Safety and efficacy of cervical disc arthroplasty in preventing the adjacent segment disease: a meta-analysis of mid- to long-term outcomes in prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter studies

References

• HoyDMarchLWoolfAThe global burden of neck pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 StudyAnn Rheum Dis2014731309131510.1136/annrheumdis-2013-20443124482302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoffinJVan CalenberghFVan LoonJIntermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease of the with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prothesis: single level and bi-levelSpine2013282673267810.1097/01.BRS.0000099392.90849.AA
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HunterLYBraunsteinEMBaileyRWRadiographic changes following anterior cervical fusionSpine198053994017455770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HilibrandASCarlsonGDPalumboMAJonesPKBohlmanHHRadiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of previous anterior cervical arthrodesisJ Bone Joint Surg Am19998151952810225797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoreDRRoentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten year follow upSpine2001262463246611707711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FallahAAklEAEbrahimSAnterior cervical discectomy with artrhroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and metaanalysisPLoS One201278e4340710.1371/journal.pone.004340722912869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GaoYLiuMLiTHuangFTangTXiangZA meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc diseaseJ Bone Joint Surg Am20139555556110.2106/JBJS.K.0059923515991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MaZMaXYangHGuanXLiXAnterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical arthroplasty for the management of cervical spondylosis: a meta-analysisEur Spine J2017264998100810.1007/s00586-016-4779-727771787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaoMJNieSPXiaoBWZhangGHGanXRCaoSSCervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsArch Orthop Trauma Surg20151351192810.1007/s00402-014-2122-525475930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RenCSongYXueYYangXMid- to longterm outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsEur Spine J20142351115112310.1007/s00586-014-3220-324515337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShangguanLNingGZTangYWangZLuoZJZhouYDiscover cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in symptomatic cervical disc diseases: a meta-analysisPLoS One2017123e017482210.1371/journal.pone.017482228358860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XieLLiuMDingFLiPMaDCervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in symptomatic cervical degenerative disc diseases (CDDDs): an updated meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs)Springerplus201651118810.1186/s40064-016-2851-827516926
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MoherDLiberatiATetzlaffJAltmanDGPreferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statementPLoS Med200967e100009710.1371/journal.pmed.100009719621072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TashaniOAEl-TumiHAneibaKQuality of systematic reviews: an example of studies comparing artificial disc replacement with fusion in the cervical spineLibyan J Med201510e2885710.3402/ljm.v10.28857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchwarzerGmeta: an R package for meta-analysisR News2007734045
   Google Scholar
• HigginsJPThompsonJGDeeksJJAltmanDGMeasuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ2003327741455756010.1136/bmj.327.7420.89512958120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoreDRSepicSBAnterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded disc A review of one hundred forty six patientsSpine198496676716505833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoselieTFWillemsPCvan MamerenHde BieRBenzelECvan SantbrinkHArthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a Cochrane ReviewSpine20133817E1096E110710.1097/BRS.0b013e3182994a3223656959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GoffinJVan CallenberghFVantommeNLong term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spineJ Spinal Disord Tech200417798515260088
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeHThongtranganIKimDHHistorical review of cervical arthro-plastyNeurosurg Focus200417E110.3171/foc.2004.17.3.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AndersonPANassrACurrierBLEvaluation of adverse events in total disc replacement: a meta-analysis of FDA summary of safety and effectiveness dataGlobal Spine J201771 Supl76S83S10.1177/219256821668819528451497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiGLHuJZQuJGuoLYZaiFLAnterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosisJ Clin Neurosci201522346046710.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.01025533051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LuoJGongMHuangSYuTZouXIncidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studiesArch Orthop Trauma Surg2015135215516010.1007/s00402-014-2125-225424753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MuheremuANiuXWuZMuhanmodeYTianWComparison of the short- and long-term treatment effect of cervical replacement and anterior cervical disk fusion: a meta-analysisEur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2015251S87S10010.1007/s00590-014-1469-124791930
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ShriverMFLubelskiDSharmaAMSteinmetzMPBenzelECMrozTEAdjacent segment degeneration and disease following cervical arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysisSpine J201616216818110.1016/j.spinee.2015.10.03226515401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanWZhouCGuoDTreatment of single-level cervical spondylosis: cervical disk arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusionOrthopedics2017401e23e3410.3928/01477447-20161213-0127992641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuAMXuHMullinixKPMinimum 4-year outcomes of cervical total disc arthroplasty versus fusion: a metaanalysis based on prospective randomized controlled trialsMedicine20159415e66510.1097/MD.000000000000087425881841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XingDMaXLMaJXWangJMaTChenYA meta-analysis of cervical arthroplasty compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single-level cervical disc diseaseJ Clin Neurosci201320797097810.1016/j.jocn.2012.03.04623375397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XuBMaJTianJGeLMaXIndirect meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes of total cervical disc replacements with fusions for cervical degenerative disc diseaseSci Rep20177174010.1038/s41598-017-01865-328496111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangBLiHZhangTHeXXuSThe incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trialsPLoS One201274e3503210.1371/journal.pone.003503222558112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YaoQLiangFXiaYJiaCA metaanalysis comparion total disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative diseasesArch Orthop Trauma Surg2016136329730410.1007/s00402-015-2337-026411552
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YinSYuXZhouSYinZQiuYIs cervical disc arthroplasty superior to fusion for treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease? A meta-analysisClin Orthop Relat Res20134711904191910.1007/s11999-013-2830-023389804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoungIAClelandJAMichenerLABrownCReliability, construct validity and responsiveness of the neck disability index, patient-specific functional scale and numeric pain rating scale in patients with cervical radiculopathyAm J Phys Med Rehabil2010891083183910.1097/PHM.0b013e3181ec98e620657263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YuLSongYYangXLvCSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: comparison of total disc replacement with anterior decompressionOrthopedics20113410e651e65810.3928/01477447-20110826-0921956061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZeichmeisterIWinklerRMadPArtificial total disc replacement versus fusion for the cervical spine: a systematic reviewEuro Spine J20112017718410.1007/s00586-010-1583-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhaoGSZhangQZxQUANMid-term efficiacy and safety of cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion in cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysisBiomed Rep20176215916610.3892/br.2016.82328357067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhongZMZhuSYZhuangJSWuQZhuQReoperation after cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompresion and fusion – a meta-analysisClin Orthop Relat Res2016474130710.1007/s11999-016-4707-526831475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhuYZhangBLiuHWuYZhuQCervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for incidence of symptomatic adjacent segment disease: a metaanalysis of prospective randomized controlled trialsClinical2016411914931502
   Google Scholar
• NunleyPDJawaharAKerrEJGordonCJCavanaughDAFactors effecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent level disease in cervical spine after total disc artrhroplasty. 2- to 4-yrs follow up of three prospective randomized trialsSpine20123744545110.1097/BRS.0b013e31822174b321587111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VermaKGandhiSDMaltenfordMAlbertTJHillibrandASRate of adjacent segment disease in cervical disc arthroplasty versus single-level fusion: metaanalysis of prospective studiesSpine2013382253225710.1097/BRS.000000000000005224335631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenCZhangXMaXDurability of cervical disc arthroplasties and its influence factors: a systematic review and a network meta-analysisMedicine2017966e594728178135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PickettGESekhonLHSearsWRDuggalNComplications with cervical arthroplastyJ Neurosurg Spine200649810510.3171/spi.2006.4.2.9816506475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CasonGWHerkowitzHNCervical intervertebral disc replacementJ Bone Joint Surg201395327928510.2106/JBJS.J.0104223389792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HellerJGSassoRCPapadopoulosSMAndersonPAFeslerRGHackerRJComparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of the randomized, controlled clinical trialSpine20093410110710.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee26319112337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SassoRCAndersonPARiewKDHellerJGResults of cervical arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: four year clinical outcomes in a prospective, randomized controlled trialJ Bone Joint Surg Am201193181684169210.2106/JBJS.J.0047621938372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhangXZhangXChenCRandomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial comparing Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion in ChinaSpine201237643343810.1097/BRS.0b013e31822699fa21673620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MummaneniPVBurkusJKHaidRVClinical and radiographic of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trialJ Neurosurg Spine20076319820910.3171/spi.2007.6.3.19817355018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurkusJKTraynelisVCHaidRWJrMummaneiPVClinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7 year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial: clinical articleJ Neurosurg Spine201421451652810.3171/2014.6.SPINE1399625036218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MurreyDJanssenMDelamarterRGoldsteinJZiglerJTayBResults of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Administration investigational device exemption study of the Prodisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomaticervical disc diseaseSpine J2009927528610.1016/j.spinee.2008.05.00618774751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZiglerJEDelamarterRBFive year results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drugs Administration investi-gational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total replacement versus circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of single-level degenerative disc disease. Clinical articleJ Neurosurg2013176493501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JanssenMEZiglerJESpivakJMDelamarterRBDardenBV2ndKopjarBProdisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for single level symptomatic cervical disc disease: seven year follow-up of the prospective randomized U.S. Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption StudyJ Bone Joint Surg Am201597211738174710.2106/JBJS.N.0118626537161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoricDNunleyPDGuyerRDMusanteDCarmodyCNGordonCRProstpective randomized multicenter study of cervical arthroplasty: 269 patients from the Kineflex-C artificial disc investigational device exemption study with minimum 2 yrs follow-up: clinical articleJ Neurosurg Spine201115434835821699471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VaccaroABeutlerWPeppelmanWClinical outcomes with selectively constrained Secure-C cervical disc arthroplasty: two year results from the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter investigational device exemption studySpine2013382227223910.1097/BRS.000000000000003124335629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HiseyMSZiglerJEJacksonRProspective randomized comparison of one level Mobi-C cervical total disc replacement vs anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results at 5 year follow upInt J Spine Surg2016101010.14444/301027162712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisRJNunleyPDKimKDHiseyMSJacksonRJBaeHWTwo level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up resultsJ Neurosurg Spine2015221152510.3171/2014.7.SPINE1395325380538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RadcliffKLernerJYangCBernardTZiglerJESeven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studiesJ Neurosurg Spine201624576076810.3171/2015.10.SPINE1550526824587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JacksonRJDavisRJHoffmanGASubsequent surgery rates after cervical total disc replacement using a Mobi-C Cervical Disc Prothesis versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomized clinical trial with 5 year follow upJ Neurosurg Spine201624573474510.3171/2015.8.SPINE1521926799118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GornetMFBurkusJKShaffreyMEArgiresPJNianHHarrellFEJrCervical arthroplasty with PRESTIGE LP discus versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective, multicenter investigational device excemption studyJ Neurosurg Spine20152355857310.3171/2015.1.SPINE1458926230424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GornetMFBurkusJKShaffreyMENianHHarrelFEJrCervical disc arthroplasty with Prestige LP Disc versus anterior cervical discec-tomy and fusion: seven years outcomesIn J Spine Surg2016102410.14444/3024
   Google Scholar
• GornetMFLanmanTHBurkusJKHodgesSDMcConnelJRDryerRFCervical disc arthroplasty at two levels with PRESTIGE LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: results of a prospective, multicenter pivotal clinical trial at twenty four monthsJ Neurosurg Spine201726665366710.3171/2016.10.SPINE1626428304237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsFMLeeJYBGeislerFHCappucinoAChaputCDDeVineJGA prospective randomized controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discec-tomy and fusion. 2 years results from the US FDA IDE clinical trialsSpine201338E907E91810.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f23591659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PhillipsFMGeislerFHGilderKMReahCHowellKMMcAfeePCLong-term outcomes of the US FDA IDE prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusionSpine2015401067468310.1097/BRS.000000000000086925955086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SkeppholmMLindgrenLHenriquesTVavruchLLoefgrenHOlerudCThe discover artificial disc replacement versus fusion in cervical radiculopathy – a randomized controlled outcome trial with 2 year follow upSpine J20151561284129410.1016/j.spinee.2015.02.03925733022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar