Hybrid graft vs autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis

References

• WangHFleischliJEZhengNNTranstibial versus anteromedial portal technique in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: outcomes of knee joint kinematics during walkingAm J Sports Med20134181847185623752955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MallNAChalmersPNMoricMIncidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United StatesAm J Sports Med201442102363237025086064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MariscalcoMWFlaniganDCMitchellJThe influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter orthopaedic outcomes network (moon) cohort studyArthroscopy201329121948195324140144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MohanRWebsterKEJohnsonNRClinical outcomes in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysisArthroscopy201834128930028866344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez-PinzonAMBarksdaleLKrillMKLeoBMHybrid graft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a predictable graft for knee stabilizationOrthopedics2015386e473e47626091219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiJWangJLiYA prospective randomized study of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft, γ-irradiated allograft, and hybrid graftArthroscopy20153171296130225891223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurrusMTWernerBCCrowAJIncreased failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with soft-tissue autograft-allograft hybrid graftsArthroscopy201531122342235126276093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacobsCABurnhamJMMakhniECAllograft augmentation of hamstring autograft for younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: clinical and cost-effectiveness analysesAm J Sports Med201745489289928298052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KraeutlerMKimSBrownCA matched-pair comparison of patient-reported outcomes following primary ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft vs hybrid graftArthroscopy2016326e6
   Google Scholar
• KraeutlerMJKimSHBrownCCClinical outcomes following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring auto-graft versus planned hybrid graftJ Knee Surg201831982783329294500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PennockATHoBParvantaKDoes allograft augmentation of Small-Diameter hamstring autograft ACL grafts reduce the incidence of graft Retear?Am J Sports Med201745233433828005400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DarnleyJELéger-St-JeanBPedrozaADAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a combination of autograft and allograft tendonOrthop J Sports Med201647232596711666224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeoBMKrillMBarksdaleLFailure rate and clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstring versus a hybrid graftArthroscopy201632112357236327286700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangHDGaoSJZhangYZComparison of clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hybrid graft versus a hamstring autograftArthroscopy20183451508151629287949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XuHDongJXinDSecond-look arthroscopic evaluation and clinical outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft and hybrid graft: a retrospective studyMed Sci Monit2017235564557329167416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BonielloMRSchwinglerPMBonnerJMImpact of hamstring graft diameter on tendon strength: a biomechanical studyArthroscopy20153161084109025703286
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TakeuchiHNikiYMatsunariHTemporal changes in cellular repopulation and collagen fibril remodeling and regeneration after allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an experimental study using Kusabira-Orange transgenic pigsAm J Sports Med2016442375238327329998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaletisGBChenJInacioMCLoveRMFunahashiTTIncreased risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with soft tissue allografts compared with autografts: graft processing and time make a differenceAm J Sports Med20174581837184428301224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DibartolaACEverhartJSKaedingCCMagnussenRAFlaniganDCMaximum load to failure of high dose versus low dose gamma irradiation of anterior cruciate ligament allografts: a meta-analysisKnee201623575576227297938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AguilaCDelcroixGJKaimrajhDNEffects of gamma irradiation on the biomechanical properties of peroneus tendonsOpen Access J Sports Med2016712312727695371
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DasheJParisienRLCusanoAAllograft tissue irradiation and failure rate after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic reviewWorld J Orthop20167639240027335815
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van EckCFSchkrohowskyJGWorkingZMIrrgangJJFuFHProspective analysis of failure rate and predictors of failure after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograftAm J Sports Med201240480080722238055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarrettAMCraftJAReplogleWHHydrickJMBarrettGRAnterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a comparison of graft type based on age and Tegner activity levelAm J Sports Med201139102194219821784999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KaedingCCArosBPedrozaAAllograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: predictors of failure from a moon prospective longitudinal cohortSports Health201131738123015994
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MaletisGBInacioMCDesmondJLReconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: association of graft choice with increased risk of early revisionBone Joint J201395-B62362823632671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoxCLHustonLJDunnWRAre articular cartilage lesions and meniscus tears predictive of IKDC, KOOS, and Marx activity level outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A 6-year multicenter cohort studyAm J Sports Med20144251058106724647881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar