for patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ Open. 2020;10(10):e036252. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Human Reproduction. 2019;34(12):2340–2348. doi:10.1093/humrep/dez229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou T, Zhu Y, Zhang J, et al. Effects of PGT-A on Pregnancy Outcomes for Young Women Having One Previous Miscarriage with Genetically Abnormal Products of Conception. Reproductive Sci. 2021;1–7. doi:10.1007/s43032-020-00271-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee M, Lofgren KT, Thomas A, et al. The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunnewell SJ, Honess ER, Karia AM, Keay SD, Al Wattar BH, Quenby S. Diminished ovarian reserve in recurrent pregnancy loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2020;113(4):818–827. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaron Y, Pauta M, Badenas C, et al. Maternal plasma genome-wide cell-free DNA can detect fetal aneuploidy in early and recurrent pregnancy loss and can be used to direct further workup. Human Reproduction. 2020;35(5):1222–1229. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colley E, Devall AJ, Williams H, et al. DNA in the Investigation of Miscarriage. J Clin Med. 2020;9(11):3428. doi:10.3390/jcm9113428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainsenbacher MK, Merrion K, Levy B, Kutteh WH Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis of 63,277 products of conception (POC) samples: a 10-year laboratory experience. Fertility and Sterility. 2020;114(3):e47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar