103
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Lateral Position versus Prone Position for Cervical Laminoplasty: A Retrospective Comparative Study

, , , &
Pages 133-140 | Published online: 21 Feb 2020

References

  • Petraglia AL, Srinivasan V, Coriddi M, et al. Cervical laminoplasty as a management option for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a series of 40 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010;67:272–277. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000371981.83022.B1
  • Anderton JM. The prone position for the surgical patient: a historical review of the principles and hazards. Br J Anaesth. 1991;67:452–463. doi:10.1093/bja/67.4.452
  • Dharmavaram S, Jellish WS, Nockels RP, et al. Effect of prone positioning systems on hemodynamic and cardiac function during lumbar spine surgery: an echocardiographic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:1388–1393. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000218485.96713.44
  • Marchi L, Pimenta L, Oliveira L, et al. Distance between great vessels and the lumbar spine: MRI study for anterior longitudinal ligament release through a lateral approach. J Neurol Surg a Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2017;78:144–153. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1592144
  • Oikawa Y, Eguchi Y, Watanabe A, et al. Anatomical evaluation of lumbar nerves using diffusion tensor imaging and implications of lateral decubitus for lateral transpsoas approach. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:2804–2810. doi:10.1007/s00586-017-5082-y
  • Ziino C, Konopka JA, Ajiboye RM, et al. Single position versus lateral-then-prone positioning for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation. J Spine Surg. 2018;4:717–724. doi:10.21037/jss
  • Lalonde NM, Villemure I, Pannetier R, et al. Biomechanical modeling of the lateral decubitus posture during corrective scoliosis surgery. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010;25:510–516. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.03.009
  • Japanese Orthopedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. J Jpn Orthop Assoc. 1994;68:490–503.
  • Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, et al. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1981;6:354–364. doi:10.1097/00007632-198107000-00005
  • Kato S, Ganau M, Fehlings MG. Surgical decision-making in degenerative cervical myelopathy – anterior versus posterior approach. J Clin Neurosci. 2018;58:7–12. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2018.08.046
  • Ganau M, Holly LT, Mizuno J, et al. Future directions and new technologies for the management of degenerative cervical myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29:185–193. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.006
  • Rao RD, Currier BL, Albert TJ, et al. Degenerative cervical spondylosis: clinical syndromes, pathogenesis, and management.J. Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1360–1378. doi:10.2106/00004623-200706000-00026
  • Edgcombe H, Carter K, Yarrow S. Anaesthesia in the prone position. Br J Anaesth. 2008;100:165–183. doi:10.1093/bja/aem380
  • Grisell M, Place H. Face tissue pressure in prone positioning: a comparison of three face pillows while in the prone position for spinal surgery. Spine. 2007;7:84S–85S. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2007.07.209
  • Jain V, Bithal PK, Rath GP. Pressure sore on malar prominences by horseshoe headrest in prone position. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007;35:304–305.
  • Myers MA, Hamilton SR, Bogosian AJ, et al. Visual loss as a complication of spine surgery. A review of 37 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:1325–1329. doi:10.1097/00007632-199706150-00009
  • Heitz JW, Audu PB. Asymmetric postoperative visual loss after spine surgery in the lateral decubitus position. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:380–382. doi:10.1093/bja/aen163
  • Ganau M, Syrmos N, Martin AR, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound in spine surgery: history, current applications, future developments. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8:261–267. doi:10.21037/qims.2018.04.02
  • Tetreault L, Palubiski LM, Kryshtalskyj M, et al. Significant predictors of outcome following surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018;29:115–127. doi:10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.020